Team 1 Term Project: In-N-Out Burger
In-N-Out Burger
Jeff Tolonen Tom Sobelman
Team 1 Term Project: In-N-Out Burger
Why In-N-Out?
Everybody likes
In-N-Out. Part of Southern California Culture. Its a thriving Mom & Pop chain in today's corporate dominated Mc World. In-N-Out is always crowded and for some reason people dont mind waiting. They have a unique business model.
Team 1 Term Project: In-N-Out Burger
In-N-Out Burger
Family owned California, Nevada, Arizona only Accountable to customer, not shareholder $1.8 million average annual revenue per restaurant (2005) Rivals top chains: McDonalds & BK Limited menu (Burgers, fries, sodas, shakes) Consistent McDonalds has added 37 items since 1955 Made to order business model No freezers, heat lamps, or microwaves Produce delivered fresh every other day
Team 1 Term Project: In-N-Out Burger
Inventory Management
Delivered fresh Daily or every other day, depending on location Minimize holding cost Own distribution system Private butchers, warehouses, truck lines Must improve system to expand beyond west coast and maintain strategic position EOQ & ROP Too hard without insider info: cost per order, vendor info, holding cost, etc
Team 1 Term Project: In-N-Out Burger
Side Note About In-NOut
What happened after I emailed In-N-Out Corporate?.NOTHING!!! The response to my email:
Dear Mr. Tom Sobelman: Thank you for taking the time to contact us. Your project sounds exciting! As you may know, In-N-Out Burger is privately held and family operated. As such, the information you requested is not published. However, we sincerely appreciate your consideration, and wish you success in your future endeavors. Thanks again for your e-mail, and for your interest. Sincerely, Jeff Dreher Customer Service Representative
Team 1 Term Project: In-N-Out Burger
What it takes to get a call from In-N-Out Burger Corp.
Customer Service @ In-N-Out, Im finding your response, below, a little confusing. If the information that I was looking for was published- I wouldnt have contacted you, rather, I would have had it already. I would much rather prefer a yes we can or a no we cant. I am not competitor nor am I requesting specific information. I find the fact that you wouldnt have time to talk to a student from a school of 35,000, that is central to 2 of your San Fernando Valley locations, difficult to fathom. If In-N-Out is unwilling to speak to me- thats fine, however, I would like a less condescending reason as to why. Is it because the information that I am requesting is too sensitive is it because In-N-Out doesnt have time for students?
Tom Sobelman Operations Data Analyst Care Level Management Mobile: (818) 665-9851 Office: (818) 595-8251 E-mail: tsobelman@carelevel.com
Team 1 Term Project: In-N-Out Burger
Product Attributes (External)
Cost: In-N-Out is relatively inexpensive. Comparable to any
other burger joint.
Response
time: Slow compared to the competition. You
get your food more than twice as fast at McDonalds & Burger King.
Variety: Limited to burgers, fries, soda, and shakes. Quality: In-N-Out is the gold standard for fast food. All the
ingredients are fresh and everything is made to order. Nothing is pre-made.
Team 1 Term Project: In-N-Out Burger
Process Competencies (Internal)
Cost: Kept low by owning distribution system and
minimizing holding costs
Flow
time: Made-to-order business model slows flow time
compared to the competition. You get your food more than twice as fast at McDonalds & Burger King.
Flexibility: Cross-trained workers adds to flexibility, but
highly dedicated capital resources limits it.
Quality: Consistent product. Accurate, reliable, and
maintainable processes.
Team 1 Term Project: In-N-Out Burger
Strategic Positioning & Operational Effectiveness
Market driven business Key competitive priorities
Low cost Quick delivery-response time Fresh
Responsiveness
Competitive product space Added quality
Made to order
Narrowed variety Focused strategy and processes Low flexibility
Dedicated capital resources Maximize resource utilization
Quality
Team 1 Term Project: In-N-Out Burger
Strategic Positioning & Operational Effectiveness
The gluttonous customer dilemma Accept or reject order?
Align processes with strategic position Consider resource availability
10
Team 1 Term Project: In-N-Out Burger
Process Architecture
Process Flexibility
High
JOB SHOP
(Commercial Printer, Architecture firm)
BATCH
(Heavy Equipment, Auto Repair)
FLOW SHOP
Connected Line Flow (assembly line) (Auto Assembly, Car lubrication shop)
CONTINUOUS FLOW
Low
(Oil Refinery)
Low
Few Major Products
High
Product Variety
11
Team 1 Term Project: In-N-Out Burger
The Process Flowchart
Flow unit = customer
Drive through
Grill meat Place order
Assemble Burger Assemble Order
Order in queue
Walk-in Clean/peel potatoes Slice potatoes
Prepare Fries
(Batches)
Load fries Cook fries In oil Unload fries
Note: assemble order consists of making the burger with the grilled patty, boxing the fries, getting any drinks/cups (including shakes), box/tray order 12
Team 1 Term Project: In-N-Out Burger
Process Flow Measures
Ri, drive through(t)
Ri, walk-in(t)
Ro (t)
Analyze Job Flow Flow unit = 1 customer
Two inputs: Drive-through or walk-in Any number of items per customer
Assume average order: Double-Double, Fries, drink
Stable process (Ri = Ro) No unserved customers at closing time
13
Team 1 Term Project: In-N-Out Burger
Process Flow Measures
I
23
R=5.0
Problem: When R(t) > 0, line grows
R= -11.0
R=1.0
R=3.0
12:30pm
1:00pm
1:30pm
R(t) = Ri(t) Ro(t)
Time Beginning Inv. * Inflow Rate Ri* Outflow Rate Ro* Buildup Rate R Ending Inventory*
*
12:30p NA NA NA NA 15+2=17
12:30-12:45p 15+2=17 24+10=34 19+10=29 5.0 19+3=22
12:45-1:00p 19+3=22 23+7=30 19+10=29 1.0 21+2=23
1:00-1:15p 21+2=23 12+6=18 19+10=29 -11.0 10+2=12
1:15-1:30p 10+2=12 16+16=32 19+10=29 3.0 14+1=15
14
Drive-through + walk-in
Team 1 Term Project: In-N-Out Burger
Observed Flow Times
Random Order Walk-in Drive-through (12:30pm-1:30pm) (mm:ss) (mm:ss) 1 2 3 7:15 7:40 8:01 14:45 8:30 14:15
4
5 6 7
9:15
6:52 13:02 7:18
17:10
15:10 13:12 12:15
8
9 10 Average (T)
5:46
7:41 7:36 8:02
13:45
11:35 10:40 13:07
15
Team 1 Term Project: In-N-Out Burger
Customer Flow Variability
Flow time (T) increases with: Capacity utilization Interarrival variability
I=RxT
16
Team 1 Term Project: In-N-Out Burger
Flow Rate and Capacity Analysis
Resource pool Worker (cashier) Register Worker (flipper) Grill
Unit Load (min per order) 0.5 min 0.5 min 3.5 min 3.5 min
Worker (fry cook)
Fryer Worker (burger assembly) Counter workstation
0.5 min
5.5 min 0.25 min 0.25 min
Worker (order assembly)
Counter workstation
0.25 min
0.25 min
17
Team 1 Term Project: In-N-Out Burger
Flow Rate and Capacity Analysis (cont)
Resource pool Unit Load (min per order) 0.5 min 0.5 min 3.5 min 3.5 min 0.5 min 5.5 min 0.25 min 0.25 min 0.25 min 0.25 min Units in pool (c) Min (16,3)=3 3 Min(16,2)=2 2 Min(16,8)=8 8 Min(16,5)=5 5 Min(16,5)=5 5 Load Batch (orders per batch) 1 1 20 20 3 3 1 1 1 1 Availability (min per hour) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 Effective Capacity (orders per hour)
(3/0.5) x 1 x 60=360 (3/0.5) x 1 x 60=360 (2/3.5) x 20 x 60= 685 (2/3.5) x 20 x 60= 685 (8/0.5) x 3 x 60 = 2880 (8/5.5) x 3 x 60 = 261 (5/0.25) x 1 x 60 = 1200
Worker (cashier) * Register Worker (flipper) * Grill Worker (fry cook) * Fryer (baskets) Worker * (burger assembly) Counter workstations Worker * (order assembly) Counter workstations
(5/0.25) x 1 x 60 = 1200 (5/0.25) x 1 x 60 = 1200
(5/0.25) x 1 x 60 = 1200
16 total interchangeable workers
18
Team 1 Term Project: In-N-Out Burger
Bottleneck Analysis
Levers for fixing the bottleneck Take processes off critical path
Adjust strategic position
Increase capacity with more resources
To increase resources requires capital Low utilization during low demand
Is the bottleneck a problem? Ri = 114 orders x 85%* = 96.9 orders of fries per hour Effective capacity = 261.0 orders per hour
*Based
on observation
19
Team 1 Term Project: In-N-Out Burger
Flow Time As is
Load Prep Fries Grill meat
Take Order
Assemble Burger
Assemble Order
Cook Fries
Unload
-t
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0
Time (min)
20
Team 1 Term Project: In-N-Out Burger
Flow Time Take Fries off Critical Path
Assemble burger Assemble order
Cook Fries (continuous) Grill meat
Take Order
Unload
-t
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0
Time (min)
21
Team 1 Term Project: In-N-Out Burger
Flow Time Take Fries & Grill off Critical Path
Assemble burger
Assemble order
Cook Fries (continuous)
Unload
Grill meat (delay)
Take Order
-t
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0
Time (min)
22
Team 1 Term Project: In-N-Out Burger
Levers for Managing Flow Time
Select Takes McDonalds fast food strategic position and focus it to only a few items Eliminates customer initiated wait time (ie gimme a minute)
Customers know what they want before getting into queue secret menu off regular menu to avoid wasted time
Encourages knowing what you want before getting in queue
Eliminate Drink cups with customers (walk-in)
23
Team 1 Term Project: In-N-Out Burger
Levers for Managing Flow Time
Drive through management Avoid blockage (ie drive through line into street) & abandonment (customer gets frustrated and leaves) Bring the window to the customer (PDA guys)
Possible without a mobile menu due to limited product variety
Single line layout
Describe effect on time in buffer Saves real estate Downside: deceivingly long line (customer does not realize it will move fast)
Dual line layout:
Choice of which queue to enter Slower queue (ie someone with a long or complex order) holds up all customers behind him Not possible to switch queues, so flow time is significantly slower for those who chose the slow line (cost: lost goodwill)
24
Team 1 Term Project: In-N-Out Burger
Levers for Managing Flow Time
Cultivate walk in business Assign priorities (balance inflow sources) Drive through Walk in
25
Team 1 Term Project: In-N-Out Burger
Conclusion & Discussion
26