Mobile Advertising A Potential Medium Not Being Utilized Affectively
Mobile Advertising A Potential Medium Not Being Utilized Affectively
affectively”
Supervisor
Submitted by
MBA-IV (E)
BAHRIA UNIVERSITY, ISLAMABAD 1
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION TO THE REPORT
“As the mobile phones have rapidly outnumbered Television sets by over 3 to 1, and
Personal Computers based internet users by over 4 to 1, and the total laptop and desktop
PC population by nearly 5 to 1, advertisers in different markets have rushed to this new
media. In Spain, around 75% of mobile phone users receive ads through their cell phone,
in France 62% and in Japan 54%. As the mobile advertising is maturing, like in the most
advanced markets, the user involvement has also matured. In Japan, 44% of mobile
phone users click on ads they receive on their mobile phones. D2, the largest mobile
advertising agency in Japan claimed in November 2009 at the Mobile Asia Congress, that
mobile advertising in Japan was worth 900 million.” (Wikipedia)
“Mobile media has begun to draw more significant attention from media giants and
advertising industry since the mid-2000s, based on a view that mobile media was to
change the way advertisements were made, and that mobile devices can form a new
media sector. Despite this, revenues are still a small fraction of the advertising industry as
a whole.”
“Advertising is known as the second oldest occupation by some people. The method of
advertising has been drastically changed due to the arrival of PC, Internet, e-commerce,
and graphic designing.”
“The key objective of advertising is to make people buy goods or services. If the world is
the market place where everyone is trying to sell a product, a service, or an idea, the
significance of advertising could hardly be over-emphasized. The post-PC era where
information travels at the speed of light to strike all geographical barriers has helped turn
the art of advertising into a precise science which can make or break a manufacturer to
confirm maximum returns the ultimate indicator of which is the targeted increase in
sales.”
“Experts around the world believe that the industry is only at its formative years and is on
the edge for phenomenal growth in the emerging markets like India and Pakistan. The
reason is the low PC penetration and limited wired internet availability. Mobile web is
providing the first internet experience to most users. Mobile operators are accelerating
the market growth by providing low-cost reliable internet connections.”
“So what makes mobile advertising so enticing? The answer lies in the intrinsic
advantages of mobile as a medium. The reach of the mobile medium is tremendous and
has spilled well beyond the larger cities. Brands tie up with ad networks to leverage this
ability to reach out to the masses and increase their brand awareness. Mobile ad networks
are constantly trying to improve the tools and technology used to provide users with
relevant ads. Ads vary depending on the economic status of the user like a watch
company advertisement showing a cool trendy watch for youth and more sophisticated
elegant watch for an adult. Similarly parameters like operator, demography, handset
In the very near future campaigns will be more mobile device-centric and will fully
leverage the capabilities of the device. For e.g. the ads for a video ad will only be shown
on mobiles which have the capability of video streaming and other phones will be served
with banner ads. User patterns and preferences would be the key to ad relevance keeping
in mind privacy concerns of the users. Imagine passing by a movie theatre and your
mobile page will have an ad showing the trailers of the movies running in the theatre.
Media Explosion
Last decade, Media grew exponent in Pakistan, opening new horizons for the world of
advertising. Media Planning and buying got mature and more formal. There are roughly
40 satellite TV channels and almost a dozen FM radio stations and a number of print
publications. This also showed a significant increase in the viewership of TV. This made
the job of agencies more challenging and demanding.
Creativity
A cut throat competition in all sectors ignited the clients to take advertising more
seriously (as a fruitful investment than as an expense), they now ask for superior
advertisements and are equally willing to pay for it, creativity has started niggling into
Pakistani advertisements industry.
“It can be said for sure that the future predictions for the growth in the mobile users are
very bright and the current scenario is very hospitable for new advances. The people of
Pakistan are also taking up the habit of using the mobile phone in their day to day matters
and are appreciating the new services being provided to them. The market is full of state-
of-the-art and mobile phones with innovative features and youngsters are buying it in
great numbers.”
“The introduction of value added services for example GRRS, MMS Balance Transfer
etc. have been introduced to appeal more consumers and there are many more to be
introduced in the coming future.”
“According to one of the prominent newspaper Daily Jang (2009), the need for mobile
phones is growing and the market is expanding day by day. The number of consumers
has increased from 3 Million in 2003 to more than 97 Million in 2010. This shows the
exponential growth in the number of consumers over the past few years.”
“The recent trends show a very optimistic and bright future for the Pakistani mobile
users. The number of subscribers will continue to increase as there is an enormous market
potential and similarly the number of mobile users will also increase.”
The significance of this topic is that through this research it will be settled whether the
mobile advertisement can be executed and accepted by the people in Pakistan or not. So
far very petite research has been done in this field so this research will be of help for
others. The research will help people understand the practice and importance of mobile
advertising.
In addition the second questionnaire was filled by the managers of selected companies.
The companies that were studied for this purpose are:
1. Beauty saloon
2. Educational institution
3. Telecom industry
4. Restaurant
5. Food and beverages
6. Banks
For the second questionnaire 6 companies were selected to find out the response of the
company’s owners or Managers towards the usage of m-advertising.
Data for this research was collected through questionnaire survey. The questionnaire were
developed from the existing literature and self-created. In the questionnaire, 5-point
Likert scale (1 strongly disagree; 2 disagree; 3 neither disagree nor agree; 4
agree; 5 strongly agree) was used to measure customer attitudes towards
mobile advertisements. The survey questionnaire consisted of eighteen questions.
The first three questions were related to the demographic characteristics of the
respondents, and the last fifteen questions were intended to investigate mobile phone
user’s attitudes. Before the questionnaire was conducted, it was pretested on ten
mobile phone users in order to measure the construct the validity of the attitude
measurement.
• This study employed only 9 convenience samples of people from different age
groups.
• Since this study was conducted mostly with student sample, the result of this
study cannot be generalized to the cell phone user population as a whole. It can
only be generalized for the young educated people of Islamabad.
• Another problem of scarcity of the written material. As very fewer researches
have been conducted on m-advertising in Pakistan.
• And last but not the least was element of secrecy due to which I couldn’t get
access to all information especially from the companies selected fro the study.
• At last being the time duration; 2 months are not enough to understand the
functions of m-advertising and then carrying out a research report on this topic.
CHAPTER 4: Discussion
LITERATURE REVIEW
The non-personal nature of advertising means that there is generally no prospect for
immediate response from the message receiver (except in direct-response advertising).
In the models given below the advertisement is used to emphasize the present habits of
product and the experience of the product is the dominant factor; which frames
experience and secure the brand of consumer franchise. (Ehrenberg 1994;
Pechmann & Stewart, 1989).
There is less information about the potential factors that influence the behavior of
consumers towards mobile advertising, and this is because perspective customer has
fewer opportunities to express their uncertainty of marketing activities and behaviors
using mobile technology. Research done to know the impression of advertising activities
on the attitude of consumer is influenced by messages via advertising, advertising
company and even the applied media.
According to Yoon & Kim (2001), web advertising and mobile advertising have many
common features such as digital texts, voice, tailored and responsive capabilities.
However the mobile advertising has little edge over web based advertising such as the
mobility limitation is removed. One has access to mobile anytime and anywhere.
The mobile advertising has produce a new field for research that is what consumer think
about advertisement of products via mobile, do they get irritated, will this be of any
good? Which means will be more useful for advertising? So a good understanding of
these things will be of vital use for advertising via mobile. As it is very important to
know how customer feel about the ads sent to them via cellular phone.
Research has shown that the major issue in the advertising is the public attitude. Some of
the studies like of Bauer & Greyser and Gallup in 1959 have anticipated positive attitude
towards advertisings, but the modern studies by Bracket and Carr in 2001 proposed
Now while keeping in mind how to plan m-advertising, there are two main choices to be
made when planning any advertising campaigns; to whom do we want to talk, i.e.
directing the advertisement? And what do we want to say to them? i.e. the advertising
content.
Haghirian et. al. (2005) opines that “associated to advertising via classical media and
Internet-based advertising, m-advertising has some unique features which enrich as well
as limit advertising opportunities for marketers. M-advertising provides possibility for
personalization, because mobile devices typically carry the user’s assigned identity” (Lee
& Benbasat, 2003). “If marketers use mobile devices for their advertising activities, they
can use consumer feedback to tailor their messages and offerings and collect information
about consumers’ preferences to advance future products and services” (Stewart &
Pavlou, 2002). Users are open to advertising that is personalized and related to their
lifestyle, states Reza Chady, the head of global market research at Nokia Networks
(DeZoysa, 2002).
2.6.1. Personalization
According to Lee & Benbasat (2003), “M-advertising provides possibility for
personalization, because mobile devices typically carry the user’s assigned identity. If
marketers utilize mobile devices for their advertising activities, they can use consumer
feedback to tailor their messages and offerings and collect information about consumers’
preferences to advance future products and services” (Stewart & Pavlou, 2002).
Before analysis of the report, it is necessary to keep in mind that mobile advertising till
this point in time in every kind of market is being used as additional advertising
campaign and it is not being run as completely separate campaign. The companies using
mobile advertising haven’t devices single campaign solely for mobile phones but they are
running a main campaign through electronic media and in order to support the message
mobile advertising is being used.
Looking at the availability of service; MMS service was started in December 2005. At
this point this service is in its expansion stages. An MMS interconnection service was
being unveiled by Warid Telecom, Telenor and Ufone; three GSM network operators in
Pakistan, enabling subscribers of each company to exchange MMS messages with each
other, without incurring interconnect charges.
Looking at the volume of the usage of this service, Warid said MMS was at that time the
fastest growing value added service and was expected to have the same growth rate in
Pakistan as SMS experienced. However, this is to be remembered that SMS service was
introduced in Pakistan by Mobilink in year 1998 and took almost nine years to be at the
place at which it is the mostly used value added service in Pakistan. MMS will certainly
take less time to develop as it is based on the same technology as SMS.
There are no precise figures available to the volume and usage of the MMS, SMS.
However the mobile phones being used are an indication of the fact that how much
people have the access to all these services. All the users of mobile phones have access to
SMS services, however, the accessibility to MMS services is reliant upon the mobile
phones and phones which support such services are much expensive.
Comparing with the international situation, the SMS advertising is taking over M-
advertising scene due to very low cost associated for customers and advertising agencies
are benefiting from it due to the volume of advertising they are catering to. The SMS
advertising world wide is used as a supplementary advertising service for the print and
electronic campaigns for the advertisers.
These factors are also prevailing in Pakistani Market. There is a large customer base
removing the constraint of volume. Also mobile advertising for SMS services is provided
at a micro level as an additional for the advertiser. So although the cost for operating M-
advertising is high at this point but it is a good source of revenue for the advertising
agencies especially in an environment where growth rate is phenomenal in customer base
and average spending per person is raising every year.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Male 119 59.5 59.5 59.5
Female 81 40.5 40.5 100.0
Total 200 100.0 100.0
The above table shows that 59.5% of the respondents were males and 40.5% were
females.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Student 147 73.5 73.5 73.5
Teacher 12 6.0 6.0 79.5
University employee 11 5.5 5.5 85.0
Advocate 3 1.5 1.5 86.5
Private sector employee 6 3.0 3.0 89.5
Radio anchor 4 2.0 2.0 91.5
Nurse 5 2.5 2.5 94.0
Housewife 7 3.5 3.5 97.5
Business man 5 2.5 2.5 100.0
Total 200 100.0 100.0
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 2-3 hours 54 27.0 27.1 27.1
4-5 hours 41 20.5 20.6 47.7
More than 5 hours 21 10.5 10.6 58.3
Less than 2hours 83 41.5 41.7 100.0
Total 199 99.5 100.0
Missing System 1 .5
Total 200 100.0
Of all the 200 respondents, 41.5% watch T.V. less than 2 hours a day, 27% watch
T.V. 2 to 3 hours a day, 21% watch T.V. 4 to 5 hours a day, and only 10.5% watch T.V.
more than 5 hours a day. Those who watch T.V. for more than 4 hours are considered as
heavy viewers, so only 10.6% of respondents turned to be heavy viewers. The result
shows that the frequency of watching T.V. is not much. From here it can be concluded
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid YES I do watch
114 57.0 57.3 57.3
Advertisements
NO I switch to
85 42.5 42.7 100.0
Other channels
Total 199 99.5 100.0
Missing System 1 .5
Total 200 100.0
Almost 57% of the respondents watch advertisements while watching T.V. and 42.5%
switch to other channels. This shows the propensity of respondents to watch
advertisements is quite frequent.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Short duration 122 61.0 61.9 61.9
Long duration 15 7.5 7.6 69.5
Short with gimmicks
51 25.5 25.9 95.4
and animations
Long with gimmicks
9 4.5 4.6 100.0
and animations
Total 197 98.5 100.0
Missing System 3 1.5
Total 200 100.0
The result of the survey of “Which type of advertisements do people prefer” shows that a
large majority of respondents (61.9%) watch short duration advertisements on the T.V.,
which results in that SMS ads will be preferred by the mobile users. Whereas only 7.6%
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid YES 182 91.0 91.0 91.0
NO 18 9.0 9.0 100.0
Total 200 100.0 100.0
The table shows that almost all the respondents i.e. 91% have access to mobile phone.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid SMS 136 68.0 69.4 69.4
MMS 60 30.0 30.6 100.0
Total 196 98.0 100.0
Missing System 4 2.0
Total 200 100.0
Of all the 200 respondents, SMS service is available to 68% people and MMS services
are available to only 30%. The result shows that SMS ads will be more successful than
MMS as the MMS technology is not available on all the cell phones.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid SMS 180 90.0 91.8 91.8
MMS 16 8.0 8.2 100.0
Total 196 98.0 100.0
Missing System 4 2.0
Total 200 100.0
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid YES 155 77.5 77.5 77.5
NO 45 22.5 22.5 100.0
Total 200 100.0 100.0
Of all the 200 respondents, only 22.5% respondents were not aware of Mobile
Advertisements while the remaining 77.5% were aware of it.
Table 3.11: Respondent’s response of “mobile ads are a source of timely information”
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Strongly agree 44 22.0 22.3 22.3
Agree 92 46.0 46.7 69.0
Neither agree nor
33 16.5 16.8 85.8
disagree
Disagree 17 8.5 8.6 94.4
Strongly disagree 11 5.5 5.6 100.0
Total 197 98.5 100.0
Missing System 3 1.5
Total 200 100.0
The result shows that 46% of respondents agree that mobile advertisements will be a
source of timely information. 22% respondents strongly agree, 16.5% neither agree nor
disagree, and only 8.5% disagree. The conclusion drawn here is that almost all the
respondents agree that mobile advertisements will provide them with the information at
the right time.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid SMS 126 63.0 66.7 66.7
MMS 63 31.5 33.3 100.0
Total 189 94.5 100.0
Missing System 11 5.5
Total 200 100.0
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 message a day 86 43.0 45.5 45.5
2 messages a day 54 27.0 28.6 74.1
3 messages a day 30 15.0 15.9 89.9
4 messages a day 19 9.5 10.1 100.0
Total 189 94.5 100.0
Missing System 11 5.5
Total 200 100.0
Of all the 200 respondents, only 9.5% choose to receive 4 messages a day while 45.5%
prefer only 1 message a day. So it can be concluded that the respondents will find it
disturbing to receive more than 2 messages day.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Ignore it completely 33 16.5 16.6 16.6
Read it occasionally 78 39.0 39.2 55.8
Read it after accumulating
10 5.0 5.0 60.8
too many of them
Read it when you get time 37 18.5 18.6 79.4
Read it right away 41 20.5 20.6 100.0
Total 199 99.5 100.0
Missing System 1 .5
Total 200 100.0
The result of the survey of “reaction of the respondents on receiving the ads” shows that
39% will read the advertising message occasionally, and 20% will read it right away.
16.5% will ignore it completely. The conclusion drawn here is that only a few
respondents will ignore the message while many of the respondents will read it not right
away but will read it once they get it.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Morning 26 13.0 13.8 13.8
Noon 20 10.0 10.6 24.3
Afternoon 30 15.0 15.9 40.2
Evening 113 56.5 59.8 100.0
Total 189 94.5 100.0
Missing System 11 5.5
Total 200 100.0
Almost half of the respondents i.e. 56.5% prefer to receive mobile ads in evening time.
And only 10% prefer them at noon. This shows that the best time to send the advertising
message is evening.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Disturbing privacy 65 32.5 32.8 32.8
Make purchase
65 32.5 32.8 65.7
convenient
More exposure 68 34.0 34.3 100.0
Total 198 99.0 100.0
Missing System 2 1.0
Total 200 100.0
In terms of the respondents reaction towards the impact of m-ads on the personal life of
the receiver shows that 34% agree that it is source for providing them with information
which results in more exposure. Only a few respondents say that it can be a cause of
disturbing the privacy. 32.5% respondents respond that it will make purchase convenient
as the consumer can immediately reply to the advertised message.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Strongly agree 55 27.5 27.6 27.6
Agree 80 40.0 40.2 67.8
Neither agree nor
42 21.0 21.1 88.9
disagree
Disagree 18 9.0 9.0 98.0
Strongly disagree 4 2.0 2.0 100.0
Total 199 99.5 100.0
Missing System 1 .5
Total 200 100.0
40% of the respondents agree that mobile advertisements can be irritating at times. 9%
disagree and 2% strongly disagree. 27.5% strongly agree. It can be concluded that almost
half of the respondents agree that m-advertisements are annoying.
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Strongly agree 40 20.0 20.2 20.2
Agree 102 51.0 51.5 71.7
Neither agree nor
41 20.5 20.7 92.4
disagree
Disagree 11 5.5 5.6 98.0
Strongly disagree 4 2.0 2.0 100.0
Total 198 99.0 100.0
Missing System 2 1.0
Total 200 100.0
The result of the survey of “Providing incentives for receiving mobile advertisements can
affect consumer intentions to receive mobile advertisements” shows that 51% agree with
the statement. 2% strongly disagree and 20% strongly agree to it. Almost half of the
respondents agree that if they are provided with some incentives then they will prefer to
receive the m-advertisements.
Table 3.19: Cross Tabulation between age of the respondents and their preference of ads
preferableads
short with long with
gimmicks and gimmicks and
short duration long duration animations animations Total
age 15-20 Count 29 3 10 2 44
% within age 65.9% 6.8% 22.7% 4.5% 100.0%
21-25 Count 64 9 34 4 111
% within age 57.7% 8.1% 30.6% 3.6% 100.0%
26-30 Count 12 0 3 0 15
% within age 80.0% .0% 20.0% .0% 100.0%
31-35 Count 6 2 0 1 9
% within age 66.7% 22.2% .0% 11.1% 100.0%
36-40 Count 2 0 2 1 5
% within age 40.0% .0% 40.0% 20.0% 100.0%
41-45 Count 4 1 0 1 6
% within age 66.7% 16.7% .0% 16.7% 100.0%
46-50 Count 2 0 1 0 3
% within age 66.7% .0% 33.3% .0% 100.0%
above 50 Count 3 0 1 0 4
% within age 75.0% .0% 25.0% .0% 100.0%
Total Count 122 15 51 9 197
% within age 61.9% 7.6% 25.9% 4.6% 100.0%
The above table shows the cross tabulation between age and preferred advertisements. It
shows that what types of ads are preferred by the respondents according to their age. The
result shows that most of the respondents almost from all the age groups like watching
short duration advertisements. Only a few respondents aging 36-40 like long
advertisements with gimmicks and animations. This can be concluded that SMS
advertisements will be preferred by all the respondents and MMS advertisements will
only be preferred by respondents aging from 36-40 as they like advertisements that are
long with gimmicks and animations.
Table 3.20: Cross Tabulation between age of the respondent and their frequency of watching TV
frequencywatchTV
more than less than
2-3 hours 4-5 hours 5 hours 2 hours Total
age 15-20 Count 12 12 4 16 44
% within age 27.3% 27.3% 9.1% 36.4% 100.0%
21-25 Count 31 16 13 51 111
% within age 27.9% 14.4% 11.7% 45.9% 100.0%
26-30 Count 2 5 1 7 15
% within age 13.3% 33.3% 6.7% 46.7% 100.0%
31-35 Count 2 2 1 4 9
% within age 22.2% 22.2% 11.1% 44.4% 100.0%
36-40 Count 1 1 2 2 6
% within age 16.7% 16.7% 33.3% 33.3% 100.0%
41-45 Count 4 3 0 0 7
% within age 57.1% 42.9% .0% .0% 100.0%
46-50 Count 1 1 0 1 3
% within age 33.3% 33.3% .0% 33.3% 100.0%
above 50 Count 1 1 0 2 4
% within age 25.0% 25.0% .0% 50.0% 100.0%
Total Count 54 41 21 83 199
% within age 27.1% 20.6% 10.6% 41.7% 100.0%
The above table shows the cross tabulation between age and frequency of watching T.V.
The result shows that mostly young people aging from 15 to 30 and above 50 watch less
T.V. i.e. less than 2 hours a day. The m-ads can be targeted towards these two extremes
i.e. the young aging from 15 to 30 and people above 50. The respondents aging from 36
to 40 watch T.V. more than 5 hours a day which shows that they are heavy viewers of
T.V. and will not be the target for m-ads.
Table 3.21: Cross Tabulation between respondent’s gender and mobile ads are irritating
The above table shows the cross tabulation between gender and the irritating content of
m-ads. The result shows that 42% male respondents agree that mobile ads are irritating
and 37.5% of the female respondents also agree. When compared the above table shows
that mostly male respondents find m-ads more irritating than female respondents.
Table 3.22: Cross Tabulation between ages of the respondent and watch TV ads or Switch
watchadsorswitch
YES I do
watch NO I switch
advertise to other
ments channels Total
age 15-20 Count 28 16 44
% within age 63.6% 36.4% 100.0%
21-25 Count 68 43 111
% within age 61.3% 38.7% 100.0%
26-30 Count 5 10 15
% within age 33.3% 66.7% 100.0%
31-35 Count 5 4 9
% within age 55.6% 44.4% 100.0%
36-40 Count 3 3 6
% within age 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
41-45 Count 4 3 7
% within age 57.1% 42.9% 100.0%
46-50 Count 1 2 3
% within age 33.3% 66.7% 100.0%
above 50 Count 0 4 4
% within age .0% 100.0% 100.0%
Total Count 114 85 199
% within age 57.3% 42.7% 100.0%
The above table shows the cross tabulation between age and frequency of watching ads
on T.V. or switching to other channels during commercial breaks. The result shows that
mostly respondents aging from 15 to 25 watch ads and respondents aging 26 to 30 and
above 50 switch to other channels. Hence it is concluded that young respondents like
watching ads on the T.V. and they will prefer receiving m-ads too.
Table 3.23: Cross Tabulation between respondent’s gender and preference of ads
The above table shows the cross tabulation between gender and their preference of ads on
T.V. The result shows that both the male and female respondents prefer short duration
ads. This means that if they are willing to receive m-ads so they will prefer SMS ads.
While some females also prefer long duration with gimmicks and animations, so it can be
concluded that MMS ads will be preferred more by the female population.
Table 3.24: Cross Tabulation between respondent’s gender and frequency of watching TV
Frequency of watching TV
More than Less than
2-3 hours 4-5 hours 5 hours 2 hours Total
Gender Male Count 34 22 10 52 118
% within gender 28.8% 18.6% 8.5% 44.1% 100.0%
Female Count 20 19 11 31 81
% within gender 24.7% 23.5% 13.6% 38.3% 100.0%
Total Count 54 41 21 83 199
% within gender 27.1% 20.6% 10.6% 41.7% 100.0%
The above table shows the cross tabulation between gender and their frequency of
watching T.V. the table shows that the 13.6% females are heavy viewers of T.V. as they
watch T.V. more than 5 hours a day. Mostly the male respondents are less viewers of
T.V. as only 44.1% male’s watch T.V. less than 2 hours a day.
The above table shows the cross tabulation between gender and their attitude towards m-
ads whether it is a source for timely information or not. The results show that 40% female
respondents agree with it and 51.3% male respondents also agree that it provides timely
information. Hence it can be concluded that both the males and females agree that m-ads
will be a good source for providing timely information. As only 3.8% female and 6.8%
male strongly disagree with it.
Table 3.26: Cross Tabulation between respondent’s gender and providing incentives for receiving
mobile advertisements can affect consumer intentions to receive ads
Table 3.27: Cross Tabulation between respondent’s occupation and time of receiving m-ads
The above table shows the cross tabulation between occupation and the m-advertisement
receiving time. The result show that 55.6% teachers, 60 % private companies
employees, 61% students, 50% advocates, 100% radio anchors, 40% nurses from
different hospitals, and 28.6% housewives are willing to receive the ads at evening time
while only 50% businessman are willing to receive the ads at noon. The overall result
shows that all those who are willing to receive the ads at evening time are busy in their
own professions from morning till afternoon so that is why they want the advertisements
to be received in the afternoon so they will have time to read the advertisements. Only the
businessmen are willing to receive the ads at noon because they are the people who are
mostly busy from noon till the evening.
Table 3.28: Cross Tabulation between respondent’s gender and preference of m-ads
The above table shows the cross tabulation between gender and what type of
advertisements (SMS or MMS) would they prefer. The result shows that 73% male and
57.7% female prefer SMS advertisements. And only a few respondents prefer MMS
advertisements. One of the reasons behind this liking can be that not all the mobile users
have the access to MMS technology so that is the reason why most of the respondents
favor SMS advertisements.
Cumulative
Percent Percent
Valid bank 9.1 9.1
telecom industry 27.3 36.4
restaurant 27.3 63.6
oil refinery 9.1 72.7
food and beverages 9.1 81.8
educational institution 9.1 90.9
Most of the respondents were from telecom industry and restaurants. Other companies
were banks, educational institutions, food and beverages and beauty saloons.
Cumulative
Percent Percent
Valid highly satisfied 54.5 54.5
Satisfied 45.5 100.0
Total 100.0
Almost all the respondents are satisfied with the current advertising mediums that they
are utilizing in terms of its cost. The result shows that 54.5% that is half of the
respondents are highly satisfied.
Cumulative
Percent Percent
Valid highly satisfied 27.3 27.3
satisfied 63.6 90.9
neither satisfied
9.1 100.0
nor dissatisfied
Total 100.0
Almost all the respondents are satisfied with the current advertising mediums that they
are utilizing in terms of its impact on the customers. The result shows that 63.6% that is
more than half of the respondents are satisfied. Only 9.1% are neither satisfied nor
dissatisfied. The result shows that almost all the companies are satisfied and there is no
such company who is not satisfied with the current advertising mediums.
Cumulative
Percent Percent
Valid YES 100.0 100.0
The result shows that all the respondents are aware of m-advertising.
Cumulative
Percent Percent
Valid strongly agree 45.5 45.5
agree 45.5 90.9
neither agree nor
9.1 100.0
disagree
Total 100.0
The result of the survey of “whether m-advertising is a good source for promoting a
product” shows that almost 45.5% respondent’s responded in a positive way. They are of
the opinion that mobile should be used as a source for promoting product and service.
Cumulative
Percent Percent
Valid surely 90.9 90.9
may not 9.1 100.0
Total 100.0
Of all the respondents, only 9.1% choose not to use mobile for promoting their product.
However the remaining 90% are willing to use mobile for promotion. Hence it can be
concluded that if this technology is made available so it will be utilized by many
companies.
Cumulative
Percent Percent
Valid SMS 9.1 9.1
BOTH 90.9 100.0
Total 100.0
The above table shows the cross tabulation between type of the company and their
attitude towards using mobile for promotion of their product or not. All the respondents
are “surely” willing of utilizing this opportunity. Standard Chartered Bank already uses
m-advertising. For all the other companies that are willing to promote their products via
mobile this tool of advertising should be introduced for them. There is a chance that m-
advertising will be successful in Pakistan as well as is in the other nations. The spa’s and
beauty saloons opposes m-advertising. As it is a gender driven business so it contains
some privacy reasons and they don’t want to consume this opportunity.
Type of advertisements
prefered for promotion of
the product via mobile
SMS BOTH Total
Type of Bank 0 1 1
the .0% 10.0% 9.1%
Company Telecom industry 0 3 3
.0% 30.0% 27.3%
Restaurant 0 3 3
.0% 30.0% 27.3%
Oil refinery 0 1 1
.0% 10.0% 9.1%
Food and beverages 0 1 1
.0% 10.0% 9.1%
Educational institution 1 0 1
100.0% .0% 9.1%
Spa and beauty saloon 0 1 1
.0% 10.0% 9.1%
Total 1 10 11
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
The above table shows the cross tabulation between type of the company and their
preference of ads, SMS, MMS or both. All the companies responded that they will make
use of both SMS and MMS. Only one of the companies which works for the promotion
of education and provides scholarships for students is of the opinion that SMS will be
utilized for promotion. The reason is that mostly MMS are for those companies who want
the customers to view the products that they are offering but for the educational
institutions they don’t need to send MMS as they can work out only with SMS that is text
based messages.
DISCUSSION
The results from the data collected from the customers and companies have been
discussed separately as given below:
Overall, the result from the customers suggests that the participants have positive
attitudes mobile advertising. The respondents are of the opinion that mobile advertising
poses some security problems. Most of the respondent’s frequency of watching T.V. is
less, so the advertisements shown on T.V. will also be ignored because if they don’t
watch T.V. so the advertisement shown on the T.V. will have no impact on the
consumers. A large majority of respondents watch short duration advertisements on the
T.V., which results in that SMS ads will be preferred by the mobile users. SMS ads will
be more successful than MMS as the MMS technology is not available on all the cell
phones. Almost all the respondents agree that mobile advertisements will provide them
with the information at the right time. The respondents prefer to receive only 1 message a
day. So it can be concluded that the respondents will find it disturbing to receive more
than 2 messages day. Only a few respondents will ignore the message while many of the
respondents will read it not right away but will read it when they get it. The results also
show that the best time to send the advertising message is evening. Almost all the
respondents agreed that it is source for providing them with information which results in
more exposure and makes purchasing easier and convenient. Some respondents are of the
view that m-advertisements are annoying at times. Young people were more tolerant
toward mobile advertising than elder people, so the message might not irritate them a lot
while comparing with older people. Respondents agreed that if they are provided with
some incentives then they will prefer to receive the m-advertisements. The use of
incentives shows a strong correlation to motivate m-advertising acceptance. Marketers
may consider offering various combinations of incentives to motivate the consumers.
The only company that opposes m-advertising is “Solitude Day Spa”. The owner
declared that m-advertising cannot be successful in the beauty saloon industry in
Pakistan. As it is a gender driven business so it contains some privacy reasons. The
owner states that it is not wise to use m-advertising in a culture like Islamabad where
people are not aware of the spa industry. Many women in Islamabad have mobile phones
that are not registered by their own names. So it will be very difficult to create a database
of the clients which will be helpful in using m-advertising. These are the reasons the
owner confirm might become the hurdles in the success of m-advertising for beauty
saloons and spa’s in a conservative culture like Islamabad.
5.1 Conclusion
Based on the findings of the data collected from both customers and companies it can be
concluded that the Mobile advertising has a great potential of being used and accepted by
the consumers and many companies in Islamabad. After the research the respondents
responded in a positive manner towards m-advertising. The consumers are willing to
receive m-advertisements. Some people feel that m-advertisements can be irritating and
disturbing at times. But many are of the opinion that m-advertisements will provide them
with the information, will give them more exposure to the market and will make
purchasing convenient too.
Companies find it very easy and convenient source of advertising. All the companies are
satisfied with the current advertising mediums that they are utilizing in terms of cost and
its impact on the consumers, but still they welcome new and unique ways of advertising
their products. They are of the opinion that both SMS and MMS will be used for
advertising if m-advertising is integrated with the current advertising mediums. Many
people strongly agree that providing incentives for receiving mobile advertisements can
affect consumer intentions to receive mobile advertisements. So keeping in mind this the
companies should provide the customers with some incentives so they will be willing to
receive the m-advertisements.
More than 90% of the young population of Islamabad has access to mobile phones and
the growth of using mobile phone is increasing day by day. These are the people who can
be targeted. The company’s especially those who are targeting the young audience
should take this opportunity of advertising via mobile as it will have a great impact on the
consumers.
The other conclusions drawn are that the people of Pakistan are welcoming newer
technologies. The advertisers are using new and unique ways of advertising their
products. So m-advertising will also be a success in the Pakistani competitive market
environment.
Mobile phone is a new direct marketing device that provides direct access to
consumers and interacts with them in a very personal way. It can be used for attractive
and efficient marketing. The mobile advertising, mobile Internet, mobile banking and
mobile entertainment services are growing in the world and in Pakistan it should also be
introduced. GSM operators and retailers should benefit from these mobile marketing
tools.
These are the issues of immediate concern for the mobile advertising field while
implementing it in any form in Pakistani market.
At this stage there has been very little research available regarding mobile advertising in
Pakistani environment. Considering the fact that it has turned to a multibillion industry all
over the world; future research is needed in a vastly growing market like Pakistan.
Afuah, A. & Tucci, C. L. (2001). “Internet business models and strategies”, McGraw
Hill: New York, USA.
Beatty, S. E., Kahle, L. R., Homer, P. and Shekar, M. (1985) "Alternative Measurement
Approaches to Consumer Values: The List of Values and the Rokeach Value Survey",
Psychology and Marketing 2(3), 1985, pp. 181 - 200.
Bracket, L.K., & Carr, B.N. (2000). “Cyberspace advertising vs. other media:
consumer vs. mature student attitudes”, Journal of Advertising Research, 41 (5), 23–
32.
Ehrenberg, Andrew S.C. (1974). “Repetitive Advertising and the Consumer”, Journal
of Advertising Research, pg 25-34.
Fortunati, L. (2001). “The Mobile Phone: An Identity on the Move”, Personal and
Ubiquitous Computing, 5(85 - 98.
Green, N., Harper, R. H. R., Murtagh, G. and Cooper, G. (2001). “Configuring the
Mobile User: Sociological and Industry Views”, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing,
5(146 – 156).
Jung, J. and Leckenby, J.D. (2007) “Attitudes Toward Mobile Advertising Acceptance
and Behavior Intention: Comparison Study of Korea and U.S”, American Academy of
Advertising Asia-Pacific Annual Conference at the Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
Kalakota, R., & Robinson, M. (2002). “M-Business. The Race to Mobility”, NY:
McGraw Hill.
Marcussen, C. H. (2004). “Mobile Phones, WAP and the Internet”, Available from
http://www.crt.dk/uk/staff/chm/wap.htm.
Tsang, M. M., Ho, S.C., & Liang, T. (2004). “Conusmer Attitudes Toward Mobile
Advertising: An Empirical Study”, International Journal of Electronic Commerce,
Spring 2004, 8 (3), 65-78.
Yoon, S.J., and Kim, J.H. “Is the Internet more effective than traditional media?
Factors affecting the choice of media”, Journal of Advertising Research,41, 6 (2001),
53–60
Zanot, E.J. “Public attitudes toward advertising”, In H.H. Keith (ed.), Advertising in a
New Age: American Academy of Advertising Proceedings. Provo, UT: American
Academy of Advertising, 1981.
Zoller, E.; Housen, V.L.; and Matthews, J. “Wireless Internet business models: Global
perspective, regional focus”, OVUM 2001 Report, pp. 1–64.