default search action
9. IWDM 2008: Tucson, AZ, USA
- Elizabeth A. Krupinski:
Digital Mammography, 9th International Workshop, IWDM 2008, Tucson, AZ, USA, July 20-23, 2008, Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5116, Springer 2008, ISBN 978-3-540-70537-6
Breast Density, Texture and Risk I
- Serghei Malkov
, Jeff Wang, John Shepherd:
Improvements to Single Energy Absorptiometry Method for Digital Mammography to Quantify Breast Tissue Density. 1-8 - Albert Torrent
Breast Density Segmentation: A Comparison of Clustering and Region Based Techniques. 9-16 - Wenda He, Izzati Muhimmah, Erika R. E. Denton, Reyer Zwiggelaar:
Mammographic Segmentation Based on Texture Modelling of Tabár Mammographic Building Blocks. 17-24 - Michael Barnathan, Jingjing Zhang
Analyzing Tree-Like Structures in Biomedical Images Based on Texture and Branching: An Application to Breast Imaging. 25-32 - Keith Hartman, Ralph Highnam, Ruth Warren, Valerie Jackson:
Volumetric Assessment of Breast Tissue Composition from FFDM Images. 33-39
Clinical Experiences
- Susan M. Astley, Neil Prasad, Eve Allcock, Jennifer Diffey, Yit Yoong Lim, Caroline R. M. Boggis:
Effect of Image Quality on Film Reading. 40-47 - Takako Morita, Maya Yamada, Akiko Kano, Sumiya Nagatsuka, Chika Honda, Tokiko Endo:
A Comparison between Film-Screen Mammography and Full-Field Digital Mammography Utilizing Phase Contrast Technology in Breast Cancer Screening Programs. 48-54 - N. Hambly, Niall Phelan, G. Hargaden, A. O'Doherty, Fidelma Flanagan:
Impact of Digital Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening: Initial Experience in a National Breast Screening Program. 55-60 - Andrew P. Smith, Elizabeth A. Rafferty, Loren Niklason:
Clinical Performance of Breast Tomosynthesis as a Function of Radiologist Experience Level. 61-66 - Anders Tingberg
BIRADS Classification in Breast Tomosynthesis Compared to Mammography and Ultrasonography. 67-73 - David J. Getty, Carl J. D'Orsi, Ronald M. Pickett:
Stereoscopic Digital Mammography: Improved Accuracy of Lesion Detection in Breast Cancer Screening. 74-79 - S. Basu, A. Mavi, T. Cermik, R. Kumar, Abass Alavi:
Potential Role of FDG-PET Imaging in Defining Biology of Primary Breast Lesions. 80-83
Breast Imaging Physics
- Katsuhiro Ichikawa, Hiroko Kawashima, Naohiro Kimura, Mikio Hasegawa:
Clinical Usefulness of Super High-Resolution Liquid Crystal Displays Using Independent Sub-pixel Driving Technology. 84-90 - Baorui Ren, Andrew Smith, David Aizer, Don Kennedy, Jeffrey Yorker, Zhenxue Jing:
The Effect of Tomosynthesis X-Ray Pulse Width on Measured Beam Quality. 91-98 - Mark B. Williams, Patricia Goodale Judy, Mitali J. More, Jennifer A. Harvey, Stan Majewski, James Proffitt, John McKisson, Alexander V. Stolin, Brian Kross, Alexander Stewart, Edward F. Bullard, Manish Kankaria, Roman Janer:
Tomographic Dual Modality Breast Scanner. 99-107 - Aurelie Laidevant, Serghei Malkov
Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Method Using a Full Field Digital Mammography System. 108-115 - Ann-Katherine Carton, Christer Ullberg, Karin Lindman, Tom Francke, Andrew D. A. Maidment
Optimization of a Dual-Energy Contrast-Enhanced Technique for a Photon Counting Digital Breast Tomosynthesis System. 116-123 - Shih-Ying Huang, John M. Boone, Dandan Zheng, Kai Yang, Nathan J. Packard, George Burkett:
Simulation and Phantom Studies of Contrast-Enhanced Dual Energy Mammography (CEDEM). 124-129 - Satoru Matsuo, Hiroshi Fujita, Junji Morishita, Tetsuro Katafuchi, Chika Honda, Junko Sugiyama:
Preliminary Evaluation of a Phase Contrast Imaging with Digital Mammography. 130-136
Poster Session I
- Stephanie Tiew, Susan M. Astley, Bernice Dillon, Julie Morris, Caroline R. M. Boggis:
Prompting in Mammography: Reproducibility. 137-142 - Michael Berks, Chris Rose, Caroline R. M. Boggis, Susan M. Astley:
Synthesising Abnormal Structures in Mammograms Using Pyramid Decomposition. 143-150 - Sylvain Bernard, Serge Muller, Jon Onativia
Computer-Aided Microcalcification Detection on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Data: A Preliminary Evaluation. 151-157 - Fei Ma, Mariusz Bajger
Temporal Analysis of Mammograms Based on Graph Matching. 158-165 - Ann-Katherine Carton, Jean Anne Currivan, Emily F. Conant, Andrew D. A. Maidment
Temporal Subtraction Versus Dual-Energy Contrast-Enhanced Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A Pilot Study. 166-173 - Yang Can Gong, Michael Brady:
Texture-Based Simultaneous Registration and Segmentation of Breast DCE-MRI. 174-180 - Gabriel Prieto, Margarita Chevalier
A CDMAM Image Phantom Software Improvement for Human Observer Assessment. 181-187 - Yuji Ikedo, Takako Morita, Daisuke Fukuoka, Takeshi Hara, Hiroshi Fujita, Etsuo Takada, Tokiko Endo:
Computerized Classification of Mammary Gland Patterns in Whole Breast Ultrasound Images. 188-195 - Tetsuro Kusunoki, Masahiro Tagi, Kenji Yosikawa, Hiroshi Arai, Nachiko Uchiyama, Chieko Nagashima, Hiroyuki Kobayashi:
Comparison between Physical Image Quality as Measured by a Newly Developed Phantom Dedicated for Digital Mammography QC and That by European Guidelines Methods. 196-203 - Anthony J. Maeder
Assuring Authenticity of Digital Mammograms by Image Watermarking. 204-211 - Claudia Mello-Thoms
Different Search Patterns and Similar Decision Outcomes: How Can Experts Agree in the Decisions They Make When Reading Digital Mammograms?. 212-219 - Thomas Mertelmeier, Jasmina Ludwig, Bo Zhao, Wei Zhao:
Optimization of Tomosynthesis Acquisition Parameters: Angular Range and Number of Projections. 220-227 - Takako Morita, Maya Yamada, Akiko Kano, Sumiya Nagatsuka, Chika Honda, Tokiko Endo:
Subtle Abnormalities in Highly Dense Breasts Detected by Use of a Digital Phase Contrast Mammography System: A Report of Three Invasive Cancer Cases in the Early Stage. 228-234 - Nadia Oberhofer, Nicoletta Paruccini, Ehrenfried Moroder:
Image Quality Assessment and Equipment Optimisation with Automated Phantom Evaluation in Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM). 235-242 - Benjamin J. Pollard
Breast Mass Detection under Increased Ambient Lighting. 243-248 - Hans Roehrig, Jiahua Fan, William J. Dallas, Elizabeth A. Krupinski, Jeffrey Johnson:
Reducing Noise of Medical Grade Liquid Crystal Displays (LCD) and Its Relation to the Detection of Micro-calcifications. 249-256 - Shanghua Sun, Paul M. Taylor, Louise Wilkinson, Lisanne Khoo:
An Ontology to Support Adaptive Training for Breast Radiologists. 257-264
Image Analysis and CAD I
- Dave Tahmoush, Hanan Samet:
A Web Database for Computer-Aided Detection and Diagnosis of Medical Images. 265-272 - Nico Karssemeijer, Andrea Hupse, Maurice Samulski, Michiel Kallenberg
An Interactive Computer Aided Decision Support System for Detection of Masses in Mammograms. 273-278 - Heang-Ping Chan
Detection of Masses in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Mammography: Effects of the Number of Projection Views and Dose. 279-285 - Swatee Singh, Georgia D. Tourassi
Effect of Similarity Metrics and ROI Sizes in Featureless Computer Aided Detection of Breast Masses in Tomosynthesis. 286-291 - Georgia D. Tourassi
Knowledge Transfer across Breast Cancer Screening Modalities: A Pilot Study Using an Information-Theoretic CADe System for Mass Detection. 292-298 - Fengmei Zou, Yufeng Zheng, Zhengdong Zhou, Kwabena Agyepong:
Gradient Vector Flow Fields and Spiculated Mass Detection in Digital Mammography Images. 299-306 - Da Qi, Erika R. E. Denton, Joanna M. E. Leason, Diaa Othman, Reyer Zwiggelaar:
The Evaluation of Effects on Breast Cancer Diagnoses When Using Mammographic Semantic Information. 307-314 - Shinsuke Katsuhara, Hitoshi Futamura, Satoshi Kasai, Takako Morita, Tokiko Endo:
Computerized Scheme for Focal Asymmetric Densities on Mammograms by Use of Geometric and Texture Analyses. 315-322 - Yading Yuan, Maryellen L. Giger
Identifying Corresponding Lesions from CC and MLO Views Via Correlative Feature Analysis. 323-328
Image Analysis and CAD II
- Piotr A. Habas, Jacek M. Zurada, Georgia D. Tourassi
Case-Specific Reliability Assessment for Improved False Positive Reduction with an Information-Theoretic CAD System. 329-335 - Lubomir M. Hadjiiski
Computerized Detection and Classification of Malignant and Benign Microcalcifications on Full Field Digital Mammograms. 336-342 - Michiel Kallenberg
The Effect of Training Sample Size on Performance of Mass Detection. 343-349 - Balaji Krishnapuram, Jonathan Stoeckel, Vikas C. Raykar, R. Bharat Rao, Philippe Bamberger, Eli Ratner, Nicolas Merlet, Inna Stainvas
Multiple-Instance Learning Improves CAD Detection of Masses in Digital Mammography. 350-357 - Philippe Bamberger, Isaac Leichter, Nicolas Merlet, Eli Ratner, Glenn Fung, Richard Lederman:
Optimizing the CAD Process for Detecting Mammographic Lesions by a New Generation Algorithm Using Linear Classifiers and a Gradient Based Approach. 358-365 - Maciej A. Mazurowski, Jacek M. Zurada, Georgia D. Tourassi
Reliability Assessment of Ensemble Classifiers: Application in Mammography. 366-370 - Jiazheng Shi, Berkman Sahiner, Heang-Ping Chan
Breast Mass Classification on Full-Field Digital Mammography and Screen-Film Mammography. 371-377 - Guido van Schie, Nico Karssemeijer:
Detection of Microcalcifications Using a Nonuniform Noise Model. 378-384
Modeling and Simulation
- Vijay Rajagopal
The Breast Biomechanics Reference State for Multi-modal Image Analysis. 385-392 - Craig K. Abbey, John M. Boone:
An Ideal Observer for a Model of X-Ray Imaging in Breast Parenchymal Tissue. 393-400 - Michael Berks, Steven Caulkin, Rumana Rahim, Caroline R. M. Boggis, Susan M. Astley:
Statistical Appearance Models of Mammographic Masses. 401-408 - Mary Yip, Abdulaziz Alsager, Emma Lewis, Kevin Wells, Kenneth C. Young:
Validation of a Digital Mammography Image Simulation Chain with Automated Scoring of CDMAM Images. 409-416 - J. Michael O'Connor, Mini Das, Clay Didier, Mufeed Mahmoud, Stephen J. Glick:
Comparison of Two Methods to Develop Breast Models for Simulation of Breast Tomosynthesis and CT. 417-425 - Christine Tanner, John H. Hipwell, David J. Hawkes:
Statistical Deformation Models of Breast Compressions from Biomechanical Simulations. 426-432
Image Analysis and CAD III
- Gobert N. Lee
Classification of Benign and Malignant Masses in Ultrasound Breast Image Based on Geometric and Echo Features. 433-439 - Gina M. Clarke, James G. Mainprize, Chris Peressotti, L. Sun, Dan Wang, Judit T. Zubovits, C. M. B. Holloway, Gregory J. Czarnota, Martin J. Yaffe:
Validation of Cone-Beam CT Measurements of Tumour Burden Using Three-Dimensional Histopathology: Initial Results For a Lumpectomy. 440-446 - Akira Hasegawa, Huzefa Neemuchwala, Hiroko Tsunoda-Shimizu, Satoru Honda, Kazuo Shimura, Minoru Sato, Tomomi Koyama, Mari Kikuchi, Sonoe Hiramatsu:
A Tool for Temporal Comparison of Mammograms: Image Toggling and Dense-Tissue-Preserving Registration. 447-454 - Takeshi Hara, Daisuke Fukuoka, Yuji Ikedo, Etsuo Takada, Hiroshi Fujita, Tokiko Endo, Takako Morita:
Development of Whole Breast Ultrasound Viewer and Automated Mass Detection System. 455-462 - Mitchell M. Goodsitt, Heang-Ping Chan
Automated Registration of Volumes of Interest for a Combined X-Ray Tomosynthesis and Ultrasound Breast Imaging System. 463-468
Poster Session II
- Jennifer Diffey, Alan Hufton, Susan M. Astley, Claire Mercer
Estimating Individual Cancer Risks in the UK National Breast Screening Programme: A Feasibility Study. 469-476 - Gisella Gennaro
Clinical Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Full-Field Digital Mammography: Preliminary Results. 477-482 - Edward M. Hadley, Erika R. E. Denton, Josep Pont, Elsa Pérez, Reyer Zwiggelaar:
Analysis of Anatomical Linear Structure Information in Mammographic Risk Assessment. 483-490 - Despina Kontos, Cuiping Zhang, Nicole V. Ruiter
Evaluating the Effect of Tomosynthesis Acquisition Parameters on Image Texture: A Study Based on an Anthropomorphic Breast Tissue Software Model. 491-498 - Yoshifumi Kuroki, Shigeru Nawano, Seiko Suzuki, Hideya Takeo, Shigeru Saotome:
Computer Aided Detection (CAD) for Digital Mammography: A Retrospective Reading Study for Consideration on Utilizing CAD Most Effectively. 499-503 - Isaac Leichter, Richard Lederman, Eli Ratner, Nicolas Merlet, Glenn Fung, Balaji Krishnapuram, Philippe Bamberger:
Does a Mammography CAD Algorithm with Varying Filtering Levels of Detection Marks, Used to Reduce the False Mark Rate, Adversely Affect the Detection of Small Masses?. 504-509 - Hui Li, Maryellen L. Giger
Performance of CADx on a Large Clinical Database of FFDM Images. 510-514 - Anna María López, G. Barker, A. Bhattacharryya, K. Scott, M. Descour, L. Richter, J. Davenport, S. Lazarus, L. Kreykes, A. Valencia, R. Weinstein:
Expedited Breast Care: A New Model in Breast Health. 515-521 - Jennifer M. Oduko, Kenneth C. Young, Ozcan Gundogdu
Effect of Using Tungsten-Anode X-Ray Tubes on Dose and Image Quality in Full-Field Digital Mammography. 522-529 - Christina M. Shafer, Ehsan Samei
Assessment of Low Energies and Slice Depth in the Quantification of Breast Tomosynthesis. 530-536 - Joerg Teubl, Horst Bischof
Comparison of Multiple View Strategies to Reduce False Positives in Breast Imaging. 537-544 - Meritxell Tortajada, Robert Marti
Image Correction and Reconstruction for Breast Biopsy. 545-552 - Christopher E. Tromans, Michael Brady, Dominique Van de Sompel, Michele Lorenzon
Progress Toward a Quantitative Scale for Describing Radiodensity in Mammographic Images. 553-560 - Dominique Van de Sompel, Michael Brady:
Systematic Performance Analysis of SART as Applied to Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. 561-569 - Mari Varjonen, Pekka Strömmer:
Optimizing the Target-Filter Combination in Digital Mammography in the Sense of Image Quality and Average Glandular Dose. 570-576 - Moi Hoon Yap
Generic Infrastructure for Medical Informatics (GIMI): The Development of a Mammographic Training System. 577-584 - Cuiping Zhang, Predrag R. Bakic
Evaluation of 3D Breast Surface Reconstruction Accuracy Using Non-contact Scanner Images: A Phantom Study. 585-592
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
- Yiheng Zhang, Heang-Ping Chan
Investigation of Different PV Distributions in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) Mammography. 593-600 - Gang Wu, James G. Mainprize
Characterization of Projection Ordering in Iterative Reconstruction Methods for Breast Tomosynthesis. 601-605 - Ingrid S. Reiser, Beverly A. Lau, Robert M. Nishikawa
Effect of Scan Angle and Reconstruction Algorithm on Model Observer Performance in Tomosynthesis. 606-611 - Jasmina Ludwig, Thomas Mertelmeier, Holger Kunze
A Novel Approach for Filtered Backprojection in Tomosynthesis Based on Filter Kernels Determined by Iterative Reconstruction Techniques. 612-620 - Iason Kastanis, Simon R. Arridge
3D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Using Total Variation Regularization. 621-627 - Yue-Houng Hu, Wei Zhao, Thomas Mertelmeier, Jasmina Ludwig:
Image Artifact in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Its Dependence on System and Reconstruction Parameters. 628-634 - Amarpreet S. Chawla, Ehsan Samei
Multi-projection Correlation Imaging as a New Diagnostic Tool for Improved Breast Cancer Detection. 635-642 - Melissa L. Hill
Sensitivity of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Breast Tomosynthesis to Changes in Iodine Concentration during Acquisition. 643-650
Breast Density, Texture and Risk II
- Jennifer Diffey, Alan Hufton, Christine Beeston, Julia Smith, Tom Marchant, Susan M. Astley:
Quantifying Breast Thickness for Density Measurement. 651-658 - Olivier Alonzo-Proulx, Albert H. Tyson, Gordon E. Mawdsley, Martin J. Yaffe:
Effect of Tissue Thickness Variation in Volumetric Breast Density Estimation. 659-666 - Styliani Petroudi
Breast Abnormality Detection Incorporating Breast Density Information Based on Independent Components Analysis. 667-673 - Predrag R. Bakic
Comparison of Breast Percent Density Estimated from Digital Mammograms and Central Reconstructed Tomosynthesis Slice Images. 674-680 - Despina Kontos, Predrag R. Bakic
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Parenchymal Texture Analysis for Breast Cancer Risk Estimation: A Preliminary Study. 681-688 - Yang Can Gong, Michael Brady:
Texture Based Segmentation of Breast DCE-MRI. 689-695
Physics, Image Quality and Quality Assurance
- Ruben E. van Engen, Ramona Bouwman, Roeland van der Burght, Barbara Lazzari, David R. Dance, Patrice Heid, Magnus Aslund, Kenneth C. Young:
Image Quality Measurements in Breast Tomosynthesis. 696-702 - Jürgen Jacobs, Kim Lemmens, Joris Nens, Koen Michielsen
One Year of Experience with Remote Quality Assurance of Digital Mammography Systems in the Flemish Breast Cancer Screening Program. 703-710 - Gisella Gennaro
Automatic Exposure Control in Digital Mammography: Contrast-to-Noise Ratio Versus Average Glandular Dose. 711-715 - Paola Baldelli, Niall Phelan, Gillian Egan:
Effect of Anode/Filter Combination on the Dose and Image Quality of a Digital Mammography System Based on an Amorphous Selenium Detector. 716-723 - Hilde Bosmans
Comparative Technical Study of Two Generations of CR Plates for Digital Mammography. 724-731 - Kenneth C. Young, Jennifer M. Oduko, Ozcan Gundogdu
Comparing the Performance of Digital Mammography Systems. 732-739 - Jeff Wang, Serghei Malkov
Cross-Calibration and Longitudinal Quality Control of Hologic Selenia Full-Field Digital Mammography Systems for Volumetric Breast Density Measurements. 740-747 - Chantal Van Ongeval
Classification of Artifacts in Clinical Digital Mammography. 748-755 - Dörte Apelt, Heinz-Otto Peitgen:
Contrast Sensitivity in Mammographic Softcopy Reading - Determination with Psychophysical Procedures. 756-763
manage site settings
To protect your privacy, all features that rely on external API calls from your browser are turned off by default. You need to opt-in for them to become active. All settings here will be stored as cookies with your web browser. For more information see our F.A.Q.
last updated on 2024-11-04 20:31 CET by the dblp team
all metadata released as open data under CC0 1.0 license
see also: Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Imprint
dblp was originally created in 1993 at:
since 2018, dblp has been operated and maintained by:
the dblp computer science bibliography is funded and supported by: