User talk:Pennenetui3000

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Pennenetui3000!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:30, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests

File:Affiche VVD 1949 nogmaals omlaag.jpg

File:Affiche VVD 1949 nogmaals omlaag.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Tekstman (talk) 21:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Affiche CHU 1948 Stemt Tilanus.jpg

File:Affiche CHU 1948 Stemt Tilanus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Tekstman (talk) 19:11, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Affiche PvdA 1952 de beste keus.jpg

File:Affiche PvdA 1952 de beste keus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Tekstman (talk) 19:24, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Affiche KVP 1956.jpg

File:Affiche KVP 1956.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Tekstman (talk) 19:26, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Affiche GPV 1959.jpg

File:Affiche GPV 1959.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Tekstman (talk) 19:27, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jan Anthonie Bruijn - Dutch Kidney Foundation

Hallo Pennenetui3000, weet je of dit het logo is van de Dutch Kidney Foundation (Q29787926) (Nierstichting Nederland) zoals in het lemma aangegeven?? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 08:19, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dat geldt natuurlijk dan ook voor deze afbeeldingen. Cheers. Lotje (talk) 08:21, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Lotje, de Nierstichting gebruikt in hun logo zo te zien zelf de ondertekst "Je nieren zijn je leven" (voorheen "Leven gaat voor", geïntroduceerd in 2013), en dat heeft een iets andere kleurstelling (zie bv. bovenaan op https://nierstichting.nl/). Het logo dat in deze foto's te zien is lijkt een soort "actielogo" te zijn, dat in ieder geval op https://actie.nierstichting.nl/ door de Nierstichting zelf gebruikt wordt. (Hier een heuse downloadpagina). Pennenetui3000 (talk) 10:24, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bedankt voor de reactie Pennenetui3000. De afbeeldingen samen onderbrengen in Category:Dutch Kidney Foundation of Category:Nierstichting Nederland onder te brengen in Category:Human kidneys en/of Category:Health care foundations? Wat denk je? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 11:25, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, lijkt me een goed idee ja, iets als "2020 in Blijdorpse Polder" voldoet wat dat betreft niet m.i. Ik geloof dat het gebruikelijk is om hier de Engelstalige naam aan te houden, maar ik heb daar geen hele sterke mening over. Pennenetui3000 (talk) 12:23, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Vysotsky: je advies zou welkom zijn :-) Cheers. Lotje (talk) 13:02, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

De meeste organisaties in Category:Medical and health organizations of the Netherlands zijn Nederlandstalig, dus dat heb ik aangehouden. Vysotsky (talk) 13:35, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:PVV-meeuw.svg

File:PVV-meeuw.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Mbch331 (talk) 15:03, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tweede Kamer layout

Hallo Pennenetui3000, ik was de pagina van de Tweede Kamer een beetje aan het updaten en het viel me op dat jouw afbeelding van de layout van de Kamer een aantal kleuren gebruikt die niet helemaal overeenkomen met de partijkleuren. Bijv. SP is donderrood, terwijl de officiele kleur lichter is dan GL/PvdA. Ik heb een aangepaste versie gemaakt (https://ufile.io/ohq7uyc7). Aan jou de vraag of je deze kan uploaden als nieuwe versie van het bestand, mits je het eens bent met de aanpassing natuurlijk. Groeten, Frikandelbroodje42 (talk) 18:38, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Frikandelbroodje42, ik heb de kleuren in die afbeelding gebaseerd op de kleuren in nl:Sjabloon:Zetelverdeling/Partij/NL, om de kleuren zo veel mogelijk consistent te houden met de partijkleuren zoals ze op de Nederlandse Wikipedia worden gebruikt, bijvoorbeeld in de tabel op nl:Lijst van Tweede Kamerleden 2023-heden en nl:Politiek in Noord-Holland. Afweging bij het kleurgebruik in dit soort afbeeldingen gaat natuurlijk tussen enerzijds de kleuren uit de logo's direct gebruiken, en anderzijds wat voor kleuren goed contrast met elkaar hebben. Zo heb ik JA21 in een wat paarsige kleur gezet, omdat die partij in de eerste versie wegviel tussen de PVV-zetels. Ook bij SP en PvdA spelen dit soort problemen, wat dat betreft liggen jouw SP-felrood en PvdA-donkerrood redelijk dicht bij elkaar. Maar wat betreft geel voor NSC kun je denk ik wel een argument maken: de partij lijkt geel te gebruiken als secundaire kleur, er zijn geen andere partijen die we met geel aanduiden (behalve het niet-vertegenwoordigde BIJ1), en je hebt door zo'n wijziging meer ruimte op blauw. Pennenetui3000 (talk) 20:45, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hoi Pennenetui3000, dank voor je reactie. Ik zie nu inderdaad dat de kleuren op de Nederlandse wiki anders zijn dan op de Engelse. Dom van mij dat me dit niet eerder is opgevallen. Onderscheid tussen de kleuren is ook erg belangrijk. Ik zal proberen SP en GL/PvdA nog iets verder uit elkaar te brengen en ook nog even kijken of JA21 goed te zien is. Ik vind wel dat de Engelse pagina een eigen versie verdient, omdat de kleuren daar nu niet overeenkomen. Het geel voor NSC zou wat mij betreft ook een goede verbetering zijn voor de Nederlandse pagina's, omdat er al zoveel partijen met een versie van blauw zijn. Frikandelbroodje42 (talk) 12:28, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maakt niet uit dat je dat niet gezien had hoor ;) Ik wist ook niet dat je van de Engelse wiki afkwam, maar ja de kleuren verschillen inderdaad (het sjabloon dat daar wordt gebruikt is overigens en:Template:Party color, met hier de lijst van kleuren op beginletter). Het is trouwens ook niet uniek dat er voor beide wiki's andere afbeeldingen gebruikt worden, zo bestaat File:Dutch House of Representatives, 2017.svg

(voor de Engelse wiki) naast File:Dutch House of Representatives, March 2017.svg

(voor de Nederlandse). En inderdaad, gezien het kleurenpalet op beide wiki's anders zijn, ben ik het met je eens dat de Engelse pagina een eigen versie verdient. Ik zal iig even kijken naar de kleur van NSC, want daar zijn we het geloof ik wel over eens :) Pennenetui3000 (talk) 17:33, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Abzeronow (talk) 16:38, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Pennenetui3000

Contents

Deletion requests