Scribd
Upload
22 views1 page

Data 1 FT1 (LPM) FT2 (LPM) VH (m3/s) VC (m3/s) H (KG/S) C (KG/S) U (kW/m3.K)

This document contains data from two experiments that tested different flow rates of hot (FT1) and cold (FT2) fluids through a heat exchanger. In the first experiment (Data 1), flow rates of hot and cold fluids were varied between 2-10 LPM and efficiency ranged from 14.4-8.38% as flow rates increased. In the second experiment (Data 2), the cold fluid flow rate was held at 10 LPM while the hot fluid rate was varied, resulting in higher maximum heat transfer rates but lower efficiencies ranging from 5.25-2.58% compared to the first experiment.

Uploaded by

Aeyrul Khairul
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
22 views1 page

Data 1 FT1 (LPM) FT2 (LPM) VH (m3/s) VC (m3/s) H (KG/S) C (KG/S) U (kW/m3.K)

This document contains data from two experiments that tested different flow rates of hot (FT1) and cold (FT2) fluids through a heat exchanger. In the first experiment (Data 1), flow rates of hot and cold fluids were varied between 2-10 LPM and efficiency ranged from 14.4-8.38% as flow rates increased. In the second experiment (Data 2), the cold fluid flow rate was held at 10 LPM while the hot fluid rate was varied, resulting in higher maximum heat transfer rates but lower efficiencies ranging from 5.25-2.58% compared to the first experiment.

Uploaded by

Aeyrul Khairul
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

DATA 1

FT1 FT2 VH VC ṁH ṁC Cmin (kJ/ qH q max Efficiency ΔTm U


(LPM) (LPM) (m3/s) (m3/s) (kg/s) (kg/s) K.s) (kW) (kW) (%) (K) (kW/m3.K)
−4 −4
10 2 1.66710 0.33310 0.1647 0.0329 0.1375 0.3443 2.393 14.4 14.59 0.3522

−4 −4
10 4 1.66710 0.66710 0.1647 0.0659 0.2754 0.4132 4.930 8.38 16.41 0.3758

−4 −4
10 6 1.66710 1.010 0.1647 0.0988 0.4129 0.5509 7.680 7.17 17.58 0.4677

−4 −4
10 8 1.66710 1.33310 0.1647 0.1317 0.5504 0.5509 10.51 5.24 18.24 0.4508

−4 −4
10 10 1.66710 1.66710 0.1647 0.1647 0.6883 0.5509 11.84 4.65 17.14 0.4797

DATA 2
FT1 FT2 VH VC ṁH ṁC Cmin (kJ/ qH q max Efficiency ΔTm U
(LPM) (LPM) (m3/s) (m3/s) (kg/s) (kg/s) K.s) (kW) (kW) (%) (K) (kW/m3.K)
−4 −4
2 10 0.33310 1.66710 0.0329 0.1647 0.6883 0.3301 12.80 2.58 17.06 0.2888
−4 −4
4 10 0.66710 1.66710 0.0659 0.1647 0.6883 0.6613 12.60 5.25 16.81 0.5872
−4 −4
6 10 1.010 1.66710 0.0988 0.1647 0.6883 0.6609 12.66 5.22 17.22 0.5728
−4 −4
8 10 1.33310 1.66710 0.1317 0.1647 0.6883 0.5506 12.46 4.42 17.18 0.4783
−4 −4
10 10 1.66710 1.66710 0.1647 0.1647 0.6883 0.4820 12.11 3.98 16.79 0.4285

You might also like