83% (6) 83% found this document useful (6 votes) 1K views 226 pages Universe, Carl Sagan
Carl Sagan, renombrado astrónomo y escritor, es reconocido como el mas brillante divulgador del conocimiento científico de nuestra era. A través de sus libros y series de TV ha puesto al alcance del público común las nociones, claramente entendibles sobre la naturaleza del Universo.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here .
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Go to previous items Go to next items
Save Universe, Carl Sagan For Later erry Puke 5
_ UNIVERSE
ir
n =
i
‘
a
ae )ht= ooh a ? bd
aN Basra Ano ELIZABETH BILSON
4
%Carl Sagan’s
Universe
Edited by
Yervant Terzian Elizabeth Bilson
Cornell University Cornell University
| CAMBRIDGE
i) UNIVERSITY PRESSPUBLISHED BY THE PRESS SYNDICATE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE
Tho Pitt Building, Trumpington Stroot, Cambridge CB2 1RP, United Kingdom
CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS
‘The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, United Kingdom
40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011-4211, USA
10 Stamford Road, Cakleigh, Melbourne 3166, Australia
© Cambridge University Press 1997
‘This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception
and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements,
no reproduction of any part may take place without
the written permission of Cambridge University Press.
First published 1997
Printed in the United States of America
‘Typeset in Melior and Eurostile
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Carl Sagan’s universe / edited by Yervant Terzian, Elizaboth Bilson.
om.
ISBN 0-521-57206-X.— ISBN 0-521-57609-2 (pk)
1. Life on other planets. 2. Science news. 3. Science - Social
‘aspects. 4. Sagan, Carl, 1934-1996. I. Terzian, Yervant, 1939-
Il, Bilson, Elizabeth M.
QB54.C37 197
500 - dc21 96-40511
cP
A catalog record for this book is available from
the British Library
ISBN 052157286 X hardback
ISBN 052157603 2 paperbackContents
List of Contributors page ix
Preface xi
Yervant Terzian and Elizabeth M. Bilson
PLANETARY EXPLORATION 1
‘1 On the Occasion of Car! Sagan's Sixtieth Birthday
WESLEY TL HUNTRESS JR
@ The Search for the Origins of Life: U.S. Solar
System Exploration, 1962-1994
EDWARD C, STONE 8
S&S Highlights of the Russian Planetary Program
ROALD SAGDEEV 28
‘@ _From the Eyepiece to the Footpad: The Search for
Life on Mars
BRUCE MURRAY 35
LIFE IN THE Cosmos 49
S Environments of Earth and Other Worlds
OWEN B. TOON 51
6G The Origin of Life in a Cosmic Context
CHRISTOPHER F. CHYBA 64
7 Impacts and Life: Living in a Risky
Planetary System
DAVID MORRISON 75
8 Extraterrestrial Intelligence: The Significance
of the Search
FRANK D. DRAKE 87vi
9 Extraterrestrial Intelligence:
The Search Programs
Contents
PauLHOROWTZ
10 Do the Laws of Physics Permit Wormholes for
Interstellar Travel and Machines for Time Travel?
KIP S. THORNE
INTERLUDE
411 The Age of Exploration
CARL SAGAN
SCIENCE EDUCATION
12 Does Science Need to Be Popularized?
‘ANN DRUYAN
13 Science and Pseudoscience
JAMES RAND!
14 Science Education in a Democracy
PHILIP MORRISON
415 The Visual Presentation of Science
JON LOMBERG
16 Science and the Press
WALTER ANDERSON
17 Science and Teaching
BILL G, ALDRIDGE
SCIENCE, ENVIRONMENT,
AND PUBLIC POLICY
16 The Relationship of Science and Power
RICHARD L. GARWIN
19 Nuclear-Free World?
GEORGI ARBATOV
@O Car! Sagan and Nuclear Winter
RICHARD P. TURCO
21 Public Understanding of Global Climate Change
JAMES HANSEN
22 Science and Religion
JOAN B. CAMPBELL
121
135
141
161
163
170
179
190
212
219
221
228
239
247
254Contents vii
————
@3 Speech in Honor of Car! Sagan
FRANK PRESS: 261
EPILOGUE 271
24 Car Sagan at Sixty
FRANK H. T. RHODES 273List of Contributors
BILL G. ALDRIDGE
Director, Science Education Solutions
Vice President, Airborne Research
and Services
WALTER ANDERSON
Editor, Parade Publications
GEORGI ARBATOV
Director Emeritus and Chairman
of the Governing Board, Institute
of U.S. and Canadian Studies
Russian Academy of Sciences
ELIZABETH M. BILSON
Administrative Director, Center
for Radiophysics and Space
Research, Comell University
Editor of this volume
JOAN B. CAMPBELL
General Secretary, National Council
of the Churches of Christ
CHRISTOPHER F CHYBA
Assistant Professor, Department of
Planetary Sciences, The University
of Arizona
FRANK D. DRAKE
Professor of Astronomy, University of
California at Santa Cruz
ANN DRUYAN
Secretary, Federation of American
Scientists
RICHARD L. GARWIN
IBM Fellow Emeritus
IBM Research Division
JAMES HANSEN
Director, NASA Goddard Institute
for Space Studies
PAUL HOROWITZ
Professor of Physics
Harvard University
WESLEY T. HUNTRESS, JR.
Associate Administrator for Space
Science, NASA Headquarters
JON LOMBERG
Senior Advisor
The Planetary Society
DAVID MORRISON
Chief, Space Science Division
NASA Ames Research Center
PHILIP MORRISON
University Professor Emeritus
Massachusetts Institute
of Technology
BRUCE MURRAY
Professor of Planetary Sciences
Division of Geological & Planetary
Sciences, California Institute
of Technology
FRANK PRESS,
Senior Fellow, Carnegie Institution
of Washington ieimage
not
availablePreface
When Carl Sagan came to Cornell in 1968 he was young, brilliant,
and ambitious; in this respect not so different from other new faculty
members. But Sagan had uncommon vision and well-defined purpose.
He was fascinated by science and by astronomy in particular, and
he believed that key questions concerning the origins of life and the
existence of life elsewhere in the universe could be confronted by
rational thinking combined with astute research and observation. He
was further convinced that what he knew and believed, and what he
hoped to discover, had to be effectively communicated to the public
policy makers and indeed to the general public at large. He recognized
that in a technological society (or in any advanced society, for that
matter) science is critical for informed decision making.
For nearly three decades we watched Carl Sagan pursue his vision
with great dedication and spectacular success. He played a leading
role in the American space program since its inception. He briefed the
Apollo astronauts before their flights to the Moon and was an exper-
imenter on the Mariner, Viking, Voyager, and Galileo expeditions to
the planets, He helped solve the mysteries of the high temperature of
Venus in terms of a massive greenhouse effect; he explained that the
seasonal changes on Mars were caused by windblown dust; and he
showed that the reddish haze of Titan was due to organic molecules
in its atmosphere. He was a consultant and adviser as well as an im-
portant spokesperson for the National Aeronautics and Space Admin-
istration (NASA) and the entire scientific community at congressional
hearings and in the press. He brought public attention to extremely
important environmental and other issues, such as the Nuclear Winter.
He was one of the key scientists who organized and inspired programs
in the search of extraterrestrial intelligence.
Sagan became a best-selling author the world over of books that
popularize science and its significance for mankind. In 1978 heimage
not
availableimage
not
availableimage
not
availableOn the Occasion of Carl
Sagan’s GOth Birthday
WESLEY T. HUNTRESS, JR.
NASA Headquarters, Washington, D.C.
Carl Sagan is sixty years old, and the Space Age is only thirty-seven
years old. Car! is so identified with the Space Age that it is hard to
believe that he wasn’t born with it. Over those thirty-seven years of the
Space Age, Carl has been the single most-recognized science mission-
ary bringing the ideas, excitement, and adventure of space exploration
to the general public. One thing that Carl has done so well in his ca-
reer is to make both scientist and layman think, and in particular to
think about science and space exploration in a much larger societal
and historical context. He has caused us to consider what it is about
space oxploration that is so fascinating to human beings and why an
investment in space is so important for our future.
Over his long scientific, literary, and public career, I think that
Carl’s greatest accomplishment may be that he has become for many
Americans an icon for modern science. For many on this planet, Carl
is the personification of space science and exploration. He has reached
millions of people with his articles, television appearances, and books.
He has explained science and its importance to many an audience.
Throughout his work, Carl has carried the message that the commu-
nication of science is crucial to its success. Carl realized long ago that
scientists have a responsibility to participate in society. Scientists can
no longer remain safely in their laboratories and offices, divorced from
the rest of the world. Carl recognized early in his career that scientific
discoveries have value only if they are shared. Carl understood more
than most scientists that science can continue to prosper only if the
public can participate in its excitement and thereby support its con-
tinuation. There have been those in the science community who have
not fully appreciated the value that Carl's approach has brought to the
scientific enterprise. The truth is that we need a lot more like him.
The chapters of this book clearly reflect the role Car! has played in
promoting scionce and the scientific process. They start with a sectionimage
not
availableimage
not
availableimage
not
availableOn the Occasion of Carl Sagan’s 60th Birthday
universe, to seek out new planets, and to search for life elsewhere
in the galaxy. In fulfilling this mission, we need to use earth-orbiting
spacecraft to develop the means to understand life-sustaining pro-
cesses on this planet; we need to travel robotically beyond earth in
our own solar neighborhood to survey, explore, and sample every ac-
cessible body in the Solar System; we need to extend our vision of
planetary exploration beyond our own Solar System in order to con-
duct an astronomical search for planets around the nearest stars; we
need to expand our ability to observe the distant universe in order to
survey the universe across the entire electromagnetic spectrum; and,
all the while, we need to develop the means for human exploration
beyond earth orbit so that we may in the twenty-first century fulfill
human destiny to explore beyond earth and to utilize the Solar System
for the full benefit of the people of this planet.image
not
availableimage
not
availableimage
not
availableThe Search for the Origins of Life:
Solar System Exploration
can shed a great deal of light on the conditions under which life can
evolve.
Where else in the Solar System might liquid water be found? In the
1980s, wo looked farther out in the Solar System, to the giant planets.
The first of these is Jupiter. Figure 2.5 shows Jupiter with two of its
moons: Io (lef), the closest moon, which is six planetary radii from
the center of Jupiter, and Europa, which is about ten planetary radii
from the center of the planet. Both satellites, which are about the size
of our own Moon, orbit Jupiter in synchronism, with Io orbiting twice
for every one orbit of Europa. Because of the gravitational interplay of
these two satellites in Jupiter's immense gravitational field, Io's crust
is constantly flexed by tidal forces. This flexing generates enough heat
to cause extensive volcanic activity, resulting in a constantly renewed
surface that is unmarked by impact crators (Figure 2.6). The shades
of orange that apparently mark Io's surface are most likely associated
with the presence of sulfur, a possibility that Carl studied in some
detail.
Figure 2.7 shows an interesting Io feature named Loki Patera (the
crescent-shaped black spot below center), believed to be a lake of
liquid sulfur with a solidified surface crust. The evidence for this is
an average surface temperature on Io (which is five times farther from
the Sun than Earth is) of 120 kelvins, or 120° above absolute zero,
whereas the temperature of Loki Patera is 310 kelvins, warmer than
room temperature. Loki Patera and the other black spots seen in the
a4
FIGURE 2.3
These channels on
the surface of Mars
were likely carved
by ancient flows
of water.image
not
availableimage
not
availableimage
not
availableThe Search for the Origins of Life: U.S. Solar System Exploration 15.
FIGURE 2.9
Unlike Io, Europa
still has water ~ in
the form of an
icy crust.
FIGURE 2.10
Europe's surface is
the smoothest
surface observed in
the Solar System:
its highest features
are the white
streaks, which are
porhaps a fow
hundred meters
high. (Image
processing by U.S.
Goological Survoy,
Flagstaff, AZ)image
not
availableimage
not
availableimage
not
availableimage
not
availableimage
not
availableimage
not
availableimage
not
availableimage
not
availableimage
not
availableimage
not
availableimage
not
availableThe Search for the Origins of Life:
Solar System Exploration
Solar System is so spread out that many frames were required. In the
portrait, the Sun is visible as a bright point, but the planets cannot be
easily discerned, except in individual enlargements (with captions) of
some of the images. Figure 2.24 shows a frame isolating Earth. In Carl’s
words, from this perspective, “Earth is a pale blue dot.” I am confident
that in the years ahead, we will continue enlarging our perspective of
the origin of life as we undertake new journeys of exploration.
27image
not
availableimage
not
availableimage
not
availableHighlights of the Russian Planetary Program
The next episode in the surrealist program of Russia was a project
known to many in the United States. We were planning to leunch a
huge atmospheric balloon to Venus. The date of launch was choson —
1983. We were doing it together with the French space community,
and the idea was that we would celebrate the 200-year anniversary
of the Montgolfier brothers’ balloon flight in the atmosphere of the
Earth, So, this spirit of celebration, of launching at the important his-
toric date, prevailed, but what happened? The project technically was
feasible. I'm sure we would still be getting a lot of data from this flight,
which was to carry a rather sophisticated scientific payload. Part of it
was to be used to study the complicated chemistry of the clouds in the
atmosphere of Venus. The reason this project was abandoned almost at
tho last minute in 1981 was that we discovered that Bruce Murray was
lagging behind schedule in trying to persuade NASA and the admin-
istration in this country to launch a spacecraft to encounter Halley’s
Comet. Such factors influenced our program so much that we decided
to abandon the big balloon celebrating the Montgolfier brothers, but
rather to send a spacecraft first to Venus with small balloons and a
lander and then after a swing by to encounter Halley's Comet. I think
it was probebly the biggest international project, involving about nine
nations, in the history of the Soviet program. At that time, not even
NASA was involved in such extensive international cooperation, and
it brings me to my very first momory of meeting Carl.
Theard, of course, a lot about Carl. I read some of the books. One of
the books he coauthored with a very close friend of mine and a leading
scientist of the Space Research Institute, Iosef Shklovskii. And then in
1976 I was planning to go to the United States and hoping to see Carl
during my visit at Cornell, but he was absent from his office at that
particular period, so finally we were able to arrange the meeting at the
National Airport in Washington. To identify Carl, 1 was given a small
photograph. One probably would not be able to find a single living
creature on the planet now who would need a photograph to recognize
Carl. It was bofore the Cosmos sories. So I kept the photograph and
he was very easy to find. What happened then seemed like science
fiction. I met the man for the first time, and half an hour later we
were talking about how to bring real openness in the Soviet program.
We elaborated on a scenario in which one of the next Soviet Veneras
landing on the surface of Venus would be coordinated in terms of
scientific coverage of the mission, with a parallel American Pioneer
Venus mission. Unfortunately, we lived in a different epoch, and only
part of this scenario materialized, buta very few years later, in 1986, we
fully recovered this scenario when Carl came to Moscow during a real-
time encounter with Halley’s Comet. I think it was such an unusual
coincidence. We did not try to respect any important Bolshevik dates.
After all, we had the excuse that the orbits of comets are controlled by
God. But at the very moment when Carl was in real time sitting in theimage
not
availableimage
not
availableimage
not
availableFrom the Eyepiece
to the Footpad: The
Search for Life on Mars
BRUCE MURRAY
Division of Geological &
Plonetary Sciences
California Institute of Technology
I would like to amplify Roald Sagdoov's remarks about how the Soviet
space program was so driven by milestones and nationalistic symbol-
ism. Sagdeev was diplomatic enough not to refer to the U.S. program
in the same way. However, the target date for the Viking Lander to go
down to the surface of Mars was July 4th, 1976, our 200th anniversary.
The landing actually was on the 20th of July, for good technical rea-
sons. NASA had the wisdom to back off from the symbolic date to be
sure we were technically ready. Thus, nationalistic fervor over space
activities was strong also in the United States, but being a more open
and pluralistic society, scientists and engineers had a greater influence
on policy and technical decisions.
U.S. space efforts have been transformed by the end of the Cold War
also. It's over, really over. We're all together in a new era of rapidly
evolving international cooperation and competition. Now we have to
create a new, more international paradigm to motivate ourselves for
real space achievement once again. That is what Carl and I and The
Planetary Society have tried to focus on. How do we go beyond the
bittersweet highs and lows of the Cold War into a new era that will
also be distinguished by great scientific accomplishments? How can
our children and grandchildren leave their mark on history that will
be remembered long into the future? I hope that this conference helps
to bring that need and opportunity into focus.
Introduction
My task is to talk briefly about a big subject - Mars. Fortunately, there
is a powerful integrating theme for Mars. It is the search for life. “From
the Eyepiece to the Footpad” refers to the allure of life on Mars from
the beginning of observing Mars through telescopes in the nineteenth
century to the motivation for humans to arrive there in the twenty-firstimage
not
availableimage
not
availableimage
not
availableFrom the Eyepiece to the Footpad 39
FIGURE 4.1
Mariner 4's first glimpse of Mars’ surface. The large crater that dominates this tiny
snapshot of Mars’ surface was an astonishing clue to the fact that Mars’ surface was more
like tho Moon than the Earth, In this frame, the sunlight is coming from the botiom of the
picture. In this primitive digital television picture, there are only 200 picture elements
in each direction.
on Mars, which meant that there had been no Earth-like erosion and
weathering for billions of years and, therefore, no oceans, rainfall,
and rivers. We knew right then, from this primitive set of picturos,
that Mars was not like the Earth. It didn’t have an Earth-like history.
It seemed more like the Moon with a thin atmosphere at this point.
Naturally, the expectation of life on Mars plummeted. And there
was more to come. My Caltech colleague, Professor Robert Leighton,
puzzled about this very thin carbon dioxide atmosphere surround-
ing Mars. He made some basic energy calculations and demonstrated
clearly that the physical consequence of that carbon dioxide atmo-
sphere on Mars is that the frost cap should be carbon dioxide, not
water ice! Then, Mariners 6 and 7 flew by Mars in 1969 and reaffirmedimage
not
availableimage
not
availableimage
not
availableFrom the Eyepiece to the Footpad a3
FIGURE 4.5
South polar layered terrains. This preliminary image from Mariner 7 shows the eroding
edge of a delicately layered blanket of wind-deposited sediments that characterize both
the north and south polar regions of Mars. The sun is coming from the lower left in this
image. The regular pattern of black dots is geometric reference points in the focal plate.
At the lower portion of the picture, faint craters can be seen from the underlying surface,
beneath the blanket. The thin layers are part of an escarpment that is facing equatorward
(north). The upper portion of the picture is dominated by a lower left/upper right set of
streaks that are believed to be a wind erosional feature called yardangs, carved out in a
very smooth top surface of this blanket of wind-deposited material. This image is about
50 kilometers (30 miles) in horizontal dimension.
The Viking Search For Life
‘Timed to coincide with the U.S. bicentennial in 1976, the most elab-
orate unmanned mission ever deployed arrived at Mars. Figure 4.7
shows a model of the Viking lander. Note the long arm designed to
reach out and sample the soil, then drop the samples into a special
processing laboratory aboard the sophisticated lander. Included in that
laboratory were some of the most sophisticated life-detecting experi-
ments ever built.
How does one detect life? It’s a tough question. If somebody gives
you some stuff, how can you prove something in it is alive? There was
only onereally universal way. One has to find evidence that something
is roplicating and growing. There were three experiments to look for
something growing. Two of them used differing liquid broths, offeringimage
not
availableimage
not
availableimage
not
availableFrom the Eyepiece to the Footpad
What's Next?
So once again the prospect of life now on Mars’ surface plummeted. Yet
Mars may have supported at least simple life forms in the geological
past. This is where the convergence of Sagan and Murray came about.
Carl’s original optimism about finding a living biota on Mars that
we could sample and compare with Earth’s faded. But despite my orig-
inal pessimism, there was overwhelming evidence that Mars once had
avery active carly history with a lot of water present on the surface in
different forms. That time scale seems long enough for life to have
formed on Mars analogously to how it must have on the Earth. The
implication is that when Mars changed its atmospheric state, probably
about three billion years ago, to an extremely hostile one, any surface
life that might have developed was not able to survive.
So the post-Viking scientific focus has become the search for tell-
tale clues to past life. On Earth, the most abundant clues to past life
are indirect ones — geological strata high in biogenically deposited cal-
cium carbonate, and best, those that contain organic matter. If similar
layers of ancient calcium carbonate were discovered on Mars, it would
be suggestive of an earlier life-bearing epoch. But, the definitive indi-
rect proof would he discovery of deposits of ancient organic matter.
Inasmuch as the present surface environment of Mars destroys organic
matter as revealed by the Viking lander experiments, we need to know
how deep do we have to go to get below this oxidizing layer. A me-
ter? Ten meters? A hundred meters? That is a key element. Surely
there must be on Mars somewhere relatively uncontaminated, unde-
stroyed strata surviving from that early aqueous period. Such locations
are what we want to find, especially near enough to the surface that
advanced robotic drilling or other systems could search directly for
organic material. The full exploitation of such sites could become the
scientific objective of future human missions.
Building for the Future
Following Viking, and the extraordinary exploration of the outer Solar
System with the two Voyager spacecraft, the U.S. planetary program
collapsed. NASA had become completely committed to a technolog-
ical objective, the Space Shuttle, rather than a scientific one. NASA
became focused on the means rather than the ends. Space shuttle de-
velopment overcame the agency. It was a bad choice to put a human in
the loop for everything in space. The United States has abandoned that
approach after Challenger, but it cost the U.S. space program nearly
fifteen years of progress, The most critical damage was to robotic
deep space missions that required the greatest propulsion to get to
the planets.
a7image
not
availableimage
not
availableimage
not
availableOwen B. Toon
recognizing the tenuous nature of the atmosphere of Mars and the pos-
sible need to terraform the planet to maintain life as we know it. A
giant mountain fictionally mapped near the Martian equator presages
the discovery of Mt. Olympus, the largest known volcano in the solar
system. After Mariner 9 photographically mapped Mars, Carl Sagan
showed that some of the famous canals pictured by the map actually
exist. For oxample, the classical canal Agathodaemon, or Coprates
(the only canal actually photographed from Earth), corresponds to the
canyon named Valles Marineris. However, Valles Marineris is nearly
as large as the United States, so it is more a grand-Grand Canyon than
an aqueduct.
Perhaps the aspect of Edgar Rice Burroughs’ map of Mars that inter-
ests Carl the most is not the map itself, but the way it was supposedly
obtained. Edgar Rice Burroughs’ hero, John Carter, traveled to Mars
by simply lifting his arms. No long and lonely voyage or life support
was needed. This idea sounds ridiculous, but truth being as strange
as fiction, that is exactly what has been done over the past thirty years
or so, An armada of robots has been sent by the nations of Earth to
see, feel, and listen to the planets for us. During this spacecraft era
we have peeked beneath the veil of mystery surrounding the planets.
The planets are no longer mere figments of the imagination; they have
become places.
A casual glance at a Viking lander image of Mars, like the one shown
in Figure 5.1, suggests that Mars might not be such a bad place to visit.
People who enjoy a desert lifestyle might even find these scenes to be
reminiscent of home and think to themselves, “Here is a great place to
take a stroll.” However, such hasty judgments are dangerous. Before
we step out on the red planet, we need to know what a visit to Mars
actually would be like.
We may not be ready to send humans to Mars, but NASA's Ames
Research Genter and Arizona State University at Tempe operate a wind
tunnel that simulates Martian conditions. Although it is large enough,
you cannot stand inside the wind tunnel to see firsthand what Mars is
like. However, you can peer through the window to see what the con-
sequences of a walk on Mars might be. Some very interesting physical
phenomena occur as the atmospheric pressure is reduced from terres-
trial to Martian. A jar of water (imagine that this is the blood in your
body) left standing inside the wind tunnel looks perfectly normal un-
til pressures near those of Mars are reached. Then the water begins to
boil furiously, but instead of hot steam it emits a frigid vapor that con-
denses to little pellets of ico. Within a few seconds the boiling water
freezes solid into a jagged, porous lump of ice. The surface pressure
‘on Mars is equivalent to that beyond an altitude of 100,000 feet above
Earth's surface. If you ventured out to explore the Martian desert with-
out a pressure suit, your body would literally explode as your blood
boiled, killing you before you missed that first breath of oxygen that
sustains us on Earth.image
not
availableimage
not
availableimage
not
availableOwen B. Toon
our atmosphere. Therefore, the Martian atmospheric nitrogen cannot
supply more than about 0.1% of the nitrogen contained in Earth's cur-
rent and fossil biomass.
Carbon dioxide is often thought of as the key material for making
Mars more habitable. Mars’ atmospheric carbon dioxide supply is ca-
pable of maintaining a plant world. However, if we wished to reheat
Mars using carbon dioxide as a greenhouse gas, we would have to
access geologic reservoirs. Unfortunately, the resulting carbon diox-
ide atmosphere, which would have to have a total pressure exceeding
Earth’s to yield Martian temperatures near freezing, would be toxic
to humans even if oxygen were present. In fact, current Mars’ atmo-
spheric carbon dioxide amounts are nearly toxic for humans. Green-
house gases other than carbon dioxide will be needed if Mars is ever
to be a home for unprotected humans.
Oxygen, a key requirement for some forms of terrestrial life, is
present only in limited quantities in the current Martian atmosphere,
but it is plentiful in the soils. The terrestrial oxygen atmosphere was
created in the last 25% of Earth’s history as a by-product of life. Oxy-
gen availability does not limit our ability to terraform Mars.
Terraforming Mars would be a massive project. A synthetic atmo-
sphere would have to be produced and constantly maintained. We can
envision several ways to possibly achieve such an atmosphere, but
lack of knowledge of the mineral reservoirs on Mars prevents us from
determining if any of these schemes is practical. Instead of searching
for gold, or black gold like terrestrial miners, astronaut prospectors
may seek the currency of terraforming-accessible carbon and nitrogen
reservoirs in the Martian soil.
Of course, planetary-scale terraforming is not the only way to make
Mars habitable for humans, Astronauts may terraform small parts of
Mars enclosed within protective shells, so that a human colony can
be maintained, even if planetary-scale reengineering is just a distant
dream.
Science fiction writers correctly captured the essence of the Mar-
tian environment in the first half of this century. They saw it as a vast
desert, with a dwindling atmosphere. However, they envisioned our
nearest neighbor, Venus, as a tropical paradise complete with humans
and various prehistoric reptiles. But, Venus is more like Hades than
the Garden of Eden.
If you were a visitor to Venus on an approaching spacecraft you
might see the pale yellow clouds as a soft, welcoming haze with var-
ious interesting markings in the ultraviolet (Figure 5.3). However, a
descent into the cloud tops, which extend nearly 70 kilometers above
the surface, would reveal a mist of concentrated sulfuric acid that
would badly burn yourskin if you were exposed to it. These clouds are
similar to stratospheric volcanic clouds on Earth. A visit to the cloud
tops might remind you visually of a smoggy day in Los Angeles. Asimage
not
availableimage
not
availableimage
not
availableOwen B. Toon
VENUS EARTH MARS
° 1 2
DISTANCE FROM THE SUN
VENUS EARTH ine
2 7 °
‘SOLAR FLUX
EARTH VENUS MARS
2 1 °
SOLAR ENERGY ABSORBED
FIGURE 5.6
The relative positions of the planets are illustrated from three perspectives. At the top
are the physical positions of the planets. in the middle are the relative amounts of solar
energy available at the physical positions of the planets. At the bottom are the amounts of
sunlight actually absorbed by the planets. At the bottom it can be seen that Venus, because
of its highly rofl
clouds, is effectively nearly as far from the sun as is Mars
300,000 times the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere of
Earth.
Yot there is more to understanding the difference in surface temper-
atures between the Earth and Venus than knowing the current levels
of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Earth has just as much carbon stored
away in the form of limestones in crustal reservoirs as Venus has stored
in the form of carbon dioxide in its atmosphere. Figure 5.7 shows that
the storage of carbon in different places on Earth is related to liq-
uid water. The arrows mark the path taken by terrestrial atmospheric
carbon dioxide as it dissolves in fresh and salt water, along with cal-
cium ions, which then are used by organisms to form limestone in the
oceans. Without liquid water the carbon would build up in our atmo-
sphere as carbon dioxide, and Earth would quickly become overheated
like Venus.
Venus lost its water early in solar system history. Because of the
high solar flux at the location of Venus, its original oceans of water
vaporized into the atmosphere in a massive runaway greenhouse. At
the top of the water-saturated atmosphere, water vapor dissociated
into hydrogen and oxygen. The hydrogen escaped to space. So the
position of Venus with respect to the sun is an important indirect
factor in fixing its current temperature, because its position controlled
the composition of the atmosphere.image
not
availableimage
not
availableimage
not
available64
The Origin of Life
in a Cosmic Context
CHRISTOPHER F. CHYBA:
White House Office of Science
and Technology Policy*
The title of this essay is taken from a paper Carl Sagan published
twenty years ago in the journal Origins of Life [Sagan 1974]. “The Ori-
gin of Life in a Cosmic Context” was one in a series of publications by
Carl on the planetary context for life. Beginning in 1961 with “On the
Origin and Planetary Distribution of Life” [Sagan 1961], he continued
with the landmark book written with losef Shklovskii, Intelligent Life
in the Universe [Shklovskii and Sagan 1966] and the article “Life” in
the Encyclopaedia Britannica [Sagan 1970]. The time period of these
articles spanned the entire U.S.-Soviet Moon race. But the 1974 paper
was special in being the first in that series that could take into account
the results of the lunar exploration by the Apollo astronauts.
The 1974 paper suggested three reasons why an extraterrestrial
context was essential for understanding the origins of terrestrial life:
Distinguishing the Contingent from the Necessary. Only the study of
extraterrestrial life will allow us to avoid the dangers inherent in try-
ing to reach general conclusions about the nature of life based on the
single example provided by terrestrial biolog}
found ignorance of exobiology, life is a solipsism,
is no aspoct of contemporary biology in which we can distinguish the
evolutionary accident from the biological sine qua non. We cannot
distinguish the contingent from the necessary.” Does life really have
to be based on proteins and DNA? Does it even have to be based on car-
bon? The danger of parochialism lurks in every conclusion we might
reach.
“In our present pro-
Carl wrote. “There
*Current address: Department of Planetary Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson.
AZ85721 USA.
"The ideas contained in this paper do not necessarily represent the views of
the White House Office of Scionce and Technology Policy or the United States
Government.image
not
availableimage
not
availableimage
not
availableChristopher F_Chyba
which excavated the 200-kilometer diameter Chicxulub crater
{Sharpton et al. 1992], was the impact of an object about the size of
Halley’s comet — ten kilometers or so in diameter. It now seems quite
likely that the K/T impact had a profound influence on the history
of life on Earth. The fact that we are here - rather than, say, six-foot
green reptiles ~ may be the result of this impact. By extrapolating the
lunar cratering record to the Earth, it is clear that objects the size of
the K/T impactor collided with Earth some 10,000 times during its
first billion years. At tho time of the origins of life, say about 4 Gyr
ago, Earth was sustaining such an impact every few hundred thousand
years.
‘The lunar cratering record also reveals that the flux of impact-
ing bodies increased in number as something like the 1.6 power of
decreasing impactor diameter. Therefore, for example, Earth 4 Gyr
ago would also have been experiencing the impact of a 1-kilometer
diameter body every 5,000 years or so.
Clearly, this was an extremely hostile environment. Darwin, in his
famous 1871 letter to Hooker (reproduced, e.g., in [Hartman, Lawless,
and Morrison 1985]), imagined that life had originated in some warm
little pond. This is a peaceful image, leading one to envision quiet,
serene conditions. But the Moon teaches us that this is not the right
picture. The right picture is that life on Earth must have originated
not in quiet, peaceful circumstances, but rather in extremely violent,
impact-ridden ones.
The largest craters on the Moon — big, multiringed structures grea-
ter than 300 kilometers across — are called basins. We now know of
about fifty such lunar basins [Wilhelms 1987], ranging in size up to the
South-Pole Aitken basin, about 2.200 kilometers in diameter [Belton
et al. 1992]. The largest basin that one can see on the lunar near side
is Imbrium, about 1,160 kilometers across. Objects with radii in the
range 50-150 kilometers are required to excavate basins of this size.
With a terrestrial gravitational cross section nearly 25 times bigger
than that of the Moon, and about 50 known lunar basins, it’s clear
Earth sustained a large number of giant impacts.
The most gigantic of these giant impacts would have had extremely
grave consequences for life on Earth. Work by Maher and Stevenson
[1988] and Sleep et al. [1989] suggests that the biggest might well have
sterilized the surface of the Earth. In this case, the window available
for the origin of life was only as wide as the time between the oldest
geological evidence for life (either 3.5 or 3.8 Gyr ago) and the final ster-
ilizing impact. With the heavy bombardment of the Moon not tailing
off until around 3.8 Gyr ago (the Imbrium impact, incidentally, seems
to have occurred 3.85 Gyr ago), the timescale for the origin of life on
Earth shrinks from nearly a billion years down to around 100 Myr, or
even less. The suggestion that the lunar bombardment evident in the
Apollo results implied a narrower window for the origin of life thanimage
not
availableimage
not
availableimage
not
availableChristopher F. Chyba
organics [McDonald and Bada 1995]. Bigger pieces of Mars, ten meters
or more in size, could shield microorganisms from cosmic rays during
interplanetary passage, so that it’s possible that microorganisms may
have successfully migrated between Mars and Earth early in these
planets’ histories.
In the future, as we explore Mars, and as we look for signs of an
ancient Martian biosphere, it will be precisely those fossils that are
easiest to recognize as fossils — because of their similarities to terres-
trial microfossils — for which it will be the hardest to tell whether they
represent a separate Martian origin of life or merely resulted from a
kind of inoculation of Mars by the Earth. (For that matter, they could
even represent the now-extinct ancestors of terrestrial life, whose only
living descendants are the progeny of those that survived the perilous
journey to Earth.) Would the discovery of microscopic fossils that re-
sembled terrestrial microorganisms tell us that life on other worlds
must find the same solutions to the problems of early evolution? Or
would it merely mean that the two worlds had exchanged organisms
early in their history? It is not clear that fossil discoveries on Mars
will necessarily help in providing the kind of perspective that Carl
has asked for. That kind of perspective may be even more difficult to
attain than we had hoped.”
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Alvarez, L. W., Alvarez, W. A., Asaro, F., Michel, H. V. 1980. Extraterrestrial
cause for the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction. Science 208:1095-1108.
Basaltic Volcanism Study Project 1981. 1981. Basaltic Volcanism on the Terres-
trial Planets. New York: Pergamon Press.
Belton, M. |. S., Head, J. W., Pieters, C. M., Greeley, R., McEwen, A. S., Neukum,
G., Klaasen, K. P., Anger, C. D., Carr, M. H., Chapman, C. R., Davies, N. E.,
Fanale, F. P., Gierasch, P. J., Greenberg, R., Ingersoll, A. P., Johnson, T.,
Paczkowski, B., Pilcher, C. B., Veverka, J. 1992. Lunar impact basins and
crustal heterogeneity: New western limb and far side data from Galileo.
Science 255:570-576.
Boston, P. J., Ivanov, M. V., McKay, C. P. 1992. On the possibility of chemosyn-
thetic ecosystems in subsurface habitats on Mars. Icarus 95:300-308,
Cech, T. R. 1993. The efficiency and versatility of catalytic RNA: Implications
for an RNA world. Gene 135:33-36.
Chyba, C. F., McDonald, G. D. 1995. The origin of life in the Solar System:
Current issues. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet Sci. 24:215-249.
*Note added in proof: Since this chapter was written, possible microfossils and other
possible signs of life have been reported in the Martian meteorite ALH84001. These
claims remain controversial. See McKay, D. S., Gibson, E. K., Thomas-Keprta, K. L.,
Vali, H., Romanek, C. S., Clemett, S. J., Chillier, X. D. F, Maechling, C. R., Zare,
R. N, 1996. Search for past life on Mars: Possible relic biogenic activity in Martian
meteorite ALH84001. Science 273:924-930.image
not
availableimage
not
availableimage
not
available76
David Morrison
the course of biological evolution is profoundly altered. The history
of life on this planet, and by implication the origin of humans, is thus
closely coupled to the impact history of the Solar System.
This paper deals with a new paradigm: that life evolved on Earth in
an environment punctuated by impact catastrophes. We have learned
that our planet lives in a “bad neighborhood,” with occasional out-
bursts of violence that have dramatically influenced our history. We
are particularly interested in the contemporary hazard imposed by
impacts and with proposals for ways to dea] with these risks.
Carl Sagan has played an important role in the revolution we are
discussing. As the world’s foremost exponent of planetary exploration,
he has done much to stimulate missions to the planets, to plan the
critical science that was done on those missions, and to interpret the
results for the broadest possible audience. Carl has also played a lead-
ing role in recognizing the importance of impacts and the existence
of a contemporary threat. And he has been especially sensitive to the
geopolitical implications of the impact hazard and the impetus this
threat has given to possible defense schemes, many of which are po-
tentially more dangerous then the natural hazard they are designed to
mitigate. His unique combination of technical expertise and humane
wisdom will be important for the public policy debates that will grow
around the impact hazard and potential defensive systems.
Lessons from the Comet Crash
When Comet S-L 9 was discovered, some months after it had broken
apart during a very close encounter with Jupiter, it already consisted
of more than 20 fragments, each in orbit about Jupiter (Plate VIII). As
a result of perturbations introduced by solar gravity, these orbits were
distorted to yield a planetary collision the next time around. Over a
period of about a week in July 1994, each of the fragments was doomed
to impact the planet at 44° south latitude, just over the horizon as
seen from the Earth. Although terrestrial telescopes could not image
the actual entry and explosion from each impact, they would be well
placed to see any large plume of material ejected above the impact
site. And within a few minutes of each event, the impact site would
be carried into direct view by the rapid rotation of the planet.
In the months preceding the impacts, a number of models were
developed to predict the consequences as material smashed into the
planet at a speed of 70 kilometers/second, more than three times the
reentry speed of the Apollo lunar capsules. The stress of deceleration
in the Jovian atmosphere would lead to the rapid breakup of each im-
pactor. Unfortunately, however, the sizes of the fragments could not
be measured, leading to widely divergent predictions for the observ-
able phenomena. Models of the tidal breakup of the comet during its
1992 flyby of Jupiter suggested that the largest fragments were no moreimage
not
availableimage
not
availableimage
not
availableimage
not
availableimage
not
availableimage
not
availableimage
not
availablea4
David Morrison
Earth must have formed in the swirling debris of the solar nebula
through a process of accretion of smaller bodies. High-velocity impacts
generated heat, and eventually the upper layers of the planet melted
to form a global ocean of liquid rock. At some point during the period
of accretion, we were struck by another coalescing world about the
size of Mars today — that is, with a mass about 10% that of the Earth.
The smeller, Mars-sized planet was completely destroyed, and even
the larger Earth was shattered to its core. Some of that ejected material
continued to orbit the Earth as a giant ring, which cooled and collapsed
to form our Moon.
If the Moon-forming impact had been just a little larger, the Earth
itself would have been disrupted. There may have been examples of
such planetary collisions during the early days of Solar System history,
but if so, the direct evidence is long gone. We do see other examples
of planetary peculiarities, however, that are best understood as the
product of random collisions. Venus spins in the opposite direction
from its orbital motion about the Sun, probably as the result of a late
collision that struck it a glancing blow and reversed its direction of
rotation, and the small planet Mercury appears to be the metal-rich
remnant of a larger parent, stripped of most of its rocky mantle in
another giant collision. It is largely a matter of luck that the final prod-
uct of this chaos was the four inner planets we have today: Mercury,
Venus, Earth, and Mars, plus the Moon.
‘The building blocks of life came to Earth through impacts, as stud-
ied by Chris Chyba (at the time at Cornell University) and his col-
leagues. In the outer parts of the solar nebula, far from the Sun, tem-
peratures were much lower, leading to abundant water ice and other
frozen gases such as methane, ammonia, carbon dioxide, carbon mon-
oxide, and even ethyl alcohol. The volatiles on Earth must be derived
from this distant reservoir in the outer Solar System through cometary
bombardmentin the last stages of accretion, which may have extended
to several hundred million years after the birth of our planet. Most of
the material of the biosphere — and of our own bodies — is comet-stulff,
a gift from the outer Solar System. Were it not for this rain of ice and
carbon compounds, our planet would be as dry and lifeless as the
Moon. Life is a gift from the comets. But the gift did not come without
a price to pay.
As the rain of cometary materials persisted, the Earth (and presum-
ably Mars and Venus as well) built up a thick atmosphere of carbon
dioxide and other compounds and developed shallow oceans of liquid
water, rich in dissolved organic materials. Such an environment is ex-
actly what most scientists think was required for the origin of life. The
first self-replicating molecules must have formed in these early seas,
perhaps onall three planets. Ifall of the impacting comets were small,
this environment might have approximated the “warm little pond”
hypothesized by Charles Darwin for the origin of life. However, theimage
not
availableimage
not
availableimage
not
availableFrank D. Drake
knowledge that must exist among the intelligent civilizations of our
galaxy and other galaxies - information of a scientific and technical
nature, as well as philosophical and biological, gathered not only over
hundreds of years, as has been our experience, but over literally thou-
sands, millions, even (I won't use the “B” word), thousands of millions
of years.
Surely from this would come a richness of knowledge, even wis-
dom, that would help us achieve a higher quality of life, save our
resources, give us sophisticated information we would like to have,
and within years rather than hundreds of years, or thousands, which it
might take us to achieve these same results through our own research.
So those, in a nutshell, are the possible significant results of SETI,
and of course they are of the most profound consequence and impor-
tance to all of us. That is why those of us who have the privilege to
work in SETI feel it is a very important project and we give ourselves
to it.
Now, these ideas are not new. They have been around a long time,
as long as people have first understood, as Galileo did, that the other
planets were in some way like the Earth. The ideas became even more
widespread when we recognized that the stars were objects like our
Sun. As the years have gone on, people have speculated or fantasized
about life in the universe and particularly intelligent life. An example
of early excitement about this subject is the front page from The New
York Times, August 17, 1924. (Walter Sullivan is not responsible for
this.) It contains drawings, totally wrong, done by Percival Lowell
and this very chauvinistic statement that Mars invites mankind to
reveal “his” secret. The following Saturday, there was to be a very
close approach of Mars to the Earth, and all the world looked. Among
all these observations were many attempts to detect signs of intelligent
life on Mars. We read, for example, that from the top of the Jungfrau,
Swiss astronomers were to flash alight signal to the planet with a giant
helioscope.
At the same time, there were many attempts to detect radio signals
from Mars. Searches for extraterrestrial radio signals are not something
solely of our era: they started actually back in the 1890s and reached
a peak in 1914. On another front page of The New York Times, from
seven days later, there is this announcement, front page news, “Radio
Hears Things as Mars Nears Us.” We're supposed to be impressed,
because it tells us that it took a twenty-four tube set in England to
pick up the strong signals and that Vancouver, for some reason, was
ofa special interest to the Martians! We don’t know why that is, and,
in fact, the great cryptographer, William Friedman, who had broken
the German codes in World War I, was standing by in Washington to
decode the messages. Front page news. but as is typical, when it turned
out those dots and dashes were from a radio transmitter in Seattle, that
was quietly announced on page thirty, where one could read: “MarsExtraterrestrial Intelligence
Sails By Us without a Word. Disappointment.” These events produced
one of the false alarms that discredited not just searching for life in the
universe, but planetary science as a whole for many, many decades.
That science only recovered its prestige and escaped its taboo nature
with the dawn of the Space Age.
It is interesting to point out that at this very same time, something
of very great importance to SETI was occurring. Again, ina front page
of The New York Times, with the headline: “Talk with Aviator by Radio
a Mile over Central Park,” and “Experimenter Catches Words above
the Roar of the Airplane.” This may not seem very startling today, but
if one looks at the engineering textbooks of that time, one finds that the
physics of radio links was very fuzzy. The engineers believed that the
design of an electromagnetic communication link required a transmit-
ter anda receiver, each of which had a connection to the ground. There
was this false concept that somehow radio signals were conducted in
a sort of electrical circuit in which one leg of the circuit was in the
Earth and the other was through the atmosphere; therefore, without
that ground connection one could not communicate. Of course if that
were true, it would have terrible consequences for SETI, because there
would be no way one star could communicate with another. But we
read that the flyer did broadcast directly from the plane. When you
read this you find that there was a Lieutenant Connell, on his hands
and knees in the open cockpit of this airplane, shouting into a mi-
crophone so he could be heard over the roar of the Liberty engine. It
was a great moment for SETI. He succeeded with no ground wires!
‘That was a very important breakthrough because it showed that radio
didn’t need ground wires and so radio could communicate between
the stars. The technological basis for SETI was established.
We sense again the interest in the possibility of electromagnetic
communication between the stars from a front page of The New York
‘Times, 1933, announcing the discovery of cosmic radio emission. Sur-
prisingly, reporters and editors recognized the significance of Karl
Jansky’s discovery of cosmic radio emission and put it on the front
page. The headline reads, “New Radio Waves Traced to Contor of the
Milky Way, Mysterious Static Recorded by K. G. Jansky Held to Differ
from Cosmic Ray.” The lowest headline says, “Only Delicate Receiver
is Able to Register; No Evidence of Interstellar Signaling.” Even then,
they wondered if perhaps radio was the means by which we might
contact other civilizations.
All of these early ideas were very speculative and they were not
properly scientific in that there were no quantitative calculations made
whatsoever of, say, what power levels were required to make a de-
tectable signal over what distance. These were really hand-waving
ideas. It was only in the 1950s and early 1960s when people started
to approach the matter in a proper scientific way, in the manner first
done in print by Philip Morrison and Guiseppe Cocconi at Cornell.Frank D. Drake
Another watershed event at that time was the publication of the book
by Carl Sagan and Iosef Shklovskii on SETI, a monumental book that
has become a classic. Here Carl took a rather narrowly written book
by Shklovskii, written in the context of the limited state of knowledge
of the Soviet Union, and added to it a great breadth of scientific and
technical knowledge. This created what, to this day, is a handbook for
the quantitative analysis of what it might take to detect life elsewhere
in the Solar System. So, in the late 1950s, early 1960s, finally, this
subject became one that had a proper quantitative scientific basis. We
entered what might be called the modern era of SETI.
Now, along the way, many discoveries have stimulated interest in
this subject and have indicated or provided growing evidence that in-
telligent life can be expected to be ubiquitous in the Milky Way and
in other galaxies. We've learned that the galaxy is fifteen billion years
old. That there are four hundred billion stars, many like the Sun. We
have learned how star formation proceeds and that in the clouds of
gas and dust that form the stars, we have the chemical precursors of
life on Earth. There have been discussions in the previous chapters
about these materials being brought to Earth by the comets. We've seen
evidence of other solar systems, although not yet another solar system
just like our own. A great deal of circumstantial evidence suggests that
planetary systems and planets like the Earth are extremely common.
We've seen in the planets of the Solar System themselves a great abun-
dance of the organic molecules and other materials likely to give rise
to life, and even to intelligent life. We know about tantalizing Titan,
motivating us, suggesting that the abodes of life are very abundant in
the Milky Way and therefore that searches for life are of great value.
SETI has significance in areas that are less profound than the ones
I first mentioned. It has provided grist for the entertainment industry.
‘The best-selling movies of all time have been based on ideas of SETI.
Even now, Carl is working on such a movie, Contact, which will be a
source of entertainment, but will also build understanding in the pop-
ulation at large about the possibilities of contact with extraterrestrial
life. That helps us in carrying out our search. SETI has also turned
out to be a wonderful magnet to attract young people to an interest
in science. In many places, including our SETI Institute, curriculum
materials based on SETI are being developed. These turn out to work
extremely well with young people in the real world, because young
people are very interested in life in the universe. Once they find out
that to understand SETI you have to lean about organic chemistry,
or atmospheric structures, and so forth, they're willing to study those
things that might otherwise be boring.
The existence of SETI activity has stimulated much theoretical
work about the propagation of radio waves in the galaxy and more
speculative theoretical work, some of it good, some of it not so good.
which has to do with the nature and behavior of life in the universe.Extraterrestrial Intelligence
SETI is a source of pride in cultures and countries, because we rec-
ognize that the pursuit of extraterrestrial intelligent life is one of the
most noble, if we can use that word, of human tasks. Both America and
the Soviet Union have taken great pride in it, and so have states like
West Virginia. A pamphlet for potential tourists to that state points out
“buried treasures.” It describes the National Radio Astronomy Obser-
vatory as a place where “they listen for signs of life in outer space.”
‘You might think they don’t do anything else there, according to this
pamphlet! They just listen for signs of life in outer space! Actually,
no major program of this kind has been carried out there in the last
twenty years!
Other impacts of significance: SETI brings out the very best in
people and attracts some of the most talented of our scientists and
engineers. Among these is Dr. Jill Tarter, who is the senior project
scientist for Project Phoenix, the new name for what was the NASA
SETI Search. That search, having lost its federal funding, has become
privately based project operated by the SETI Institute. Jill ‘Tarter’s orig-
inal name was Jill Comell, and in fact she is a direct descendant of
the founder of Cornell University, Ezra Cornell, and got her education
in engineering physics at Cornell. Dr. Kent Cullers, Ph.D. in physics,
is in charge of the signal detection systems for Project Phoenix, a very
daunting task. In Project Phoenix there are some fifty-six million chan-
nels of information providing data. Kent Cullers’ task is to find algo-
rithms that can search through this in real time for signs of intelligent
signals, yet in an affordable way. He has been blind since birth, yet
he carries out the most abstruse, difficult mathematics in his head,
all the mathematics connected with communication theory and com-
puter algorithms. Dale Corson may be surprised to be mentioned in
connection with SETI, but he has been important through his role in
the construction and the upgrading of the Arecibo telescope reflector.
He helped make what is to this day and for the next few decades prob-
ably by far the largest radio telescope in the world. It is the preeminent
telescope for SETI, the one that gives us our greatest power, the one that
we wish to use the most. Project Phoenix has contributed about two
million dollars to the further upgrading of Arecibo now under way.
Dale Corson and the other people at Cornell have helped in other
ways. For example, Jill Cornell wanted to study engineering physics
at Cornell. In the will of Ezra Cornell it was specified that all male
descendants of Ezra Cornell shall be admitted to Cornell and will at-
tend free of all tuition. Jill inquired into this and its lack of political
correctness, and of course there was a great deal of discussion in the
back room about what to do. In the end, Dale Corson, as president, rec-
ognized the unfairness of that stipulation in the will, and quietly took
care of it all. As a result, Jill did attend Cornell on a full scholarship
and that was an important turning point for SETI, because without
Jill, SETI would be a much weaker endeavor.
51FIGURE 8.1
Radio receivers
used during the
1960 Ozma Project.
Frank D. Drake
‘As has become obvious, the name Cornell pops up repeatedly.
Many of the people active in SETI had their roots there: Phil Morri-
son, Carl Sagan, jill Tarter, myself, and others. This says, if you think
about it, that it's not really a result of chance but the result of the
fact that at Cornell University creativity and original ideas have been
nurtured and protected. Cornell has protected and nourished the pi-
oneers, the people who have interesting but unusual ideas, and from
that has come much of the university's greatness, not just in SETI, but
in many other areas.
What is another significance of SETI? SETI works as a motivator
for the development of the very best in frontier technology, particu-
larly in radio receiving systems. The first modern SETI system, used
in 1960 in Project Ozma, was rather simple. Even so, it cost $2,000
and occupied four banks of equipment, all using vacuum tubes, by
the way. See Figure 8.1. This was before the transistor was invented.
Itcould monitor one channel at atime. The people who did this exper-
iment are shown in Figure 8.2 at a reunion of a few years ago in front
of the 85-foot telescope where it took place. In the thirty-four years
since Project Ozma, other activities have joined SETI in motivating
the development of much better technology such as the Arecibo tele-
scope, which has one hundred times the collecting area of that of the
Ozma telescope. A picture of its great reflector is shown in Figure 8.3,Extraterrestrial Intelligence
ag
FIGURE 8.2
‘The Tatel 85-foot radio telescope in Green Bank, West Virginia, and the team that was
involved with the Ozma Project in 1960 (the author of this article is second from the right
standing).
the reflector reflecting rays to the suspended platform, which is right
now undergoing major alterations.
With the construction of such telescopes SETI has been given the
ability to detect signals from anywhere in the galaxy, signals no
stronger than we radiate. Many years ago it was recognized that the
real challenge to SETI was not sensitivity so much, but the ability toimage
not
availableExtraterrestrial Intelligence
search through all the possible frequency channels in the microwave
spectrum where signals might occur. That has led to the application
of some of the most brilliant minds on the planet, and an article is
presented by ono in the next chapter, to the development of systems,
affordable systems, which can achieve that task. A picture of one of the
very first is in Figure 8.4, using digital circuitry in this case to develop a
system that monitors about 68,000 channels at once. This system was
produced by Paul Horowitz, using mostly very simple off-the-shelf
components. Over the years, it has led to much more powerful and
complicated systems. These require special-purpose computer chips
that have been developed at the cost of about $300,000 for the first one.
After that, they cost $50 each, and they are about the size of a postage
stamp. They do eighty million flops and 220 million data transfers a
second, all to simulate a multichannel radio receiver. One such chip
has the same power as a Cray 1 supercomputer programmed to do
the same task. We have now incorporated these in our systems, forty-
seven of them, so we have in effect forty-seven Cray supercomputers
to produce the instruments of Project Phoenix. The equipment again
occupies four racks, just like the Ozma receiver did, but in this case
the total number of channels is fifty-six million. See Figure 8.5. This
system is 100 trillion times more powerful than what we had thirty-
four years ago. In fact, the doubling time for improvements has been
consistently 250 days; exponential growth has continued. The Project
Phoenix equipmentis in atrailer that can be carried ina large transport
plane. See Figure 8.6. Right now it is being readied to go to Australia for
six months of observations with the Parkes Telescope, the last chance
FIGURE 8.4
A digital system
that can monitor
68,000 spectral
channels at once.936 Frank D. Drake
——
FIGURE 8.5
The fity-six-
million channel
receiver used in
Project Phoenix.
FIGURE 8.6
The NASA trailer
containing the
Project Phoenix
complex
instrumentation
ready to be shipped
to the Parkes
radiotolescope in
AustraliaExtraterrestrial Intelligence
for many years to observe the southem candidate stars where we might
find an extraterrestrial intelligence signal.
SETI people are motivated to dream of much bigger systems. We
dream of great systems on Earth, as may be built some day as the
significance of SETI becomes more widely recognized. Perhaps there
will be SETI in space; systoms have boon in the eyes of the designers
for many years now. The ultimate dream is that we will achieve those
very profound results I mentioned earlier.
Lastly, there is one other significant aspect of SETI that Carl has
emphasized many times, which comes about when we do SETI and
construct messages such as the Pioneer 10 plaque. Carl and I invented
that one day during a coffee break in a corridor at a American Astro-
nomical Society meeting (I probably shouldn't reveal that; I probably
should say there were endless committee meetings and white papers
and planning documents, but that’s not so; it all happened over coffee
in a hotel). When we not only search but send messages to space, we
are actually sending messages to ourselves, reminding us of what hu-
man beings can achieve if they work together and use their talents in
the very best possible way. SETI sends a message to us that humans
can achieve great things. If we work hard enough we can join the com-
pany of other creatures in space and receive all of the great bounty
that will accrue when, finally, the discovery is made.
a7Extraterrestrial
Intelligence:
The Search Programs
PAUL HOROWITZ
Harvard University
The topic, “Extraterrestrial Intelligence: The Search Programs,” should
also include the searchers — you can’t really disembody the personali-
ties who motivated these searches and the people who did them from
the searches themselves. I'dlike tohighlight some of the giants of SETI,
and their predecessors — Hertz, Jansky, Purcell - names you don’t hear
so much nowadays. That means many pictures of people, their anten-
nas, and their equipment, and only a few equations or graphs.
In fact, let’s get the equations over with; Figure 9.1 illustrates SETI
Fact Number One: SETI is possible because, as each of us who have
become delighted with the subject has discovered rather early on,
radio communication is extraordinarily efficient. All of the equations
crammed into one figure. It’s an old calculation that those of us in
this business have all done, in one form or another: You take a pair of
modest-sized radio telescopes, a couple of hundred meters in diameter
(that’s smaller than the Arecibo dish, though not by a lot); you space
these apart a modest distance, let’s say a thousand light years; you
transmit a three-centimeter wave, say; and you ask, for a given amount
of energy transmitted, how much is received? Is this crazy scheme
going to work?
You calculate transmitted energy, areas, gains, and all that sort of
thing. And when you're done, you find that a dollar’s worth of energy
transmitted results in 4 x 10-1? ergs of energy received out there. Now
you should ask yourself, “Well, ten to the minus 12 ergs, not very
many ergs, and ergs are pretty darned small; is this even detectable?”
Well, you'd be right, it’s nota lot of energy; but the crucial point is that
the energy that it has to compete with is even less. The received signal
has to compete with cosmic noise, antenna noise, amplifier noise,
and so on. How large are these? The delightful fact is that, at these
microwave frequencies, you can build receiving systems with large
apertures (Arecibo-sized) whose equivalent thermal noise temperatureExtraterrestrial Intelligence ss
Galactic Communication via Microwaves?
vaaoal je sh
‘$1 = 1OKWh = 4x10’wart-sec = 4x10" erg
A (3) = 3x(104F = 3x108om?
= BRA, 4x3x3010°
* 4x i
7 a 10" (86dB!)
&
Re Aly, = 3x10"%3%107 = 10!em; 10001y. = 10em
410x410 acdc!
4x3x107
So, $1 transmitted = ugg * 10-er
Well?
Competes with thermal noise: k — 1.4%10" eng/deg
at = 3 om, can achieve T,, = SOK-100K. (sky is cold)
50, KT ~ I
FIGURE 9.1
Received energy is =400 kT! Asimple
oo calculation
If we choose bit rate & integration time so that each bit = 15 kT, demonstrates that
na 5 bitsleter
then we get ~ 25 “biwtuek: fe. communication by
In other words... microwaves is
“Interstellar Telegrams Cost $1/Word” extraordinarily
efficient.
is of the order of a hundred Kelvin or less. And that includes the
combined noise contributions of the dish, feeds, amplifier — the works.
It is an astronomical fact that the sky itself is extremely cold at these
frequencies (which, of course, motivates this choice of wavelength).
So, finally, the thermal fluctuation energy that this message has to
compete with is something like 10" ergs, four hundred times smaller
than the message itself. In other words, a dollar's worth of energy is100
FIGURE 9.2
Even with
technology no
betier than we have
now, galactic
‘communication is
a bargain (after
E. M. Purcell).
Paul Horowitz
INTERSTELLAR TELESENS
ARE CHEAP
Everey RAwATID PR BIT TRAMSHETTED + 0% kWh;
cosr PER weRD: FI.00
all it takes. For a dollar you've got four hundred times the fluctuation
energy at the receiving end. You pick your bit rate and coding so that
each bit is received at fifteen times the noise, say, and that gives you
something like twenty-five bits per buck received at the far end. If
you group these into letters of five bits each (don’t use ASCII; use
Baudot!), and if you speak in words of one syllable, you wind up with
the conclusion that interstellar telegrams are cheap (Figure 9.2, an
old slide of Ed Purcell’s). This is a remarkable, and essential, fact of
SETI - that an interstellar telegram out to a thousand light years costs
a mere dollar per word, and that's using only technology that we have
on earth now.
In fact, we have even larger dishes. The largest on earth is the great
1,000-foot Arecibo dish, with double the area of those I have been
discussing. With transmitters and receivers no better than we have
right now, two of these things could communicate anywhere across
the galaxy (assuming, of course, that they knew to point at each other
and to use the same wavelength). This fact is, for most people, coun-
terintuitive.
Fortunately for SETI, our galaxy is endowed with an ample supply
of candidate life sites; it is shown (Figure 9.3), somewhat simplified.
It contains something like four hundred thousand million stars, in
various colors. It’s a flattened disk a hundred thousand light years in
diamoter; we're out in the galactic suburbs, so to speak, at about thirty
thousand light years. The Sun is in the plane, as shown, in the middle
of a more or less uniform distribution of stars; there are roughly a
million stars like the Sun within a thousand light years. That is the
range within which we can communicate for a dollar per word.image
not
availableaa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.106 Paul Horowitz
FIGURE 9.7
‘The first antenna
on earth to detect
radio waves from
neutral hydrogen,
in space.
informed by radioscience and communication theory — the first search
that could have succeeded. Among several legacies of Frank's experi-
ment is the apparent mandate that SETI apparatus always occupy four
racks, I'll demonstrate this curious effect in subsequent photographs.
This opened the floodgates (or perhaps I should say the tricklegates)
for subsequent searches, most of which have been done at the hydro-
gen hyperfine frequency, or its near relatives. The traditional reason
one always hears is that signaling is most efficient in the centimetric
region of the spectrum (and it is). To be historically accurate, however,
we should note that Frank chose hydrogen for a different reason: He
wanted deniability ifaccused of wasting government money for crazy
research — this was, after all, a radioastronomy receiver.
But this is in fact the efficient wavelength regime. Drake showed
that there is no obvious advantage to short or long wavelengths, on the
basis of power delivered to a distant observer. What matters, of course,
is the competition — the galactic and atmospheric noise backgrounds,
which clearly favor contimetric wavelongths if you believe that an
efficient strategy is optimum.
Let's take now a quick tour through a rogue's gallery of searchers.
Palmer and Zuckerman were persistent guys using the NRAO 300-
foot radio telescope. They did 500 hours of searching, 674 stars, 21aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.Extraterrestrial Intelligence 114
Galactic Map of Candidate Events as of September 1994
+ Events seen on 2 different days (barycentric reference frame)
+ - Events seen on 2 different days with 2 detections per observation
(no reference frame assumptions)
5 ‘ cae FIGURE 9.11
sky visible from Arecibo; in fact, many positions are observed three, Peunat cents
four, or five times. The hardware is a four-megachannel Fourier spec- from two yoars of
trometer, observing at 430 megahertz. At this frequency one gets lots SERENDIP It's
of interference. parasitic operation
‘The idea is to take these seventy trillion signals coming in, and & Arecibo.
you look for regularities in frequency and space and time, rejecting
everything that smells like a rat: signals that stay on too long while
the antenna’s moving, signals that keep coming back at the same fre-
quency because they're from some local transmitter, and so on, and
in the end you wind up with a residuum of a few hundred interesting
events. Figure 9.11 shows the result of two years of running, about two
hundred fifty events that were seen on more than one occasion, The
statistics happen to be just at the level of chance, and none of these
has been seen three times (a single such instance of which would be
extremely improbable). This project was done at low cost and with
great elegance of design and execution.
Meanwhile, at Ohio State University (the antenna that looks like a
football field), the longest-running search has just increased its chan-
nel count by a factor of 100,000, with the receipt of a four-megachannel
system from Berkeley. A photograph of their upgraded receiver is in
Figure 9.12, sitting in the leftmost rack of the obligatory four racks
of equipment. Perhaps the most tantalizing candidate signal in SETI
came from Ohio's search, the celebrated WOW signal, which displayed
an uncanny match to the antenna’s beam profile as it drifted through.112
FIGURE 9.12
Four-megachannel
Berkeley
spectrometer at
Ohio State
University
observatory.
Paul Horowitz
This event has now occupied hundreds of observing hours in futile
attempts at reacquisition. These occasional wonderful signals have
been seen by just about every search, invariably operating in a mode
that makes immediate reobservation impractical. At the end, I will
comment on what should be done about things like that.
Hore's another ongoing experiment (Figure 9.13), the infrared ap-
paratus of Charlie Townes and Al Betz, looking for carbon dioxide
laser beacons. Charlie has always favored infrared and thinks the rest
of us are missing out on a good bet. This is elegant physics — they use
true coherent detection, in an optical heterodyne system.
Finally, our search (META) at Harvard and Buenos Aires, spon-
sored primarily by The Planetary Society. My son Jake (Figure 9.14),
when he was six years old, is pointing to the Cassegrain radome of the
equatorial 84-foot dish at Harvard, Massachusetts. Our apparatus is
shown in Figure 9.15, with its eight million channel analyzer, turned
on in 1985 with some fanfare (Figure 9.16). What you are seeing, from
left to right, is 1) the switch that would turn it on if anybody had a
hand on it; 2) the fellow who gave the money to build the stuff that
the switch turns on; 3) the fellow who talked this guy into giving the
money, and 4) one of the guys who built it
A second identical system (META Il) was built by the Argentines,
who shipped it to their 30-meter dish, where it is performing a search
of the southern sky, and also a set of simultaneous observations of the
portion of the sky visible from both observatories.
What have we found with these searches? Things like the WOW
event, things that go bump in the night, things that never come back.Extraterrestrial Intelligence
For instance, in Figure 9.17 is the result of the META search at Harvard,
10" channels examined, during five years of continuous observations.
Strong events that survive all tests for fishiness are plotted in this sky
plot (reported in Astrophysical Journal, 415, 218 [1993]); the larger
points are far too strong to be due to chance, whereas the smaller ones
are consistent with the statistical noise tail. What may be rather inter-
esting is the clustering of the five strongest signals in an apparently
nonrandom arrangement relative to the galactic plane. We've spent
many, many days on each one of these, in an attempt at reobservation,
and we haven't gotten any to come back. It’s like the cargo cults — we've
deployed telescopes, and we'd do anything (even build airstrips!) to
make those signals come back.
What can one conclude from three decades of negative results in
SETI? Of course, it would be much better to have found something —
we in the SETI business all wish we had magical results like those
that Ed Stone showed this morning from the spectacularly successful
program of planetary exploration. But in SETI you either get totally
magical results or nothing at all. Carl and I made an effort to extract
the most from the “nothing at all” of our search, and it goes something
like this: If you believe that there may be supercivilizations, in the
Kardashev sense (ones that extract all the energy of sunlight falling on
113
FIGURE 9.13
‘Ten-micron
infrared
heterodyne SETI at
Mount Wilson.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.Extraterrestrial Intelligence 117
tosen| 0 | O
FIGURE 9.17
Surviving events from 5 years of META. Filled circles are 1.4 GHz, open ciscles are 2.8
GHz: the five strongest events are shown as larger circles. The center of the Milky Way is
indicated by an X.
West
(following)
East
‘Antenna, (preceding)
pattern,
‘Apparent motion
of celestial
radio source
2
2 FIGURE 9.18
z Dual-beam transit
3 SETI. A third
§ channel, fed from
a low-gain all-sky
discone, provides
a velo.
Time =
shown in Table 9.2. With a table like this we can outrun even Frank's
optimistic projections. Kent even used Drakian units - ozmas and oz-
mas/second (Ozma kept Frank busy for 2 months, back in 1960) —
listed as logarithms, because the gains have been so spectacular. You
can see that the current and future systems. depending on the kind of
signal that you posit, are something between seven and fourteen or-
ders of magnitude improved over Ozma in sensitivity. That's not bad
for thirty years.118
Paul Horowitz
FIGURE 9.19
‘Two hundred fifty-
million-channel
spectometer for
SETI. BETA
operates et 40
billion operations
per second,
contains 3.4
gigabytes of RAM
serving over 200
processors, and
produces 250
MByte per second
of spectral data.
A last comment about these improving searches: we've all learned
from these once-a-month or once-in-the-middle-of-the-night events
that we've got to include much better schemes for the mitigation of ra-
dio frequency interference, occasional errors in the processors, and so
on; and we have to include means for quick follow-up, whether there's
an operator at the controls or not. All of us pursuing the SETI enter-
prise now know this well. Just to give an example, in our new BETA
system we've implemented a system with three horns, so that the sig-
nal has to display proper sidereal drift through the sky horns while
remaining undetected in the terrestrial antenna; BETA also uses re-
dundant processors, and it uses extensive parity checking. If a signal
passes these tests, the system responds by leapfrogging the antennaaa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.fe UE ea eee aoe eerste ey '
Peete eMC me Mu Mu ea Meme eRe em UL
rte Mea Rte eee a as ad
CCS CMe MS Mee em MeL Y
earls eM le Oe Me CUM) Lele
ee er seer el eo ae Te omer]
en eee Ce ae eur meen Ma ste ce Re ra
of articles by a distinguished team of authors, and covers the many
fee eee et UN meu eee Raia)
Beans
Deen Re OR eon Te
Re ot Om I eal Coe)
Ce ae eRe On te Me RCM Co]
EU eu Comte cae Mr)
Ree ee ROR Mee ie Mis rec eM ato
Coe eRe oie Oe RES ie Kd
Rec ne ee i Rr ue ht ae one)
eee ca ere Ua oats Rae eeu ie
Caan Rr Rank an ce
PTC uke SCS ae mL aC
een mee MCs Rim Imei ae)
exploration, the search for extraterrestrial life, or the role of science in
Dees ane e
Ce oe Me MN Sel: MAC LCL e eee LteLie esc oh LoL
Orr eMC sae Mae i ae Me UM cum re]
Ce USC TCC amn Nm co
RN aM uum ae mar ace
RMU aes UST a eee
SOI RC eum aRe ek mcs
D
5
Cover photo: NASA Hubble Space Telescope photograph P e
OR eee] A
J a * * CAMBRII
UNJVERSITY I
ee I)
,
G3 3
aaah)
ISBN 0-521-57603-2
9"780521"576037