skip to main content
10.1145/3511047.3538028acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesumapConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

What Are Filter Bubbles Really? A Review of the Conceptual and Empirical Work

Published: 04 July 2022 Publication History

Abstract

The original filter bubble thesis states that the use of personalization algorithms results in a unique universe of information for each of us, with far-reaching individual and societal consequences. The ambiguity of the original thesis has prompted both a conceptual debate regarding its definition and has forced empirical researchers to consider their own interpretations. This has led to contrasting empirical results and minimal generalizability across studies. To reliably answer the question of whether filter bubbles exists, on what platforms, and what caused them, we need a systematically and empirically verifiable definition of the filter bubble that can be used to develop rigorous tests for the existence and strength of a filter bubble. In this paper, we propose an operationalized definition of the (technological) filter bubble and interpret previous empirical work in light of this new definition.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (fairumap_compressed.mp4)
Presentation of "What are Filter Bubbles Really? A Review of the Conceptual and Empirical Work"

References

[1]
Himan Abdollahpouri, Gediminas Adomavicius, Robin Burke, Ido Guy, Dietmar Jannach, Toshihiro Kamishima, Jan Krasnodebski, and Luiz Augusto Pizzato. 2020. Multistakeholder recommendation: Survey and research directions. User Model. User Adapt. Interact. 30, 1 (2020), 127–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-019-09256-1
[2]
Ashton Anderson, Lucas Maystre, Ian Anderson, Rishabh Mehrotra, and Mounia Lalmas. 2020. Algorithmic Effects on the Diversity of Consumption on Spotify. In Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020 (Taipei, Taiwan) (WWW ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2155–2165. https://doi.org/10.1145/3366423.3380281
[3]
Guy Aridor, Duarte Goncalves, and Shan Sikdar. 2020. Deconstructing the Filter Bubble: User Decision-Making And Recommender Systems. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1145/3383313.3412246
[4]
Eytan Bakshy, Solomon Messing, and Lada A. Adamic. 2015. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science 348, 6239 (2015), 1130–1132. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160 arXiv:https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aaa1160
[5]
Dimitrios Bountouridis, Jaron Harambam, Mykola Makhortykh, Mónica Marrero, Nava Tintarev, and Claudia Hauff. 2019. SIREN: A Simulation Framework for Understanding the Effects of Recommender Systems in Online News Environments. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Atlanta, GA, USA) (FAT* ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287583
[6]
Axel Bruns. 2019. Filter Bubble. Internet Policy Review 8, 4 (Nov. 2019). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1426
[7]
Axel Bruns. 2019. It’s not the technology, stupid: How the ‘Echo Chamber’ and ‘Filter Bubble’ metaphors have failed us. (2019). https://eprints.qut.edu.au/131675/
[8]
Axel Bruns. 2022. Echo Chambers? Filter Bubbles? The Misleading Metaphors That Obscure the Real Problem. In Hate Speech and Polarization in Participatory Society, Marta Pérez-Escolar and José Manuel Noguera-Vivo (Eds.). Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon, 33–48. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003109891-4
[9]
Jaime Carbonell and Jade Goldstein. 1998. The Use of MMR, Diversity-Based Reranking for Reordering Documents and Producing Summaries. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval(Melbourne, Australia) (SIGIR ’98). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 335–336. https://doi.org/10.1145/290941.291025
[10]
Nyshka Chandran. 2018. Obama to David Letterman: Media is dividing Americans. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/12/former-president-barack-obama-warns-on-polarizing-media-us-electoral-system.html Accessed: 2022-05-16.
[11]
Uthsav Chitra and Christopher Musco. 2020. Analyzing the Impact of Filter Bubbles on Social Network Polarization. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (Houston, TX, USA) (WSDM ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1145/3336191.3371825
[12]
Peter Dahlgren. 2021. A critical review of filter bubbles and a comparison with selective exposure. Nordicom Review 42 (01 2021), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0002
[13]
Kevin J. Delaney. 2017. Filter bubbles are a serious problem with news, says Bill Gates. https://qz.com/913114/bill-gates-says-filter-bubbles-are-a-serious-problem-with-news/ Accessed: 2022-05-16.
[14]
Mehdi Elahi, Dietmar Jannach, Lars Skjærven, Erik Knudsen, Helle Sjøvaag, Kristian Tolonen, Øyvind Holmstad, Igor Pipkin, Eivind Throndsen, Agnes Stenbom, Eivind Fiskerud, Adrian Oesch, Loek Vredenberg, and Christoph Trattner. 2021. Towards responsible media recommendation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00107-7
[15]
Mario Haim, Andreas Graefe, and Hans-Bernd Brosius. 2018. Burst of the Filter Bubble?: Effects of personalization on the diversity of Google News. Digital Journalism 6 (03 2018), 330–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1338145
[16]
Julian PT Higgins, James Thomas, Jacqueline Chandler, Miranda Cumpston, Tianjing Li, Matthew J Page, and Vivian A Welch. 2019. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. John Wiley & Sons.
[17]
Eslam Hussein, Prerna Juneja, and Tanushree Mitra. 2020. Measuring Misinformation in Video Search Platforms: An Audit Study on YouTube. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, CSCW1, Article 048 (may 2020), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3392854
[18]
Dietmar Jannach and Gediminas Adomavicius. 2016. Recommendations with a Purpose. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (Boston, Massachusetts, USA) (RecSys ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 7–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2959100.2959186
[19]
Glen Joris, Frederik De Grove, Kristin Van Damme, and Lieven De Marez. 2020. News Diversity Reconsidered: A Systematic Literature Review Unraveling the Diversity in Conceptualizations. Journalism Studies 21, 13 (2020), 1893–1912. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1797527 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1797527
[20]
Ping Liu, Karthik Shivaram, Aron Culotta, Matthew A. Shapiro, and Mustafa Bilgic. 2021. The Interaction between Political Typology and Filter Bubbles in News Recommendation Algorithms. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3791–3801. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442381.3450113
[21]
Felicia Loecherbach, Judith Moeller, Damian Trilling, and Wouter van Atteveldt. 2020. The Unified Framework of Media Diversity: A Systematic Literature Review. Digital Journalism 8, 5 (2020), 605–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1764374 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1764374
[22]
Feng Lu, Anca Dumitrache, and David Graus. 2020. Beyond Optimizing for Clicks: Incorporating Editorial Values in News Recommendation. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340631.3394864
[23]
Denis McQuail. 1992. Media Performance: Mass Communication and the Public Interest. SAGE Publications Ltd.
[24]
Judith Möller, Damian Trilling, Natali Helberger, and Bram van Es. 2018. Do not blame it on the algorithm: an empirical assessment of multiple recommender systems and their impact on content diversity. Information, Communication & Society 21, 7 (2018), 959–977. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1444076 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1444076
[25]
PM Napoli. 1999. Deconstructing the diversity principle. Journal of Communication 49, 4 (1999), 7–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02815.x arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02815.x
[26]
Efrat Nechushtai and Seth C. Lewis. 2019. What kind of news gatekeepers do we want machines to be? Filter bubbles, fragmentation, and the normative dimensions of algorithmic recommendations. Computers in Human Behavior 90 (2019), 298–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.043
[27]
Tien T. Nguyen, Pik-Mai Hui, F. Maxwell Harper, Loren Terveen, and Joseph A. Konstan. 2014. Exploring the Filter Bubble: The Effect of Using Recommender Systems on Content Diversity. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web (Seoul, Korea) (WWW ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 677–686. https://doi.org/10.1145/2566486.2568012
[28]
E. Pariser. 2011. The Filter Bubble: What The Internet Is Hiding From You. Penguin Books Limited. https://books.google.be/books?id=-FWO0puw3nYC
[29]
Annelien Smets, Jonathan Hendrickx, and Pieter Ballon. 2022. We’re in This Together: A Multi-Stakeholder Approach for News Recommenders. Digital Journalism (2022), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.2024079
[30]
Matus Tomlein, Branislav Pecher, Jakub Simko, Ivan Srba, Robert Moro, Elena Stefancova, Michal Kompan, Andrea Hrckova, Juraj Podrouzek, and Maria Bielikova. 2021. An Audit of Misinformation Filter Bubbles on YouTube: Bubble Bursting and Recent Behavior Changes. In Fifteenth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 1–11.
[31]
Paul S. Voakes, Jack Kapfer, David Kurpius, and David Shano-Yeon Chern. 1996. Diversity in the News: A Conceptual and Methodological Framework. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 73, 3 (1996), 582–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909607300306 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909607300306
[32]
Sanne Vrijenhoek, Mesut Kaya, Nadia Metoui, Judith Möller, Daan Odijk, and Natali Helberger. 2021. Recommenders with a Mission: Assessing Diversity in News Recommendations. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (Canberra ACT, Australia) (CHIIR ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 173–183. https://doi.org/10.1145/3406522.3446019
[33]
Frederik J. Zuiderveen Borgesius, Damian Trilling, Judith Möller, Balázs Bodó, Claes H. de Vreese, and Natali Helberger. 2016. Should we worry about filter bubbles?Internet Policy Review 5, 1 (March 2016). https://doi.org/10.14763/2016.1.401

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Use of Social Media in Urban E-PlanningRecent Advances and Prospects in Urban E-Planning10.4018/979-8-3693-5956-3.ch006(123-152)Online publication date: 17-Jan-2025
  • (2025)Emotions on Social Media as Catalysts for Change: Epistemic and Motivational Potentialities for Gender EqualityMedia and Communication10.17645/mac.859113Online publication date: 14-Jan-2025
  • (2024)Where Are the Values? A Systematic Literature Review on News Recommender SystemsACM Transactions on Recommender Systems10.1145/36548052:3(1-40)Online publication date: 5-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
UMAP '22 Adjunct: Adjunct Proceedings of the 30th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization
July 2022
409 pages
ISBN:9781450392327
DOI:10.1145/3511047
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 04 July 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. diversity
  2. filter bubble
  3. personalization
  4. recommendation
  5. recommender system

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Conference

UMAP '22
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 162 of 633 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

UMAP '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)561
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)87
Reflects downloads up to 15 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Use of Social Media in Urban E-PlanningRecent Advances and Prospects in Urban E-Planning10.4018/979-8-3693-5956-3.ch006(123-152)Online publication date: 17-Jan-2025
  • (2025)Emotions on Social Media as Catalysts for Change: Epistemic and Motivational Potentialities for Gender EqualityMedia and Communication10.17645/mac.859113Online publication date: 14-Jan-2025
  • (2024)Where Are the Values? A Systematic Literature Review on News Recommender SystemsACM Transactions on Recommender Systems10.1145/36548052:3(1-40)Online publication date: 5-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Enhancing Cross-Domain Recommender Systems with LLMs: Evaluating Bias and Beyond-Accuracy MeasuresProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3640457.3688027(1388-1394)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
  • (2024)All Polarized but Still Different: a Multi-factorial Metric to Discriminate between Polarization Behaviors on Social MediaProceedings of the 39th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing10.1145/3605098.3635972(1469-1478)Online publication date: 8-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Category-based and Popularity-guided Video Game Recommendation: A Balance-oriented FrameworkProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202410.1145/3589334.3645573(3734-3744)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • (2024)It ain't easy: using normatively motivated news diversification to facilitate policy support, tolerance, and political participationInformation, Communication & Society10.1080/1369118X.2024.2423892(1-18)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Why Culture and Philosophy Matter for the Studies of Algorithmic Recommender Systems. An Example from the Time Prior to the Outbreak of the Russian–Ukrainian War in 2022Human-Centric Intelligent Systems10.1007/s44230-023-00053-z4:1(111-126)Online publication date: 22-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Filter Bubbles and the Unfeeling: How AI for Social Media Can Foster Extremism and PolarizationPhilosophy & Technology10.1007/s13347-024-00758-437:2Online publication date: 7-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Not Just Algorithms: Strategically Addressing Consumer Impacts in Information RetrievalAdvances in Information Retrieval10.1007/978-3-031-56066-8_25(314-335)Online publication date: 24-Mar-2024
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media