100% found this document useful (2 votes)
192 views15 pages

Social Force at Work

The document discusses the collapse of Enron and analyzes various factors that contributed to its downfall. It summarizes that Enron filed for bankruptcy in 2001 after its market capitalization reached over $60 billion in 2000 due to the changing global economy and internet revolution. The board of directors failed to properly monitor managers, many directors were interlocked between companies, and both directors and analysts overlooked issues due to misplaced loyalty and herd behavior. The culture at Enron also encouraged blind loyalty over objective evaluation.

Uploaded by

Rudi San
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (2 votes)
192 views15 pages

Social Force at Work

The document discusses the collapse of Enron and analyzes various factors that contributed to its downfall. It summarizes that Enron filed for bankruptcy in 2001 after its market capitalization reached over $60 billion in 2000 due to the changing global economy and internet revolution. The board of directors failed to properly monitor managers, many directors were interlocked between companies, and both directors and analysts overlooked issues due to misplaced loyalty and herd behavior. The culture at Enron also encouraged blind loyalty over objective evaluation.

Uploaded by

Rudi San
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 15

Social Force at Work

The Collapse of an American


Corporation
New Economic
• The world economy change by
internet revolution
• One of notorious rise and fall was
that of Enron.
• In 2000 Enron’s market capitalization
was more than $60 billion
• 2001 the firm field for bankruptcy.
Corporate Board
• Corporation is a legal entity separated
from its founders or owners
• No corporation is truly immortal
– It limit the ability of a state to interfere with
the business of a corporation
• Corporate have external and internal
constrain.
• External force in US is the Securities and Exchange
Commission
Benfits of Corporate Board
• Advise and counsel executive and
provide discipline to manager.
• It is often difficult to monitor managers
directly.
• Most board are combinations of insider
and outsider
– Inside directors are manager or executive
of company.
– Outside directors are not employees
Outside Directors
• After the corporate scandals of recent
year, policy ensuring that board have
majority of outside directors has been
advocated.
• Relationship between board
composition and firm performance is
challenging because independence in
fundamentally unobservable.
It’s a Small World
• Corporate boards should have majority
of outside director
• However, outside directors sometime
seem to disregard the interest of the
firm’s owners.
• The world of corporate directors is even
smaller.
• Many of them are interlocked  there
are overlapping board membership
Directors, Compensation, and
Self-Interest
• The small world corporate directors means
that managerial innovations can be spread
rapidly.
• The most important decision a corporate
board makes is the CEO’s compensation.
• Some expressed concern that top executive’s earning
are going through the roof and reducing the
shareholder welfare.
• In some cases, it may be that directors who
put their interest ahead of shareholder are
purely self-interested.
Directors and Loyalty
• It’s possible that directors are prone to
misplaced loyalty.
• People will sometimes disregard their
conscience when a person of authority
call for action.
• Loyalty may have important
consequences in the boardroom if
directors are prone to blindly follow
the CEO.
Analysts
• Professional security analysts
– Information intermediaries
– Consider information from financial statements,
trade show, the press, conversation with
corporate executive, and other insider.
• Types of professional analysts
– Sell-side analysis; employed by brokers, dealers,
and investment bank.
– Buy-side analysts; employed by large money
management firm, including mutual and hedge
funds and insurance company.
– Independent analysts; not associated with any
large investment or money management firm.
• Performance Security Analysts
– The analysts are too optimistic
– Focus on sell-side because buy-side
analysts not available to public.
– Clear conflict of interest provides likely
source of sell-side analysts.
• Do Analyst Herd
– Conflict of interest just describe,
analysts’ decision may be affected by
social forces.
– Herding, or convergence in behavior,
among investors is often proposed as an
explanation for large swings in market
prices.
ENRON
• Formed in 1985 by Kenneth through the
merger of natural gas pipeline.
• In 2000, Enron stock trade at $90.75 per share
• In end 2001 the firm’s totally bankrupt.
• Directors of Enron seem to rubber-stamp
anything management brought before them
• Their compensation was highest in the US
• 15 external directors served among them.
• We do not sure that they truly independent.
The Analysts
• During bankruptcy, they continued to
be optimistic about the firm.
• They recommended buy or 1.9,
where 1= strong buy and 5= strong
sell.
• They optimistic because of the large
investment banking fess generated
by Enron
Other Player in Enron’s
Downfall
• The mania of the dot-com run-up in
stock prices.
• Investors seemed to focus entirely on
short-term gain.
• Enron’s Auditor, Arthur Anderson, too
readily accepted Enron’s business
model and method of accounting.
• 2002 Anderson official were found
guilty of obstructing justice.
Organization Culture and
Personal Identity
• Everyone love Enron.
– Many analysts and investors remained optimistic
about the firm.
• The firm have a unique culture.
– The employees were loyal to the firm
– They though that the firm was invincible
– However, loyalty to an organization can be even
more dangerous than loyalty to a person.
• The lesson by the fall of Enron is that it is
important to any person in any organization to
keep separate identity.

You might also like