0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views31 pages

CH 9

Chapter 9 discusses virtual memory, highlighting its benefits such as allowing programs to run with less physical memory and improving CPU utilization. It covers key concepts like demand paging, page replacement algorithms, and the management of kernel memory. The chapter also explores the relationship between shared memory and memory-mapped files, along with various page replacement strategies.

Uploaded by

M Numan Zafar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views31 pages

CH 9

Chapter 9 discusses virtual memory, highlighting its benefits such as allowing programs to run with less physical memory and improving CPU utilization. It covers key concepts like demand paging, page replacement algorithms, and the management of kernel memory. The chapter also explores the relationship between shared memory and memory-mapped files, along with various page replacement strategies.

Uploaded by

M Numan Zafar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 31

Chapter 9: Virtual Memory

Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Chapter 9: Virtual Memory
 Background
 Demand Paging
 Copy-on-Write
 Page Replacement
 Allocation of Frames
 Thrashing
 Memory-Mapped Files
 Allocating Kernel Memory
 Other Considerations
 Operating-System Examples

Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 9.2 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Objectives

 To describe the benefits of a virtual memory system


 To explain the concepts of demand paging, page-replacement
algorithms, and allocation of page frames
 To discuss the principle of the working-set model
 To examine the relationship between shared memory and
memory-mapped files
 To explore how kernel memory is managed

Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 9.3 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Background
 Code needs to be in memory to execute, but entire program rarely
used
 Error code, unusual routines, large data structures
 Entire program code not needed at same time
 Consider ability to execute partially-loaded program
 Program no longer constrained by limits of physical memory
 Each program takes less memory while running -> more
programs run at the same time
 Increased CPU utilization and throughput with no increase
in response time or turnaround time
 Less I/O needed to load or swap programs into memory ->
each user program runs faster

Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 9.4 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Background (Cont.)
 Virtual memory – separation of user logical memory from
physical memory
 Only part of the program needs to be in memory for execution
 Logical address space can therefore be much larger than physical
address space
 Allows address spaces to be shared by several processes
 Allows for more efficient process creation
 More programs running concurrently
 Less I/O needed to load or swap processes

Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 9.5 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Background (Cont.)
 Virtual address space – logical view of how process is stored
in memory
 Usually start at address 0, contiguous addresses until end of
space
 Meanwhile, physical memory organized in page frames
 MMU must map logical to physical
 Virtual memory can be implemented via:
 Demand paging
 Demand segmentation

Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 9.6 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Virtual Memory That is Larger Than Physical Memory

Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 9.7 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Virtual-address Space
 Usually design logical address space for
stack to start at Max logical address and
grow “down” while heap grows “up”
 Maximizes address space use
 Unused address space between
the two is hole
 No physical memory needed
until heap or stack grows to a
given new page
 Enables sparse address spaces with
holes left for growth, dynamically linked
libraries, etc
 System libraries shared via mapping into
virtual address space
 Shared memory by mapping pages read-
write into virtual address space
 Pages can be shared during fork(),
speeding process creation

Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 9.8 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Shared Library Using Virtual Memory

Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 9.9 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Demand Paging
 Could bring entire process into memory
at load time
 Or bring a page into memory only when
it is needed
 Less I/O needed, no unnecessary
I/O
 Less memory needed
 Faster response
 More users
 Similar to paging system with swapping
(diagram on right)
 Page is needed  reference to it
 invalid reference  abort
 not-in-memory  bring to memory
 Lazy swapper – never swaps a page
into memory unless page will be needed
 Swapper that deals with pages is a
pager

Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 9.10 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Basic Concepts
 With swapping, pager guesses which pages will be used before
swapping out again
 Instead, pager brings in only those pages into memory
 How to determine that set of pages?
 Need new MMU functionality to implement demand paging
 If pages needed are already memory resident
 No difference from non demand-paging
 If page needed and not memory resident
 Need to detect and load the page into memory from storage
 Without changing program behavior
 Without programmer needing to change code

Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 9.11 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Valid-Invalid Bit
 With each page table entry a valid–invalid bit is associated
(v  in-memory – memory resident, i  not-in-memory)
 Initially valid–invalid bit is set to i on all entries
 Example of a page table snapshot:

 During MMU address translation, if valid–invalid bit in page table


entry is i  page fault

Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 9.12 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Page Table When Some Pages Are Not in Main Memory

Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 9.13 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Page Fault

 If there is a reference to a page, first reference to that page will


trap to operating system:
page fault
1. Operating system looks at another table to decide:
 Invalid reference  abort
 Just not in memory
2. Find free frame
3. Swap page into frame via scheduled disk operation
4. Reset tables to indicate page now in memory
Set validation bit = v
5. Restart the instruction that caused the page fault

Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 9.14 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Steps in Handling a Page Fault

Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 9.15 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Page Replacement

 Prevent over-allocation of memory by modifying page-


fault service routine to include page replacement
 Use modify (dirty) bit to reduce overhead of page
transfers – only modified pages are written to disk
 Page replacement completes separation between logical
memory and physical memory – large virtual memory can
be provided on a smaller physical memory

Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 9.16 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Need For Page Replacement

Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 9.17 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Basic Page Replacement
1. Find the location of the desired page on disk

2. Find a free frame:


- If there is a free frame, use it
- If there is no free frame, use a page replacement algorithm to
select a victim frame
- Write victim frame to disk if dirty

3. Bring the desired page into the (newly) free frame; update the page
and frame tables

4. Continue the process by restarting the instruction that caused the trap

Note now potentially 2 page transfers for page fault – increasing EAT

Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 9.18 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Page Replacement

Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 9.19 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Page and Frame Replacement Algorithms

 Frame-allocation algorithm determines


 How many frames to give each process
 Which frames to replace
 Page-replacement algorithm
 Want lowest page-fault rate on both first access and re-access
 Evaluate algorithm by running it on a particular string of memory
references (reference string) and computing the number of page
faults on that string
 String is just page numbers, not full addresses
 Repeated access to the same page does not cause a page fault
 Results depend on number of frames available
 In all our examples, the reference string of referenced page
numbers is
7,0,1,2,0,3,0,4,2,3,0,3,0,3,2,1,2,0,1,7,0,1

Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 9.20 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
First-In-First-Out (FIFO) Algorithm
 Reference string: 7,0,1,2,0,3,0,4,2,3,0,3,0,3,2,1,2,0,1,7,0,1
 3 frames (3 pages can be in memory at a time per process)

15 page faults
 Can vary by reference string: consider 1,2,3,4,1,2,5,1,2,3,4,5
 Adding more frames can cause more page faults!
 Belady’s Anomaly
 How to track ages of pages?
 Just use a FIFO queue

Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 9.21 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
FIFO Illustrating Belady’s Anomaly

Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 9.22 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Optimal Algorithm
 Replace page that will not be used for longest period of time
 9 is optimal for the example
 How do you know this?
 Can’t read the future
 Used for measuring how well your algorithm performs

Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 9.23 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Least Recently Used (LRU) Algorithm
 Use past knowledge rather than future
 Replace page that has not been used in the most amount of time
 Associate time of last use with each page

 12 faults – better than FIFO but worse than OPT


 Generally good algorithm and frequently used
 But how to implement?

Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 9.24 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
LRU Algorithm (Cont.)
 Counter implementation
 Every page entry has a counter; every time page is referenced
through this entry, copy the clock into the counter
 When a page needs to be changed, look at the counters to find
smallest value
 Search through table needed
 Stack implementation
 Keep a stack of page numbers in a double link form:
 Page referenced:
 move it to the top
 requires 6 pointers to be changed
 But each update more expensive
 No search for replacement
 LRU and OPT are cases of stack algorithms that don’t have
Belady’s Anomaly

Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 9.25 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Use Of A Stack to Record Most Recent Page References

Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 9.26 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
LRU Approximation Algorithms
 LRU needs special hardware and still slow
 Reference bit
 With each page associate a bit, initially = 0
 When page is referenced bit set to 1
 Replace any with reference bit = 0 (if one exists)
 We do not know the order, however
 Second-chance algorithm
 Generally FIFO, plus hardware-provided reference bit
 Clock replacement
 If page to be replaced has
 Reference bit = 0 -> replace it
 reference bit = 1 then:
– set reference bit 0, leave page in memory
– replace next page, subject to same rules

Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 9.27 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Second-Chance (clock) Page-Replacement Algorithm

Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 9.28 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Enhanced Second-Chance Algorithm
 Improve algorithm by using reference bit and modify bit (if
available) in concert
 Take ordered pair (reference, modify)
1. (0, 0) neither recently used not modified – best page to replace
2. (0, 1) not recently used but modified – not quite as good, must
write out before replacement
3. (1, 0) recently used but clean – probably will be used again soon
4. (1, 1) recently used and modified – probably will be used again
soon and need to write out before replacement
 When page replacement called for, use the clock scheme but
use the four classes replace page in lowest non-empty class
 Might need to search circular queue several times

Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 9.29 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Counting Algorithms
 Keep a counter of the number of references that have been made
to each page
 Not common

 Lease Frequently Used (LFU) Algorithm: replaces page with


smallest count

 Most Frequently Used (MFU) Algorithm: based on the argument


that the page with the smallest count was probably just brought in
and has yet to be used

Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 9.30 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
End of Chapter 9

Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013

You might also like