Measuring Safety Performance
With Leading Indicators
A N Nachar
Measuring Safety Performance
What are you doing to measure your
organization’s safety performance?
Today’s objective: Understand the concept of –
leading performance indicators
Versus
lagging performance indicators
Measuring Safety Performance
“What doesn’t get
measured just
doesn’t get done”
Measuring Safety Performance
Lagging indicators
(the traditional approach to managing safety)
Injury/ ill statistics
Workers’ compensation data
“illogical to count things you don’t
intend to happen”
Measuring Safety Performance
Leading performance indicators-
What do we intend to happen?
Measure the presence rather than
absence of safety
Measuring Safety Performance
Sample leading safety indicators
% of scheduled safety inspections completed
% of scheduled Job Observations completed
% of new employee workstations evaluated
% of safety related work orders completed
% of safety trainings completed
In every month
Leading & Lagging
Leading indicators
positive indicators
Compliance
Risk reduction, Injury reduction
“what was made to happen”
Lagging indicators
Negative indicators
Non-compliance
Number of accidents, man-hours lost etc
Leading Indicator
Due Diligence to Show That:
Safety management system is working
Preventative “Make it Happen” safety
objectives are being taken
Improve assurance that lagging indicators
will remain low
Leading Indicator
Set a standard of performance
Measure that performance
Leading indicators are a measure of
performance
Measuring What Matters Most
What matters most?
Risk
Commitment
Sustenance
What should we measure?
1. Risk
2. Commitment
3. Sustenance
Principles of Setting and
Measuring Leading Indicators
Measure against standards (programs & procedures)
Objective & verifiable by auditors
Place on corporate agenda
Corporate goals to include leading indicators
Report to CEO & BOD
Review with CEO & BOD
Tied to pay for performance process
Checks and Balances
To ensure the system works “honestly”
Joint safety committee
Internal auditors – union/ management
External auditors
Safe workplace association
Regulatory agency audits
SMS - knits it all together
Safety Management System
Policy stating commitment
Demonstrate commitment by putting leading
indicators in corporate strategic plan
Assessment of risks
Setting safety standards via
Programs & procedures
Provide training on standards
Clear - two way communication
Evaluating performance of:
Individuals, programs & safety system
Annual performance report on strategic goals
Measuring Safety At Horizon
“Make it happen” safety objectives:
Scoring system:
Leadership 20%
Program Compliance 30%
Training + application of skills 20%
Program improvement 20%
Lagging indicators 10%
Total score 100%
Score Determines management bonus
Measuring Safety
Measuring leadership:
Safety programs reviewed by –
BOD (--%)
VPs (--%)
Departmental Managers (--%)
Shopfloor (--%)
Measuring Safety
Program Compliance:
Measure actual over expected #
Work observations (--%)
Risk assessed & reduced (--%)
Accident investigations (--%)
Increase in preventative incident
reporting (--%)
Year Over Year Results
What gets measured gets done
Work Observations
% Score actual / expected
160 146
140 131
120
94
100
% Score
71 66
80 62
55
60
40
40 28
20
0
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
1 2001 2002 2003 2004
Annual checks
Two Internal Audits
One external audit
Workplace risk assessment of newly
introduced machines / activities / jobs
Bottom Line
Safety Performance score of
--%
A single meaningful number that provides a
focus on making safety a high priority
Strengthen & Sustain
Safety Culture
Building on Success Event
Celebrate leading indicator results
Invite all executives & directors
Team member presentations
Appreciation : certificates / gift
Publicize companywide
Train & re-train
Yesterday’s trainee, today’s trainer