International Journal of Innovative Research and Advanced Studies (IJIRAS)
Volume 5 Issue 3, March 2018                                                    ISSN: 2394-4404
  Noise And Health Evaluation Using Blood Pressure Measurement
                           As Indicator
                         NTE, F.U                                                              NTE, A.I.
 Environmental Physics, Department of Physics, Faculty of                  Clinical Psychologist UPTH, Department of
       Science, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria                   Neuropsychiatry, University of Port Harcourt Teaching
                                                                                            Hospital
       Abstract: Noise is considered by world health organization, WHO as the third most hazardous type of pollution. It is
  a silent killer in most uniformed society. The impact ranges from; physical, pathological and psychological. This study
  seeks to evaluate the noise impact on the University of Port Harcourt Science and engineering workshop. Using staff and
  industrial attachment students. The test involves their blood pressure variation with increasing sound level as index. The
  physics is that stressors like heat, light and sound can induce psychological expressions and constriction of muscles,
  which by Boyles law are psychological reactions associated with the noise stressors at a range of 90-110 dBA using a post-
  traumatic stress disorder Keame scale where applicable and other physical observations. The analysis of variance with P
  value of 0.682 and 0.343 for x < 90 dBA and y > 110 dBA for a five minute exposure shows no significant difference in
  blood pressure measurement. The psychological impact evaluation shows level of restlessness and loss of concentration at
  100 dBA. There are study indicative that long term exposure can aggravate health condition and hearing loss which was
  avoided in this preliminary research.
                   I.   INTRODUCTION                                   In another development, Ising and Michalak (2004) assert
                                                                  that the systolic BP Reponses to moderate noise in field
     The subject noise is highly topical and controversial        conditions were more consistent than those intense noise in a
because of individual differences and adaptation, health          Laboratory on same individual due to environmental influence
challenges and overriding economic interest of those that         while using et al (2004) claimed that emotional responses such
generate the noise.                                               as anger or fear may magnify and prolong the effect of the
     The noise which is a wave function can be;                   noise. In other development Carter et al (2002) discovered that
 Intermittent e.g. ringing of telephone,                         sleep laboratory (BP) and heart rate (HR) were traced after
 Fluctuating in nature e.g motor traffic                         acoustic stimuli or recorded transport noise arousal.
 Steady source e.g generators and transformers                        From a social study angle, Blanc et al (1997) found that
 Impulsive e.g drilling, welding, fire arms and handling of      both systolic and diastolic BP level as well as heart rate HR
     materials, all of which have different impact on health.     increased with higher noise level during the preceding minutes
     This study focuses on the impact of varying steady noise     which is indicative that persistent noise affect health more.
level on the blood pressure of the University of Port Harcourt         On the compliment Dave et al (1993) conducted studies
Science and Engineering Staff and Students, using a range of      on five subjects groups and found an increase in diastolic BP
50-110 dBA Sound level. Along the line of studies, Fogari et al   from 4 to 6mmHg associated with arousal according to sleep
(2001) with other scholars claimed that workers exposed to        stages.
high-level industrial noise and having their BP Measured via           There are however major differences between Laboratory
ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) Showed BP increase                and real life condition. For instance in real life condition, other
during exposure to noise for a few hours.                         fluctuating noise have its side effect. Many factors apart from
                                                                  the environmental element determine noise impact.
Page 234                                        www.ijiras.com | Email: contact@ijiras.com
              International Journal of Innovative Research and Advanced Studies (IJIRAS)
                                      Volume 5 Issue 3, March 2018                                                            ISSN: 2394-4404
 Haralabidise et al (2008) claimed that illness that can affect BP                  The analysis shows that there is no significant difference
 measurement include the following medication and conditions;                   between the health impact of the noise using BP before and
  Antihypertensive medication                                                  during exposure with varying noise level, since p-values is
  Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus                                               0.343 greater than the α level of significance at 0.05
  Diagnosis of obstructive sleep sponoea syndromes
  Working in night shift
  Using sleeping pills and sedative                                                            IV. ANALYSIS OF RESULT
  Diagnosis of hearing impairment
  Regular use of earplugs or exposed to industrial noise                            The experiment within the bound of 100-110d BA for a 5
  Diagnosis of atrial fibrillation                                             minutes exposure shows there is no significant difference in
     Effort is made to use the experiences of the past study                    the BP rise since p value of 0.682 for X and 0.343 for Y are
 group to guide the present experiment by limiting our self to                  greater than the level of significance at 0.05. The
 11OdBA within a five to ten munities exposure to play safe on                  psychological studies however shows that the sound above
 standards.                                                                     100dBA was painful to the ear which informed the decision to
     Other related studies include. Gary et al (2007), Singh and                limit the exposure of the study persons to five minutes to
 Davo, (2010), Ising and Kruppa (2004) and Babisch (2005).                      accommodate their threshold tolerance.
                 II. MATERIALS AND METHOD                                            V. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
      The three most significant equipment in this study are the                     The theory of possible BP rise with sound level rise is
 electronic sphygmomanometer for measuring the blood                            centered on the claim that harmful stimuli causes blood vessels
 pressure before and during treatment, the audio source which is                to contract as a defence mechanism thereby making the hairs to
 a sonic media stereo, and a digital noise level meter for                      stand erect which is observable. With increase heart rate over
 measuring the noise level, supported by a noise dosimeter. The                 the contracted blood vessels there is bound to be an increase in
 screened candidates were moved to the electrical and                           BP by the application of Boyles law which stresses that the
 electronics section of the workshop where they were exposed                    pressure „P‟ of a system is inversely proportional to the volume
 to an alarm noise source of 50d BA to 110 dBA for a space of                   „V”.
 5 to 10 minutes while the reading where taken.                                      The fact that the study recorded no significant difference
                                                                                in the BP rise is indicative that most BP challenge has a
                                                                                pathological origin which is aggravated by the environmental
                             III. RESULTS                                       stressors, such as noise and not the other way round. The time
                                                                                of exposure and the pain taken to select healthy young persons
     This study tries to look at the health impact of the noise                 for the trial may not give the same effect like the industrial
 using the blood pressure4 level before and during exposure                     noise and its impact on communities which is a mixed setting
 with varying noise level as an index.                                          over a longer period of exposure.
     „C‟ = 50-60dBA which is the control, x≤ 90dBA, y ≤
 110dBA for a 5 to 10 minutes exposure.
                                                                                                        REFERENCES
      RESULTS
                                                                                [1] Babisch W. (2005). Updated review of the relationship
     Table 1 Paired Samples Statistics „C‟ with „x‟                                 between transportation noise and cardiovascular risk.
                      Mean      N         Std.      Std. Error                      Twelfth International Congress on Sound and Vibration,
                                      Deviation       Mean                          11-14 July, 2005. Lisbon
     BLOOD            1.7968    40      .20554       .03250                     [2] Blanc J. Baudrie V, Tulen J, poncho P, Gaudet E, Elghozi
    PRESSURE         1.88186 40         .28333       .04480                         JL (1997). Social Isolation affects the pattern of
   BEFORE AND                                                                       cardiovascular responses. To repetitive acoustic startle
   AFTER 90 Dba                                                                     stimutiClinExppharmacotphysiol 1997;24:40-45
    EXPOSURE                                                                    [3] Carter N, Henderson R, Lai S. Hart M, Booth S Hunyor,
                            Table 1                                                 S. (2002). Cardiovascular and autonomic response to
     Tabled Paired Samples Test „C‟ with „x‟                                        environmental noise during sleep in night shift workers.
                              Paired Differences              T   Df Sig. (2-       Sleep 2002; 25:457-464
                     Mean    Std.    Std.         95%                tailed)    [4] Chambers R. (1994). The Origin and practice of
                            Deviatio Error confidence                               participatory Rural Appraisal. Pergaman printers, Great
                               n     Mean Interval of the
                                              differences
                                                                                    Britain. Vol. 22,pp 953-989.
                                                                                [5] Davies RJ, Boberts SJ, AL, NJ, straddling JR. (1993).
                                              Lower Upper                           Arterial blood pressure responses to graded transient
Pair 1 Blood pressure      -   .33474 .05293 -.12890 .0520 -.413 39    .682         arousal from sleep in normal humans. J ApplPhysiol
       before and after .02185
           90dBA                                                                    1993;74:1123-1130
                                 Table 2
 Page 235                                                   www.ijiras.com | Email: contact@ijiras.com
           International Journal of Innovative Research and Advanced Studies (IJIRAS)
                                   Volume 5 Issue 3, March 2018                                                 ISSN: 2394-4404
[6] Fogari R, Zoppi A, Corradi L, Marasi G. Vanasia A,            [10] Ising H and B. Kruppa (2004): Health Effects Caused by
    Zanchetti A.(2001). Transient but not sustained blood              Noise: Evidence in the literature from the past 25 years.
    pressure increments by occupational noise. An                      Noise and health, 2004, 6;22,5-13NDES (1997) Niger
    ambulatory blood pressure measurement study. J                     Delta Environmental Survey phase II participatory Rural
    Hypertens 2001; 19:1021- 1027.                                     Development and participatory learning and action.
[7] Gary, N.K. Gupta, V.K. &Vyas R.K. (2007) “Noise                    PRA/PLA Nigeria.
    Pollution and its impact on urban life” Journal               [11] Ising H, and Michalak R. (2004). Stress effects of noise in
    Environmental Research Development 1(3), 290-296                   a field experiment in comparison to reactions to short
[8] Haralabidis, A.S, Dimakopoulou, K, Vigna - Taglianti, F            term noise exposure in the Laboratory. Noise Health
    et al (2008). Acute effects of night time noise exposure on        2004:6:1-7
    blood pressure in populations living near airports.           [12] Singh, V. and Dave, P. (2010) , Environmental impact of
    European heart Journal (29)658-164                                 noise pollution, A case study in S Saharanpur City,
[9] Haralabidisetal (2008) precautions of illness that affect          Western Uttar Pradesh, India International Journal of
    BP measurement. European heart Journal method,                     earth science and Engineering 3(6)874.
Page 236                                        www.ijiras.com | Email: contact@ijiras.com