Jump to content

Talk:Frogs in culture

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Vandalism

[edit]

Caught some today doing research about frogs in film. Someone typed "Penis!" in the end of the music section, fixed. Dasbrick 05:43, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Potential of this article

[edit]

Article is really just a list of barely related facts at this point. Subject has potential, not realized.Bjones 16:49, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I absolutely agree. However, it was also rather too much to remain in the Frog article, which, it was decided, should focus on the biology. - Samsara contrib talk 16:53, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Frog character in Chihiro

[edit]

Since we've got a few examples from Asian cultures in this article, we may want to expand on that. I seem to remember a frog-like character from Spirited Away aka Chihiro. Does anyone remember details of this? - Samsara contrib talk 16:33, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rename article?

[edit]

Shouldn't this article be called "Frogs in culture"? It contains sections on the Bible, and I wouldn't call that popular. It also restricts the scope of the article, as frogs have been part of culture for a long time. --liquidGhoul 13:20, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi liquidGhoul. The reason for the choice was to avoid the term "culture", which can refer to domestication and husbandry and is thus confusing. I'm happy to change the name to something more general, but I oppose the phrase "Frogs in culture" for that purpose. - Samsara (talk • contribs) 18:10, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hopkin_Green_Frog

[edit]

does it deserve mentioning as an internet phenoenon ? —This unsigned comment was added by 83.24.12.124 (talk • contribs) 19:10, 27 March 2006.

I'd say no. It does not seem significant. - Samsara (talk • contribs) 18:05, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Frogs and the French

[edit]

I recall reading that the origin of "Frog" as an appellation for the French was an aristocratic analogy of themselves as frogs and the peasantry as toads, rather than the place of frogs' legs in French cuisine. I can't find a source right now so I haven't edited the article, but it may be worth looking at. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.70.80.115 (talk) 18:03, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We don't eat frogs, anyway (they are quite tricky to catch after all). Arronax50 (talk) 00:30, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moving Content

[edit]

The following was in the Frog article, which is far too full already. I am currently cleaning it out, and will add this to this article if I get the time. If I don't, here it is if someone else feels proactive. --liquidGhoul (talk) 11:36, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Frogs and the French

[edit]

Though not especially common, the French dish known as cuisses de grenouille (frog legs), is taken as indicative of French cuisine. This is a possible source of the English use of the derogatory nickname "frogs" for French people. It may also stem from the fact that, before they adopted the Fleur de Lis as their symbol, the frog served as an avatar for the French kingdom.[1]

In the 80's, the French satirical version of the Muppet Show, named Le Bébête Show, portrayed socialist president François Mitterrand as Kermitterand in reference to Kermit the Frog.

References

  1. ^ "Why do the French call the British 'the roast beefs'?". BBC News. BBC. 2003-04-02.

Romani and frogs

[edit]

The Romani consider frogs bearers of bad luck, and will try to avoid them at all costs. In fact, some individuals use pottery frogs with that intent - perhaps someone may develop this with other sources but a newspaper article? 2.80.1.45 (talk) 09:03, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
  • "Did you ever hear about the frog who dreamed he was a king, and then became one?" Neil Diamond.
  • "I'm in love with a big blue frog." Joan Jett, the Muppets, etc.
  • "Jeremiah was a Bullfrog." Das Baz, aka Erudil 04:19, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Toadlarcomuseum.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Toadlarcomuseum.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Toadlarcomuseum.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:30, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Frogs in video games

[edit]

In the introductory paragraphs, frogs in video games are briefly mentioned as subjects of cruelty. While this may be true of Ribbit King (which I understand to be a type of golf with frogs for golf balls), I do not see that this is the case with the classic Frogger.

In Frogger, one assumes the role of the frog and one's objective is to navigate across a heavy traffics road from one side to the other. The win-state, which through basic design is implied as being the optimal outcome, is to survive the journey across the road.

One is not coaxing or coercing the frog to traverse the road, nor is one violently forcing it to. One assumes direct control of the frog, meaning that within the game-world, the players is the frog. A natural empathy occurs through this, and not only would I thusly argue that Frogger not only doesn't feature frogs merely as subjects of cruelty, but that it serves as an emergent narrative about how difficult it can be for a frog to live surrounded by a human world.


For these reasons, I ask that a suitably qualified Wikipedian rectifies this mistake by rewording the phrase in question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.114.162.13 (talk) 22:05, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Frogs in popular culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:24, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Frogs_in_culture&oldid=1195584338"