| 
    
      | Focus Group Jury |  
      | 
  
    | Total Score | Ranking |  
    | SUM(FS) | AVG(FR) |  
    | 2625 | 38th |  |  
      | 
  
    |  | Vote Section | FS | FW | FWS | FR |  
    | A | Design | 95 | 25% | 23,75 | 15th |  
    | B | Functionality | 85 | 15% | 12,75 | 12nd |  
    | C | Usability | 100 | 35% | 35 | 1th |  
    | D | Ergonomics | 80 | 15% | 12 | 52nd |  
    | E | Engineering | 75 | 15% | 11,25 | 58th |  
    | F | Presentation | 85 | 50% | 42,5 | 32nd |  
    | G | Innovation | 80 | 15% | 12 | 35th |  
    | H | Technology | 90 | 15% | 13,5 | 15th |  
    | I | Fun Details | 85 | 50% | 42,5 | 31st |  
    | J | Market Value | 75 | 25% | 18,75 | 42nd |  
    | K | Specific | 90 | 15% | 13,5 | 15th |  |  
      | Executive Summary Best Score: Best section scores, considered by focus group was achieved in Usability Section Above Avarage Scores: Design, Funcionality, Innovation, Technology. Below Avarage Scores: Market Value, Specific, Fun Details.
 |  
      |  |  | 
    
      | Academic Group Jury |  
      | 
  
    | Total Score | Ranking |  
    | SUM(AS) | AVG(AR) |  
    | 2855 | 24th |  |  
      | 
  
    |  | Vote Section | AS | AW | AWS | AR |  
    | A | Design | 95 | 50% | 23,75 | 15th |  
    | B | Functionality | 85 | 35% | 12,75 | 12nd |  
    | C | Usability | 90 | 15% | 31,5 | 17th |  
    | D | Ergonomics | 80 | 50% | 12 | 52nd |  
    | E | Engineering | 75 | 35% | 11,25 | 58th |  
    | F | Presentation | 85 | 35% | 42,5 | 32nd |  
    | G | Innovation | 80 | 50% | 12 | 35th |  
    | H | Technology | 90 | 35% | 13,5 | 15th |  
    | I | Fun Details | 85 | 15% | 42,5 | 31st |  
    | J | Market Value | 75 | 25% | 18,75 | 42nd |  
    | K | Specific | 90 | 35% | 13,5 | 15th |  |  
      | Executive Summary Best Score: Best section scores, considered by focus group was achieved in Usability Section Above Avarage Scores: Technology, Market Value, Specific, Fun Details, Presentation Below Avarage Scores: Ergonomics, Usability, Design.
 |  
      |  |  | 
    
      | Professional Group Jury |  
      | 
  
    | Total Score | Ranking |  
    | SUM(PS) | AVG(PR) |  
    | 2895 | 22nd |  |  
      | 
  
    |  | Vote Section | PS | PW | PWS | PR |  
    | A | Design | 95 | 25% | 23,75 | 15th |  
    | B | Functionality | 85 | 50% | 12,75 | 12nd |  
    | C | Usability | 90 | 50% | 31,5 | 5th |  
    | D | Ergonomics | 80 | 35% | 12 | 52nd |  
    | E | Engineering | 75 | 50% | 11,25 | 58th |  
    | F | Presentation | 85 | 15% | 42,5 | 32nd |  
    | G | Innovation | 80 | 35% | 12 | 35th |  
    | H | Technology | 90 | 50% | 13,5 | 15th |  
    | I | Fun Details | 85 | 35% | 42,5 | 31st |  
    | J | Market Value | 75 | 50% | 18,75 | 42nd |  
    | K | Specific | 90 | 50% | 13,5 | 15th |  |  
      | Executive Summary Best Score: Best section scores, considered by focus group was achieved in Usability Section Above Avarage Scores: Design, Funcionality, Innovation, Technology. Below Avarage Scores: Market Value, Specific, Fun Details.
 |  
      |  |  |