Scribd
Upload
40 views1 page

Negotiable Instruments Dispute

Nora Moulic issued two post-dated checks totaling P100,000 to Corazon Victoriano as security for jewelry to be sold on commission. Victoriano negotiated the checks to State Investment House before the jewelry was sold. Moulic withdrew her funds before the checks matured, so they were dishonored upon presentment. State Investment House sued Moulic to recover the value of the checks. The trial court dismissed the complaint. The issue is whether post-dated checks issued as security can discharge the instrument against a holder in due course. The Supreme Court ruled no, finding the only grounds for discharge are those outlined in the Negotiable Instruments Law, which do not include checks issued as security.

Uploaded by

Nivra Lyn Empiales
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
40 views1 page

Negotiable Instruments Dispute

Nora Moulic issued two post-dated checks totaling P100,000 to Corazon Victoriano as security for jewelry to be sold on commission. Victoriano negotiated the checks to State Investment House before the jewelry was sold. Moulic withdrew her funds before the checks matured, so they were dishonored upon presentment. State Investment House sued Moulic to recover the value of the checks. The trial court dismissed the complaint. The issue is whether post-dated checks issued as security can discharge the instrument against a holder in due course. The Supreme Court ruled no, finding the only grounds for discharge are those outlined in the Negotiable Instruments Law, which do not include checks issued as security.

Uploaded by

Nivra Lyn Empiales
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

State Inv. vs.

CA 217 SCRA 32

FACTS:
Private respondent Nora B. Moulic issued to Corazon Victoriano, as security for
pieces of jewelry to be sold on commission, 2 post-dated Equitable Banking Corporation
checks in the amount of P50,000.00 each, one dated 30 August 1979 and the other, 30
September 1979. Thereafter, the payee negotiated the checks to petitioner State Investment
House. Inc. (STATE). MOULIC failed to sell the pieces of jewelry, so she returned them to the
payee before maturity of the checks. The checks, however, could no longer be retrieved as
they had already been negotiated. Consequently, before their maturity dates, MOULIC
withdrew her funds from the drawee bank. Upon presentment for payment, the checks
were dishonored for insufficiency of funds. STATE allegedly notified MOULIC of the
dishonor of the checks and requested that it be paid in cash instead, although MOULIC avers
that no such notice was given her. STATE sued to recover the value of the checks plus
attorney's fees and expenses of litigation. MOULIC contends that she incurred no obligation
on the checks because the jewelry was never sold and the checks were negotiated without
her knowledge and consent. She also instituted a Third-Party Complaint against Corazon
Victoriano, who later assumed full responsibility for the checks. TC: dismissed the
Complaint as well as the Third-Party Complaint, and ordered STATE to pay MOULIC
P3,000.00 for attorney's fees.

ISSUE: WON the post-dated checks that were merely issued as security is a ground for the
discharge of the instrument as against a holder in due course.

RATIO: No. The only grounds for the discharge of the instrument as against a holder in due
course are those outlined in Sec. 119 of the Negotiable Instruments Law:
Sec. 119. Instrument; how discharged. — A negotiable instrument is
discharged: (a) By payment in due course by or on behalf of the principal
debtor; (b) By payment in due course by the party accommodated, where
the instrument is made or accepted for his accommodation; (c) By the
intentional cancellation thereof by the holder; (d) By any other act which
will discharge a simple contract for the payment of money; (e) When the
principal debtor becomes the holder of the instrument at or after maturity in
his own right.

You might also like