Skip to main content

Democracy needs journalism. Journalism needs you.

Fearless journalism is more important than ever. When news breaks, you need to understand what actually matters — and what to do about it. At Vox, our mission to help you make sense of the world has never been more vital. But we can’t do it on our own.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

Join today

Where emoji come from

Alex Abad-Santos
Alex Abad-Santos is a senior correspondent who explains what society obsesses over, from Marvel and movies to fitness and skin care. He came to Vox in 2014. Prior to that, he worked at the Atlantic.

Emoji_apple_64_indexed_256colors

Eat, pray and every other kind of emoji you can find.

On Monday, it was announced that around 250 new emoji would be entering our universe to replace more words and add things like context and texture to our digital conversations. But wait — who gets to decide what is and isn’t an emoji? What’s the process? And why isn’t there one for “cheese”?

The beginnings of emoji

Emoji are a type of visual shorthand that was first developed in 1999 by a man named Shigetaka Kurita. You can think of them as those standard emoticons on steroids.

To be clear: we’re talking about the standard “=)” emoticons as opposed to the more complex emoticons like:

  • the shrug “¯\_(ツ)_/¯”
  • or the table flip: (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻

The word emoji comes from the Japanese characters 絵 (e = picture) 文 (mo = writing) 字 (ji = character). Kurita was looking to create symbols that would provide more context in a digital conversation than texts or regular emoticons, which could get misconstrued.

For example: if a friend texts you that they got a promotion, you can send a happy-face emoticon back, but that conveys something very simple (“I am happy about this”), and suggests you didn’t put much thought into it. And it might not convey the enthusiasm you actually feel. Same with texting something like “Congrats!”

However, if you were to do something like this:

Screenshot_2014-06-17_09.55.47

You manage to convey a more specific emotion or sentiment (“great job, get the money, let’s celebrate and dance”) without needing to work that hard.

Adding them to traditional texts can help clarify your tone. “If someone says Wakarimashita you don’t know whether it’s a kind of warm, soft ‘I understand’ or a ‘yeah, I get it’ kind of cool, negative feeling,” Kurita told The Verge last year. “You don’t know what’s in the writer’s head.”

That said, emoji still allow for creative ambiguity. Take the “nail care” emoji:

Picture_171

“Nail care” could convey something as simple as “getting my nails done” or, within the right context, it could be something more haughty like “haters gonna hate”, “look what I just did”, or “I’m not bothered.” That added interpretation is part of the beauty of emoji.

Is “emoji” plural or singular?

There’s no consensus here. Some publications, like The Guardian and Slate use the term “emojis” to refer to multiple emoji. Time, USA Today, and the Associated Press prefer to use emoji as both the singular and plural. Like we do with deer and fish, Vox is going to use emoji as both the plural and singular.

Where emoji came from

The first 250 or so emoji came from Kurita’s former company, Docomo. It wasn’t able to get a copyright on their designs which opened the door for other companies to adopt emoji. Docomo’s rivals and tech juggernauts like Apple either built on Docomo’s or made their own set of rival emoji. Eventually, hundreds of emoji were encoded in Unicode, the industry standard that sets the coding of text across different software platforms, in 2010. Since most modern computer systems are compatible with Unicode, that made emoji access virtually universal.

Because emoji originated in Japan, there may be a “lost in translation” quality to some of them. One of these is the “sweat smiley” emoji:

Picture_172

That bead of sweat is popular in Japanese anime and manga, and is meant to symbolize stress, frustration, embarrassment, confusion.

“I’d really like to know to what degree they’re used in the same way, and to what degree there’s a local nuance … there are probably things that only Japanese people would understand, or only Americans would understand,” Kurita said.

Who decides which emoji make the cut?

The Unicode Consortium is responsible for deciding what characters are part of Unicode, and thus which emoji are widely available. The consortium is made up of computer corporations, software producers, database vendors, research institutions and many more. The Unicode Technical Committee, a smaller committee within the consortium, is in charge of accepting characters, scripts, and emoji into the Unicode Standard.

If you see an emoji that you think should exist but doesn’t, you can fill out a form and begin a long, formal process to get it into the standard. “It frequently takes years to move from an initial draft to final standardization,” the Unicode website states, explaining that each character, emoji, or whatnot is scrutinized very carefully.

To get a new emoji approved, you have to prove that your proposed emoji or character is widely used and will be used after its adopted into the Unicode standard.

Emoji’s diversity problem

With the exception of “man in turban” and “man with gua pia mao”, most of the “people” emoji available are white; Miley Cyrus, among many others, has been quite vocal in calling for this to change. Back in March, Apple said it was going to work with the Unicode consortium to get more diverse emoji, but it appears that non-white “people” emoji were not included in this update.

The most telling sign of progress came on Monday, when the consortium published a draft which included plans to offer five different skin tones for human emoji. The proposed process would have someone pick the human emoji, then choose a skin color. And the default “human” emoji would have an unrealistic skin color, like a smiley.

(Unicode)

“When a human emoji is not followed by a emoji modifier character, it should use a non-realistic skin tone, such as that typically used for the smiley faces, or a silhouette,”the consortium wrote.

These plans are susceptible to change and aren’t set it in stone — it is a draft after all. But it could mean a more diverse set of emojis in the future.

The great cheese emoji crisis

The continued lack of a "cheese" emoji is perhaps the greatest tragedy in the world of emoji. The lack of a "taco" emoji is a close second:

Screen_shot_2014-06-17_at_11.32.32_am

A grave injustice

There seems to be something strange going on when “man in business suit levitating” gets an emoji before cheese or taco. As I mentioned, the process is long and detailed but any cheese or taco aficionado could start up an application. There haven’t been any reports if Big Taco or Big Cheese are involved or are willing to get involved, but there’s been some grassroots activism on behalf of taco and hot dog emoji.

What’s new in this batch

There are 274 new emoji being added in July. A couple of our favorites include:

  • bed
  • “right anger bubble” (not to be confused with left anger bubble)
  • “reversed hand with middle finger extended”
  • “sleuth or spy”
  • “weightlifter”
  • “derelict house building”
  • “man in business suit levitating.”

You can find the entire list here. A majority of emoji that were added this time around were derived from the Wingdings and Webdings fonts.

The Unicode update went up on Monday. However, it will be up to Unicode platforms like iOS and Android to implement the new standards; once they do, you can start using the new ones on your phone.

Update: Unicode released an emoji draft update on Monday which addressed diversity. This article has been updated to reflect that.

See More:

More in archives

The Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health careThe Supreme Court will decide if the government can ban transgender health care
Supreme Court

Given the Court’s Republican supermajority, this case is unlikely to end well for trans people.

By Ian Millhiser
On the MoneyOn the Money
archives

Learn about saving, spending, investing, and more in a monthly personal finance advice column written by Nicole Dieker.

By Vox Staff
Total solar eclipse passes over USTotal solar eclipse passes over US
archives
By Vox Staff
The 2024 Iowa caucusesThe 2024 Iowa caucuses
archives

The latest news, analysis, and explainers coming out of the GOP Iowa caucuses.

By Vox Staff
The Big SqueezeThe Big Squeeze
archives

The economy’s stacked against us.

By Vox Staff
Abortion medication in America: News and updatesAbortion medication in America: News and updates
archives

A Texas judge issued a national ruling against medication abortion. Here’s what you need to know.

By Vox Staff