The present report discusses the protection of particularly vulnerable individuals in the context of EU policies on border checks, asylum and immigration. With a view to evaluate human rights integration in the external and internal EU policies in the field, the report studies how the protection of vulnerable individuals is ensured in, for example, border control procedures, asylum qualification, reception conditions and immigrant integration. Based on a critical analysis of relevant literature and reports by non-governmental and international organisations, the report formulates policy recommendations to further enhance the protection of vulnerable groups and individuals in the area of EU border checks, asylum and immigration policies.
The report builds upon earlier research conducted within the FRAME project, in particular the report ‘Fundamental Rights in the Institutions and Instruments of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice’ (2014) and the report ‘Critically Assessing Human Rights Integration in AFSJ Policies’ (2016). In these reports, concern was expressed over the fact that security considerations increasingly trump protection concerns in the EU’s policies on border checks, asylum and immigration. Attention was also drawn to the lack of coherence in the integration of human rights in the EU’s policy responses in this field. The present report deepens the analysis by focusing on particularly vulnerable individuals.
págs. 1-28
The instruments of pre-border control in the EU: A new source of vulnerability for asylum-seekers?
págs. 30-56
Vulnerability and detention: A study on asylum detention in Italy
págs. 60-96
Unaccompanied minors in Greece: are children’s best interests being served?
págs. 101-138
págs. 140-160
Economic and social rights and integration: The case of low-paid third-country migrant workers in Ireland
págs. 163-188
Unrecognised vulnerability?: Migration and statelessness in South Asia, with a special focus on the Indian treatment of intra-Asian refugee flows
págs. 189-209
Concluding remarks: From proclaiming acknowledgement of vulnerability to de facto vulnerabilitysensitive practices?
págs. 211-224
págs. 227-274
© 2001-2025 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados