0% found this document useful (0 votes)
27 views21 pages

Digital Impact on Society

Uploaded by

Anas Choudhary
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
27 views21 pages

Digital Impact on Society

Uploaded by

Anas Choudhary
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 21

3.

4 Text Messaging

1-1
1-1
Transforming Lives in Developing
Countries

• M-PESA in Kenya
– Save money
– Pay bills
– Transfer funds
• Communicate information about crop
prices
• Protect against counterfeit (‫ )جعلی‬medicine

1-2
1-2
Twitter

• Web-based social networking service


• More than 200 million users
• Blogging tool (A blog is a type of regularly updated website that
provides insight into a certain topic)

• Business promotion
• Role in Arab Spring uprisings debated
– (+) Social networks lead to politicization
– (-) Ties in social networks too weak for high-risk
activism
1-3
1-3
3.5 Censorship

1-4
1-4
Forms of Direct Censorship

• Government monopolization (Monopolization is the


complete control of something)

• Prepublication review
• Licensing and registration

1-5
1-5
Self-censorship

• Most common form of censorship


• Group decides for itself not to publish
• Reasons
– Avoid subsequent persecution (‫)ظلم و ستم‬
– Maintain good relations with government officials
(sources of information)
• Ratings systems created to advise potential
audience
– Movies, TVs, CDs, video games
– Not the Web
1-6
1-6
Challenges Posed by the Internet

• Many-to-many communications
• Dynamic connections
• Huge numbers of Web sites
• Extends beyond national borders, laws
• Hard to distinguish between minors and
adults

1-7
1-7
Governmental Filtering and Surveillance (close
observation of a person or group by the police or other authorities.)

• Cuba, North Korea: Internet virtually inaccessible


• Saudi Arabia: centralized control center
• People’s Republic of China:
– Blocks Internet access at times of social unrest (‫)سماجی بدامنی‬
– Has “one of most sophisticated filtering systems in the world”
• Germany: Forbids access to neo-Nazi sites
• United States: Have been repeated efforts to limit access
of minors to pornography

1-8
1-8
Ethical Perspectives on Censorship

• Kant opposed censorship


– Enlightenment thinker (The Enlightenment (Age of Reason) was
a revolution in thought in Europe and North America from the late
17th century to the late 18th century)
– “Have courage to use your own reason”
• Mill opposed censorship
– No one is infallible (incapable of making mistakes or being
wrong:)
– Any opinion may contain a kernel of truth
– Truth revealed in class of ideas
– Ideas resulting from discourse (written or spoken
communication)are more influential
1-9
1-9
Mill’s Principle of Harm

“The only ground on which intervention (‫)مداخلت‬


is justified is to prevent harm to others;
the individual’s own good is not a
sufficient condition.”

1-10
1-10
3.6 Freedom of Expression

1-11
1-11
Freedom of Expression: History

• De Scandalis Magnatum (England, 1275)


• Court of Star Chamber
• 18th century
– No prior restraints (check) on publication
– People could be punished for sedition or libel
(speech inciting people to rebel against the authority of a state)

• American states adopted bills of rights


including freedom of expression
• Freedom of expression in 1st amendment to
U.S. Constitution
1-12
1-12
1st Amendment to U.S. Constitution

Congress shall make no law respecting an


establishment of religion, or prohibiting the
free exercise thereof; or abridging the
freedom of speech, or of the press; or the
right of the people peaceably to assemble,
and to petition the government for a
redress of grievances.

1-13
1-13
Freedom of Expression
Not an Absolute Right

• 1st Amendment covers political and


nonpolitical speech
• Right to freedom of expression must be
balanced against the public good
• Various restrictions on freedom of
expression exist

1-14
1-14
Jeremy Jaynes

AP Photo/Loudoun County Sheriff’s office 1-15


1-15
FCC v. Pacifica Foundation et al.

• George Carlin records “Filthy Words”


• WBAI in New York airs “Filthy Words” (1973)
• FCC issues declaratory order to Pacifica
• Pacifica sues
• U.S. Supreme Court ruled FCC did not violate 1 st
Amendment (5-4 decision)
– Broadcast media “uniquely pervasive”
– Broadcasting uniquely accessible to children

1-16
1-16
Case Study: Kate’s Blog

• Kate: Maintains a popular “life on campus” blog


• Jerry: Another student; active in Whig Party
• At private birthday party, someone gives Jerry a Tory
Party T-shirt as a gag, and Jerry puts it on
• Kate uses cell phone to take picture of Jerry when he
isn’t looking, posts it on her blog
• Story read by many people on and off campus
• Jerry confronts Kate and demands she remove photo;
she complies, and they remain friends
• Kate’s blog and Jerry both become more popular
1-17
1-17
Kantian Analysis

• Kate uploaded Jerry’s photo to her blog


without asking his permission
• She treated him as a means to her end of
increasing the readership of her Web site
• Her action was wrong

1-18
1-18
Social Contract Theory Analysis

• Birthday party held in apartment of one of


Jerry’s friends
• Jerry had a reasonable expectation of
privacy
• Kate violated Jerry’s right to privacy
• Kate’s action was wrong

1-19
1-19
Act Utilitarian Analysis

• Benefits
– Popularity of Kate’s blog increased (definitely)
– Jerry become more popular on campus (definitely)
• Harms
– Jerry’s anger at Kate (only temporary)
– Photo could discredit Jerry at some point in future
(unlikely)
• Benefits greater than harms, so Kate did a good
thing
1-20
1-20
Rule Utilitarian Analysis

• What if everyone were constantly taking photos of people


they encountered and posting them?
• Positive consequences
– People would have more opportunities to keep up with what their
friends are doing
– People might be more reluctant to engage in illegal activities
• Negative consequences
– People would become more self-conscious
– Some relationships would be harmed
• Negative consequences more weighty than positive
consequences, so Kate’s action was bad
1-21
1-21

You might also like