Jump to content

Nathan Clifford

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
"Justice Clifford" redirects here. For other uses, see Justice Clifford (disambiguation).
"Attorney General Clifford" redirects here. For the Attorney General of Massachusetts, see John H. Clifford.

Nathan Clifford
Clifford c. 1855–65
Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States
In office
January 21, 1858 – July 25, 1881[1]
Nominated byJames Buchanan
Preceded byBenjamin Curtis
Succeeded byHorace Gray
United States Ambassador to Mexico
In office
October 2, 1848 – September 6, 1849
PresidentJames Polk
Zachary Taylor
Preceded byJohn Slidell
Succeeded byRobert Letcher
19th United States Attorney General
In office
October 17, 1846 – March 17, 1848
PresidentJames Polk
Preceded byJohn Mason
Succeeded byIsaac Toucey
Member of the U.S. House of Representatives
from Maine's 1st district
In office
March 4, 1839 – March 3, 1843
Preceded byJohn Fairfield
Succeeded byJoshua Herrick
Attorney General of Maine
In office
January 1, 1834 – January 3, 1838
GovernorRobert Dunlap
Preceded byJonathan Rogers
Succeeded byDaniel Goodenow
Member of the Maine House of Representatives
In office
1830-1834
Personal details
Born(1803-08-18)August 18, 1803
Rumney, New Hampshire, U.S.
DiedJuly 25, 1881(1881-07-25) (aged 77)
Cornish, Maine, U.S.
Resting placeEvergreen Cemetery
Political partyDemocratic
SpouseHannah Ayer
Signature

Nathan Clifford (August 18, 1803 – July 25, 1881) was an American statesman, diplomat and jurist.

Clifford is one of the few people who have held a constitutional office in each of the three branches of the U.S. federal government. He represented Maine in the U.S. House of Representatives from 1839 to 1843, then served in the administration of President James K. Polk as the U.S. Attorney General from 1846 to 1848 and as the U.S. Ambassador to Mexico from 1848 to 1849. In the latter office, he signed the Treaty of Guadeloupe Hidalgo. In 1858, President James Buchanan appointed Clifford to be an associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. Clifford served on the Supreme Court until his death in 1881.

Early life and education

Clifford was born on August 18, 1803, in Rumney, New Hampshire, to Deacon Nathaniel Clifford and his wife Lydia (née Simpson).[2] He was the eldest and only son of seven children. His family were of old Yankee stock. As a young girl in 1672, his great-great-grandmother Ann Smith was an accuser of Goody Cole, the only woman in New Hampshire convicted of witchcraft.[3]

He attended the public schools of that town, then the Haverhill Academy in New Hampshire, and finally the New Hampton Literary Institute[4] (now known as the New Hampton School).

Early career

After teaching school for a time, he studied law in the offices of Josiah Quincy III and was admitted to the bar in Maine in 1827, establishing his first practice in Newfield, Maine.

He served in the Maine House of Representatives from 1830 to 1834 and served as Speaker of the House from 1833 to 1834. He was then Maine Attorney General from 1834 to 1838, when he entered national politics.

U.S. House of Representatives (1839–43)

Initially, Clifford ran for the Senate and lost.[5] Then, Clifford was elected as a Democratic Representative to the 26th and 27th Congresses, serving March 4, 1839 through March 3, 1843.

In Washington, D.C., he followed the Democratic party line on policies, and was a strong supporter of the Van Buren administration. Clifford was opposed to a high tariff, supported internal improvements, endorsed state banking, and was in favor of federal retrenchment. He also criticized abolition, saying that its supporters were well intentioned but denounced the "mean and incendiary schemes of political Abolitionists."[5]

Due to re-redistricting and political infighting,[citation needed] Clifford was not a candidate for re-election in 1842.

Polk administration

U.S. Attorney General (1846–48)

In 1846, President James K. Polk appointed him 19th Attorney General of the United States after his predecessor, John Y. Mason, returned to being Naval Secretary. Clifford served in Polk's Cabinet from October 17, 1846, to March 17, 1848.

Ambassador to Mexico (1848–49)

Clifford resigned his post with the Justice Department to become the U.S. Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary to Mexico, serving from March 18, 1848, to September 6, 1849. It was through Clifford that the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was arranged with Mexico, by which California became a part of the United States.

A Whig Presidential victory meant that Clifford was recalled to the United States.[6] Following his service in the diplomatic corps, Clifford resumed the practice of law in Portland, Maine.

Associate Justice of the Supreme Court (1858–81)

Appointment

On December 9, 1857, President James Buchanan nominated Clifford as an associate justice of the United States Supreme Court, to a seat vacated by Benjamin R. Curtis.[7] Clifford's nomination came in the immediate wake of the Dred Scott v. Sandford decision and was hotly contested. As a longtime partisan Democrat, the opposition labeled Clifford a political hack and a "doughface" — a Northern man with Southern sympathies.[8] Anti-slavery representatives in the United States Senate fiercely opposed Clifford due to his pro-slavery record.[citation needed] After a 34-day-long confirmation process, the U.S. senate narrowly confirmed Clifford on January 12, 1858, by a 26–23 vote.[9] He was sworn into office on January 21, 1858.[1]

At the time Clifford joined the Court, all but one of the justices were affiliated with the Democratic Party. By 1872, Clifford had outlived his Democratic colleagues, and his new Republican colleagues tended to outvote him for his remaining nine years on the Court. Therefore, about one-fifth of all his opinions were in dissent.[10] He wrote the majority opinion in 398 cases.[11] His opinions were comprehensive essays on law and have sometimes been criticized as overly lengthy and digressive.

Justice Clifford rarely declared any legal philosophy about the U.S. Constitution but believed in a sharp dividing line between federal and state authority.[citation needed] One admirer, U.S. Senator James W. Bradbury, said Clifford's view was that the Constitution was not an "elastic instrument to be enlarged or impaired by construction, but to be fairly interpreted according to its terms, and sacredly maintained in all its provisions and limitations, as the best guaranty for the perpetuity of our republican institutions."[10] Clifford supported a mechanical jurisprudence adhering to the strict text of the Constitution.[citation needed]

Clifford's fields of expertise were commercial and maritime law, Mexican land grants, and procedure and practice. Clifford's major contribution to constitutional interpretation may have been his dissent in Loan Association v. Topeka rejecting "natural law" or any ground other than clear constitutional provision as a basis for the Court to use to strike down legislative acts.

Civil War

During the Civil War, Clifford remained loyal to the Union. He distrusted federal authority, but generally upheld federal power as far as was necessary to prosecute the war. Some exceptions were the Prize Cases, where he joined the dissent in arguing that the blockade of the Confederacy was illegal without a declaration of war, and Ex parte Milligan, where he joined the majority to limit the use of military tribunals to prosecute citizens when civilian courts were available.

Reconstruction

During Reconstruction, Clifford continued his skepticism of the federal government, now unrestrained by any consideration for the exigencies of wartime emergency powers. He more readily voted to limit federal power and make it easier for the South to rejoin the Union. In Cummings v. Missouri and Ex parte Garland, Clifford joined the majority in outlawing test oaths as part of the conditions of returning to the Union.[12]

Perhaps Clifford's most prominent declaration against exercise of federal authority came in the Legal Tender cases. The cases dealt with the Legal Tender Act of 1862, passed to permit the issuance of paper money to pay war debts and establishing that paper currency would be valid as legal tender.[13] In Hepburn v. Griswold (1870), a debtor whose note was made prior to the Act's passage challenged its application to her debt.[14] Clifford joined the majority in a 5–3 decision holding that the Legal Tender Act could not constitutionally apply to preexisting debts.[15]

Almost immediately after Griswold, the composition of the Supreme Court changed. Terminally ill Justice Robert Grier, who had joined the majority in Hepburn, resigned. President Ulysses S. Grant filled his seat with William Strong. The Court was also expanded by an Act of Congress from eight to nine members, with Joseph Bradley filling the new seat.[16]

This change had an immediate impact on the pending case Knox v. Lee (1871). The case dealt with remuneration for goods confiscated by the Confederate Army. The lower court ruled that the plaintiff must be repaid in paper money and that the defendant had to pay the difference in the valuation of the goods in gold to greenbacks.[17] Justice Clifford, joined by Justices Field and Nelson, dissented from the grant of certiorari, stating publicly, "I dissent from the order of the Court in these cases, especially from that part of it which opens for re-argument the question whether... the Legal Tender Act is constitutional as to contracts made before its passage—as I hold that the question is conclusively settled by the case of Hepburn vs Griswold..."[18]

On May 1, 1871, the Court ruled 5–4 to overturn Hepburn v. Griswold and find the Legal Tender Act constitutional — facially and as applied to pre-existing debt. The four justices who formed the majority in Hepburn (minus the late Justice Grier) all dissented in Knox. The new justices, Bradley and Strong, were the deciding factor.[19] Clifford submitted an 18,000 word dissent, angered that the Court would reverse its opinion in such a short amount of time. He also argued that the Legal Tender Act was facially unconstitutional, arguing that only hard money (gold and silver) with intrinsic value could serve as legal tender.[20]

Reconstruction amendments

Clifford held to a limited interpretation of the Reconstruction amendments. He joined the majority in the Slaughter-House Cases (1873), which distinguished state and federal citizenship and held that the Fourteenth Amendment only protects the narrower rights of federal citizens. In Hall v. DeCuir (1878), Justice Clifford wrote a separate concurrence to uphold segregation on steamships, coining the phrase "equality is not identity." His concurrence may have foreshadowed the principle of "separate but equal" laid down after his death, in Plessy v. Ferguson (1893).[12]

Compromise of 1877

Further information: Compromise of 1877
Nathan Clifford later in life

Clifford was president of the Electoral Commission convened in 1877 to determine the outcome of the 1876 presidential election. Clifford voted for fellow Democrat Samuel Tilden, but Rutherford B. Hayes won by a single vote.

Clifford believed that the commission erred in nullifying Tilden's apparent victory and never accepted Hayes as the lawful president.[21] Still, he signed off on Hayes' order for inauguration. In this instance Clifford put the country before his strong party beliefs, and his personal hope of having a Democratic president choose his successor.[22]

By 1877, Clifford's mental faculties had declined and impaired his ability to be an effective Justice. Justice Samuel Miller wrote that Clifford's mental deterioration was "obvious to all of the Court" and "in the work we do, no man ought to be there after 70." (Clifford was 74.) In 1880, Clifford experienced a stroke that, according to Miller, "rendered him a babbling idiot." He did not participate in any cases during that year, but still refused to step down, hoping that a Democratic president would be elected in 1880 and appoint a successor. He died on July 25, 1881, his successor on the bench, Horace Gray, instead being appointed by Republican president Chester Arthur.[23][24]

Personal life

As a young lawyer in Newfield, Clifford met his wife, Hannah Ayer. They had six children.[25]

Death and legacy

Clifford died on July 25, 1881, in Cornish, Maine, and is interred in Evergreen Cemetery in Portland.[26][27]

The Nathan Clifford Elementary School in Portland is named for him. Clifford's son, William Henry Clifford, was a successful lawyer and an unsuccessful candidate for the Maine State House of Representatives. His grandson, also named Nathan Clifford, was also a lawyer and briefly president of the Maine State Senate.

See also

References

  1. ^ a b "Justices 1789 to Present". Washington, D.C.: Supreme Court of the United States. Retrieved February 15, 2022.
  2. ^ The National Cyclopaedia of American Biography. Vol. II. James T. White & Company. 1921. p. 473. Archived from the original on May 13, 2021. Retrieved May 13, 2021 – via Google Books.
  3. ^ Gillette, William. The Justices of the United States Supreme Court, 1789-1969, Their Lives and Major Opinions. Edited by Leon Friedman and Fred L. Israel. Vol. II. New York: Chelsea House in Association with Bowker, 1969. 963.
  4. ^ A Small Gore of Land, Merrill, Gowan et al. 1977.
  5. ^ a b Gillette, William. The Justices of the United States Supreme Court, 1789-1969, Their Lives and Major Opinions. Edited by Leon Friedman and Fred L. Israel. Vol. II. New York: Chelsea House in Association with Bowker, 1969. 964.
  6. ^ Gillette, William. The Justices of the United States Supreme Court, 1789-1969, Their Lives and Major Opinions. Edited by Leon Friedman and Fred L. Israel. Vol. II. New York: Chelsea House in Association with Bowker, 1969. 966.
  7. ^ "Clifford, Nathan". Washington, D.C.: Federal Judicial Center. Retrieved February 15, 2022.
  8. ^ Bosch, William. The Supreme Court Justices, A Biographical Dictionary. Edited by Melvin I. Urofsky. New York: Garland Publishing, 1994. 123.
  9. ^ McMillion, Barry J. (January 28, 2022). Supreme Court Nominations, 1789 to 2020: Actions by the Senate, the Judiciary Committee, and the President (PDF) (Report). Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Retrieved February 15, 2022.
  10. ^ a b Gillette, William. The Justices of the United States Supreme Court, 1789-1969, Their Lives and Major Opinions. Edited by Leon Friedman and Fred L. Israel. Vol. II. New York: Chelsea House in Association with Bowker, 1969. 968.
  11. ^ A Few New Hampshire Notables Archived July 24, 2011, at the Wayback Machine USDC - District of New Hampshire.
  12. ^ a b Gillette, William. The Justices of the United States Supreme Court, 1789-1969, Their Lives and Major Opinions. Edited by Leon Friedman and Fred L. Israel. Vol. II. New York: Chelsea House in Association with Bowker, 1969. 968–972.
  13. ^ Fairman, Charles. History of the Supreme Court of the United States. Vol. VI. New York: Macmillan Company, 1971. 678.
  14. ^ Fairman, Charles. History of the Supreme Court of the United States. Vol. VI. New York: Macmillan Company, 1971. 698–700.
  15. ^ Fairman, Charles. History of the Supreme Court of the United States. Vol. VI. New York: Macmillan Company, 1971. 716–17.
  16. ^ Fairman, Charles. History of the Supreme Court of the United States. Vol. VI. New York: Macmillan Company, 1971. 717.
  17. ^ Fairman, Charles. History of the Supreme Court of the United States. Vol. VI. New York: Macmillan Company, 1971. 753.
  18. ^ Fairman, Charles. History of the Supreme Court of the United States. Vol. VI. New York: Macmillan Company, 1971. 755–56.
  19. ^ Fairman, Charles. History of the Supreme Court of the United States. Vol. VI. New York: Macmillan Company, 1971. 758.
  20. ^ Fairman, Charles. History of the Supreme Court of the United States. Vol. VI. New York: Macmillan Company, 1971. 762–3.
  21. ^ William DeGregorio, The Complete Book of U.S. Presidents, Gramercy 1997.
  22. ^ Gillette, William. The Justices of the United States Supreme Court, 1789-1969, Their Lives and Major Opinions. Edited by Leon Friedman and Fred L. Israel. Vol. II. New York: Chelsea House in Association with Bowker, 1969. 974.
  23. ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on September 27, 2016. Retrieved September 17, 2016.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  24. ^ Huebner, Timothy S. The Taney Court Justices, Rulings, and Legacy. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO, 2003. 103.
  25. ^ Gillette, William. The Justices of the United States Supreme Court, 1789-1969, Their Lives and Major Opinions. Edited by Leon Friedman and Fred L. Israel. Vol. II. New York: Chelsea House in Association with Bowker, 1969. 963–4.
  26. ^ "Hon. Nathan Clifford". Watertown Republican. July 27, 1881. p. 4. Archived from the original on May 13, 2021. Retrieved May 13, 2021 – via Newspapers.com.
  27. ^ "Funeral of Justice Clifford". Chicago Inter Ocean. Portland, Maine. July 29, 1881. p. 2. Archived from the original on May 13, 2021. Retrieved May 13, 2021 – via Newspapers.com.

Further reading

  • Clifford, Philip G., Nathan Clifford, Democrat from 1803 to 1881, New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1922.
Wikisource has original works by or about:
Nathan Clifford
Nathan Clifford Historic Marker
Legal offices
Preceded by Attorney General of Maine
1834–1838 		Succeeded by
Preceded by United States Attorney General
1846–1848 		Succeeded by
Preceded by Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States
1858–1881 		Succeeded by
U.S. House of Representatives
Preceded by Member of the U.S. House of Representatives
from Maine's 1st congressional district
1839–1843 		Succeeded by
Diplomatic posts
Preceded by United States Ambassador to Mexico
1848–1849 		Succeeded by
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nathan_Clifford&oldid=1255244671"