0% found this document useful (0 votes)
57 views24 pages

Corporate Finance Chapter7

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
57 views24 pages

Corporate Finance Chapter7

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 24

DIVIDENDS AND SHARE

REPURCHASES: ANALYSIS
1. INTRODUCTION
A payout policy is a set of principles regarding a corporation’s distributions to
shareholders.
- May be established with regard to a dividend payout, a dividend per share, a
growth in dividend per share, or any other metric.
- May include stock splits and stock dividends.
- May include stock repurchases.

Copyright © 2013 CFA Institute 2


2. DIVIDEND POLICY AND COMPANY VALUE:
THEORY

Dividends Are Bird in the


Tax Argument Other
Irrelevant Hand
• Based on • Cash • How • Clientele
MM theories. dividends are dividends are effect.
• If owners more certain taxed relative • Signaling.
want a than stock to capital • Agency cost
leveraged appreciation. gains affects effects.
position, they investors
can make it preferences
themselves. for dividends.

Copyright © 2013 CFA Institute 3


DIVIDENDS ARE IRRELEVANT
In Miller and Modigliani’s (MM) world with no taxes, no transaction costs, and
homogeneous information, dividend policy does not affect the value of the
company.
- The decision of how a company finances its business is separate from the
decision of what and how much to invest in capital projects.
- If an investor wants cash flow, he/she could sell some shares.
- If an investor wants more risk, he/she could borrow to invest.
- An investor is indifferent about a share repurchase or a dividend.
Bottom line: Dividend policy does not affect a firm’s value.

Copyright © 2013 CFA Institute 4


THE BIRD-IN-THE-HAND ARGUMENT
• Investors prefer a cash dividend to uncertain capital gains.
- Hence, investors prefer the “bird in the hand.”
- Issue: Riskiness of the stock appreciation.
• If this explanation holds, a company that pays a cash dividend will have a
higher value than a similar company that does not pay a cash dividend.

Bottom line: Dividend policy affects the value of the firm.

Copyright © 2013 CFA Institute 5


THE TAX ARGUMENT
If dividends are taxed at a rate higher than capital gains, investors prefer that
companies reinvest cash flow back into the firm.
- In other words, investors prefer the lower-taxed capital gains to the higher-
taxed cash dividends.
- This advocates a zero dividend payout when dividends are taxed at a rate
higher than that of capital gains.

Bottom line: Dividend policy affects the value of the firm.

Copyright © 2013 CFA Institute 6


THE CLIENTELE EFFECT
• The clientele effect is the influence of groups of investors attracted to
companies with specific dividend policies.
- Clientele are simply a group of investors who have the same preference.
• Types of clientele:
- If an investor has a marginal tax on capital gains lower than the marginal tax
on dividends, the investor prefers a return in the form of capital gains.
- Investors who are tax exempt (e.g., pension funds) are indifferent about
dividends and capital gains.
- Some investors, by policy or restrictions, only invest in stocks that pay
dividends.
• The importance of the existence of clientele is that investors will have a
preference for stocks with a specific dividend policy.
Bottom line: The clientele effect does not necessarily imply that dividends affect
value.

Copyright © 2013 CFA Institute 7


DIVIDENDS AND SIGNALING
• Under MM’s theory, everyone has the same information.
• When there is asymmetric information, dividend changes may convey
information.

Positive Information
• Dividend initiations
• Dividend increases

Negative Information
• Dividend omissions
• Dividend reductions

Copyright © 2013 CFA Institute 8


AGENCY COSTS AND DIVIDEND POLICY
• The separation of ownership and management in a corporation may lead to
suboptimal investment.
- Management may invest in negative NPV projects to enhance the company’s
size or management’s control.
• Jensen’s free cash flow hypothesis is that having free cash flow tempts
management to make investments that are not positive NPV.
- Paying dividends or interest on debt uses this free cash flow and averts an
agency issue.
• If a company’s debt has a restriction on paying dividends, it may avoid the
issue of paying dividends (thus benefiting owners) and may increase the risk to
bondholders.

Bottom line: Dividends may reduce agency costs and, therefore, increase the
value of the firm.

Copyright © 2013 CFA Institute 9


3. FACTORS AFFECTING DIVIDEND POLICY

Expected
Investment
Volatility of
Opportunities
Future Earnings

Financial Tax
Flexibility Considerations

Contractual and
Flotation Costs Legal
Restrictions

Copyright © 2013 CFA Institute 10


FACTORS AFFECTING DIVIDEND POLICY
• Investment opportunities:
- A company with more investment opportunities will pay out less in dividends.
- A company with fewer investment opportunities will pay out more in
dividends.
• Expected volatility of future earnings:
- Companies with greater earnings volatility are less likely to increase
dividends—a greater chance of not maintaining the increased dividend.
• Financial flexibility:
- Companies seeking more flexibility are less likely to pay dividends or to
increase dividends because they want to preserve cash.

Copyright © 2013 CFA Institute 11


FACTORS AFFECTING DIVIDEND POLICY
• Tax considerations
- The tax rate on dividends and how dividends are taxed relative to capital
gains affect investors’ preferences and, hence, companies’ dividend policy.
• Flotation costs
- These costs make it more expensive to use newly issued stock instead of
internally generated funds.
- Smaller companies face higher flotation costs.
• Contractual and legal restrictions
- Forms of restrictions:
- Impairment of capital rule
- Bond indentures
- Requirement of preferred shares

Copyright © 2013 CFA Institute 12


TAX SYSTEMS AND DIVIDEND POLICY
Consider a company that has earnings before tax of $100 million and pays all its
earnings as dividends. The company’s tax rate is 35%, and individual
shareholders have a marginal tax rate of 25%. In countries with a split-rate
system, dividends are taxed at 28% at the corporate level.
Earnings taxed at
Double corporate level and
Effective tax on
dividends =
Taxation dividends taxed at
shareholder level
51.25%

Earnings taxed at
Dividend corporate level and Effective tax on
Imputation tax credit at
shareholder level
dividends = 25%

Earnings distributed
Split-Rate are taxed at a lower Effective tax on
System rate than retained
earnings
dividends = 46%

Copyright © 2013 CFA Institute 13


4. PAYOUT POLICIES
• Stable dividend policy: Constant dividend with occasional dividend increases
- Increases may represent an adjustment to a target payout ratio.
- In theory (John Lintner’s), companies may adjust to the target using an
adjustment factor that is less than or equal to 1.0:

- Common
• Constant dividend payout: Constant dividend payout ratio
- Uncommon

Copyright © 2013 CFA Institute 14


CONTD.
• Residual dividend pay-out: Pay out earnings remaining after capital
expenditures Assume that a clothing manufacturer maintains a list of capital
expenditures that are required in future years and that the firm needs $100,000
in the current month to upgrade machinery and buy a new piece of equipment.
The firm generates $140,000 in earnings for the month and spends $100,000
on capital expenditures. The remaining income of $40,000 is paid as a residual
dividend to shareholders, which is $20,000 less than was paid in each of the
last three months. Shareholders may be upset when management chooses to
lower the dividend payment, and senior management needs to explain the
importance of capital spending to justify the lower payment.
• Uncommon

Copyright © 2013 CFA Institute 15


EXAMPLE: PAYOUT POLICIES
Consider the financial information for Apple, Inc. (AAPL)

Fiscal Year Ending 9/29/2012 9/24/2011 9/25/2010


Net income (millions) $41,773 $25,922 $14,014

1. What are dividends for FY2011 and FY2012 if the company followed a stable
dividend policy, with a target dividend payout of 10% and an adjustment
factor of 0.3?

Fiscal Year Ending 9/29/2012 9/24/2011


Increase in earnings $15,851 $11,900
Multiply by target 0.10 0.10
Multiply by adjustment factor 0.30 0.30
Dividends $475.53 $357.24

Copyright © 2013 CFA Institute 16


EXAMPLE: PAYOUT POLICIES
2. What are dividends for FY2011 and FY2012 if the company followed a
constant dividend payout at 6%?
Fiscal Year Ending 9/29/2012 9/24/2011
Net income (millions) $41,773 $25,922
Multiply by 6% 0.06 0.06
Dividends $2,506 $1,555.32

3. What are dividends for FY2011 and FY2012 if the company followed the
residual payout policy?
Fiscal Year Ending 9/29/2012 9/24/2011
Net income (millions) $41,773 $25,922
Less: capital expenditures 9,402 7,452
Dividends $32,371 $18,470

Copyright © 2013 CFA Institute 17


CASH DIVIDENDS VS. REPURCHASING STOCK
• Reasons for preferring repurchasing stock over paying a cash dividend
- Potential tax advantages
- Signaling
- Managerial flexibility
- Offset dilution from executive stock options
- Increase financial leverage
• A stock repurchase may be a good alternative to an increase in cash dividends.

Copyright © 2013 CFA Institute 18


GLOBAL TRENDS IN DIVIDEND PAYOUT
• Current:
- Large, profitable companies tend to have a stable payout policy.
- Smaller and/or less profitable companies tend to not be dividend paying.
• Trends:
- In developed companies, fewer companies pay cash dividends, but more
companies are using stock repurchases.
- The dividend amounts and payouts have increased for dividend-paying
companies, but the proportion of dividend-paying companies has declined.

Copyright © 2013 CFA Institute 19


DIVIDEND COVERAGE RATIOS
Dividend coverage ratios:

A company has $200 million in earnings, pays $40 million in dividends, has cash
flow from operations of $180 million, and had capital expenditures of $60 million.
The company spent $10 million for share repurchases.
Therefore:

Copyright © 2013 CFA Institute 20


5. ANALYSIS OF DIVIDEND SAFETY
• We can evaluate the “safety” of the dividend by examining the company’s
ability to meet its dividends.
- “Safety” pertains to the ability of the company to continue to pay the dividend
or maintain a growth pattern.
- Possible ratios: Dividend coverage and free cash flow coverage
- Using dividends plus repurchases may be more appropriate for some firms.
- Values greater than 1.0 indicate ability to meet the dividend and
repurchase, although the greater the coverage, the greater the liquidity and
ability to pay.
• It is sometimes difficult to predict changes in dividend because of “surprises,”
such as the financial crisis.

Copyright © 2013 CFA Institute 21


6. SUMMARY
• There are three general theories on investor preference for dividends: Dividend
policy is irrelevant, the bird-in-hand argument, and the tax explanation.
• An argument for dividend irrelevance given perfect markets is that the
corporate dividend policy is irrelevant because shareholders can create their
preferred cash flow streams by selling any company’s shares.
• The clientele effect suggests that different classes of investors have differing
preferences for dividend income.
• Dividend declarations may provide information to investors regarding the
prospects of the company.
• The payment of dividends can help reduce the agency conflicts between
managers and shareholders, but can worsen conflicts of interest between
shareholders and debtholders.

Copyright © 2013 CFA Institute 22


SUMMARY (CONTINUED)
• Investment opportunities, the volatility expected in future earnings, financial
flexibility, taxes, flotation costs, and contractual and legal restrictions affect
dividend policies.
• Using a stable dividend policy, a company may attempt to align its dividend
growth rate to the company’s long-term earnings growth rate.
• The stable dividend policy can be represented by a gradual adjustment
process in which the expected dividend is equal to last year’s dividend per
share, plus any adjustment.
• With a constant dividend payout ratio policy, a company applies a target
dividend payout ratio to current earnings.
• In a residual dividend policy, the amount of the annual dividend is affected by
both the earnings and the capital investment spending.

Copyright © 2013 CFA Institute 23


SUMMARY (CONTINUED)
• Share repurchases usually offer more flexibility than cash dividends by not
establishing the expectation that a particular level of cash distribution will be
maintained.
• Share repurchases can signal that company officials think their shares are
undervalued. On the other hand, share repurchases could send a negative
signal that the company has few positive NPV opportunities.
• The issue of dividend safety deals with the likelihood of the dividend being
continued.
• Early warning signs of whether a company can sustain its dividend include the
level of dividend yield, whether the company borrows to pay the dividend, and
the company’s past dividend record.

Copyright © 2013 CFA Institute 24

You might also like