INDUCTIVE & DEDUCTIVE
Created by : Zaineb Bouzerda
Othmane Elyaalaoui
Philip onge
Iliass Dadda
Research Methods
Research
Types
Deductive
Approach
Inductive
approach
In research, we often refer to the two broad methods of
reasoning as the Deductive and Inductive approaches.
Deductive Research Approach
Theory
Hypothesis
Observation
Confirmation
 Deductive reasoning works
from the more general to
the more specific.
 Sometimes this is
informally called a ‘’Top-
down’’ approach.
 Conclusion follows logically
from premises (available
facts).
Waterfall
Inductive research
approach
Theory
Tentative
Hypothesis
Pattern
Observation
 Inductive reasoning
works the other way,
moving from specific
observations to broader
generalizations and
theories.
 Informally, we
sometiomes call this a
“Bottom up” approach
 Conclusion is likely
based on premises.
 Involves a degree of
uncertainty.
Hill
Climbing
Deductive Vs. Inductive
Induction is usually described as moving from
the specific to the general, while deduction
begins with the general and ends with the
specific.
Arguments based on laws, rules and accepted
principles are generally used for Deductive
Reasoning. Observations tend to be used for
inductive Arguments.
GENERALIZATION
SPECIFIC INSTANCE
INDUCTIVE
Bottom up
DEDUCTIVE
Top down
Deductive reasoning
Premises lead to a certain conclusion
Premises
1. All men are mortal.
2. Socrates is a man
3. Socrates is mortal.
Therefore,
Conclusion
Aristotle
(Ancient Greek Philosopher)
Deductive reasoning
Premises lead to a certain conclusion
Premises
Conclusion
COGITO
ERGO
SUM
1. What thinks must exist.
2. I am thinking.
3. I exist.
Therefore,
Rene Descartes
(Philosopher of the Scientific
Revolution
Inductive reasoning
Conclusions are drawn from several observations.
Usual example :
- Connect the Dots
« The more data, the
greater the probability
of the conclusion being
true »
The more data, the closer we are to
the certainty, although we don’t quite
get there.
The Problem of Induction
David Hume
“Skeptical scotsman”
“really when it comes down to it,
induction cannot ever lead us to
certain knowledge because it :
• Presupposes that things will stay
the way they always have been.
Examples:
1. The sun always rises In the East.
2. This person loves me.
References :
-Tom Richey (2015) Deductive and Inductive reasoning (bacon vs Aristotle - scientific
revolution). Available at:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAdpPABoTzE (Accessed: 17 February 2017).
-(no date) Available at :
File:///Users/mac/downloads/abduction,%20deduction%20and%20induction%20in%20
qualitative%20research.pdf (Accessed : 17 February 2017).

Induction & deduction

  • 1.
    INDUCTIVE & DEDUCTIVE Createdby : Zaineb Bouzerda Othmane Elyaalaoui Philip onge Iliass Dadda
  • 2.
    Research Methods Research Types Deductive Approach Inductive approach In research,we often refer to the two broad methods of reasoning as the Deductive and Inductive approaches.
  • 3.
    Deductive Research Approach Theory Hypothesis Observation Confirmation Deductive reasoning works from the more general to the more specific.  Sometimes this is informally called a ‘’Top- down’’ approach.  Conclusion follows logically from premises (available facts). Waterfall
  • 4.
    Inductive research approach Theory Tentative Hypothesis Pattern Observation  Inductivereasoning works the other way, moving from specific observations to broader generalizations and theories.  Informally, we sometiomes call this a “Bottom up” approach  Conclusion is likely based on premises.  Involves a degree of uncertainty. Hill Climbing
  • 5.
    Deductive Vs. Inductive Inductionis usually described as moving from the specific to the general, while deduction begins with the general and ends with the specific. Arguments based on laws, rules and accepted principles are generally used for Deductive Reasoning. Observations tend to be used for inductive Arguments.
  • 6.
  • 7.
    Deductive reasoning Premises leadto a certain conclusion Premises 1. All men are mortal. 2. Socrates is a man 3. Socrates is mortal. Therefore, Conclusion Aristotle (Ancient Greek Philosopher)
  • 8.
    Deductive reasoning Premises leadto a certain conclusion Premises Conclusion COGITO ERGO SUM 1. What thinks must exist. 2. I am thinking. 3. I exist. Therefore, Rene Descartes (Philosopher of the Scientific Revolution
  • 9.
    Inductive reasoning Conclusions aredrawn from several observations. Usual example : - Connect the Dots « The more data, the greater the probability of the conclusion being true » The more data, the closer we are to the certainty, although we don’t quite get there.
  • 10.
    The Problem ofInduction David Hume “Skeptical scotsman” “really when it comes down to it, induction cannot ever lead us to certain knowledge because it : • Presupposes that things will stay the way they always have been. Examples: 1. The sun always rises In the East. 2. This person loves me.
  • 11.
    References : -Tom Richey(2015) Deductive and Inductive reasoning (bacon vs Aristotle - scientific revolution). Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAdpPABoTzE (Accessed: 17 February 2017). -(no date) Available at : File:///Users/mac/downloads/abduction,%20deduction%20and%20induction%20in%20 qualitative%20research.pdf (Accessed : 17 February 2017).

Editor's Notes

  • #11 There’s a very high probability that the sun will rise in the East –that it always does –because we have always seen it that way –but are we certain that the sun will rise in the East tomorrow ? Think about you’re ex-boyfriend or ex-girlfriend or something like that….you believe that because that’s been true but is it always true ? Does it remain true ? Usually, it Does not. The one constante we can count on is change.