MEANING OF MORALITY
Morality is the quality
      or value human acts
      have by which we call
      them right or wrong,
      good or evil.
The terms moral and immoral
mark the extremes of good and
bad within morality, in the field
of morals when moral is used
as the opposite of immoral.
In judging the morality of a human act,
we take into consideration the subjective
peculiarities of the agent (the doer of the act)
and look at the act as conditioned by the
agent’s knowledge and consent,
background, training, prejudices, emotional
maturity and stability, value orientation,
and other personal traits.
We may also abstract from such
subjective conditions which, though
always present in any individual act,
can be known directly only by the
simply look at the kind of act performed
and at the outward circumstances
apparent to any observer.
  Morality
considered in
 this way is
  objective
  morality.
  Morality in its
   completeness
 includes both its
subjective and its
objective aspects.
MEANING OF CONSCIENCE
In the popular mind, conscience
is often thought of as an “inner
voice,” sometimes as the “voice
of God,” telling us what to do or
avoid, but this is metaphor.
 In the traditional
sense, conscience is
not a special power
 distinct from our
      intellect.
  Conscience is a
function of intellect
  concerned with
actions that can be
   good or bad.
  MEANING OF CONSCIENCE
 The term conscience
can actually be applied
  to any of the three
    distinct aspects
    THREE DISTINCT ASPECTS
1. The intellect as a person’s ability,
under the influence of a desire to do
the right and the good, to form
judgements about the right and
wrong of individual acts
   THREE DISTINCT ASPECTS
2. The process of reasoning
that we go through, under
the influence of that desire,
to reach such a judgement
   THREE DISTINCT ASPECTS
3. The conclusion of this
reasoning process, which
is called the evaluative
judgement of conscience
EMOTIONS &
CONSCIENCE
    The evaluational
 elements that I use in
   living my life have
their beginnings in my
emotions, the affective
    side of my being.
   Conscience is not developed by critical
 thought alone. Emotion also enters into its
  development along with imagination, for
conscience is not merely our power to judge
the past in moral terms but also our ability
 to see alternatives in moral situations that
      have implications for the future.
   In the opening
   chapter of this
discussion we spoke
  of the difference
between customary
    morality and
reflective morality.
 KINDS OF
CONSCIENCE
     A correct
conscience judges
 as good what is
 really good, and
  as evil what is
    really evil.
  An erroneous
conscience judges
 as good what is
 really evil, or as
evil what is really
       good.
A person’s judgement of conscience may also
be certain or doubtful. We are certain when
we judge without fear that the opposite may
  be true in fact. We are doubtful when we
either hesitate to make any judgement at all
 or make a judgement but with misgivings
       that the opposite may be true.
FOLLOWING THE
 JUDGEMENT OF
  CONSCIENCE
  Having seen what conscience is and the forms it
takes, we must now discuss our obligation to follow
what conscience approves. There are two chief rules,
       but each of them involves a problem.
                The two rules are:
1. Always follow a certain conscience
2. Never act with a doubtful conscience
1. ALWAYS FOLLOW A CERTAIN CONSCIENCE
First, notice the difference in between
 a certain and a correct conscience.
  The term correct to the objective
truth of the person’s judgement; the
  person’s judgement of conscience
  represents the real state of things.
1. ALWAYS FOLLOW A CERTAIN CONSCIENCE
 1. A certain and correct
judgement of conscience
really offers no difficulty.
2. NEVER ACT WITH A DOUBTFUL CONSCIENCE
    We have seen that a person
     acting with a certain but
      unavoidably mistaken
   conscience is avoiding moral
      evil as far as possible.
2. NEVER ACT WITH A DOUBTFUL CONSCIENCE
   But, then, what should a person
   with a doubtful conscience do?
  The person’s first obligation is to
  try to solve the doubt, to find out
      the true nature of the act.
THE MORALLY
SAFER COURSE
    THE MORALLY SAFER COURSE
By the morally safer course is
meant the course of action that
 more surely preserves moral
  goodness and more clearly
 avoids moral wrong doing.
     THE MORALLY SAFER COURSE
 We have an obligation to follow the
  morally safer course whenever we
  have a known moral obligation to
fulfil or an end (goal) that we ought to
   achieve to the best of our power.
A DOUBTFUL
OBLIGATION
      A DOUBTFUL OBLIGATION
There are other cases in which
the obligation itself is the thing
   in doubt. Here we have a
       different question.
       A DOUBTFUL OBLIGATION
Out of a desire to do the better thing
  we often follow the morally safer
 course without question, but if we
were to have an obligation to follow it
   in all cases of doubt, life would
    become intolerably difficult.