User talk:ScienceAdvisor
ScienceAdvisor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have agreed to abide by the terms the admin has stated for my account to be reinstated. Thank you for your help in reinstating my page. I will make sure any required info gets added to my user page.
Decline reason:
Your unblock request does not address the three requirements for it to be considered that are set out in the block notice above. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ATHLYT until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
US-Verified (talk) 11:27, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of ATHLYT
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on ATHLYT, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Alpha3031 (t • c) 14:12, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Time Force for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time Force until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Mercenf (talk) 10:35, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Time Force Corporate Logo Small.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Time Force Corporate Logo Small.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
is closed. Weird. "Arbitration committee ultimately decided that I was the target of a editing ring and that my block was reduced to 6 months.. Today should be 6 months exactly. I request my account and all the IP's that have been blocked be restored. I was originally blocked on March 4th. Today is Sept 3rd." I'm afraid I would need more than an unverified UTRS ticket to this effect. And as the block log still shows this is an indefinite checkuser block, I told 'em to email ArbCom. Courtesy ping @Ponyo: -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:24, 3 September 2023 (UTC)