ERROR ANALYSIS
(UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS)
 16.621 Experimental Projects Lab I
                                      1
                     TOPICS TO BE COVERED
•   Why do error analysis?
•   If we don’t ever know the true value, how do we estimate the error
    in the true value?
•   Error propagation in the measurement chain
     – How do errors combine? (How do they behave in general?)
     – How do we do an end-to-end uncertainty analysis?
     – What are ways to mitigate errors?
•   A hypothetical dilemma (probably nothing to do with anyone in the
    class)
     – When should I throw out some data that I don’t like?
     – Answer: NEVER, but there are reasons to throw out data
•   Backup slides: an example of an immense amount of money and
    effort directed at error analysis and mitigation - jet engine testing
                                                                      2
                   ERROR AND UNCERTAINTY
•   In engineering the word “error”, when used to describe an aspect of
    measurement does not necessarily carry the connotation of mistake
    or blunder (although it can!)
•   Error in a measurement means the inevitable uncertainty that
    attends all measurements
•   We cannot avoid errors in this sense
•   We can ensure that they are as small as reasonably possible and
    that we have a reliable estimate of how small they are
                       [Adapted from Taylor, J. R, An Introduction to Error Analysis;
                             The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements]
                                                                              3
            USES OF UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS (I)
•   Assess experimental procedure including identification of
    potential difficulties
     – Definition of necessary steps
     – Gaps
•   Advise what procedures need to be put in place for measurement
•   Identify instruments and procedures that control accuracy and
    precision
     – Usually one, or at most a small number, out of the large set of
       possibilities
•   Inform us when experiment cannot meet desired accuracy
                                                                   4
            USES OF UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS (II)
•   Provide the only known basis for deciding whether:
     – Data agrees with theory
     – Tests from different facilities (jet engine performance) agree
     – Hypothesis has been appropriately assessed (resolved)
     – Phenomena measured are real
•   Provide basis for defining whether a closure check has been
    achieved
     – Is continuity satisfied (does the same amount of mass go in
       as goes out?)
     – Is energy conserved?
•   Provide an integrated grasp of how to conduct the experiment
                                                                             5
                       [Adapted from Kline, S. J., 1985, “The Purposes of Uncertainty
                                 Analysis”, ASME J. Fluids Engineering, pp. 153-160]
UNCERTAINTY ESTIMATES AND HYPOTHESIS ASSESSMENT
                                                              600
                                                              500
                                                              400
                                              Distance [cm]
                                                              300
                                                              200
                                                              100
                                                               0
                                                                    0    20    40      60                         80    100    120
                                                                                     Mass [g]
                   600                                                                                  600
                   500                                                                                  500
                   400                                                                                  400
   Distance [cm]
                                                                                        Distance [cm]
                   300                                                                                  300
                   200                                                                                  200
                   100                                                                                  100
                    0                                                                                    0
                         0   20   40     60                         80   100   120                            0        20     40       60       80   100   120
                                       Mass [g]                                                                                      Mass [g]
                                                                                                                                                           6
        HOW DO WE DEAL WITH NOT KNOWING
                THE TRUE VALUE?
•   In “all” real situations we don’t know the true value we are
    looking for
•   We need to decide how to determine the best
    representation of this from our measurements
•   We need to decide what the uncertainty is in our best
    representation
                                                                   7
    AN IMPLICATION OF NOT KNOWING THE TRUE VALUE
•   We easily divided errors into precision (bias) errors and random
    errors when we knew what the value was
•   The target practice picture in the next slide is an example
•   How about if we don’t know the true value? Can we, by looking at
    the data in the slide after this, say that there are bias errors?
•   How do we know if bias errors exist or not?
                                                                   8
                          A TEAM EXERCISE
•   List the variables you need to determine in order to carry out your
    hypothesis assessment
•   What uncertainties do you foresee? (Qualitative description)
•   Are you more concerned about bias errors or random errors?
•   What level of uncertainty in the final result do you need to assess
    your hypothesis in a rigorous manner?
•   Can you make an estimate of the level of the uncertainty in the final
    result?
     – If so, what is it?
     – If not, what additional information do you need to do this? 11
                HOW DO WE COMBINE ERRORS?
•   Suppose we measure quantity X with an error of dx and quantity Y
    with an error of dy
•   What is the error in quantity Z if:
       • Z = AX where A is a numerical constant such as π?
       • Z = X + Y?
       • Z = X - Y?
       • Z = XY?
       • Z = X/Y?
       • Z is a general function of many quantities?
                                                                12
               ERRORS IN THE FINAL QUANTITY
•   Z=X+Y
•   Linear combination
     – Z + dz = X + dx + Y + dy
     – Error in Z is dz = dx + dy   BUT this is worst case
•   For random errors we could have
     – dz = dx − dy
        or dy − dx
     – These errors are much smaller
•   In general if different errors are not correlated, are
    independent, the way to combine them is
       dz = dx2 + dy2
                                                             13
•   This is true for random and bias errors
                       THE CASE OF Z = X - Y
•   Suppose Z = X - Y is a number much smaller than X or Y
          dz = dx2 + dy2
          dx dy
•   Say     =   =ε     (say 2%)
          X   Y
    dz   2 dx                               dx
•      =          may be much larger than
    Z    X−Y                                X
•   MESSAGE ==> Avoid taking the difference of two numbers of
    comparable size
                                                                14
ESTIMATES FOR THE TRUE VALUE AND THE ERROR
•   Is there a “best” estimate of the true value of a quantity?
•   How do I find it?
•   How do I estimate the random error?
•   How do I estimate the bias error?
                                                                  15
              SOME “RULES” FOR ESTIMATING
             RANDOM ERRORS AND TRUE VALUE
•   An internal estimate can be given by repeat measurements
•   Random error is generally of same size as standard deviation (root
    mean square deviation) of measurements
•   Mean of repeat measurements is best estimate of true value
•   Standard deviation of the mean (random error) is smaller than
    standard deviation of a single measurement by
        1 Number of measurements
•   To increase precision by 10, you need 100 measurements
                                                                    16
      GENERAL RULE FOR COMBINATION OF ERRORS
•   If Z = F (X1, X2, X3, X4) is quantity we want
•   The error in Z, dz, is given by our rule from before
•   So, if the error F due to X1 can be estimated as
                              Error in X1
                ∂F
          dF1 =    dx                        and so on
                ∂X1 1
                         Influence coeff.
                     2                 2            2
              ∂F     2    ∂F             ∂F 
        dz =       dx1 +         dx22 +          dx 2
•             ∂X1         ∂X 2            ∂X n 
                                                        n
•   The important consequence of this is that generally one or few of
    these factors is the main player and others can be ignored
                                                                  17
              DISTRIBUTION OF RANDOM ERRORS
•   A measurement subject to many small random errors will be
    distributed “normally”
•   Normal distribution is a Gaussian
•   If x is a given measurement and X is the true value
                                            1    −(x−X2 ) 2σ 2
        Gaussian or normal distribution =      e
                                          σ 2π
• σ is the standard deviation
                                                                 18
                       A REVELATION
•   The universal gas constant is
        accepted R = 8.31451 ±0.00007 J/mol K
•   This is not a true value but can be “accepted” as one
                                                            20
    ONE ADDITIONAL ASPECT OF COMBINING ERRORS
•   We have identified two different types of errors, bias (systematic)
    and random
    – Random errors can be assessed by repetition of measurements
    – Bias errors cannot; these need to be estimated using external
      information (mfrs. specs., your knowledge)
•   How should the two types of errors be combined?
    – One practice is to treat each separately using our rule, and then
      report the two separately at the end
    – One other practice is to combine them as “errors”
•    Either seems acceptable, as long as you show that you are going
    to deal (have dealt) with both
                                                                    21
            REPORTING OF MEASUREMENTS
•   Experimental uncertainties should almost always be
    rounded to one significant figure
•   The last significant figure in any stated answer should
    usually be of the same order of magnitude (in the same
    decimal position) as the uncertainty
                                                                       22
                             [from Taylor, J., An Introduction to Error Analysis]
             COMMENTS ON REJECTION OF DATA
•   Should you reject (delete) data?
•   Sometimes on measurement appears to disagree greatly with all
    others. How do we decide:
     – Is this significant?
     – Is this a mistake?
•   One criteria (Chauvenaut’s criteria) is as follows
     – Suppose that errors are normally distributed
     – If measurement is more than M standard deviations (say 3),
       probability is < 0.003 that measurement should occur
     – Is this improbable enough to throw out measurement?
•   The decision of “ridiculous improbability” [Taylor, 1997] is up to
    the investigator, but it allows the reader to understand the basis
    for the decision
     – If beyond this range, delete the data                        23
              A CAVEAT ON REJECTION OF DATA
•   If more than one measurement is different, it may be that
    something is really happening that has not been envisioned, e.g.,
    discovery of radon
•   You may not be controlling all the variables that you need to
•   Bottom line: Rigorous uncertainty analysis can give rationale to
    decide what data to pay attention to
                                                                    26
                               SUMMARY
•   Both the number and the fidelity of the number are important in a
    measurement
•   We considered two types of uncertainties, bias (or systematic
    errors) and random errors
•   Uncertainty analysis addresses fidelity and is used in different
    phases of an experiment, from initial planning to final reporting
    – Attention is needed to ensure uncertainties do not invalidate
      your efforts
•   In propagating uncorrelated errors from individual measurement to
    final result, use the square root of the sums of the squares of the
    errors
    – There are generally only a few main contributors (sometimes
      one) to the overall uncertainty which need to be addressed
•   Uncertainty analysis is a critical part of “real world” engineering
    projects
                                                                     27
         SOME REFERENCES I HAVE FOUND USEFUL
•   Baird, D. C., 1962, Experimentation: An Introduction to Measurement
    Theory and Experiment, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
•   Bevington, P. R, and Robinson, D. K., 1992, Data Reduction and
    Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY
•   Lyons, L., 1991, A Practical Guide to Data Analysis for Physical
    Science Students, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
•   Rabinowicz, E, 1970, An Introduction to Experimentation, Addison-
    Wesley, Reading, MA
•   Taylor, J. R., 1997, An Introduction to Error Analysis, University
    Science Books, Sauselito, CA
                                                                     28
    BACKUP EXAMPLE: MEASUREMENT OF JET ENGINE
                  PEFORMANCE
•   We want to measure Thrust, Airflow, and Thrust Specific Fuel
    Consumption (TSFC)
    – Engine program can be $1B or more, take three years or more
    – Engine companies give guarantees in terms of fuel burn
    – Engine thrust needs to be correct or aircraft can’t take off in
      the required length
    – Airflow fundamental in diagnosing engine performance
    – These are basic and essential measures
•   How do we measure thrust?
•   How do we measure airflow?
•   How do we measure fuel flow?
                                                                   29
                         THRUST STANDS
•   In practice, thrust is measured with load cells
•   The engines, however, are often part of a complex test facility
    and are connected to upstream ducting
•   There are thus certain systematic errors which need to be
    accounted for
•   The level of uncertainty in the answer is desired to be less than
    one per cent
•   There are a lot of corrections to be made to the raw data
    (measured load) to give the thrust
                                                                      32
        TEST STAND-TO-TEST STAND DIFFERENCES
•   Want to have a consistent view of engine performance no matter
    who quotes the numbers
•   This means that different test stands must be compared to see
    the differences
•   Again, this is a major exercise involving the running of a jet
    engine in different locations under specified conditions
•   The next slide shows the level of differences in the
    measurements
                                                                     35