Jurnal Reading
Jurnal Reading
aDepartment of Pediatrics, Brown Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island; bDepartment of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana;
cCenter for Research for Mothers and Children, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Rockville, Maryland; dRTI International, Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina
The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE. Beneficial effects of breast milk on cognitive skills and behavior ratings
have been demonstrated previously in term and very low birth weight infants.
                                                                                                                               www.pediatrics.org/cgi/doi/10.1542/
Extremely low birth weight infants are known to be at increased risk for devel-                                                peds.2005-2382
opmental and behavior morbidities. The benefits of breast milk that is ingested in                                             doi:10.1542/peds.2005-2382
the NICU by extremely low birth weight infants on development and behavior
                                                                                                                               Key Words
have not been evaluated previously.                                                                                            human milk, extremely low birth weight,
                                                                                                                               Bayley, outcomes
METHODS. Nutrition data including enteral and parenteral feeds were collected pro-
                                                                                                                               Abbreviations
spectively, and follow-up assessments of 1035 extremely low birth weight infants                                               LC-PUFA—long-chain polyunsaturated
at 18 months’ corrected age were completed at 15 sites that were participants in                                               fatty acids
                                                                                                                               ELBW— extremely low birth weight
the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research                                                 AAP—American Academy of Pediatrics
Network Glutamine Trial between October 14, 1999, and June 25, 2001. Total                                                     CA— corrected age
                                                                                                                               NICHD—National Institute of Child Health
volume of breast milk feeds (mL/kg per day) during hospitalization was calculated.                                             and Human Development
Neonatal characteristics and morbidities, interim history, and neurodevelopmental                                              BSID II—Bayley Scales of Infant
                                                                                                                               Development II
and growth outcomes at 18 to 22 months’ corrected age were assessed.
                                                                                                                               BRS—Behavior Rating Scale
                                                                                                                               MDI—Mental Development Index
RESULTS. There were 775 (74.9%) infants in the breast milk and 260 (25.1%) infants
                                                                                                                               PSI—Psychomotor Development Index
in the no breast milk group. Infants in the breast milk group were similar to those                                            VLBW—very low birth weight
in the no breast milk group in every neonatal characteristic and morbidity,                                                    Accepted for publication Jan 31, 2006
including number of days of hospitalization. Mean age of first day of breast milk for                                          Address correspondence to Betty R. Vohr, MD,
                                                                                                                               Women and Infants Hospital, 101 Dudley St,
the breast milk infants was 9.3 ⫾ 9 days. Infants in the breast milk group began to                                            Providence, RI 02905. E-mail: Betty_Vohr@
ingest non– breast milk formula later (22.8 vs 7.3 days) compared with the non–                                                brown.edu
breast milk group. Age at achieving full enteral feeds was similar between the                                                 PEDIATRICS (ISSN Numbers: Print, 0031-4005;
                                                                                                                               Online, 1098-4275). Copyright © 2006 by the
breast milk and non– breast milk groups (29.0 ⫾ 18 vs 27.4 ⫾ 15). Energy intakes                                               American Academy of Pediatrics
of 107.5 kg/day and 105.9 kg/day during the hospitalization did not differ between
the breast milk and non– breast milk groups, respectively. At discharge, 30.6% of
e116   VOHR et al
                           Downloaded from http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/ by guest on October 18, 2017
work between October 1999 and June 2001. A total of                    months’ CA.32 BSID II scores of 100 ⫾ 15 represent the
251 infants died before discharge, and 23 infants died                 mean ⫾ 1 SD. An abnormal score (⬍70) is ⬎2 SD below
before the 18-month visit. A total of 124 infants were                 the mean. BRS percentile scores range from 1 to 99;
lost to follow-up. The final sample consisted of 1035                  scores of 11 to 25 are considered questionable, and
(89.4%) of 1159 ELBW infant survivors on whom fol-                     scores of 1 to 10 are nonoptimal.
low-up data were available. Mothers of infants who                        The primary caregiver or adult who brought the child
were seen in follow-up were more likely to have re-                    for the visit stayed with the child during the BSID II
ceived prenatal care than mothers of infants who were                  examination, which was administered early in the clinic
not seen (93% vs 86%; P ⬍ .01, respectively). There                    visit before the medical assessment and interviews. Ex-
were no differences in infant characteristics or morbidi-              aminers were not able to administer parts or all of the
ties between those who were and were not seen in                       BSID II successfully to 95 children who were seen. The
follow-up.                                                             following reasons were given: acute illness (n ⫽ 10),
    The Glutamine Trial encouraged early parenteral nu-                language barrier (n ⫽ 2), behavior problem (n ⫽ 24),
trition but did not prescribe an enteral feeding protocol.             developmental delay (n ⫽ 18), and other (n ⫽ 41). The
Nutrition data were collected daily until the infants were             other category included children who had sensory loss
on full enteral feeds (ⱖ462 kJ/kg per day). Thereafter,                (blindness or deafness) and could not be administered
data were collected on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday                   the BSID II items. These data therefore were not in-
of each week until discharge or 120 days; values were                  cluded in the analysis. Although every effort was made
interpolated for days of the week on which the data                    to test children within the window of 18 to 22 months’
were not collected: Tuesday data were the weighted                     CA, 22 infants were evaluated outside the window be-
average of Monday and Wednesday data. The total vol-                   cause of illness or tracking issues. These data were in-
ume of breast milk feeds per kilogram per day for the                  cluded because the BSID II is age adjusted.
duration of hospitalization was calculated. A total of 775                Social and economic status information, including
(74.9%) of the infants received some breast milk during                maternal and paternal education and occupation, mari-
their NICU hospitalization. None of the centers used                   tal status, insurance status, and income level, and a
banked breast milk during the trial. The proportion of                 detailed interim medical history, including data on hear-
infants who received breast milk feeds at centers ranged               ing and vision status, were obtained. Hearing status in-
from a low of 39.1% to a high of 97.3%. Information                    formation was obtained from the parent and follow-up
was not collected on breast milk ingestion after dis-                  audiologic test results when available. Hearing impair-
charge. Neonatal characteristics and morbidities were                  ment was defined as use of hearing aids. A history of
collected, including gestational age by best obstetric es-             postdischarge eye examinations and procedures was ob-
timate, birth weight, and neonatal course. Institutional               tained from the parent. In addition, a standard eye ex-
Review Board approval and informed consent were ob-                    amination was completed to evaluate tracking, esotro-
tained as previously described.36                                      pia, nystagmus, or roving eye movements. Blind was
    Infants were evaluated at 18 to 22 months’ CA. The                 defined as functional corrected vision ⬍20/200.
assessment included standardized interim medical his-                     Statistical analyses were completed by RTI Interna-
tory, a developmental evaluation, neurologic assess-                   tional. Bivariate analyses for group differences (any
ment, and physical examination that included growth                    breast milk versus no breast milk) consisted of t tests, 2,
parameters.32 A neurologic examination that was based                  or Fisher’s exact tests. We evaluated the relationship
on the Amiel-Tison37 assessment was performed by cer-                  between breast milk feeding and developmental out-
tified examiners. The neurologic assessment included an                comes in 3 ways: (1) whether any breast milk feeding
evaluation of tone, strength, reflexes, angles, and pos-               was beneficial (breast milk yes versus breast milk no),
ture. Infants were scored as normal when no abnormal-                  (2) whether the amount of breast milk feeding was
ities were observed in the neurologic examination. Ce-                 associated with better developmental outcomes (breast
rebral palsy was defined as a nonprogressive central                   milk as a continuous variable), and (3) whether there
nervous system disorder characterized by abnormal                      was a threshold beyond which breast milk feeding pro-
muscle tone in at least 1 extremity and abnormal control               vided benefits. Infants who received breast milk were
of movement and posture.                                               divided into quintiles of mean intake of breast milk per
    The Bayley Scales of Infant Development II (BSID                   kilogram per day during the entire hospitalization, in-
II),35 including the Mental Scale, Motor Scale, and the                cluding 0 for days with no intake, for analysis. Mean
Behavior Rating Scale (BRS), were administered by                      volume of human milk (mL/kg per day) for the entire
testers who were trained to reliability by 1 of 4 study                hospitalization was entered as a continuous variable.
Gold Standard examiners. Examiner certification at sites               Multivariate analyses to evaluate the effects of breast
was obtained by the successful completion of 2 video-                  milk on outcomes consisted of multiple linear-regression
taped demonstrations of accurate performance and scor-                 and logistic-regression analyses. Adjustments were made
ing of the BSID II on preterm children at 18 to 22                     for the following confounders: mother’s age, education,
e118        VOHR et al
                                          Downloaded from http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/ by guest on October 18, 2017
                              TABLE 3 Outcomes by Breast Milk Feeding
                                            Outcomes                                 Breast Milk, n (%)                No Breast Milk, n (%)                 Adjusted P
                                                                                      or Mean ⫾ SD                        or Mean ⫾ SD
                            MDI                                                          79.9 ⫾ 18                             75.8 ⫾ 16                        .0709
                            MDI ⬍85                                                      421 (58.1)                            168 (70.9)                       .0355
                            PDI                                                          84.6 ⫾ 19                             81.3 ⫾ 17                        .0227
                            PDI ⬍85                                                      307 (42.9)                            116 (49.2)                       .0939
                            BRS
                               Orientation/engagement                                    53.8 ⫾ 30                             48.5 ⫾ 29                        .0351
                               Emotional regulation                                      53.0 ⫾ 29                             47.1 ⫾ 29                        .0825
                               Motor quality                                             50.1 ⫾ 35                             44.1 ⫾ 33                        .0296
                               Total                                                     52.0 ⫾ 31                             45.6 ⫾ 30                        .0280
                            Blind in both eyes                                              4 (0.5)                               0 (0.0)                       .5773a
                            Hearing aids                                                    9 (1.2)                               4 (1.6)                       .7472a
                            Cerebral palsy (moderate/severe)                              43 (5.6)                              16 (6.2)                        .7327a
                            Rehospitalizations before first birthday                      180 (23.3)                             78 (30.1)                       .028
                            Adjustments were made for the following confounders: mother’s age, education, marital status, and race and infant’s gestation, gender, sepsis,
                            IVH 3 to 4, PVL, O2 at 36 weeks, necrotizing enterocolitis, weight ⬍10th percentile at 18 months, and volume of breast milk (mL/kg per day) for
                            every day of hospitalization (a continuous variable).
                            a Unadjusted P.
 TABLE 4 Effect of Breast Milk Feeding (mL/kg per day) on                                             no breast milk group. Breast milk intake by quintile
         Developmental Outcomes and Rehospitalization: Multiple                                       ranged from 1.0 mL/kg per day to 110.6 mL/kg per day.
         Regression Results                                                                           In addition, total breast milk on days when only breast
                     Outcomes                                  Parameter                 P            milk was ingested was calculated and ranged from 22.1
                                                                Estimate                              mL/kg per day to 124.0 mL/kg per d. The proportion of
MDI                                                                 0.53               .0002          infants who were discharged on breast milk ranged from
PDI                                                                 0.63              ⬍.0001          ⬃0.7% for the lowest quintile to 85.1% for the highest
BRS                                                                 0.82               .0025
                                                                                                      quintile. Mean Bayley MDI, PDI, and BRS were calcu-
Logistic regression                                                 OR                95% CI          lated for the quintiles, and the relationship between
Rehospitalization for infection or respiratory                      0.94             0.90–0.98        BSID II scores and quintiles of breast milk are shown.
  morbidity
                                                                                                      For MDI, there was a 13.1-point difference between
Estimates are adjusted for standard covariates listed previously. OR indicates odds ratio; CI,
confidence interval.
                                                                                                      ⱕ20th quintile and ⬎80th quintile, and for PDI, there
                                                                                                      was an 8.8-point difference between ⱕ20th quintile
                                                                                                      and ⬎80th quintile. Overall, the differences across the
milk on all of our study outcomes remained significant.                                               feeding quintiles of MDI and PDI were significant (mod-
(data not shown).                                                                                     el-adjusted P ⬍ .0044 and P ⬍ .0027, respectively).
    In an effort to identify a threshold effect of breast milk                                        There was a 14.0% difference in BRS scores between the
on Bayley MDI and PDI scores and BRS percentile                                                       lowest and highest quintiles (P ⬍ .028). For the out-
scores, we calculated the mean volume of breast milk                                                  comes presented in Table 4 (MDI, PDI, BRS, and Rehos-
per kilogram per day during the hospitalization, and                                                  pitalization ⬍1 year), only the values for the ⬎80th
infants in the breast milk group were divided into quin-                                              percentile of breast milk feeding are significantly differ-
tiles of breast milk ingestion adjusted for confounders as                                            ent from the no breast milk values at P ⬍ .01 within the
shown in Table 5. Quintiles were analyzed relative to the                                             multiple-regression analyses. The values for MDI, PDI,
 TABLE 5 Breast Milk Feeding Measures, Developmental Outcomes, and Rehospitalization by Quintiles of Breast Milk Intake During
         Hospitalization
                                                                                 No Breast Milk                                        Percentile                                  Adjusted P
                                                                                                       ⱕ20th        20th–40th         40th–60th         60th–80th         ⬎80th
Total breast milk (mL/kg per day) for every day of hospitalization                      0.0               1.0            7.3                24.0            63.8          110.6      —
Total breast milk (mL/kg per day) on days breast milk received                          0.0              22.1           45.0                66.8            95.3          124.0      —
% Discharged on breast milk                                                             0.0               0.7            2.1                 8.6            40.2           85.1      —
Mean MDI score                                                                         75.8              74.2           76.9                78.3            80.4           87.3a    ⬍.0044
Mean PDI score                                                                         81.3              80.6           82.7                84.2            84.4           89.4a     .0027
Mean total BRS percentile score                                                        45.6              44.8           52.1                50.1            51.8           58.8a     .0281
Rehospitalized ⬍1 y                                                                    30.2              25.2           32.2                26.0            23.2           12.7a     .0460
a Value   significantly different from no breast milk value at P ⬍ .01.
e120   VOHR et al
                           Downloaded from http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/ by guest on October 18, 2017
and none are breastfeeding exclusively. Differences in                 optimize outcomes and decrease costs by decreasing the
parenting style and maternal intelligence, which were                  number of VLBW children who required special educa-
not a part of this study protocol, also have been proposed             tion services. Lucas et al5 reported that increased volume
to be important. These factors are difficult to measure                of breast milk was significantly associated with higher
and cannot be ruled out. Our results, however, were                    test scores in VLBW infants and that effects remained
adjusted for maternal education. Another factor that was               significant at 7.5 to 8 years of age. Although critics of
not evaluated is that there is greater bioavailability of              breast milk studies have suggested that higher family
protein in breast milk compared with formula. The                      socioeconomic status is the major contributor to higher
fourth proposed mechanism is the role of specific com-                 developmental scores, both in our own cohort and in
ponents of breast milk, including LC-PUFA (arachidonic                 that of Lucas et al,5 breast milk effects remained signifi-
acid and docosahexanoic acid), choline, glycoproteins,                 cant after adjustment of measures of socioeconomic sta-
phospholipids, growth factors, and hormones, on cogni-                 tus confounders. A limitation of our study is that we did
tive function.20,36,49–51 These mechanisms may comple-                 not assess maternal IQ. The potential long-term benefit
ment each other.                                                       of receiving breast milk in the NICU for the ELBW infant
    Our findings suggest that the effects of breast milk on            and family may be to optimize cognitive potential and to
the ELBW population are similar to that previously                     reduce the needs for early intervention and special ed-
found in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants.1–6 The                  ucation services. Long-term follow-up of ELBW infants
mean gestation of infants in our study was lower at 26.6               is needed to determine whether these effects persist at
weeks. We speculate that the 12 to 14 weeks before term                school age. A weakness of this study is that we do not
may be an important window of opportunity for this                     have data on use of breast milk after discharge, and we
vulnerable population of infants. Active brain develop-                do not have specific information on the home environ-
ment, neurogenesis, migration, and synaptogenesis oc-                  ment.
cur during this time, and brain development may be
particularly responsive to “maternal nutrition.” Previous              CONCLUSION
studies have shown beneficial effects of arachidonic acid              The provision of breast milk to ELBW infants during the
and docosahexanoic acid in breast milk on neurodevel-                  neonatal period is an easy-to-implement, cost-effective
opment.20–24,26–29 During the study period, preterm for-               intervention with a potential payoff that includes better
mulas with these nutrients were not available. Addi-                   developmental outcomes, more optimal behavior, and
tional prospective studies need to be initiated to examine             fewer rehospitalizations.
the relationships between breast milk ingestion and
brain development before term and after discharge.                     ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    Strengths of the study include the large study popu-               Members of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network:
lation, the detailed nutritional intake data collected, and            Alan Jobe, MD, PhD, Chairman*; University of Cincin-
the finding of breast milk effects after controlling for               nati, University of California at San Diego (U10
known environmental and biological confounders. The                    HD40461): Neil N. Finer, MD*, Yvonne Vaucher, MD‡,
13.1-point difference in Bayley MDI scores (74.2– 87.3)                Chris Henderson, RCP, Martha Fuller, RN, MSN; Case
between the lowest and highest quintiles adjusted for                  Western Reserve University (U10 HD21364), Avroy A.
environmental confounders at 18 months is remarkable                   Fanaroff, MB, BCh*, Dee Wilson, MD‡, Nancy Newman,
and provides a measure of the gap between those with                   RN, Bonnie Siner, RN; University of Cincinnati (U10
the highest and lowest amount of breast milk feeding. In               HD27853, M01 RR 08084): Edward F. Donovan, MD*,
our regression analyses adjusted for important maternal                Jean Steichen, MD‡, Marcia Mersmann, RN, Teresa
social/environmental and infant biological confounders,                Gratton, RN; Emory University (U10 HD27851): Barbara
every 10 mL/kg per day of breast milk contributed 0.53                 J. Stoll, MD*, Ira Adams-Chapman, MD‡, Ellen Hale,
points to the Bayley MDI. Therefore the impact on the                  RN; Indiana University (U10 HD27856, M01 RR 00750):
Bayley MDI of breast milk for infants who were in the                  James A. Lemons, MD*, Anna Dusick, MD‡, Lucy
highest quintile and ingested 110 mL/kg per day would                  Miller, RN, Leslie Richard, MD; University of Miami
be 10 ⫻ 0.53, or 5.3 points. The societal implications of              (U10 HD21397): Shahnaz Duara, MD*, Charles R.
a 5-point potential difference (one third of an SD) in IQ              Bauer, MD‡, Ruth Everett, RN; National Institute of
are substantial.52 Annually, ⬃56 000 (1.4%) of infants in              Child Health and Human Development: Linda L. Wright,
the United States are born VLBW.53 Reports54–57 indicate               MD, Rosemary Higgins, MD, James Hanson, MD; Uni-
that 50% of VLBW infants (⬃28 000 children) require                    versity of New Mexico (U10 HD27881, M01 RR00997):
remedial or special education services at school age.                  Lu-Ann Papile, MD*, Conra Backstrom, RN; Research
Hack56 reported a history of lower academic achieve-                   Triangle Institute (U01 HD36790): W. Kenneth Poole,
ment in adult VLBW survivors for whom the IQ was 5                     PhD, Abhik Das, PhD, Betty Hastings, Carolyn Petrie,
points lower than that in term control subjects (87 vs 92,             MS; Stanford University (U10 HD27880, M01 RR
respectively). An increase of 5 points potentially would               00070): David K. Stevenson, MD*, Susan R. Hintz, MD‡,
e122     VOHR et al
                               Downloaded from http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/ by guest on October 18, 2017
34. American Academy of Pediatrics, Section on Breastfeeding.                     benefits and challenges, incidence and duration, and barriers to
    Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. 2005;115:496 –506                    breastfeeding in preterm infants. Adv Neonatal Care. 2005;5:
35. Bayley N. Bayley Scales of Infants Development-II. San Antonio,               72– 88; quiz 89 –92
    TX: Psychological Corporation; 1993                                     47.   Killersreiter B, Grimmer I, Buhrer C, Dudenhausen JW,
36. Poindexter BB, Ehrenkranz RA, Stoll BJ, et al. Parenteral glu-                Obladen M. Early cessation of breast milk feeding in very low
    tamine supplementation does not reduce the risk of mortality                  birthweight infants. Early Hum Dev. 2001;60:193–205
    or late-onset sepsis in extremely low birth weight infants.             48.   Doyle LW, Rickards AL, Kelly EA, Ford GW, Callanan C.
    Pediatrics. 2004;113:1209 –1215                                               Breastfeeding and intelligence. Lancet. 1992;339:744 –745
37. Amiel-Tison C. Neuromotos status. In: Taeusch HW, Yogman                49.   Fewtrell MS, Morley R, Abbott RA, et al. Double-blind, ran-
    MW, eds. Follow-up Management of the High-Risk Infant. Boston,                domized trial of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid supple-
    MA: Little, Brown & Company; 1987:115–126                                     mentation in formula fed to preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2002;
38. Papile LA, Burstein J, Burstein R, Koffler H. Incidence and                   110(pt 1):73– 82
    evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage:              50.   O’Connor DL, Hall R, Adamkin D, et al. Growth and develop-
    a study of infants with birth weights less than 1,500 gm.                     ment in preterm infants fed long-chain polyunsaturated fatty
    J Pediatr. 1978;92:529 –534                                                   acids: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics.
39. Horwood LJ, Fergusson DM. Breastfeeding and later cognitive
                                                                                  2001;108:359 –371
    and academic outcomes. Pediatrics. 1998;101(1). Available at:
                                                                            51.   Amin SB, Merle KS, Orlando MS, Dalzell LE, Guillet R. Brain-
    www/pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/101/1/e9
                                                                                  stem maturation in premature infants as a function of enteral
40. Furman L, Wilson-Costello D, Friedman H, Taylor HG, Minich
                                                                                  feeding type. Pediatrics. 2000;106(pt 1):318 –322
    N, Hack M. The effect of neonatal maternal milk feeding on the
                                                                            52.   Weiss B. Pesticides as a source of developmental disabilities.
    neurodevelopmental outcome of very low birth weight infants.
                                                                                  Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 1997;3:246 –256
    J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2004;25:247–253
                                                                            53.   Martin JA, Kochanek KD, Strobino DM, Guyer B, MacDorman
41. Nolan L, Goel V. Sociodemographic factors related to breast-
    feeding in Ontario: results from the Ontario Health Survey. Can               MF. Annual summary of vital statistics: 2003. Pediatrics. 2005;
    J Public Health. 1995;86:309 –312                                             115:619 – 634
42. Lucas A, Cole TJ, Morley R, et al. Factors associated with              54.   Taylor HG, Minich N, Bangert B, Filipek PA, Hack M. Long-
    maternal choice to provide breast milk for low birthweight                    term neuropsychological outcomes of very low birth weight:
    infants. Arch Dis Child. 1988;63:48 –52                                       associations with early risks for periventricular brain insults.
43. Meinzen-Derr J, Poindexter BB, Donovan EF, et al. The role of                 J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2004;10:987–1004
    human milk feedings in risk of late-onset sepsis [abstract].            55.   Litt J, Taylor HG, Klein N, Hack M. Learning disabilities in
    Pediatr Res. 2004;55:393A                                                     children with very low birthweight: prevalence, neuropsycho-
44. Furman L, Taylor G, Minich N, Hack M. The effect of maternal                  logical correlates, and educational interventions. J Learn Dis-
    milk on neonatal morbidity of very low-birth-weight infants.                  abil. 2005;38:130 –141
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157:66 –71                               56.   Hack M, Flannery DJ, Schluchter M, Cartar L, Borawski E,
45. Callen J, Pinelli J, Atkinson S, Saigal S. Qualitative analysis of            Klein N. Outcomes in young adulthood for very-low-birth-
    barriers to breastfeeding in very-low-birthweight infants in the              weight infants. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:149 –157
    hospital and postdischarge. Adv Neonatal Care. 2005;5:93–103            57.   Saigal S. Follow-up of very low birthweight babies to adoles-
46. Callen J, Pinelli J. A review of the literature examining the                 cence. Semin Neonatol. 2000;5:107–118
Updated Information &             including high resolution figures, can be found at:
Services                          http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/118/1/e115
References                        This article cites 52 articles, 23 of which you can access for free at:
                                  http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/118/1/e115.full#ref-list-
                                  1
Subspecialty Collections          This article, along with others on similar topics, appears in the
                                  following collection(s):
                                  Fetus/Newborn Infant
                                  http://classic.pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/fetus:newb
                                  orn_infant_sub
Permissions & Licensing           Information about reproducing this article in parts (figures, tables) or
                                  in its entirety can be found online at:
                                  https://shop.aap.org/licensing-permissions/
Reprints                          Information about ordering reprints can be found online:
                                  http://classic.pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/reprints
 Pediatrics is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly publication, it
 has been published continuously since . Pediatrics is owned, published, and trademarked by the
 American Academy of Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point Boulevard, Elk Grove Village, Illinois,
 60007. Copyright © 2006 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. All rights reserved. Print ISSN:
 .
  The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is
                         located on the World Wide Web at:
              http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/118/1/e115
 Pediatrics is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly publication, it
 has been published continuously since . Pediatrics is owned, published, and trademarked by the
 American Academy of Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point Boulevard, Elk Grove Village, Illinois,
 60007. Copyright © 2006 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. All rights reserved. Print ISSN:
 .