Talk:Steven Berkoff: Difference between revisions
change need-photo to specific Image requested using AWB |
→Controversy: new section |
||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
[[Special:Contributions/221.220.176.243|221.220.176.243]] ([[User talk:221.220.176.243|talk]]) 13:19, 27 October 2010 (UTC) |
[[Special:Contributions/221.220.176.243|221.220.176.243]] ([[User talk:221.220.176.243|talk]]) 13:19, 27 October 2010 (UTC) |
||
== Controversy == |
|||
This man is a bigot. He is severely critical views of the Bible; accuses the English of being anti-Jewish; and suggests that opposition to the Israeli attacks on Gaza is anti-semitic or worse. Has there been no public condemnation of his extreme views? |
Revision as of 07:05, 10 January 2012
Biography Start‑class | |||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Steven Berkoff be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Steven Berkoff article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
James Bond (inactive) | ||||
|
Comment
"Berkoff is hailed as the most prolific leader of alternative theatre across the globe." Citations? I know Berkoff is highly regarded, but is he really THE top man? Depends what you mean by alternative theatre maybe.
- Fixed by removing the text. Smalljim 19:16, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Query
why does Berkman redirect here? 172.131.17.165 02:26, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- It only does as a "may refer to" link. Smalljim 19:16, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Links
Hi,
I have a site on Berkoff which contains a number of masters theses and articles on Berkoff (included on my site with permission from the authors). These include in-depth analyses of Berkoff's work, as well as an insightful (if difficult) interview with Berkoff. I would like to include links to (some of) these on the Wiki entry, as I think it will direct people to invaluable sources of information, cited in a number of university courses on literature. Can I include these links? None are written by me. I run the site (I also run the official Steven Berkoff site) but it is not-for-profit, aimed at raising awareness of Berkoff, and providing a source for scholarly research. I appreciate and will follow your advice.
Best wishes
Iain Iainfisher (talk) 00:42, 1 October 2008 (UTC)iainfisher
- Sorry; but unofficial self-published websites and message boards are not acceptable as sources or as external links in Wikipedia, according to Wikipedia editing policies and guidelines: again: please see WP:V#Sources, WP:BLP#Sources, and WP:EL. These are official Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Readers of Wikipedia are, of course, free to do their own original research outside of Wikipedia, and your self-published sites and message boards are easily found via a Google search. But including them here is not within Wikipedia's policies and guidelines as an encyclopedia: see Wikipedia:Encyclopedia, as well as the above links re: WP:NOR, another core policy in Wikipedia. If you have authored an article or book on the subject(s) published by an authoritative publisher (publishing company or journal), not yourself, then you can cite those publications in a Wikipedia article. The official Website already links to you as a "contact", and people will find you that way; the listing of the official Website is bonafide. "Links" in Wikipedia articles are called "External links" (section heading): see WP:MOS for content of articles and WP:EL for guidelines for links that may be included. Self-published unofficial sites are not among them, as are not self-published blogs or message boards. As a new editor, you would benefit from consulting Wikipedia's various editing policies and guidelines, so that you do not waste your time adding links that have to be removed. See: WP:SPAM and WP:Advert, as well. Fansites are not permissible links if they are not also official websites of the actors, playwrights, or other celebrities/living persons. Being a contact person on an official website does not make your personal Website or message boards permissible external links or source references in Wikipedia. Please see the policy and guidelines linked in the talkpage header template above; espec. WP:NOR, WP:V, and WP:BLP. Thanks. --NYScholar (talk) 05:59, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Permissible sources and External links in Wikipedia articles
If iainfisher wants to link to third-party published sources that he has reprinted on his self-published Website, he needs to find the original sources and to give the full publication information in a proper source citation.
Articles reprinted on self-published Websites are not the same as the original sources, which are verifiable and citable with proper bibliographical information and, if Web resources, easily accessible with proper URLs provided. WP:BLP#Sources is very strict. Fansites and non-professional, unofficial self-published Website links are not permitted in biographies of living persons. Being a fan who has become a contact person for a subject's official Website is not the same as being a recognized published author/critic whose work is published by reliable book publishing companies and peer-reviewed journals. "Peer-review" means review by other specialists in a field (in this case dramatic literature and film and cultural studies). If one publishes an article in a peer-reviewed journal or a book on the subject, then one would cite that third-party publication. --NYScholar (talk) 06:06, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Also: Master's theses and Ph.D. theses/dissertations are not publications; they are unpublished theses. If one wants to cite them, there are appropriate ways to do so, with proper bibliographical format; for guidance, see The MLA Style Manual and/or other Style guides listed in Wikipedia: WP:MOS. (Such unpublished theses are not generally permissible as sources for articles (espec. about living persons) in Wikipedia.) I am sure that there are plenty of already published journal articles and books that list in their published bibliographies references to unpublished theses and dissertations. Wikipedia is not a substitute for academic research. It is just a starting point. Anyone can do his or her own additional research, using the third-party published sources and libraries for further resources. Self-published Websites are really not a substitute for such work. If anyone does, however, want to consult Iainfisher's website, they can find it easily enough via Google or other search engine. --NYScholar (talk) 06:11, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, I won't add them. Iainfisher (talk) 19:30, 1 October 2008 (UTC)iainfisher
Bibliography and filmography?
This article could use a properly-documented (WP:CITE, "well-sourced") section of "Bibliography" (list of works written by Berkoff: subsections: "Plays", etc.) and "Filmography" (lists of TV and Film roles) in reverse chronological or chronological order: see WP:MOS and other articles on playwrights and actors for models. --NYScholar (talk) 19:03, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Berk or Berks
He is listed as born 'Berk' in the introduction, but 'Berks' in the info. box. Which one?
- Checked Who's Who: "Berk" is the typo. Thanks for spotting this. --Old Moonraker (talk) 05:56, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Berkoff in the Professionals
In episode 10, series 5 of The Professionals (A Man Called Quin), Berkoff plays KGB hitman, Krasnov.
No idea how to add that into Wikipedia itself, but hope that someone that reads this can add it.
221.220.176.243 (talk) 13:19, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Controversy
This man is a bigot. He is severely critical views of the Bible; accuses the English of being anti-Jewish; and suggests that opposition to the Israeli attacks on Gaza is anti-semitic or worse. Has there been no public condemnation of his extreme views?