NATIONAL BOARD OF
ACCREDITATION (NBA)
CONTENT
Part A-Information
Institution Information
Department Information
Programme Specific Information
Part B- NBA Evaluation Criteria
Department/Programme Specific Criteria
Institution Level Criteria
Part C Declaration by the Institution
INFORMATION
1. INSTITUTIONAL INFORMATION
1.1. Detail : Institution and Contact person for the NBA
1.2. History of Institution : Starting date ,No.of seats of various
programmes in tabular form and also if any accreditation
1.3. Ownership status: trust / society (Govt. /NGO/Private)/private
1.4. Institution -Vision and Mission
1.5. Organizational Structure
1.6. Financial status: Govt. (central/state) / grants in aid/ not for profit/ private
self financing
1. INSTITUTIONAL INFORMATION
(Contd...)
1.7. Academic Institutions of the trust/society
1.8. External sources and Internally acquired funds
1.9.Were scholarships or any other financial assistance provided to
students
1.10. Admission : Basis/criterion
1.11. Total number of students and employees
2. DEPARTMENTAL INFORMATION
2.1. Detail :Department and Contact Person For The NBA
2.2. Department History -including date of introduction and number of
seats of various programmes, if any accreditation
2.3. Department Vision and Mission
2.4. List of the programmes/ departments which share human resources
and/or the facilities of this department/programme (in %)
2.5. Total number of students
2.6 Department : No. of staff and their roll during the current and three
previous academic years (1st July to 30th June)
2.6.1. Summary of department budget for the Current Financial Year
(CFY) and the actual expenditure incurred in the Current Financial
Year minus 1(CFYm1), CFYm2 and CFYm3
3. PROGRAMME SPECIFIC
INFORMATION
3.1. Name of the Programme
3.2. Title of the Degree
3.3.Detail: Programme Coordinator for the NBA
3.4. History : Programme along with the NBA accreditation, if any
3.5. Deficiencies, weaknesses/concerns from previous accreditations
3.6. Total number of students in the programme
3.7. No. of staff for the current and the three previous academic years
(1st July to 30th June) in the programme
3.8. Summary of budget for the CFY and the actual expenditure
incurred in CFYm1, CFYm2 and CFYm3 (for this programme in
the department exclusively)
CRITERIA
CRITERION
No.
CRITERIA
First
Time
Reaccreditati
on
Vision, Mission and Programme Educational
Objectives
60
20
II
Programme Curriculum and Teaching
Learning Processes
150
150
III
Programme Outcomes and Course Outcomes
100
150*
IV
Students Performance-
150
150
Faculty Information and Contributions
160
190*
VI
Facilities and Technical Support
80
50*
VII
Continuous Improvement
50
90*
VIII
First Year Academics
50
50
IX
Student Support Systems
50
50
Governance, Institutional Support and
Financial Resources
150
100*
CRITERION I - Vision, Mission
and Programme Educational
Objectives -First Time 60,
Reaccreditation 20
CRITERION I
1.1. Institute and Department -Vision and Mission. In case of change
from previous accreditation mention both with reasons thereof
1.2. Programme Educational Objectives-programme seeking
accreditation. In case of change from previous accreditation
mention both with reasons thereof
1.3.Indicate where and how the Vision, Mission and PEOs are
published and disseminated and also Describe where the
websites, curricula, posters etc. published and how the
stakeholders got the information about the same.
1.4. State the internal and external stakeholders of the programme
and articulate their relevance
CRITERION I (Contd...)
1.5. State,describe and articulate the process for defining and/or
reviewing the Vision and Mission of the Department, and PEOs of
the programme.
1.5.1.In case of institutions that are more than ten years old that
periodically review the PEOs based on the needs of the stakeholders
1.6. Establish consistency of PEOs with Mission of the Institute.
Generate a Mission of the Institute PEOs matrix with justification
and rationale of the mapping
CRITERION II - Programme
Curriculum and Teaching
Learning Processes First Time 150
and Reaccreditation 150
CRITERION II
2. 1 Programme Curriculum
2.1.1. State the process used to identify compliance of the University
curriculum for attaining the Programme Outcomes, mention the identified
curricular gaps if any
2.1.2. State the delivery details of the content beyond the syllabus for the
attainment of Pos
-Provide the additional course
-learning material-content
-laboratory experiments
-projects
2.1.2.1. Arising from the gaps identified in a tabular form with the delivery
details for each of the assessment year in the format (Current Academic Year
minus 2)CAYm2, (Current Academic Year minus 1)CAYm1, (Current
Academic Year)CAY
CRITERION II (Contd...)
2.2.3. Initiatives to improve the quality of final year projects
-Quality of the project factors :Cost, type (application, product,
research, review etc.), environment, safety, ethics and standards.
-Processes related to project : Identification, allotment,
continuous monitoring, evaluation including demonstration of
working prototypes, and to enhance the relevance of projects.
-Mention the initiatives, implementation details and impact
analysis
2.2.4. Initiatives related to industry interaction
-Give details of the industry involvement in the programme
such as industry-attached laboratories, partial delivery of
appropriate courses by industry experts etc.
-Mention the initiatives, implementation details and impact
analysis
CRITERION II (Contd...)
2.2.5. Initiatives related to industry internship/summer training
-Mention the initiatives, implementation details and impact
analysis etc.
CRITERION III - Programme
Outcomes 100
and Course Outcomes 150*
CRITERION III
3.1. Establish the correlation between the courses and the Pos
3.1.1. Programme level Course-PO matrix of all courses including
first year courses
3.1.2. Course Outcomes SAR should include course outcomes of
one course from each semester of study, however, should be
prepared for all courses
3.1.3. CO-PO matrices of courses selected in eight matrices
CRITERION III (Contd...)
3.2. Attainment of Course Outcomes
3.2.1. Describe the assessment processes used to gather the data
upon which the evaluation of Course Outcome is based-Examples
of data collection processes may include, but are not limited to,
specific exam/tutorial questions, assignments, laboratory tests,
project evaluation, student portfolios (A portfolio is acollection of
artifacts that demonstrate skills, personal characteristics, and
accomplishments created by the student during study period),
internally developed assessment exams, project prsentations,
oral exams, focus groups etc
CRITERION III (Contd...)
3.2.2. Record the attainment of Course Outcomes of all courses with
respect to set attainment levels
Programme shall have set Course Outcome attainment levels for
all courses. The attainment levels shall be set considering
average performance levels in the university examination for the
assessment years.
Measuring CO achievement through university examinations
Target may be stated in terms of percentage of students getting
more than the university average marks or more as selected by
the Programme in the final examination
CRITERION III (Contd...)
Targets and achievement are to be stated
Achievement is measured in terms of actual percentage
of students getting set percentage of marks.
If targets are achieved then the CO1 and CO2 are
attained for that year. Programme is expected to set
higher targets for the following years as a part of
continuous improvement.
If targets are not achieved the programme should put in
place an action plan to attain the target in subsequent
years.
CRITERION III (Contd...)
3.3. Attainment of Programme Outcomes
3.3.1. Describe assessment tools and processes used for assessing
the attainment of each PO
-Describe the assessment tools and processes used to
gather the data upon which the evaluation of each the
Programme Outcome is based indicating the frequency
with
which these processes are carried out.
-Describe the assessment processes that demonstrate
the
degree to which the Programme Outcomes are
attained and
document the attainment levels
CRITERION III (Contd...)
3.3.2. Provide results of evaluation of each PO
-Programme shall set Programme Outcome attainment levels
for all POs.
-Direct attainment level of a PO is determined by taking average
across all courses addressing that PO. Fractional numbers may be used.
-Indirect attainment level of a PO is determined based on
the
student exit surveys and employer surveys.
CRITERION IV Students
Performance-First time 150 and
Reaccreditation150
CRITERION IV
4.1. Success Rate in the stipulated period of the programme
4.1.1. Success rate without backlogs in any year of study
4.1.2. Success rate in stipulated period
4.3. Academic Performance in Third Year
4.4. Academic Performance in Second Year
4.5. Placement and Higher Studies
4.6. Professional Activities
4.6.1. Professional societies / chapters and organizing
engineering events
4.6.2. Publication of technical magazines, newsletters, etc
4.6.3. Participation in inter-institute events by students of the
programme of study
CRITERION V Faculty
Information and
Contributions
First time 160
Reaccreditation 190*
CRITERION V
5.1. Student-Teacher Ratio
5.2. Teacher Cadre Proportion
The reference teacher cadre proportion is 1(T1):2(T2):6(T3)
T1: Number of Professors required = 1/9 x Number of teachers
required to comply with 15:1 Student-teacher ratio based on admitted
students including lateral entry or sanctioned intak whichever is higher
T2: Number of Associate Professors required = 2/9 x Number of
teachers required to comply with 15:1 Student-teacher ratio based
on
admitted students including lateral entry or sanctioned intake
whichever
is higher
CRITERION V (Contd...)
T3: Number of Assistant Professors required = 6/9 x Number of
teachers required to comply with 15:1 Student-teacher ratio based
on
admitted students including lateral entry or sanctionedintake whichever is
higher in 2nd, 3rd and 4th year of study.
5.3. Faculty Retention
5.4. Innovations by the teachers in Teaching and Learning
Any contributions to teaching and learning should satisfy the
criteria:
- The work must be made available on Institute web site
- The work must be available for peer review and critique
-The work must be able to be reproduced and built on by other
scholars
CRITERION V (Contd...)
5.5. Teachers as participants in teacher development/training activities
-A teacher scores maximum five points for participation
-Participant in 2 to 6 days teacher/faculty development programme: 3
Points
-Participant >6 days teacher/faculty development programme: 5 points
5.6. Research and Development
5.6.1. Academic Research and Sponsored Research
-research paper publications, PhD guidance, faculty receiving PhD
during the assessment period
- Sponsored research (Funded Research)
CRITERION V (Contd...)
5.6.2. Consultancy and Product Development
5.7. Teacher Performance Appraisal and Development System
The assessment is based on
- A well defined system instituted for all the assessment years
-Its implementation and effectiveness
5.8. Visiting/Adjunct Faculty
CRITERION VI -Facilities and
Technical Support
First time 80
Reaccreditation 50 *
CRITERION VI
6.1. Laboratories in the department to meet the Curriculum
Requirements
6.1.1. Availability of adequate, well-equipped laboratories to meet
the curriculum requirements
6.1.2. Initiatives by the Department to create facilities for
improving the quality of experiments
6.2. Technical Manpower Support in the Department
6.2.1. Availability of adequate and qualified technical
supporting staff for programme - specific laboratories
6.2.2. Incentives, skill upgrade, and professional advancement
CRITERION VII Continuous
Improvement
First Time 50
Reaccreditation 90 *
CRITERION VII
7.1. Actions taken based on the results of evaluation of each of the Pos
- Identify the areas of weaknesses in the programme based on the
analysis of evaluation of Pos attainment levels.
-Planned measures identified and implemented to improve POs
attainment levels for the assessment years.
-PO Attainment Levels and Actions for improvement LYGm2
LYG: Latest year of graduation; LYGm1: Latest year of graduation
minus one year; LYGm2: Latest year of graduation minus two years
7.2 Improvement in Success Index of Students without the backlog
7.3. Improvement in Placement and Higher Studies
7.4. Improvement in the quality of students admitted to the programme
CRITERION VIII - First Year
Academics
First Time 50
Reaccreditation 50
CRITERION VIII
8.1. First Year Student- Teacher Ratio (FYSTR)
8.2. Qualification of Faculty Teaching First Year Common Courses
8.3. First Year Academic Performance
8.4. Attainment of Course Outcomes of first year courses
8.4.1. Describe the assessment processes used to gather the data
upon which the evaluation of Course Outcomes of first year is based
8.4.2. Record the attainment of Course Outcomes of all first year
courses
CRITERION VIII (Contd)
8.5. Attainment of Programme Outcomes of all first year courses
8.5.1. Indicate results of evaluation of each relevant PO
8.5.2. Actions taken based on the results of evaluation of Pos
CRITERION IX -Student Support Systems
First Time 50
Reaccreditation 50
CRITERION IX
9.1. Mentoring system to help at individual levels
9.2. Feedback analysis and reward /corrective measures taken, if any
9.3. Feedback on facilities
9.4. Self Learning
9.5. Career Guidance, Training, Placement
9.6. Entrepreneurship Cell
9.7. Co-curricular and Extra-curricular Activities
CRITERION X- Governance,
Institutional Support and Financial
Resources
First Time 150
Reaccreditation 100 *
CRITERION X
10.1. Organization, Governance and Transparency
10.1.1. Governing body, administrative setup, and functions of various
bodies
10.1.2. Defined rules, procedures, recruitment, and promotional policies,
etc.
10.1.3. Decentralization in working and grievance redressal mechanism
10.1.4. Delegation of financial powers
10.1.5. Transparency and availability of correct/unambiguous
information in public domain
CRITERION X (Contd)
10.2. Budget Allocation, Utilization, and Public Accounting at Institute
level
10.2.1. Adequacy of budget allocation
10.2.2. Utilization of allocated funds
10.2.3. Availability of the audited statements on the institutes
website
10.3. Programme Specific Budget Allocation, Utilisation
10.3.1. Adequacy of budget allocation
10.3.2. Utilization of allocated funds
10.4. Library and Internet
10.4.1. Quality of learning resources (hard/soft)
10.4.2. Internet
Declaration
The head of the institution needs to make a declaration as per the
format
