FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING
FYP1-1
FYP1 Evaluation Form
(TOTAL MARKS)
Name:
Matric No: Program:
4ZK25 /
4ZK50
Project Title:
Overall Assessment
Marks
Proposal (10%)
Progress Evaluation (20%)
Oral Defence (30%) 1st Examiner Average Mark:
2nd Examiner
3rd Examiner
Technical Paper (10%) 1st Examiner Average Mark:
2nd Examiner
3rd Examiner
FYP1 Report (30%)
Total Marks %
Supervisor’s Signature & Official Stamp:
Date:
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING
FYP1-2
FYP1 Proposal Assessment
Name:
Matric No.:
Marks
Abstract (CO1, PO1)
The abstract is brief summary with clear structure (comprehensive focus on problem statement,
methodology, results/findings and conclusion)
Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent
0-3 4-5 6-7 8 9-10
Introduction (CO1, PO1)
The introduction presents the relevant background and theory with reliable sources.
Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent
0-7 8-11 12-15 16-17 18-20
Problem Statement (CO1, PO2)
Formulate clear and concise problem statement
Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent
0-3 4-5 6-7 8 9-10
Objectives (CO1, PO2)
Formulate realizable, realistic and concise objectives based on the problem statements
Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent
0-3 4-5 6-7 8 9-10
Scope of Works(CO1, PO2)
Define clear and balanced scopes of research work
Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent
0-3 4-5 6-7 8 9-10
Methodology(CO1, PO1)- (2)
Propose a highly convincing and thorough rationale methodology
Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent
0-7 8-11 12-15 16-17 18-20
Work Management (CO1, PO12)
Demonstrate project management (Gantt Chart & Milestones) and finance planning (Budget
estimation)
Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent
0-7 8-11 12-15 16-17 18-20
TOTAL MARKS= ………/100 x 10%=………………………….
Supervisor’s comments/suggestions (use the other side of this page if required):
Name and supervisor’s signature: Date:
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING
FYP1-3
FYP1 Progress Evaluation
(Week 1- Week 14)
Name:
Matric No.:
Marks
Work Progress (CO1, PO2)
Define problem, concepts & theories are used appropriately
Conduct sufficient literature survey and preliminary findings.
Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent
0-15 16-23 24-31 32-35 36-40
Work Management (CO1, PO12)
Execute work accordingly to project planning and budget.
Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent
0-7 8-11 12-15 16-17 18-20
Log Book Recording (CO1, PO12)
Provide complete records of all discussions, findings and all relevant notes.
Punctual to all appointments with supervisor and have attended at least 7 meetings with the supervisor.
Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent
0-7 8-11 12-15 16-17 18-20
Work Attitude (CO1, PO1)
Apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering fundamentals to solve engineering problems
Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent
0-7 8-11 12-15 16-17 18-20
TOTAL MARKS= ………/100 x 20%=………………………….
Supervisor’s comments/suggestions (use the other side of this page if required):
Name and supervisor’s signature: Date:
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING
FYP1-4
FYP1 Oral Presentation Assessment
Name:
Matric No.: Program: 4ZK25
/ 4ZK50
Project Title: Supervisor:
Marks
Technical Content (CO3, PO11)
· Introduction is summarized, objectives, problem statement and scopes are concisely presented,
Methodology is clearly described and challenges/difficulties are discussed
· Preliminary results are presented and discussed
· Summary/conclusion reflect the objectives and recommendations are relevant
Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent
0-15 16-23 24-31 32-35 36-40
Effectiveness of Presentation (CO3, PO9)
· Communicate effectively with confidence and clarity
· Ability to make presentations in professionalism manner
· Ability to utilize the presentation aids effectively
Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent
0-11 12-17 18-23 24-26 27-30
Capability to Defence (CO3, PO8)
· Ability to practice active listening skills
· Defend arguments with sound engineering knowledge
Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent
0-11 12-17 18-23 24-26 27-30
TOTAL MARKS= ………/100 x 30%=………………………….
Comments:
Signature/ Stamp of Examiner: Date:
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING
FYP1-5
FYP1 Technical Paper Assessment
Name:
Matric No.
Marks
Abstract: (CO2, PO4)
The abstract is brief summary with clear structure (comprehensive focus on problem statement, methodology,
results/findings and conclusion)
Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent
0-3 4-5 6-7 8 9-10
Introduction: (CO2, PO4)
The introduction presents the relevant background and theory with reliable authorities’ sources.
Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent
0-11 12-17 18-23 24-26 27-30
Methodology: (CO2, PO3)
Explain the used methodology which suits the type of project (design, modeling & experimental projects)
Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent
0-11 12-17 18-23 24-26 27-30
Preliminary Results & Discussion: (CO2, PO4)
Able to provide adequate preliminary results & discussion
Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent
0-7 8-11 12-15 16-17 18-20
Conclusion: (CO2, PO4)
The research problem/ issue and attainment of the objectives is addressed
Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent
0-3 4-5 6-7 8 9-10
TOTAL MARKS= ………/100 x 10%=………………………….
Comments:
Signature/ Stamp of Examiner: Date:
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING
FYP1-6a
FYP1 Report Evaluation
Name:
Matric No.:
Marks
Introduction (CO2, PO4)
· Overview of the project is clearly described
· Problem statement is concisely explained
· Objectives are clearly stated
· Scope of project is clearly described
Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent
0-7 8-11 12-15 16-17 18-20
Literature Review (CO2, PO4)
· Literatures are comprehensive and relevant to the topic
· Theoretical background is well explained with highly related authorities’ literature sources
Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent
0-11 12-17 18-23 24-26 27-30
Proposed Methodology (CO2, PO3)
(1) Design Projects
· Problems are identified, attempts to solve the problems are indicated and the proposed solutions are
illustrated
· Main tasks and milestones are identified and explained in flow chart and Gantt chart detailing the
workflow
· Challenges and potential difficulties are identified and explained
· Product design specifications are identified
· Function structure are identified and explained
· Framework for product testing (physical/virtual) are identified and justified
(2) Experimental Projects
· Problems are identified, attempts to solve the problems are indicated and the proposed solutions are
illustrated
· Main tasks and milestones are identified and explained in flow chart and Gantt chart detailing the
workflow
· Challenges and potential difficulties are identified and explained
· Tools/techniques/approaches/standards used are identified and justified
· Experimental design process including tools setup and approach to retrieve, process and
analyze the data are identified and explained
(3) Modeling Projects
· Problems are identified, attempts to solve the problems are indicated and the proposed solutions are
illustrated
· Main tasks and milestones are identified and explained in flow chart and Gantt chart detailing the
workflow
· Model input options (solvers to be used, meshing quality, element types, material properties, material
model, failure criteria, boundary conditions, constraints, initial conditions, contacts, etc.) are identified
· Idealizations/assumptions and model input options are identified and justified
· Scenario to be modelled/simulated and validation framework are identified and explained
· Challenges and potential difficulties are identified and explained
Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent
0-11 12-17 18-23 24-26 27-30
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING
FYP1-6b
Preliminary Results & Discussion (CO2, PO4)
(1) Design Projects
· Concept generation and conceptual design are produced and explained
· Concepts are evaluated and selected
(2) Experimental Projects
· Testing facility is organized/devised
· Specimen/specimen design is produced and explained
· Trial/initial data is analyzed
(3) Modeling Projects
· Initial model(s) is developed
· Initial/trial simulation is performed
· Preliminary analysis is performed
Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent
0-3 4-5 6-7 8 9-10
Conclusion & Recommendation (CO2, PO4)
· The research problem/ issue and attainment of the objectives is addressed
· Research findings are concluded
· Future development is recommended based on understanding of the project potentials and the
limitations of the methodology
Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent
0-3 4-5 6-7 8 9-10
TOTAL MARKS= ………/100 x 40%=………………………….
Supervisor’s comments/suggestions (use the other side of this page if required):
Name and supervisor’s signature: Date:
