PHA Training - Day 1
PHA Training - Day 1
Palembang
4 – 6 Nov 2019
a) Provide basic knowledge of Process Safety Hazard Analysis concept and its
application in analyzing Plant Process Hazard and Industrial Work Activity
Hazard (Construction activity, Project Activity, and Operation Work
Activity).
b) Better understand the various standard PHA methodology as described above
that can be used to conduct a PHA and its appropriate application.
c) Enable the participant to plan a PHA session, appropriate member/resources
required, meeting, record and report the session including the recognizing the
gaps and providing recommendation(s).
Background of PHA
• ISO 17776 Guidelines on tools and techniques for hazard identification and risk
assessment.
• CCPS (Center for Chemical Process Safety) – Guideline for Hazard Evaluation
Procedure 2nd Ed 1992.
• CCPS (Center for Chemical Process Safety) – Evaluating Process Safety in the Chemical
Industry.
• IEC International Standard 61882, Hazard and Operability Studies (HAZOP) Application
Guide.
• OSHA 3132, Process Safety Management (PSM) Guideline, 2000.
• OSHA 29 CFR 1910.119, Process Safety Management of Highly Hazardous Chemical.
• CCPS (Center for Chemical Process Safety) – Guideline for Chemical Process
Quantitative Risk Analysis.
• ICI (Imperial Chemical Industries) United Kingdom 1960 – Hazop Guideword
INTRODUCTION TO HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK
ASSESSMENT
HAZARD
Source of HARM
RISK
Consequence
Series
Hazard
of
Event
Risk
INTRODUCTION TO HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK
ASSESSMENT (ISO 17776)
EXERCISE
Barrier Defense
Consequence
Series
Hazard
of
Event
Risk
INTRODUCTION TO HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK
ASSESSMENT (ISO 17776)
Object for Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment:
Process Safety
f. FMEA
g. SIL/LOPA
h. QRA and Cost Benefit Analysis c. Specific Hazard Identification Review
• Objective:
Facility Owner
System/Area Case/Phase
Drawing Ref
Haz Hazard Hazardous Risk Matrix Action
Consequence Safeguards Risk Recommendation
No Guideword Event Cons Freq Party
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION TECHNIQUE (ISO 17776)
“HAZID Guidewords”
No Potential Hazard Hazard Description
01 Hydrocarbons Oil under pressure Hydrocarbons in LPGs (e.g. LNGs Condensate, Hydrocarbon gas Oil at low Wax Coal
formation Propane) NGL press
02 Refined hydrocarbons Lube and seal oil Hydraulic oil Diesel fuel Petroleum spirit/
gasoline
03 Other flammable Cellulosic Pyrophoric
materials materials
materials etc
04 Explosives Detonators Conventional Perforating gun
explosive charges
material
05 Pressure hazards Bottled gases Water under Non-hydrocarbon Air under high Hyperbaric Decompression Oil and HC
under pressure pressure in gas under pressure operations (diving) gas under
pipeworks pressure in (diving) pressure
pipeworks
06 Hazards associated Personnel at Personnel at Overhead Personnel
height >2 m height <2 m equipment under water
with differences in
height
07 Objects under induced Objects under Objects under
tension compression
stress
08 Dynamic situation On-water transport In-air transport Boat collision Equipment with Use of Use of knives, Transfer Land-transport
(boating) (flying) hazard to other moving or hazardous machetes and from boat to
hazards vessels and rotating parts hand tools other sharp offshore
offshore structures (grinding, objects platform
sawing)
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION TECHNIQUE (ISO 17776)
“HAZID Guidewords (Cont)”
No Potential Hazard Hazard Description
09 Environmental Weather Sea state Tectonic Wildfire
hazards
10 Hot surfaces Process piping and Process piping Engine and turbine Steam piping
equipment (60-150 and equipment exhaust systems
°C) over 150 °C
11 Hot fluids Temperatures Temperatures
(100-150 °C) greater than 150
°C
12 Cold surfaces Process piping (– Process piping Process piping (0
25 °C to – 80 °C less than – 80 °C to -25 °C)
range) °C
13 Cold fluids Oceans, seas and
lakes less than 10
°C
14 Open flame Heaters with fire Direct-fired Flares
tube furnaces
15 Electricity Voltage > 50 V to Voltage > 50 V Voltage > 440 V Lightning Electrostatic
440 V in cables to 440 V in discharge energy
equipment
16 Electromagnetic Ultraviolet radiation Infrared Microwaves Lasers E/M radiation:
radiation high voltage
Radiation AC cables
17 Ionizing radiation — Alpha, beta — Gamma rays — Neutron -— Open Naturally
Open source Open source source occurring
Open source ionizing
radiation
18 Ionizing radiation — Alpha, beta — Gamma rays — Neutron — Closed
Closed source Closed source source
Closed source
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION TECHNIQUE (ISO 17776)
“HAZID Guidewords (Cont)”
No Potential Hazard Hazard Description
19 Asphyxiates Insufficient oxygen Excessive CO2 Drowning Excessive N2 Halon Smoke
atmospheres
20 Toxic gas H2S (hydrogen Exhaust fumes SO2 (SOx), NOx Benzene, Chlorine Welding fumes Tobacco CFCs
sulfide, sour gas) Toluene, Xylene smoke
(BTX)
21 Toxic liquid Mercury PCBs Biocide Methanol Brines Glycols etc
(gluteraldehyde)
22 Toxic solid Asbestos Man-made Cement dust Sodium Powdered Sulfur dust etc
mineral fibre hypochlorite mud
additives
23 Corrosive substances Hydrofluoric acid Hydrochloric Sulfuric acid Caustic soda
acid (sodium
hydroxide)
24 Biological hazards Food-borne Water-borne Parasitic insects Cold and flu Human Other
bacteria (e.g E. bacteria (e.g (pin worms, bed virus Immune communicable
coli) Legionella) bugs, lice, fleas) deficiency diseases
Virus (HIV)
25 Ergonomic hazards Manual materials Damaging noise Loud steady noise Heat stress Cold stress High humidity Vibration Illumination etc
handling > 85 dBA (high ambient (low ambient
temperatures) temperatures
)
26 Psychological hazards Living on the Working and Post traumatic Fatigue Shift work Peer pressure
job/away from living on a live stress
family plant
27 Security-related Piracy Assault Sabotage Crisis (military Theft,
action, civil pilferage
hazards disturbances,
terrorism)
28 Use of natural Water Air
resources
29 Medical Medical unfitness Motion sickness
30 Noise High-level noise Intrusive noise
31 Entrapment Fire / explosion Mechanical Diving
damage
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION TECHNIQUE (ISO 17776)
“HAZID Exercise and Discussion”
Safeguarding is the in-place (existing) barrier to prevent or reduce likelihood for the
*1)
*2)
Initial Risk is combination of the probability of hazardous event to occured and the
consequence of hazardous event assuming safeguard in place fails. While the probability
of hazardous event to occurred is counted with the likely of the safeguarding in place
fails.
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION TECHNIQUE (ISO 17776)
“HAZID Exercise and Discussion”
Analyze Guidewords
Deviations
Brainstorm
Consequences of Safeguards
Deviation
Consider
Create an
Risk
Action List
HAZOP TECHNIQUE (IEC-61882)
“Defining Node”
Objective: to have proper focus, effective and efficiency of the
study
Criteria for Selecting Node:
• Design Intent
• Significant Change of State Occurred (process fluid phase)
• Piece of process equipment with different process parameters
(i.e multistage compressor)
• Each major piece of equipment and its associated piping.
The leader will facilitate the team to achieve agreement in selecting/defining node.
HAZOP TECHNIQUE (IEC-61882)
“Exercise Defining Node”
Guideword Causes
No Flow Block valve closed, wrong line-up, slip blind, installed, incorrectly
installed check valve, valve fails to close or open (control valve,
shutdown valve, blowdown valve, etc), equipment failure/down
(pump, compressor, instrumentation, etc).
Reverse Flow Malfunction of omitted check valves (note that check valves are
not usually bubble tight or positive shut-off devices), siphon
effect, incorrect differential pressure, two-way flow, emergency
venting, wrong line-up, etc
Guideword Causes
Less Flow Line restriction - filter fouled - defective pumps - fouling of vessel
or lines, valves, orifice plates – density or viscosity changes,
competing pump heads and flows, in-advertently throttled valve,
etc
More Level Outlet isolated or blocked - inflow greater than outflow - control
failure - faulty level measurement – condensation in vapor line –
vessel overflow – deactivated level alarm – inadequate time to
respond - etc
Less Level Inlet flow stop – leak – outflow greater than inflow – faulty level
measurement – two phase flow – plugged instrument taps –
liquid control valve fails to open or stuck closed - inadequate
resident time (insufficient separator size) – inadequate mixing -
etc
HAZOP TECHNIQUE - Guidewords and Causes
Guideword Causes
More Pressure Design Pressure - Surge Problem - Leakeage from interconnected
high pressure system (i.e HE) – PCV fails closed or open – thermal
over pressure – positive displacement pumps – increased
centrifugal pump suction pressure – more reaction - etc
A Reactor mix substance A and B and react each other to form a new substance
C.
However, if any substance B more than A greater than it supposed to be, there
is potential for overpressure in the reactor.
END – DAY 1
1. Background
The key provision of PSM is process hazard analysis (PHA)—a careful review of what could go wrong and what
safeguards must be implemented to prevent releases of hazardous chemicals. (OSHA)
One or more of the following Process Hazard Analys methods, as appropriate, to determine and evaluate the hazards of
the process being analyzed: • What-if, • Checklist, • What-if/checklist, • Hazard and operability study (HAZOP), •
Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA), • Fault tree analysis, or • An appropriate equivalent methodology.
A discussion of these methods of analysis is contained in the companion publication, OSHA 3133, Process Safety
Management Guidelines for Compliance. Whichever method(s) are used, the process hazard analysis must address the
following: • The hazards of the process; • The identification of any previous incident that had a potential for
catastrophic consequences in the workplace; • Engineering and administrative controls applicable to the hazards and
their interrelationships, such as appropriate application of detection methodologies to provide early warning of
releases. Acceptable detection methods might include process monitoring and control instrumentation with alarms, and
detection hardware such as hydrocarbon sensors; • Consequences of failure of engineering and administrative controls;
• Facility siting; • Human factors; and • A qualitative evaluation of a range of the possible safety and health effects on
employees in the workplace if there is a failure of controls.
4. Objective of the Course:
a) Provide basic knowledge of Process Safety Hazard Analysis concept and its application in analyzing Plant
Process Hazard and Industrial Work Activity Hazard (Construction activity, Project Activity, and Operation
Work Activity).
b) Better understand the various standard PHA methodology as described above that can be used to conduct a
PHA and its appropriate application.
c) Enable the participant to plan a PHA session, appropriate member/resources required, meeting, record and
report the session including the recognizing the gaps and providing recommendation(s).
7. Method of Training
c) Class Presentation
d) Discussion and Answer and Question.
e) Exercise each PHA methodology to fill the use of it.
f) Pre-Test and Post Test.
g) Example of Video/Lesson Learnt Demonstration and analysis what PHA should capture the hazard
beforehand.