Geology 1999 CV M
Geology 1999 CV M
of volcanism awaits a systematic geologic map- unpublished dates obtained during an ongoing
ra
M
ping, which is still to be undertaken in several project for the first geologic map of the entire
ad
re
areas of Mexico. Nevertheless, isotopic age Mexican Volcanic Belt are also used. The data- North American
Oc
plate
determinations, which have nearly doubled in the base currently contains 825 entries; ~15% of
c
id
en
past decade, can provide a first definition of the them are unpublished. These data are available
tal
Pacific plate
Neogene evolution of arc volcanism in central through the GSA data repository1.
Mexico. In this work, we use the most updated As any compilation of this type, one may be Rivera MVB
20° plate
compilation of isotopic ages for central Mexico concerned that data could be biased by over-
to analyze the variation in time and space of the sampling of a particular unit or by low-quality data.
continental volcanism in relation with the evolu- 0 500 km Cocos
tion of the subduction system and to solve the plate
1Data Repository item 9928, Compilation of ages
long-debated problem of the age of the waning of rocks in Central Mexico, is available from Docu- Figure 1. Geodynamic setting of Mexico show-
ments Secretary, GSA, P.O. Box 9140, Boulder, CO ing main Cenozoic volcanic provinces. MVB—
*E-mail: luca@servidor.unam.mx. 80301. Mexican Volcanic Belt.
Data Repository item 9928 contains additional material related to this article.
24
#
38 - 25 Ma 25 - 17 Ma
####
#### # #
# #
## # # # ##
# ###
# #
#
#
# #
# #
# #
# #
# # ###
# #### ## #
# ##
### #
# # # ## # #
# # #
# # #
#
22
# #
#
# # # ##
# # # #
## #
# #
# # #
# #
# # # # # # #
# # # #
##
# #
# #
# #
#
## # #
### # # #
# #
# # #
#
# # #
# #
#
20
#
#
#
#
#
# #
# # #
#
## # # #
# # #
#
# #
#
##
# # # # #
18
# #
#
#
#
#
#
# # #
# ##
# # ### #
#
### ##
# # #
# # #
#
n=146 n=92
#
# #
#
#
16
#
# #
a b
20
# # #
# #
# ## # #
# # # #
# # # ## #
## ## # # #
#
based on envelope of ## # # #
# #
# ## # #
# #
#
#
# #
# #
# #
in text. Gto.—Guanajuato, 16
#
#
#
Zacatecas
#
24
##
## ## #
7 - 0 Ma
#### #
# ## # # # #
# #### # #
### #
# #
#
# # #
# #
#
# # #
#
# #
Nayarit
# #
S.Luis Potosí
#
# #
#
22 #
# # ##
##
##
##
# ##
###
#
##
##
##
#
#
# #
#
#
#
#
#
# ## # # # ## #
Gto.
## # ## # # ## #
## ### ## # # # # #
# # #
##
# ## # ### ### # #
#
# # #
#
Qro.
###
##
## #### # # #
# ###
## # # ######
# # # #
# ## #
## ## ## ## #
## # ###### #
## # ## # #
# ### #
## ## # # # ## # # # #
#
# ## # # ### ### ## # # # #
## # # #
# # ### ### ### #
# ## #
# #
# ## # # # #### ### ##
# # # # #
### # # #
# # # ## # # #######
#### ## # ##
# # # # ### # # # ## # # # # ## ## #
## # # # ## # # #
# ## # # ## # # #
## # # # # #
## # # # # ## # ## ## ###### # # ## # #
### # ##
# # ## # # # # ### ## # #
#
## # # # # ## # #
## # # # ### # ##
20
# # ## ## # # # # ## # ##
## ## ## # #
# # ## # # ## ## # ## ## #
#
#
# # # ## ####### #
## ## ## # # ## ##
# ## #######
#
#### ### ## #### # ### # # ## # #
## #
# #
Jalisco
# # # # # ### ##### ## ### # # # # # # ## # #
## # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # ## #
# ## # # # # # #
# # ## # # #### ## #
### # ## # # ## ## ### # # ### # # #
## # #####
### # ## # # # ## # # # # ######### #
# # ## # #
# ## ##
#### # # ## # # # #
###
# ## # ## ##
###
#### # #
## #
# ## # # # # # ## # # ## # # ####
### ##
### # ## ## # ## # # ## #
# # # #
# ## # # ## # # # ## ##
# # ### # #
# #
# ##
# # # # # # # #
# #### # # # #
# # # # # # # # ### ## # # # #
# ## # # ## # # # #
# # ### #
## # #
## #
Ver
#
# ####
## # #
## #
Michoacán
##
a
# #
cru
# #
Puebla
# #
# ##
## # #
z
# # ## # # # ## # #
# # ## #
#
# #### # ##
18
# # # #### #
#
# # # # # ##
# # # #
# #
#
##
Guerrero
# #
# ##
# # # ## #
#
## # #
# ## #
n=368
# # #
#
#
Oaxaca
# #
# #
16
#
#
# #
data presented here show an abrupt cessation of 1979), and has been recently documented that Composition of dated rocks
volcanism south of lat 18° and a landward jump of most of the silicic volcanism in Guanajuato, San 100
% of Mafic to Intermediate vs. Silicic
the volcanic front during the early Miocene Luis Potosí, and Zacatecas also occurred be- 90
(Fig. 3b); they also show a volcanic front close to tween 31 and 28 Ma (Nieto-Samaniego et al., 80
70 Silicic
the present position by the middle Miocene 1999). The second peak at ca. 23 Ma is corrobo-
60
(Fig. 3c). Based on these observations, we pro- rated by over 1000 m of silicic ignimbrite with
50
pose that the shallowing of the subducting slab this age found in southern Durango (El Salto 40
occurred during early to middle Miocene. sequence, McDowell and Keizer, 1977), north- 30
ern Jalisco (Bolaños area, Scheubel et al., 1988), Mafic to intermediate
20
IS VOLCANISM REALLY EPISODIC? and northeastern Nayarit (Ferrari, unpublished 10
Although we lack systematic volumetric esti- data), which account for about 80% of the vol- 0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
mations of volcanic rocks per time interval, sev- canism in these areas. In the Mexican Volcanic Age (Ma)
eral observations indicate that most of the peaks Belt, a late Miocene mafic pulse is substantiated
Figure 4. Variation of composition of dated
of isotopic ages shown on Figure 2 reflect real by 10.5 to 9 Ma basaltic successions, over 800 m
rocks, expressed as percentage of rocks hav-
pulses of intense volcanic activity. First of all, the thick in places, which cover ≈3500 km3 in ing mafic to intermediate versus silicic com-
geographic coverage of the database (Fig. 3f) is Nayarit and Jalisco (Ferrari et al., 1997) and for position per 1 m.y. intervals. Mafic to inter-
very good, at least for the central part of the study which we estimate a volume 2 to 3 times larger mediate—basaltic to dacite, silicic—rhyolite
area. Other geologic observations can support the than the volcanic rocks emplaced from 8 to 5 Ma. (SiO2 > 63%). Note rapid change from silicic to
intermediate-mafic varieties during middle
episodicity of volcanism. A pulse at ca. 30 Ma is A volcanic pulse in the last 5 m.y. is more diffi- Miocene. Smoothing (bold line) obtained by
well known in the Sierra Madre Occidental to the cult to evaluate because the database is clearly averaging two adjacent values. Same data
north of the study area (McDowell and Clabaugh, biased by the large number of dates obtained for subset as in Figures 2 and 3.