Scribd
Upload
80 views2 pages

Republic of The Philippines Metropolitan Trial Court City of Davao Branch 1 Efren Te

This document is an Answer filed by Carlo Mamac in response to a complaint of unlawful detainer filed against him by Efren Te. Mamac admits several allegations in the complaint but denies that oral demands were made to vacate after he replied to an earlier written demand. He claims that a Deed of Sale was executed transferring half the subject property to him, canceling the original title. Mamac requests that the complaint be dismissed for lack of merit. The Answer is signed by his legal counsel.

Uploaded by

Mirai Kuriyama
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
80 views2 pages

Republic of The Philippines Metropolitan Trial Court City of Davao Branch 1 Efren Te

This document is an Answer filed by Carlo Mamac in response to a complaint of unlawful detainer filed against him by Efren Te. Mamac admits several allegations in the complaint but denies that oral demands were made to vacate after he replied to an earlier written demand. He claims that a Deed of Sale was executed transferring half the subject property to him, canceling the original title. Mamac requests that the complaint be dismissed for lack of merit. The Answer is signed by his legal counsel.

Uploaded by

Mirai Kuriyama
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT


City of Davao
Branch 1

Efren Te,
Plaintiff,
CIVIL CASE No. 1234-2019
-versus- FOR: Unlawful Detainer

Carlo Mamac,
Defendant.

x-----------------------------------x

ANSWER

I, Carlo Mamac, single, of legal age, Filipino citizen of 456 Modesto


Bangkal, Davao City, after having been sworn in accordance with law, do hereby
depose and say that:

1. Paragraph 1 of the complaint is admitted;

2. Paragraph 2 of the complaint is admitted;

3. Paragraph 3 is partially admitted. While it is true that the plaintiff is the


owner of a land embraced under Transfer Certificate of Title No. T-14344,
the same has, however, already been cancelled. One-half of the same subject
property is now covered by a new Transfer Certificate of Title No. T-15355
under the name of Carlo Mamac;

4. Paragraph 4 of the complaint is admitted;

5. Paragraph 5 of the complaint is admitted;

6. Paragraph 6 of the complaint is admitted.

7. Paragraph 7 is partially denied. While it is true that defendant has stayed in


the house of the plaintiff since February 2018, said Memorandum of
Agreement, has already been impliedly terminated by virtue of the
subsequent execution of a Deed of Sale in favor of the defendant.

8. Paragraph 8 of the complaint is admitted.


9. Paragraph 9 of the complaint is denied. The truth of the matter is that no oral
demands were made after the defendant sent his reply to the previous written
demand from the plaintiff.

10. I am executing this affidavit to attest to the truth of the foregoing averments.

Wherefore, in the interest of justice, it is respectfully prayed that the instant


complaint be DISMISSED for lack of merit.

In witness whereof, I have hereunto affixed my signature this ___ day of


_____________ at Davao City, Philippines.

POGI, SY, BANTAN, EW AND ASSOCIATES LAW OFFICE


No. 143 Kagubaon Bldg., Bolton Street, Davao City
Counsel for the Defendant

By:

ATTY. POGI C. ONTAL


IBP No. 134348 1/8/21 Davao City
PTR No. 3423688 1/8/21 Davao City
MCLE Compliance No. 01-23458

You might also like