L O C A L P O W E R F O R T H E
L O C A L E C O N O M Y
E N E R G Y D E M O C R A C Y F R O M A C I T Y- O W N E D U T I L I T Y
John Farrell
Director of Energy DemocracyMarch 26, 2018
Presentation in Decorah, IA
W H Y L O C A L ? ( PA R T 1 )
L E T ’ S WA R M U P
W I N D P O W E R P O T E N T I A L ?
Percentage of state electricity sales
A. 25%
B. 55%
C. 175%
D. 5,200%
E.27,000%
W I N D P O W E R P O T E N T I A L ?
Percentage of state electricity sales
W I N D P O W E R P O T E N T I A L
Percentage of state electricity sales
A. 25%
B. 55%
C. 175%
D. 5,200%
E. 27,000%
W I N D P O W E R P O T E N T I A L
30% c.f. or better
2 0 1 0 N R E L D ATA
100m
Potential Percent of
Electricity from
Onshore Wind Power
0 to 10%
10 to 25%
25 to 50%
50 to 100%
100% or moreSource: http://1.usa.gov/1LBmAIV
“You have a unique
opportunity to buy wind that
is cheaper than fossil fuel”
—Xcel CEO Ben Fowke
L E T ’ S WA R M U P ( # 2 )
R O O F T O P S O L A R P O T E N T I A L ?
A. 2%
B. 15%
C. 36%
D. 59%
E.112%
Percentage of state electricity sales
R O O F T O P S O L A R P O T E N T I A L
A. 2%
B. 8%
C. 36%
D. 59%
E. 112%
Percentage of state electricity sales
23%
49%
All buildings
Source: http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy16osti/65298.pdf
R O O F T O P S O L A R P O T E N T I A L 2 0 1 6
POTENTIAL PERCENT OF
POWER FROM LOCAL
ROOFTOP SOLAR
Over 50%
40 to 50%
25 to 40%
11 to 25%
2008 data
40-50%
25-40%
Over
50%
Over
50%
25-40%
W H Y L O C A L ? ( PA R T 1 )
You can do it!
W H Y L O C A L ? ( PA R T 2 )
C O M M U N I T Y C H O I C E
C O M M U N I T I E S WA N T C O N T R O L
Over 50 U.S. cities have made 100% renewable
commitments
W H AT S TAT E W I L L H AV E
T W O C I T I E S W I T H 1 0 0 %
R E N E WA B L E B Y 2 0 2 0 ?
Georgetown
Denton
Both with municipal utilities!
More solar watts per capita than any other utility?
More solar watts per capita than any other utility!
Farmers Electric
Cooperative
Kalona
W H Y L O C A L ? ( PA R T 2 )
You choose
W H Y L O C A L ? ( PA R T 3 )
S O L A R E C O N O M I E S O F S C A L E
Costofelectricity
0.0¢
2.0¢
4.0¢
6.0¢
8.0¢
10.0¢
12.0¢
14.0¢
Residential ≤10 10-20 20-50 50-100 100-250 250-500 500-1000 5-10 MW 10 to
20 MW
20 to
100 MW
100 to
1,000 MW
Estimated levelized cost of
electricity (plus delivery)
based on reported 2015 costs*
Sources: Tracking the Sun IX and Utility-Scale Solar 2015
(SunShot, Berkeley Labs); SAM (NREL); Crossborder; EIA; ILSR
Uses residential electricity rates of 12¢, commercial
of 10¢ per kilowatt-hour (U.S. Average, EIA)
Actual cost to“purchase” grid-exported power
via net metering
kilowatts megawatts
DOESN’T INCLUDE LOCAL CAPACITY VALUE
OR AVOIDED TRANSMISSION LOSSES OF
DISTRIBUTED SOLAR
L O C A L S P E N D I N G VA L U E O F S O L A R
Valueoflocalspendingforproject“softcosts”
0.0¢
2.0¢
4.0¢
6.0¢
8.0¢
10.0¢
12.0¢
14.0¢
Residential ≤10 10-20 20-50 50-100 100-250 250-500 500-1000 5-10 MW 10 to
20 MW
20 to
100 MW
100 to
1,000 MW
Sources: Crossborder; ILSR
Assumes local soft costs are 25% of installed costs
for residential, 6% for large commercial, and
linearly distributed in between
Value of local spending during project installation
(20-year net present value)
kilowatts megawatts
L O C A L S P E N D I N G VA L U E O F S O L A R
Costtopurchaseenergylessvalueoflocalspending
forproject“softcosts”
0.0¢
2.0¢
4.0¢
6.0¢
8.0¢
10.0¢
12.0¢
14.0¢
Residential ≤10 10-20 20-50 50-100 100-250 250-500 500-1000 5-10 MW 10 to
20 MW
20 to
100 MW
100 to
1,000 MW
kilowatts megawatts
Cost of energy to grid less local spending benefits
Sources: Tracking the Sun IX and Utility-Scale Solar 2015
(SunShot, Berkeley Labs); SAM (NREL); Crossborder; EIA; ILSR
Uses residential electricity rates of 12¢, commercial of 10¢ per
kilowatt-hour (U.S. Average, EIA); assumes local soft costs are
25% of installed costs (Crossborder)
W H Y L O C A L ?
You can
You choose
It pays
W H AT ’ S W R O N G W I T H
T H E S TAT U S Q U O ?
P R O F I T S L E AV E
T H I S R E Q U I R E S …
… A L A W Y E R
P O W E R T O S T O P E N E R G Y S AV I N G S
Undercutting a solar study
$88,000 in campaign contributions in 2016 alone
Candidates for office
2016
88,000
Eighty-eight thousand and zero/100
Influence Patricia Leonard Kampling
FollowTheMoney.org
ilsr.org
I N C U M B E N T S O P P O S E L O C A L C O N T R O L
Y O U ’ R E N O T A L O N E
2 , 0 0 0 M U N I C I PA L U T I L I T I E S
Mutual aid
H U N D R E D S O F C O M M U N I T Y C H O I C E
P R O G R A M S
PA R T O F A L A R G E R G R I D
K E Y I S S U E : I N V E S T O R -
O W N E D A L L I A N T H A S A
D U T Y T O S H A R E H O L D E R
VA L U E
Y O U C A N , Y O U S H O U L D , I T PAY S
M U N I C I PA L I Z E ?
www.ilsr.org
C H A N G I N G
T H E R U L E S
P R O V I D I N G
T O O L S
1 0 0 % R E N E WA B L E
L O C A L E C O N O M Y
H U M A N
S C A L E
L O C A L
O W N E R S H I P
D E M O C R AT I C
A U T H O R I T Y
I L L U S T R AT I N G
T H E V I S I O N
Beyond	Sharing:	How	Communities	
Can	Take	Ownership	of	Renewable	
Power	
The electric utility monopoly is breaking up, but will new companies
make renewable energy become another form of wealth extraction or
can community renewable energy enable communities to capture their
renewable power?
John Farrell
April 2016
www.ilsr.org
R E A D O U R
R E P O R T S
R E A D M O R E
@johnffarrell
F O L L O W

Local Power for Decorah, Iowa

  • 1.
    L O CA L P O W E R F O R T H E L O C A L E C O N O M Y E N E R G Y D E M O C R A C Y F R O M A C I T Y- O W N E D U T I L I T Y John Farrell Director of Energy DemocracyMarch 26, 2018 Presentation in Decorah, IA
  • 2.
    W H YL O C A L ? ( PA R T 1 )
  • 3.
    L E T’ S WA R M U P
  • 4.
    W I ND P O W E R P O T E N T I A L ? Percentage of state electricity sales
  • 5.
    A. 25% B. 55% C.175% D. 5,200% E.27,000% W I N D P O W E R P O T E N T I A L ? Percentage of state electricity sales
  • 6.
    W I ND P O W E R P O T E N T I A L Percentage of state electricity sales A. 25% B. 55% C. 175% D. 5,200% E. 27,000%
  • 7.
    W I ND P O W E R P O T E N T I A L 30% c.f. or better 2 0 1 0 N R E L D ATA 100m Potential Percent of Electricity from Onshore Wind Power 0 to 10% 10 to 25% 25 to 50% 50 to 100% 100% or moreSource: http://1.usa.gov/1LBmAIV “You have a unique opportunity to buy wind that is cheaper than fossil fuel” —Xcel CEO Ben Fowke
  • 8.
    L E T’ S WA R M U P ( # 2 )
  • 9.
    R O OF T O P S O L A R P O T E N T I A L ? A. 2% B. 15% C. 36% D. 59% E.112% Percentage of state electricity sales
  • 10.
    R O OF T O P S O L A R P O T E N T I A L A. 2% B. 8% C. 36% D. 59% E. 112% Percentage of state electricity sales
  • 11.
    23% 49% All buildings Source: http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy16osti/65298.pdf RO O F T O P S O L A R P O T E N T I A L 2 0 1 6 POTENTIAL PERCENT OF POWER FROM LOCAL ROOFTOP SOLAR Over 50% 40 to 50% 25 to 40% 11 to 25% 2008 data 40-50% 25-40% Over 50% Over 50% 25-40%
  • 12.
    W H YL O C A L ? ( PA R T 1 ) You can do it!
  • 13.
    W H YL O C A L ? ( PA R T 2 )
  • 14.
    C O MM U N I T Y C H O I C E
  • 15.
    C O MM U N I T I E S WA N T C O N T R O L Over 50 U.S. cities have made 100% renewable commitments
  • 16.
    W H ATS TAT E W I L L H AV E T W O C I T I E S W I T H 1 0 0 % R E N E WA B L E B Y 2 0 2 0 ?
  • 17.
  • 18.
    More solar wattsper capita than any other utility?
  • 19.
    More solar wattsper capita than any other utility! Farmers Electric Cooperative Kalona
  • 20.
    W H YL O C A L ? ( PA R T 2 ) You choose
  • 21.
    W H YL O C A L ? ( PA R T 3 )
  • 22.
    S O LA R E C O N O M I E S O F S C A L E Costofelectricity 0.0¢ 2.0¢ 4.0¢ 6.0¢ 8.0¢ 10.0¢ 12.0¢ 14.0¢ Residential ≤10 10-20 20-50 50-100 100-250 250-500 500-1000 5-10 MW 10 to 20 MW 20 to 100 MW 100 to 1,000 MW Estimated levelized cost of electricity (plus delivery) based on reported 2015 costs* Sources: Tracking the Sun IX and Utility-Scale Solar 2015 (SunShot, Berkeley Labs); SAM (NREL); Crossborder; EIA; ILSR Uses residential electricity rates of 12¢, commercial of 10¢ per kilowatt-hour (U.S. Average, EIA) Actual cost to“purchase” grid-exported power via net metering kilowatts megawatts DOESN’T INCLUDE LOCAL CAPACITY VALUE OR AVOIDED TRANSMISSION LOSSES OF DISTRIBUTED SOLAR
  • 23.
    L O CA L S P E N D I N G VA L U E O F S O L A R Valueoflocalspendingforproject“softcosts” 0.0¢ 2.0¢ 4.0¢ 6.0¢ 8.0¢ 10.0¢ 12.0¢ 14.0¢ Residential ≤10 10-20 20-50 50-100 100-250 250-500 500-1000 5-10 MW 10 to 20 MW 20 to 100 MW 100 to 1,000 MW Sources: Crossborder; ILSR Assumes local soft costs are 25% of installed costs for residential, 6% for large commercial, and linearly distributed in between Value of local spending during project installation (20-year net present value) kilowatts megawatts
  • 24.
    L O CA L S P E N D I N G VA L U E O F S O L A R Costtopurchaseenergylessvalueoflocalspending forproject“softcosts” 0.0¢ 2.0¢ 4.0¢ 6.0¢ 8.0¢ 10.0¢ 12.0¢ 14.0¢ Residential ≤10 10-20 20-50 50-100 100-250 250-500 500-1000 5-10 MW 10 to 20 MW 20 to 100 MW 100 to 1,000 MW kilowatts megawatts Cost of energy to grid less local spending benefits Sources: Tracking the Sun IX and Utility-Scale Solar 2015 (SunShot, Berkeley Labs); SAM (NREL); Crossborder; EIA; ILSR Uses residential electricity rates of 12¢, commercial of 10¢ per kilowatt-hour (U.S. Average, EIA); assumes local soft costs are 25% of installed costs (Crossborder)
  • 25.
    W H YL O C A L ? You can You choose It pays
  • 26.
    W H AT’ S W R O N G W I T H T H E S TAT U S Q U O ?
  • 27.
    P R OF I T S L E AV E
  • 28.
    T H IS R E Q U I R E S …
  • 29.
    … A LA W Y E R
  • 30.
    P O WE R T O S T O P E N E R G Y S AV I N G S
  • 31.
  • 32.
    $88,000 in campaigncontributions in 2016 alone Candidates for office 2016 88,000 Eighty-eight thousand and zero/100 Influence Patricia Leonard Kampling FollowTheMoney.org
  • 33.
  • 34.
    I N CU M B E N T S O P P O S E L O C A L C O N T R O L
  • 35.
    Y O U’ R E N O T A L O N E
  • 36.
    2 , 00 0 M U N I C I PA L U T I L I T I E S Mutual aid
  • 37.
    H U ND R E D S O F C O M M U N I T Y C H O I C E P R O G R A M S
  • 38.
    PA R TO F A L A R G E R G R I D
  • 39.
    K E YI S S U E : I N V E S T O R - O W N E D A L L I A N T H A S A D U T Y T O S H A R E H O L D E R VA L U E
  • 40.
    Y O UC A N , Y O U S H O U L D , I T PAY S M U N I C I PA L I Z E ?
  • 41.
    www.ilsr.org C H AN G I N G T H E R U L E S P R O V I D I N G T O O L S 1 0 0 % R E N E WA B L E L O C A L E C O N O M Y H U M A N S C A L E L O C A L O W N E R S H I P D E M O C R AT I C A U T H O R I T Y I L L U S T R AT I N G T H E V I S I O N
  • 42.
    Beyond Sharing: How Communities Can Take Ownership of Renewable Power The electric utilitymonopoly is breaking up, but will new companies make renewable energy become another form of wealth extraction or can community renewable energy enable communities to capture their renewable power? John Farrell April 2016 www.ilsr.org R E A D O U R R E P O R T S R E A D M O R E @johnffarrell F O L L O W