Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philosophy of thermal and statistical physics: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:43, 16 April 2019

Philosophy of thermal and statistical physics

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a shred of philosophy. Started in these old exciting times (2003) when the concept of Wikipedia was vague. Original writer has long since gone, The article sits here as a poos summary of the basic laws of thermo and Maxwell's demon. I think it is time for the demon to consume it. Staszek Lem (talk) 02:08, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 02:21, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 02:21, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Andrew D. (talk) 09:24, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep Not a shred of a reason to delete. We don't delete articles because they were written in 2003. We don't delete articles because their original authors have moved on – that will happen to every article in time. We don't delete articles because they are poor – see WP:IMPERFECT and WP:NOTCLEANUP. And we don't delete articles to feed demons. For an example of an external article of a similar kind in a reputable work, see the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Andrew D. (talk) 09:11, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Science|list of Science-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Kpgjhpjm|<span style="color: orange">Kpg</span>]][[User talk:Kpgjhpjm|<span style="color: red">jhp</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Kpgjhpjm|<span style="color:green">jm </span>]] 02:21, 16 April 2019 (UTC)</small>
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's [[Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron/Rescue list|list of content for rescue consideration]]. [[user:Andrew Davidson|Andrew D.]] ([[user talk:Andrew Davidson|talk]]) 09:24, 16 April 2019 (UTC)<!--Template:Rescue list--></small>
-*'''Speedy Keep''' Not a shred of a [[WP:DEL-REASON|reason to delete]].  We don't delete articles because they were written in 2003.  We don't delete articles because their original authors have moved on – that will happen to every article in time.  We don't delete articles because they are poor – see [[WP:IMPERFECT]] and [[WP:NOTCLEANUP]].  For an example of an external article of a similar kind in a reputable work, see the ''[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/statphys-statmech/ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]''.  [[user:Andrew Davidson|Andrew D.]] ([[user talk:Andrew Davidson|talk]]) 09:11, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
+*'''Speedy Keep''' Not a shred of a [[WP:DEL-REASON|reason to delete]].  We don't delete articles because they were written in 2003.  We don't delete articles because their original authors have moved on – that will happen to every article in time.  We don't delete articles because they are poor – see [[WP:IMPERFECT]] and [[WP:NOTCLEANUP]].  And we don't delete articles to [[WP:Don't feed the troll|feed demons]].  For an example of an external article of a similar kind in a reputable work, see the ''[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/statphys-statmech/ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]''.  [[user:Andrew Davidson|Andrew D.]] ([[user talk:Andrew Davidson|talk]]) 09:11, 16 April 2019 (UTC)