User talk:I Pakapshem

Regarding reversions[1] made on June 29 2009 to Himarë

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

The duration of the block is 7*24 hours.

You don't seem to be getting the hints. Edit warring is bad. The next block will be indefinite.

William M. Connolley (talk) 20:28, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Block extended to two weeks. This continuous pattern of edit warring must STOP now. As William M. Connolley noted above, if you continue such behavior in the future, you will be blocked indefinitely. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 20:34, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

You need to look at the whole issue before blocking me. If i am reverting more than 3 times, the other two greek users tag team and revert more than three times in unison.--I Pakapshem (talk) 21:41, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

This does not excuse you from engaging in yet another edit war. Discuss on the talk page before making brash changes to the article. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 22:48, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Sure it doesn't, but they should receive bans as well. They are gaming the system perfectly, along with other greek users. It's impossible to discuss anything with these users. They always go back on their word. They have clear nationalist agenda to push.--I Pakapshem (talk) 23:56, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

By the way Alexikoua who reported me has has done a whole lot more than three edits on this article http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cham_Albanians&action=history. It seems like he is edit warring as well.--I Pakapshem (talk) 00:02, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Chameria & Cham Albanians redirection

Athenean proposed the merge of Chameria with Cham Albanians. Feel free to join the discussion here [2].--Sarandioti (talk) 22:01, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Blocked

You continue to edit war, despite the fact that I warned you just a few weeks ago that future edit warring would result in an indefinite block. I have blocked you for 1 month and am officially warning that if you continue this behavior, you will be placed under sanctions as detailed at WP:ARBMAC. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 00:32, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Balkans-related articles in a disruptive way. If you engage in further inappropriate behaviour in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. Thank you. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 00:34, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Where did I edit war?--I Pakapshem (talk) 13:57, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I Pakapshem (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I believe this block should be lifted since you arbitrarily blocked me without telling me where I have edit warred--I Pakapshem (talk) 13:59, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Sorry, we don't unblock for "technicalities." You were warned before for edit-warring, and you continued. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:22, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I Pakapshem (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I believe this block should be lifted since the admin NishKid is biased towards me, given that his blocked me once and extended my block another time for edit warring without breaking the 3RR rule, and the people that were engaged in edit warring with me have received less severe blocks or no block at all--I Pakapshem (talk) 14:54, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No indication the editor intends not to continue edit warring. Should edit warring resume after this block expires, the next block will likely be permanent. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 15:42, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Korçë - two reverts on July 20. Vlorë - one revert on July 20. Spyros Spyromilios - one revert on July 19, resuming an edit war from the previous month, Himarë - one revert on July 19, Cham Albanians - two reverts on July 18, Valon Behrami - one revert on July 16, continuing an edit war, Epirotes - two reverts on July 16. I count 10 reverts making up the bulk of your contributions from July 16-July 20. It seems despite the fact that I warned you a month ago not to engage in further edit warring, you have continued to do so. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 15:28, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

I don't think one and two reverts here and there constitute edit warring. And the least you can do is dish out proportional punishments. You gave me a one month ban, while giving athenean and alexikoua a warning and a 3 day ban respectively. These individuals, have one or two reverts in these articles as well.--I Pakapshem (talk) 15:35, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Oh and yeah, you count 8 reverts and not 10 since Epirotes does not exist as an article anymore.--I Pakapshem (talk) 15:37, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

That makes absolutely no sense at all. Your reverts are not invalidated if the article becomes a redirect. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 18:04, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I Pakapshem (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Requests being answered by admins who have no knowledge of dispute, and keep citing rigid regulations when my block on edit warring was given due to subjective interpretation of admin--I Pakapshem (talk) 16:08, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Even if that were true, it is my "subjective interpretation" that your block was justified. Page is locked until you are unblocked. PeterSymonds (talk) 16:17, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is your fifth block in a month and a half. That's why I extended the current block to 1 month. You're showing a dangerous pattern of continual edit warring and if you continue this behavior after your block, I will block you indefinitely. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 18:04, 21 July 2009 (UTC)