Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(164,136 posts)
Tue Dec 2, 2025, 09:15 AM 18 hrs ago

IRS Agents to Review OnlyFans Content to Determine if It's 'Pornographic'

Source: MEDIAite

Dec 1st, 2025, 11:43 pm


Some IRS agents won’t have to worry about getting in trouble for watching porn at work, because part of their job duties will literally involve reviewing content on OnlyFans and other online creators.

The issue, according to a report by Andrew Duehren at The New York Times, is the interpretation of a restriction on the “no tax on tips” deduction passed as part of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” Act that says that tips earned for prostitution or “pornographic activity” are not eligible.

The legislation didn’t offer much additional guidance, and the IRS has yet to issue any statements clarifying what exactly constitutes “pornographic activity,” leaving the taxing agency in a similar boat as Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart when he endeavored to define “obscenity” in the 1964 case of Jacobellis v. Ohio: “I know it when I see it.” And apparently, the IRS expects its agents to “know it when they see it” as far as determining eligibility for this deduction.

There are almost five million creator accounts on OnlyFans, reported the Times, but it’s not clear how many of them are Americans and subject to U.S. tax laws, and not all of them are posting pornographic or sexual content. It’s also “unclear,” wrote Duehren, “whether strippers could claim the tips deduction,” because “[t]here is plenty of activity that an accountant or tax lawyer could argue is merely titillating.”

Read more: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/irs-agents-to-review-onlyfans-content-to-determine-if-its-pornographic/





How about auditing a couple hundred billionaires and a purported "trillionaire"?
33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
IRS Agents to Review OnlyFans Content to Determine if It's 'Pornographic' (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 18 hrs ago OP
Will they look at Melania's nude photos while they're livetohike 18 hrs ago #1
They hiring? Temp work? Prairie Gates 18 hrs ago #2
😂 underpants 18 hrs ago #4
Epstein. twodogsbarking 18 hrs ago #3
And... 2MuchNoise 16 hrs ago #20
The Puritans in charge bucolic_frolic 18 hrs ago #5
Trump's probably wasn't lonely bird 17 hrs ago #8
Sesame Street too will be examined. twodogsbarking 18 hrs ago #6
Especially Bert and Ernie BumRushDaShow 17 hrs ago #7
Probably the "Donald Grump" character they had in the 80s. They knew. twodogsbarking 17 hrs ago #9
Those episodes were why after years of GOP threats, he killed the CPB. BumRushDaShow 16 hrs ago #15
Damn! James48 17 hrs ago #10
Instead of looking for actual tax evasion by the wealthy and corporations ? ChicagoTeamster 17 hrs ago #11
Priorities, priorities. KPN 17 hrs ago #12
Maybe they will see their spouses in the vids. twodogsbarking 17 hrs ago #13
That could make for an awkward moment at the office Christmas party. rubbersole 15 hrs ago #26
Is porn tax-deductible? Asking for a friend. NT mahatmakanejeeves 17 hrs ago #14
How much are they making the agents pay? Emrys 16 hrs ago #16
Want to boost your views OF creators? Aviation Pro 16 hrs ago #17
will they be able to publish the guidance Old Crank 16 hrs ago #18
Project 2025 again Nigrum Cattus 16 hrs ago #19
Aren't most of those authors women? FakeNoose 16 hrs ago #22
Porn supports a big portion of the intenet... Wounded Bear 16 hrs ago #21
One 2020 study reported that 12% of websites are dedicated to pornography. ancianita 16 hrs ago #23
Thank you! Botany 16 hrs ago #25
The pornography determination is a fig leaf for yet another attack on women as wage-earners. Efilroft Sul 16 hrs ago #24
Project 2025 was founded and financed by theoretical "Puritans". rubbersole 15 hrs ago #27
One of the funniest threads in a long time! dickthegrouch 14 hrs ago #28
To access some OF content... mwooldri 13 hrs ago #29
Yeah, on OF any "pornographic" content is behind a paywall...nt Wounded Bear 13 hrs ago #30
Maybe. Maybe not. mwooldri 10 hrs ago #32
Free market economics...nt Wounded Bear 8 hrs ago #33
Why? Is the money a site makes different with their clothes off? mdbl 11 hrs ago #31

twodogsbarking

(17,085 posts)
3. Epstein.
Tue Dec 2, 2025, 09:35 AM
18 hrs ago

Epstein
Epstein
Epstein
Epstein
Epstein
Epstein
Epstein
Epstein
Epstein
Epstein
Epstein
Epstein
Epstein
Epstein
Epstein
Epstein

lonely bird

(2,653 posts)
8. Trump's probably wasn't
Tue Dec 2, 2025, 10:01 AM
17 hrs ago

It didn’t “rise” to that level.

I’ll see myself out now.😁

rubbersole

(10,933 posts)
26. That could make for an awkward moment at the office Christmas party.
Tue Dec 2, 2025, 12:00 PM
15 hrs ago

"Why, hello, Mrs. Wilson. So nice to see you in a dress."

Emrys

(8,828 posts)
16. How much are they making the agents pay?
Tue Dec 2, 2025, 10:56 AM
16 hrs ago

I'm sure the review will be extremely thorough and involve losts of re-checking and second and third opinions.

Aviation Pro

(15,135 posts)
17. Want to boost your views OF creators?
Tue Dec 2, 2025, 11:03 AM
16 hrs ago

Have the men wear masks in the likeness of the fucking pedophile. The women too.

Nigrum Cattus

(1,137 posts)
19. Project 2025 again
Tue Dec 2, 2025, 11:10 AM
16 hrs ago

they want to send romance novel authors to prison
for 10 years - troglodytes !!!

FakeNoose

(39,737 posts)
22. Aren't most of those authors women?
Tue Dec 2, 2025, 11:33 AM
16 hrs ago

My impression has always been that women are the creators and consumers of the "romance" genre fiction. However men (mostly) are the creators and consumers of the raunchier stuff that most of us label as "porn."

Yes I know ... there are many exceptions ... but I'm talking in general terms only.

ancianita

(42,695 posts)
23. One 2020 study reported that 12% of websites are dedicated to pornography.
Tue Dec 2, 2025, 11:34 AM
16 hrs ago

In 2020, estimates suggested there were nearly 30 million pornography websites, comprising about 12% of all websites on the Internet.
In 2022, the total amount of pornographic content accessible online was estimated to be over 10,000 terabytes.

The four most accessed pornography websites are Pornhub, xHamster, XVideos, and XNXX.

As of 2025, a single company, Aylo, owns and operates most of the popular online streaming pornography websites, including:
Pornhub, RedTube, Tube8, and YouPorn, as well as pornographic film studios like: Brazzers, Digital Playground, Reality Kings, and Sean Cody among others.

Some have alleged that the company Aylo is a monopoly.

It does not own websites like xHamster, XVideos, and XNXX.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_pornography

Efilroft Sul

(4,262 posts)
24. The pornography determination is a fig leaf for yet another attack on women as wage-earners.
Tue Dec 2, 2025, 11:45 AM
16 hrs ago

They can dress up their tax argument however they like, but after the administration determined that certain female-dominated fields are no longer considered professional, let's not shit around about what this review really is.

rubbersole

(10,933 posts)
27. Project 2025 was founded and financed by theoretical "Puritans".
Tue Dec 2, 2025, 12:11 PM
15 hrs ago

Repressing women in every facet of society is a given. Turns out the "Puritans" are actually pedophiles or worse. Keeping the Epstine files hidden keeps the richest of these perverts from being exposed.

dickthegrouch

(4,210 posts)
28. One of the funniest threads in a long time!
Tue Dec 2, 2025, 01:18 PM
14 hrs ago

Thank you!

I almost choked halfway through the OP.
YOMANKB

mwooldri

(10,769 posts)
29. To access some OF content...
Tue Dec 2, 2025, 01:53 PM
13 hrs ago

... you need to pay a subscription.

Therefore I ask the question: is my hard earned tax dollars being used by the government to pay for OnlyFans subscriptions?

mwooldri

(10,769 posts)
32. Maybe. Maybe not.
Tue Dec 2, 2025, 05:29 PM
10 hrs ago

Some OF creators offer a "free" subscription option where teasers are posted. Those teasers can be pretty racy. The end game though is to earn money and these OF creators who do a "free" option ultimately want you to sign up for a "VIP subscription" where you pay a fee, the content is more personal. And possibly more explicit. That's my experience with spicy content creators.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»IRS Agents to Review Only...