skip to main content
note

Developing 3D Imaging Programmes--Workflow and Quality Control

Published: 16 November 2015 Publication History

Abstract

This article reports on a successful project for 3D imaging research, digital applications, and use of new technologies in the museum. The article will focus on the development and implementation of a viable workflow for the production of high-quality 3D models of museum objects, based on the 3D laser scanning and photogrammetry of selected ancient Egyptian artefacts. The development of a robust protocol for the complete process chain for imaging cultural heritage artefacts, from the acquisition of 2D and/or 3D images to the development of interactive applications for the public audience, was a specific objective of the project. The workflow devised by the university museum team combines reference photography and 3D imaging with a curatorial review of the actual object to its digital counterpart. It also integrates methodologies for managing the accompanying metadatasets to record these activities. As final stage deliverables from the process, the museum is making high-quality 3D images of artefacts from its collection available through creation and dissemination of digital 3D multiplatform interactive applications in order to allow remote access and to enhance the museum's public engagement. This short article concludes with practical considerations for a 3D imaging workflow such as time and skills needed, 3D model quality, and expectation management.

References

[1]
3DPetrie. 2014. The virtual lives of things. Retrieved September 29, 2015 from http://www.ucl.ac.uk/3dpetriemuseum.
[2]
3DPetrie team. 2014. 3DPetrie: 3D imaging research, digital applications and use of new technologies in the museum. Retrieved September 29, 2015 from http://www.ucl.ac.uk/museums/petrie/research/research-projects/3dpetrie.
[3]
Giancarlo Amati. 2014. The journey of a 3D model into interactive applications. UCL Museums Collection Blog. Retrieved September 29, 2015 from http://www.ucl.ac.uk/museums/petrie/research/research-projects/3dpetrie/3dpetrie-news/2014-02-02Blog.
[4]
Arius Technology. 2014. Arius3D Identik 300R Portable 3D Color Laser Scanner. 3D colour laser scanners. Retrieved October 14, 2015 from http://www.ariustechnology.com/.
[5]
David Arnold. 2013. 3D-COFORM. D.1.5—Project Final Report. Tools and Expertise for 3D Collection Formation. EU FP7 funded project. University of Brighton, Brighton, UK.
[6]
David Arnold and Guntram Geser. 2008. EPOCH Research Agenda for the Application of ICT to Cultural Heritage (Full report—May 2008), Budapest, Hungary: Archaeoloingua/Budapest.
[7]
Fraunhofer Institute for Computer Graphics Research IGD. 2014. About Cultlab3D. Retrieved September 29, 2105 from http://www.cultlab3d.de/.
[8]
Gabriele Guidi, Sara Gonizzi Barsanti, Laura Loredana Micoli, and Michele Russo. 2015. Massive 3D Digitization of Museum Contents. In Built Heritage: Monitoring Conservation Management. Lucia Toniolo, Maurizio Boriani, and Gabriele Guidi, eds. Research for Development. Springer International Publishing, 335--346.
[9]
Mona Hess, Ali Hosseininaveh Ahmadabadian, and Stuart Robson. 2014. A contest of sensors in close range 3D imaging: performance evaluation with a new metric test object. In ISPRS International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Volume XL-5, 277--284. ISPRS.
[10]
Mona Hess and Stuart Robson. 2010. 3D colour imaging for cultural heritage artefacts. ISPRS International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Vol. XXXVIII, Part 5, 288--292.
[11]
Ali Hosseininaveh Ahmadabadian, Stuart Robson, Jan Boehm, Mark Shortis, Konrad Wenzel, and Dieter Fritsch. 2013. A comparison of dense matching algorithms for scaled surface reconstruction using stereo camera rigs. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 78, 157--167.
[12]
Ali Hosseininaveh Ahmadabadian, Margaret Serpico, Stuart Robson, Mona Hess, Jan Boem, Ivor Pridden, and Giancarlo Amati. 2012. Automatic image selection in photogrammetric multi-view stereo methods. In VAST12: Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Intelligent Cultural Heritage, Brighton, UK, 2012. Eurographics Association, 9--16.
[13]
Marc Levoy et al. 2000. The digital Michelangelo project: 3D scanning of large statues. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. SIGGRAPH’00. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York, NY, 131--144.
[14]
London Charter Interest Group. 2009. The London Charter for the computer based visualization of cultural heritage. Retrieved September 29, 2015 from http://www.londoncharter.org/.
[15]
Aurore Mathys, Jonathan Brecko, and Patrick Semal. 2013. Comparing 3D digitizing technologies: What are the differences? In Digital Heritage International Congress, 2013. Strassbourg, 201--204.
[16]
Gordon McKenna and Efthymia Patsatzi. 2009. SPECTRUM: The UK Museum Documentation Standard, Cambridge: Museum Documentation Association. Open Knowledge Foundation 2007 Open Knowledge Definition. v1. 0.
[17]
Xueming Pan, Phillip Beckmann, Sven Havemann, Katerina Tzompanaki, Martin Doerr, and Dieter W. Fellner. 2010. A distributed object repository for cultural heritage. In 11th VAST International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage. Paris: Eurographics Association.
[18]
Ruggero Pintus, Holly Rushmeier, Kazim Pal, Ying Yang, Tim Weyrich, and Enrico Gobetti. 2014. Geometric analysis in cultural heritage. In Proceedings of Eurographics Workshops on Graphics and Cultural Heritage; State-of-the-Art Report (STAR). Darmstadt, Germany, 1--17.
[19]
Stuart Robson, Sally MacDonald, Graeme Were, and Mona Hess. 2012. 3D Recording and Museums. In C. Warwick, M. Terras, and J. Nyhan, eds. Digital Humanities in Practice. London: Facet Publishing, 91--115.
[20]
Pedros Santos, Sebastian Pena Serna, Andre Storck, and Dieter Fellner. 2014. The potential of 3D Internet in the Cultural Heritage Domain. In 3D Research Challenges in Cultural Heritage: A Roadmap in Digital Heritage Preservation, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Marinos Ioannides and Ewald Quak, eds. Springer.
[21]
Margaret Serpico, Tonya Nelson, and Mona Hess. 2013. Developing 3D interactives, The Petrie Museum of Egyptian Archaeology, London. Case Study in 3D Technology in Museum Practice. Museums Association Webpage. Retrieved October 14, 2015 from http://www.museumsassociation.org/museum-practice/3d-technology/15082013-petrie-museum.
[22]
Noah Snavely, Steven M. Seitz, and Richard Szeliski. 2008. Modeling the world from Internet photo collections. International Journal of Computer Vision. 80, 2, 189--210.
[23]
Natasha Stroeker and Rene Vogels. 2014. ENUMERATE—Survey Report on Digitisation in European Cultural Heritage Institutions. Enumerate Thematic Network (now part of Europeana v3). Retrieved March 1, 2015 from www.enumerate.eu.
[24]
Unity. 2012. Unity3D. Retrieved October 14, 2015 from www.unity3d.com.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage
Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage   Volume 9, Issue 1
February 2016
102 pages
ISSN:1556-4673
EISSN:1556-4711
DOI:10.1145/2846105
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 16 November 2015
Accepted: 01 May 2015
Revised: 01 March 2015
Received: 01 November 2014
Published in JOCCH Volume 9, Issue 1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. 3D imaging
  2. Ancient Egypt
  3. museums

Qualifiers

  • Note
  • Research
  • Refereed

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 10 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Extended reality for biomedicineNature Reviews Methods Primers10.1038/s43586-023-00198-y3:1Online publication date: 2-Mar-2023
  • (2020)Optimal Lateral Displacement in Automatic Close-Range PhotogrammetrySensors10.3390/s2021628020:21(6280)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2020
  • (2020)NK-CDS: A Creative Design System for Museum Art DerivativesIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2020.29725618(29259-29269)Online publication date: 2020
  • (2020)Innovation, Technology and User Experience in Museums: Insights from Scientific LiteratureComputational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 202010.1007/978-3-030-58799-4_59(819-832)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2020
  • (2019)Automated Low-Cost Photogrammetric Acquisition of 3D Models from Small Form-Factor ArtefactsElectronics10.3390/electronics81214418:12(1441)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2019
  • (2019) The Process Is Part of the Solution: Insights from the German Collaborative Project museum4punkt0 Museum International10.1111/muse.1219570:1-2(90-103)Online publication date: 11-Jan-2019
  • (2019)Capacity Building and Knowledge Exchange of Digital Technologies in Cultural Heritage InstitutionsMuseum International10.1111/muse.1219270:1-2(48-61)Online publication date: 11-Jan-2019
  • (2019)Examining the state of the art of audience development in museums and heritage organisations: a Systematic Literature reviewMuseum Management and Curatorship10.1080/09647775.2019.169831235:3(306-327)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2019
  • (2018)3D reconstruction in an illumination domeProceedings of the Conference on Electronic Visualisation and the Arts10.14236/ewic/EVA2018.4(18-25)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2018

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media