0% found this document useful (0 votes)
52 views2 pages

G.R. No. 177486, 21 December 2009, 608 SCRA 699

The document discusses a case regarding a writ of preliminary injunction. It summarizes that a writ of preliminary injunction is a provisional and ancillary remedy used to preserve the status quo until the merits of the case can be heard. It is usually granted to prevent irreparable injury or destruction of the status quo. The case being discussed was dismissed, so the purpose of the writ of preliminary injunction was deemed served and lifted despite the pending appeal.

Uploaded by

Tricia Cruz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
52 views2 pages

G.R. No. 177486, 21 December 2009, 608 SCRA 699

The document discusses a case regarding a writ of preliminary injunction. It summarizes that a writ of preliminary injunction is a provisional and ancillary remedy used to preserve the status quo until the merits of the case can be heard. It is usually granted to prevent irreparable injury or destruction of the status quo. The case being discussed was dismissed, so the purpose of the writ of preliminary injunction was deemed served and lifted despite the pending appeal.

Uploaded by

Tricia Cruz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

SPOUSES DAISY and SOCRATES M. AREVALO, v.

PLANTERS
DEVELOPMENT BANK and THE REGISTER OF DEEDS OF PARAAQUE CITY, G.
R. No. 193415, April 18, 2012 citing Buyco v. Baraquia, G.R. No. 177486, 21
December 2009, 608 SCRA 699.

The writ is provisional because it constitutes a temporary measure


availed of during the pendency of the action and it is ancillary because it is a
mere incident in and is dependent upon the result of the main action.
It is well-settled that the sole object of a preliminary injunction, whether
prohibitory or mandatory, is to preserve the status quo until the merits of the case
can be heard. It is usually granted when it is made to appear that there is a
substantial controversy between the parties and one of them is committing an act
or threatening the immediate commission of an act that will cause irreparable
injury or destroy the status quo of the controversy before a full hearing can be had
on the merits of the case.
xxxxxxxxx
The present case having been heard and found dismissible as it was in
fact dismissed, the writ of preliminary injunction is deemed lifted, its
purpose as a provisional remedy having been served, the appeal therefrom
notwithstanding.

A case becomes moot and academic when there is no more actual controversy
between the parties or useful purpose that can be served in passing upon the
merits.

(SPOUSES DAISY and SOCRATES M. AREVALO, v. PLANTERS DEVELOPMENT


BANK and THE REGISTER OF DEEDS OF PARAAQUE CITY, G. R. No. 193415, April
18, 2012 citing Tantoy, Sr. v. Hon. Judge Abrogar, 497 Phil. 615 (2005).)
STRADCOM CORPORATION v. HONORABLE HILARIO L. LAQUI as Acting Presiding
Judge of the Regional Trial Court of Quezon City, Branch 97 and DTECH
MANAGEMENT, INC., G.R. No. 172712, March 21, 2012

A case becomes moot and academic when, by virtue of supervening


events,1 there is no more actual controversy between the parties and no useful
purpose can be served in passing upon the merits.2 Since they are constituted to
pass upon substantial rights, courts of justice will not consider questions where
no actual interests are involved.3 As a rule, courts decline jurisdiction over such
cases or dismiss them on the ground of mootness.4

1 Vilando v. House of Representative Electoral Tribunal, G.R. Nos. 192147 & 192149, 23 August 2011.
2 Samson v. Caterpillar, Inc., G.R. No. 169882, 12 September 2007, 533 SCRA 88, 96.
3 Huibonhoa v. Concepcion, G.R. No. 153785, 3 August 2006, 497 SCRA 562, 572.
4 Mendoza v. Villas, G.R. Nos. 187256, 23 February 2011, 644 SCRA 347, 357.

You might also like