Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2017 Vol II
WCECS 2017, October 25-27, 2017, San Francisco, USA
      Low Cost Mechatronics Prototype Prosthesis for
     Transfemoral Amputation Controled by Myolectric
                        Signals
               Bravo Xavier, Comina Mayra, Tobar Johanna, Danni De La Cruz, David Loza, Jonathan Corella
    Abstract— This article presents the development of low cost               is difficult to access a prosthesis that helps them walk, for
    prototype prosthesis for transfemoral amputation leg, the                 this reason the social impact of the project, due to be a
    prototype has not only low weight but also emulates the                   functional and economic prosthesis, is highly beneficial [1]
    natural movement of a leg. It is activated by myoelectric
    signals obtained through the rectus femoris muscle of the
    amputated leg stump. Additionally, the prosthesis has a
                                                                                  The socket has a coupling system by pneumatic
    constant monitoring system of physiological parameters of                 compression whose rigidity can be controlled by the Fuzzy
    temperature and humidity, this monitoring can be seen                     system that allows the real-time automation of pressure in
    through an application for mobile phones. For this, the                   specific areas of the socket. [2]
    biomechanical analysis of gait was performed, after that the
    mechanical and electronic design, and finally test and results.               Another of the main parts is the knee, although the
                                                                              mechanical knees are capable of performing a quite adequate
       Keywords—Prosthesis,            Transfemoral,         Myoelectric,     cycle, they present a deficiency adapting to these changes.
    Physiological, Monitoring.                                                The article "A Robotic Leg Prosthesis" by Brian E. Lawson
                                                                              integrates various electronic components, adds and
                                                                              coordinates the actions of a knee and ankle motor with the
                            I.     INTRODUCTION                               intention of replicating biomechanics of the healthy limb. [3]
    The importance of this work lies in providing a solution to                   Regarding the feet designs, that have position sensors to
    the problem faced by much people in Ecuador who have                      regulate the angles of foot movement according to the
    been affected by a transfemoral amputation, since at present              running cycle, are implemented; a clear example of this is
    people with physical disabilities in Pichincha province                   developed in the title article: "Design of foot and ankle
    represent the 2.51% of the total population. The vast                     powered prosthesis By parallel elastic actuators "developed
    majority of these people has lack of economic resources so it             by Fei Gao, Wei-Hsin Liao, Bing Cehn, Hao Ma, Lai-Yin
                                                                              Qin. Its design improves the storage efficiency and release
        A transfemoral amputation prosthesis consists of three                of mechanical energy by reducing the dimensions of the
    main parts: the socket, the knee, and the foot. The Socket is             device. [4]
    the only part of the prosthesis that is in direct contact with
    human skin and allows the prosthesis to attach to the body
    Research is currently underway on the development of new                             II.   BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF THE GAIT
    styles of sockets in order to improve the people comfort
    during the use of this coupling part; one of these innovations            A. Analysis of parameters during the gait cycle.
    is detailed in the article named "Development of an
    immediate automatic lace system for artificial leg and                       Slow-cycle analysis is performed by placing markers at
    modeling of a socket with Fuzzy Control "developed by                     four reference points along the leg:
    Kohuei Najamura, Kazuhiko Sasaki and Kinya Fujita Tokyo
    University of Agriculture and Technologies members.
    Ing, Bravo Xavier, Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas - ESPE,
    Sangolquí, Ecuador (e-mail: xavieralcivar5555@gmail.com).
    Ing, Comina Mayra, Departamento de Ciencias de la Energía y Mecánica.
    Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas - ESPE, Sangolquí, Ecuador (e-mail:
    mecomina@espe.edu.ec).
     Msc, Johanna Tobar, Departamento de Ciencias de la Energía y Mecánica,
    Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas - ESPE, Sangolquí, Ecuador (e-mail:
    jbtobar@espe.edu.ec).
    Msc, David Loza, Departamento de Ciencias de la Energía y Mecánica.
    Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas - ESPE, Sangolquí, Ecuador (e-mail:
    dcloza@espe.edu.ec).
    Msc, Danni De La Cruz, Departamento de Eléctrica y Electrónica,
    Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas - ESPE, Sangolquí, Ecuador (e-mail:
    drde@espe.edu.ec).
    Jonathan Corella está en el Departamento de Ciencias de la Energía y
    Mecánica, Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas - ESPE, Sangolquí,
    Ecuador (e-mail: jpcorella@espe.edu.ec).
                                                                                       Fig 1. Reference points for gait cycle analysis
ISBN: 978-988-14048-4-8                                                                                                                  WCECS 2017
ISSN: 2078-0958 (Print); ISSN: 2078-0966 (Online)
Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2017 Vol II
WCECS 2017, October 25-27, 2017, San Francisco, USA
        These reference points are captured by a camera to
    generate a series of frames that after being analyzed allow to
    obtain the data of: speed, walking time, number of steps, step      In the analysis of the movement intervals of human gait
    length, and acceleration; so they can be used in the design      was observed that the maximum angle reaching the knee is
    of parts and pieces.                                                 and the minimum angle is     , considering    at most,
                                                                     calculate torque shown below:
    Table 1 shows the results of the variables analyzed during
    the slow gait cycle.                                             C. Angular analysis of the leg during the gait cycle
                                 TABLE I
                          GAIT CYLLE VARIABLES
                                                                        A cycle starts when one foot touches the ground and ends
                       Variables                  Results            when the same foot touches the ground again. The cycle is
                     Time slow gait              3 seconds
                 Number steps slow gait            5 steps           formed by two main phases: first, the support phase that
                  Step length slow gait           510 mm             starts with the initial contact of the heel and ends with the
                    Speed slow gait               1.67 m/s           takeoff of the fingers after that the swing phase begins; that
                 Acceleration slow gait          0.55 m/             phase is defined as the time from takeoff to when the foot
                 Maximum knee angle                                  touches the ground again. (Sanz, 2017) [4]
                  Minimum knee angle
                                                                          Next, the angular analysis of the leg without amputation
                                                                     during the support phase is shown in Figure.3, considering
    B. Force analysis                                                the following steps:
                                                                           Heel contact: Refers to the moment when the heel
       The forces analysis in the knee was performed                          of the reference leg touches the ground.
    considering the gait where the person can displaced by a               Plantar support: refers to the contact of the forefoot
    horizontal plane with a slight inclination, taking into                   with the floor.
    account the angle of variation that happens in the knee                Medium Support: occurs when the greater
    movement.                                                                 trochanter is aligned vertically with the center of
                                                                              the foot, seen from a sagittal plane.
                                                                           Heel lift: occurs when the heel rises from the floor,
                                                                           Foot peeling: occurs when fingers rise from the
                                                                              floor. (Sanz, 2017)
               Fig 2. Load-displacement of the human leg
        In Figure. 2 we can be observed the decomposition of
    the P force in the corresponding axes. y        are the
    components of the prosthesis weight in the x and y axes
    respectively.
        This analysis is necessary to find the torque that the
    motor should have to simulates the knee movement. For
    this, the following parameters are considered: person mass
    ( , the knee radius ( ), acceleration ( ), gravity ( , the
    angle variation that occurs during the gait ( ), the motor
    efficiency     and the safety factor    .
              As a result of that previous process the necessary              Fig 3. Leg support phase without amputation
    torque for the motor is obtained considering a safety factor
    of 2 and an efficiency motor of 90% :                                Then, Figure. 4 shows the angular analysis of the leg
                                                           (1)       without amputation during the swing phase considering its
                                                                     next steps:
ISBN: 978-988-14048-4-8                                                                                                  WCECS 2017
ISSN: 2078-0958 (Print); ISSN: 2078-0966 (Online)
Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2017 Vol II
WCECS 2017, October 25-27, 2017, San Francisco, USA
    -Acceleration: it is characterized by the rapid acceleration of
    the end of the leg immediately after the fingers leave the
    ground.
    -Medium swing: the balanced leg passes to the other leg,
    moving forward of the same leg, since it is in the support               As observed the ultimate strain is 36.55 MPa, value
    phase                                                                which was higher in relation to Von Mises' efforts than was
    -Deceleration: the leg stops quickly when it approaches the          obtained in the finite element analysis performed on each of
    end of the interval. (Sanz, 2017)                                    the elements of the prosthesis. Which allowed to verify using
                                                                         a real data that the prototype will support the efforts for
                                                                         which it was designed
                                                                         B. CAD Model
                                                                            The knee and the foot are the main elements of the
                                                                         prototype. On the knee a mechanical brake was incorporated
                                                                         to a servomotor that allowed to control the return of the
                                                                         prosthesis, this because the inertia that is generated during
                                                                         its operation emulating the movement of a human leg. The
                                                                         foot is formed by a simple articulation that allows to
                                                                         regulate the angles with which it moves, improving stability
                                                                         when walking. Figure 5 shows the CAD model of the
                                                                         prototype
            Fig 4. Swing phase of the leg without amputation.
     III.   DISEÑO MECÁNICO
    A. Traction Test – Material Compression
        The material used in the prosthesis is Aluminum. This
    material was subjected to tensile and compression tests, in
    order to determine if the material will support the 80 kg of
    the person, who will use the prosthesis.                                   Fig 5. CAD Model               Fig 6. Real prototype.
    The tensile and compression tests were performed in a
    universal test machine, in which the following results were
    obtained: maximum compression value of 9000 kg and
    traction of 120 kg. With these data, it was possible to              C. CAE Analysis
    conclude that the 120 kg that the molten aluminum specimen           The finite element analysis was performed in a software to
    supported in the tensile test is the critical value in relation to   observe the behavior of the parts under static and fatigue
    the 9000 kg that are supported in the compression test. So the       loads as seen in Figure. 7
    ultimate strain is then calculated as shown in equation 2.
                                                                 (2)        The safety factor against fatigue based on finite life was
                                                                         calculated by applying Modified Goodman's equation.
        Then the values are replaced assuming that the specimen                                                                   (3)
    had an initial diameter of 6.40 mm.
                                                                         These values were used in the mechanical design phase for
                                                                         static load and fatigue analysis, obtaining the safety factors
                                                                         specified in the Table II.
ISBN: 978-988-14048-4-8                                                                                                      WCECS 2017
ISSN: 2078-0958 (Print); ISSN: 2078-0966 (Online)
Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2017 Vol II
WCECS 2017, October 25-27, 2017, San Francisco, USA
                                                                                                           TABLE II
                                                                                                    CAE ANALYSIS RESULTS
                                                                            Parts         Tension         Displacement     Unitary      Minimum
                                                                                          (GPa)              (mm)          Strain        Safety
                                                                                                                                         Factor
                                                                        Socket coupling    14.5           1.097 x 10-2   1.635 x 10-4     1.9
                                                                             joint
                                                                        Knee coupling      16.2           1.445 x 10-3   1.741 x 10-4     1.7
                                                                             joint
                                                                            Knee           2.55           1.906 x 10-3   2.823 x 10-5     1.7
                                                                           Steam           11.3           6.973 x 10-4   1.133 x 10-4     2.5
                                                                            Ankle          9.58           1.058 x 10-2   9.042 x 10-5     2.9
                                                                            Foot           19.9           1.066 x 10-2   2.085 x 10-4     1.4
                                                                         Knee axle         10.6           6.356 x 10-3   3.832 x 10-4     1.62
                                                                          Foot axle        0.37           1.083 x 10-5   1.44 x 10-6      1.62
                       Fig 7. FEA Analysis                                                          IV.      ELECTRONIC DESIGN
                                                                          In order to activate the prosthesis, we obtained the signals
                                                                       from the anterior rectus muscles and the vastus external,
                                                                       with the purpose of selecting the muscle that generates
                                                                       better biopotentials, as can be seen in Figure. 9, there is
                                                                       greater repeatability in the measurements of the anterior
                                                                       rectus muscle, whereby this was selected to give the signal
                                                                       of activation to the prosthesis
                                                                            The prosthesis was activated by the myoelectric signals
                                                                       obtained through the anterior rectus muscle of the
                                                                       amputated leg stump, thus this way the microcontroller can
                                                                       send the signals to the knee and hell servomotors to start the
                                                                       movement when it detects a potential difference when
                                                                       contracting the muscle.
                     Fig 8. Stem FEA Analysis
                             Fig 9. Comparison of vastus external and rectus muscle signals during gait cycle.
ISBN: 978-988-14048-4-8                                                                                                                 WCECS 2017
ISSN: 2078-0958 (Print); ISSN: 2078-0966 (Online)
Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2017 Vol II
WCECS 2017, October 25-27, 2017, San Francisco, USA
                                                                        extension of the leg. Figure. 11 and Figure. 12 shows the
                         V.     TEST AND RESULTS                        extension and flexion of the stump, respectively
       The protocol of tests is made with the collaboration of the
    “prosthetist”, establishing the guidelines and requirements
    of a standard prosthesis.
    A. Bank alignment
        In the test, the prosthesis parts were assembled on a
    work station without the patient, the dimensions, alignment
    and stability of the prosthesis were checked and the foot was
    aligned horizontally. The dimensions were verified
    comparing them with those of the healthy limb; it was
    achieved alignment and stability in the prosthesis when
    checking that the load line is below the axis, with this it was
    possible to determine that the prosthesis is perfectly armed
    for patient use.                                                        Fig 11. Extension of the           Fig 12. Flexed prosthesis
    B. Static alignment                                                           prosthesis.
        In the test, the patient is standing with the prosthesis in
    which heights, rotations, inclinations, and others parameters       D. Gait angular analysis
    were verified to obtain a stable standing and a level support           Fig. 13 shows the walking cycle analysis during the
    on the surface of the floor. It was also verified that the          support phase and the swing phase in which angular
    patient was aligned, So that it distributes its weight              displacements of the knee and foot were verified.
    symmetrically, 50% to its affected extremity and 50% to its
    healthy extremity as shown in Figure.10.
                                                                          Fig 13. Angular analysis of the prosthesis during the gait cycle
                                                                                                   VI.   RESULTS
                        Fig 10. Standing patient.
                                                                           The angles were obtained from the analysis of the gait
    C. Dynamic alignment                                                cycle of the leg without amputation and the prosthesis, as
                                                                        presented in Figure 14 y 15
        In the test the patient performed his first steps and              The Table V below shows a comparison between
    started walking, after that the following aspects were              measurements taken on the leg without amputation and the
    verified: that the passage length is correct, that the patient is   prosthesis. The angles correspond to the knee, ankle and
    treading on the surface of the floor as flat as possible, that it   foot.
    does not have many inclinations. Two main views were                   As can be seen in the table the error rate do not exceed
    valued:                                                             5%, allowing to affirm that the operation of the prosthesis
        - Front view or back view: In this view the stump               resembles the natural movement of a human leg and that can
    inclination was determined, in which two main cases can be          be verified in the development of the patient's gait. Results
    observed: the adduction which is an internal deviation of the       guarantee the high efficiency of the prosthesis that improves
    stump and the abduction is an external deviation of the             stability when walking allowing you to have greater
    stump relative to the neutral line.                                 confidence and safety to carry out your activities.
        - Side view: In this test the patient is standing sideways                Regarding the acquisition of temperature and
    in the sagittal plane, in this view the flexion or extension of     humidity signals, different conditioning circuits were
    the stump was evaluated since these parameters modify the           performed, based on the results shown in Table VI and VII,
    alignment of the prosthesis. Ideally, the flexion degrees           The most suitable circuits for its implementation were
    should be equal to the extension degrees during the                 selected.
ISBN: 978-988-14048-4-8                                                                                                          WCECS 2017
ISSN: 2078-0958 (Print); ISSN: 2078-0966 (Online)
Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2017 Vol II
WCECS 2017, October 25-27, 2017, San Francisco, USA
                                                                                               VII. CONCLUSION
                                                                       A prototype of leg prosthesis for transfemoral amputation
                                                                    was made using low cost mechanical and electronic
                                                                    components. The design requirements were obtained from
                                                                    the gait cycle analysis, from which the angular
                                                                    displacements that were produced when walking were
                                                                    acquired and compared with the angles of the leg without
                                                                    amputation obtaining an error of between 0% and 5%,
                                                                    allowing having a natural movement in the gait. The
                                                                    temperature and humidity monitoring allows the prosthetics
                                                                    to be kept under constant control, so as not to exceed 37 ° C
                                                                    and 70% humidity, parameters that will be displayed in a
                                                                    mobile phone application and keep the patient informed,
                                                                    avoiding alterations in the skin of the stump.
                                         Fig 15. Prosthesis angle                                   REFERENCES
                                                 analysis
                                                                    [1]    Vicepresidencia. (10 de Octubre de 2012). Vicepresidencia República
                                                                           del Ecudor. Recuperado el 28 de Agosto de 2016, de
                                                                           http://www.vicepresidencia.gob.ec
                                                                    [2]    Kohuei Najamura, K. S. (2004). Desarrolo de un sistema de encaje
        Fig14. Leg angle analysis                                          automático inmediato para pierna artificial y modelado de un Socket
                                                                           con control Fuzzy. Tokio: Universidad de Agricultura y Tecnologías
                                                                           de Tokio.
                                                                    [3]    Brian E. Lawson, J. E. (2014). A ROBOTIC LEG PROSTHESIS.
                                                                           IEEE , 70-81.
                           TABLE V
      COMPARISON OF LEG ANGLES WITHOUT AMPUTATION AND               [4]    Fei Gao, W.-H. L.-Y. (2015). gn of Powered Ankle-Foot Prosthesis
                         PROSTHESIS                                        Driven. IEEE, 6-6.
                                                                    [5]    INEC. (2013). Población por condición de discapacidad, según
                                                                           provincia, cantón, parroquia y área de empadronamiento. Obtenido de
                                                                           Ecuadorencifras: http://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/?s=discapacidad
                                                                    [6]    Kohuei Najamura, K. S. (2004). Desarrolo de un sistema de encaje
                                                                           automático inmediato para pierna artificial y modelado de un Socket
                                                                           con control Fuzzy. Tokio: Universidad de Agricultura y Tecnologías
                                                                           de Tokio.
                                                                    [7]    Fujtaba, K. (2003). Desarrollo de un sistema de Socket de montaje
                                                                           inmedaito para pierna artificial. IEEE, 4-4.
                                                                    [8]    A. Altamirano, L. L. (2012). Prótesis Biónica de Rodilla de Bajo
                                                                           Costo Basa en Mecanismos Policéntricos. IEEE, 89-94.
                                                                    [9]    Brian E. Lawson, J. E. (2014). A ROBOTIC LEG PROSTHESIS.
                                                                           IEEE , 70-81
                               TABLE VI
                                                                    [10]   Jungwoon Yoon, H. N.-s. (2006 ). A Novel 4-DOF Robotic Foot
                ERROR RATE: TEMPERATURA SENSOR CIRCUIT
                                                                           Mechanism with Multi-platforms for. IEEE, 4-4.
                                                                    [11]   Aamir, N., Hannan, A., Urooj, F., & Mohsin, T. (2016). Design and
                                                                           Analysis of Dynamic Energy Return Prosthesis Foot using Finite
                                                                           Element Method. International Conference o Intelligent Human-
                                                                           Machine Systems and Cybernetics.
                                                                    [12]   Fei Gao, W.-H. L.-Y. (2015). gn of Powered Ankle-Foot Prosthesis
                                                                           Driven. IEEE, 6-6.
                               TABLE VII                            [13]   Hannan, A., Fawaz, W., Ahsan, A., Mohsin, T., Javaid, I., & Nigel, L.
        ERROR CIRCUITO DE ACONDICIONAMIENTO SENSOR DE HUMEDAD              (2014). Actuator Design for Robotic Powered an Ankle-Foot
                                                                           Prosthesis. Sydney.
                                                                    [14]   Budynas, R., & Keith, N. (2008). Diseño en ingeniería mecánica de
                                                                           Shigley. México: McGrawHill.
                                                                    [15]   Nordin, & Frankel. (2005). Biomecánica básica del Sistema
                                                                           Musculoesquelético. Madrid: McGraw Hill.
ISBN: 978-988-14048-4-8                                                                                                             WCECS 2017
ISSN: 2078-0958 (Print); ISSN: 2078-0966 (Online)