100% found this document useful (1 vote)
23 views17 pages

Monitoring and Evaluation

The document outlines the concepts of Monitoring and Evaluation, defining monitoring as the systematic tracking of project progress through data collection and analysis, while evaluation assesses the worth or quality of a program. It discusses various types of monitoring and evaluation, including process, progress tracking, formative, and summative evaluations. Key principles for effective monitoring include simplicity, timeliness, relevance, and participation, while evaluation helps establish benchmarks and indicates program effectiveness.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
23 views17 pages

Monitoring and Evaluation

The document outlines the concepts of Monitoring and Evaluation, defining monitoring as the systematic tracking of project progress through data collection and analysis, while evaluation assesses the worth or quality of a program. It discusses various types of monitoring and evaluation, including process, progress tracking, formative, and summative evaluations. Key principles for effective monitoring include simplicity, timeliness, relevance, and participation, while evaluation helps establish benchmarks and indicates program effectiveness.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 17

Monitoring and

Evaluation

By: Dr. Ayush Mishra


Monitoring

The Periodic tracking (for example, daily,


weekly, monthly, quarterly, annually) of any
activity’s progress by systematically
gathering and analyzing data and information
is called Monitoring.
Definition- Monitoring is a process of
measuring, recording, collecting,
processing and communicating
information to assist project
management decision making.
tasks are carried out according to
schedule
accord with project objectives
Whether project objectives / targets/
execution needs adjustments
Types of monitoring

Process Monitoring (Real Time Monitoring)

Progress Tracking: Every project has set


output targets to be achieved. To capture
progress against those output targets.

Progress Validation: Progress of key project


activities are usually reported by the field staff.

Performance Monitoring
Principles of Monitoring

Monitoring must be simple: A complex or


complicated monitoring system is self defeating.
The basic task of monitoring is to simplify the
field-level complexity, sifting the more
important concerns from the less important.
Monitoring must be timely. Timeliness is of
the essence in monitoring. Timeliness is closely
related to the credibility of monitoring itself.
Monitoring must be relevant. It must
concern itself only with parameters which are
relevant to programme objectives.
Contd.

Information provided through


monitoring should be dependable.
Management will rely on monitoring findings
only if the information is believed to be
reasonably accurate.
Monitoring efforts should be
participatory. Effort should be made to
ensure participation by all concerned with
extension, be they field-level personnel,
subject-matter specialists, or extension's
clients (the farmers)
Contd.

Monitoring must be flexible. It is


 It also gets routinized with the passage of
time. These two features should not, however,
lead to rigidity
Monitoring should be action oriented
Monitoring must be cost effective
Monitoring efforts should be top
management oriented
Contd.

Monitoring units represent specialised


undertakings. Monitoring is not merely
concerned with the collection and analysis of
data, but with diagnosing problems and
suggesting alternative practical solutions.
EVALUATION
Evaluation’ is a derived of Latin word ‘Valere’
means strength From ‘Valere’ comes the
word ‘Value’ meaning worth or quality of
something
Evaluation may be defined as the process or
method of determining the worth or
quality of something.
Types of Evaluation
Informal and Formal evaluations
Formative and Summative Evaluations
On-going and Ex-post Evaluation
Informal and Formal
Evaluations
Formal evaluation have data which support
the conclusions made from the test
Informal: not data driven but rather content
and performance driven.
Casual every day evaluation
Self-checking evaluation
Do-it ourself evaluation
Formative Evaluation
It attempts to identify and remedy
shortcoming during the developmental
state of a programme.
These are conducted before programme
completion
During programme implementation
Provide early feedback
Can be used to modify or adjust remaining
stages of programme
Summative Evaluation
It assess the worth of final version
Conducted after the completion of
programme
We can assess the accomplishments and can
know whether objectives are achieved
On-going and Ex-post Evaluations

On-going evaluation
An action oriented analysis
To be carried out during implementation
Ex-post evaluation
Conducted several years after completion
of investment
To review the experience and impact
Base for future policy formulation and project
design
Advantages of Evaluation
Helps to establish bench mark
Shows how far our plans have progressed
Shows whether we are proceeding in the right
direction
Indicates effectiveness of a programme
Helps to locate strong and weak points
Improves our skills in working with the people
Helps to determine priorities for activities in
plan of work
Brings confidence and satisfaction to our work

You might also like