User talk:MJL/Archive 10

Moving History

As noted here, I have moved my talk page's history to User Talk:MJL/Archive 8. Sorry for the inconvenience, but I wanted to start off fresh. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 00:58, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

A salamander for you!

Acorri has given you a salamander! Salamanders promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Your salamander must be fed daily and will be your faithful companion for life! You can brighten someone's day by giving them a WikiCritter on their talk page with a friendly message, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To give a salamander: {{salamander|message=Your message here. ~~~~}}

I'm a day late, but happy 413! I'm surprised we were the only ones editing the article, on the tenth anniversary no less, with such a huge bombshell too. Well, I'm glad I wasn't the only one at least! Have a great 413 and happy editing~ ♦AcoriSage 17:53, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

@AcorriSage: Oh my gosh! This is the best gift I have ever gotten on Wikipedia!! In return, please have this bunny I found. Happy 4/13 to you as well!!! [my own delayed response was trying to vectorize bunnykind lol] –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 20:41, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Bunnykind for AcorriSage

That's so cool and sweet, you just made my day! I gave it a spot on my userpage <3 ♦AcoriSage 23:41, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Outline of the Northwest Territories has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Outline of the Northwest Territories. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

bagpipes

the project is not inactive - It would be appreciated if you saw the amount effort to resurrect it recently - I am not on it daily , but have considerable amount to add to the project as it stands - and it does not fit into musical instruments - due the reasons given at the xfd discussion. JarrahTree 05:01, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

It would be useful - either if you could revert yourself - or at least discuss what you think an effort to recover from inactive requires ? 05:04, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

@JarrahTree: To be honest, I was torn between tagging it inactive and semi-active. Does the latter work for you? (edit conflict) –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 05:06, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

sheesh - being honest on wikipedia is dangerous - you never know what might catch you out :( - the problem is the xfd is still in limbo... I would ask for it to be removed until such time as someone actually closes the xfd process - then it will become obvious which way it goes - as with the amount of tagging or extra work either way the xfd goes... :( JarrahTree 05:08, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

If I wasn't on a self-imposed restriction from closing XfD's, I probably would have closed this as keep instead of placing the tag. I see the effort to recover from inactivity as a process, and policy wise the arguments you made there hold more water. I mostly just tagged the project instead because of the aforementioned pending MfD because I figured that was what should have been done originally.
I get this process can be nerve-wracking, but you gotta let it play out. I'll self-revert for you if it helps at all, though. (btw Ray Trygstad is semi-active still if you want to reach out to them.) –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 05:17, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Response

Hi! Thank you for letting me know about the student pages - with the articles, definitely feel free to edit and merge them as needed. We've emphasized to students that once the pages are moved live, they can be edited, merged, or deleted. Basically, while I'd definitely make sure to explain things to them and assume good faith, student work should not be treated differently than work put out by any editor.

With getting your university to participate, I think that would be awesome! Can you contact us at contactwikiedu.org? This will connect you with the person who handles this end things! If you know of any specific professors who would be interested they can also contact us through that email address! Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:47, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

• There's also information about this here. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:51, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

IP Note

you have deleted my article on BRIAN WENZEL, trying to add a filmogrophy section — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.43.110.199 (talk) 08:15, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

As I just explained here, you removed the reference section. You can get it back rather easily by going through the article history –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 08:19, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

OKAY, THANK-YOU, COULD YOU PLEASE KINDLY COMPLETE FILMOGRAPHY SECTION FOR MR. WENZEL, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.43.110.199 (talk) 08:21, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

I'll see what I can do, but please refrain from Shouting. Thank you, –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 08:26, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

The filmography section IS HOWEVER NOT COMPLETE
okay sorry i apologise — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.43.110.199 (talk) 08:27, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

It's okay, I guess. Where did you source this filmography from? We need a reliable source for all the entries. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 08:30, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

i understand, it is from IMDb, "not the best and most reliable source", but its sometimes, be it most times, its all we have on FILMOGRAPHY— Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.43.110.199 (talk) 08:33, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Okay, yeah at least you are aware that it's not the best to source things to IMdb. I'll get started on cleaning up the filmography using reliable sources, but in the meantime it'd be awfully helpful if you checked out this link and possibly create an account. That'd make my life a ton easier. :) –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 08:39, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Hello, how are you, thankyou for your work on the article, is much appreciated, however thee is still some more credits to add, because the filmography only goes to 1980, kind regards.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.43.110.199 (talk) 05:53, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
i Have fixed some of the other links to serials.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.43.110.199 (talk) 09:39, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
ned to reinstate ref section — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.43.110.199 (talk) 10:39, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Gotcha, sorry I was asleep when you wrote me. On it now! :) –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 15:35, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Hello my friend, how are you? thank you for work and contributions, i understand as you know what to do with restoring reference and categories, i appreciate your kindness very much, i will let ypou know if i need any other help, best regards.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.43.110.199 (talk) 20:35, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

​Of course, and Any time! :) [If I may remark, that it'd help a lot of you signed your talk page posts by writing ~~~~ at the end (where one might sign their name). It makes conversations easier to follow.] Take care, –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 20:44, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Portal update

Hi @MJL:. I'll take and update the Portal:Lancaster, Pennsylvania if that's still OK. I left a message on the deletion discussion as well. It may take a few days until I get some free time (I have another article I'm working on and not much time at all this week), but I'll fix up the links, articles, etc. I really had no idea there were Portals on here, but one for a medium-size metro area like this seems like a good addition worth keeping. Thanks Scanlan (talk) 04:23, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

@Scanlan: just saw and wrote a reply for you! :)
I can expand on what I meant here if you would like. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 04:26, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cod Island has been accepted

Cod Island, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:08, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

I presume you like kittens (based on your tps notice). So, here, have a kitten.

Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 21:13, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

@Dreamy Jazz: Why thank you! :D
I do hope I deserve it, though. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 08:43, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Japanese apple for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Japanese apple is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Japanese apple until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:34, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Current events noticeboard

Hi MJL, this month's discussion report on The Signpost notes that the current events noticeboard doesn't exist yet, even though there was community consensus to establish it on a trial basis in your successful RfC (which I supported). It looks like Yellowdesk also asked you about this in March. Are you still interested in creating this noticeboard? — Newslinger talk 03:22, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

@Newslinger: I am! I just have become apprehensive about it since my adopter (Swarm) told me to bow out of meta-processes, clerking, closing, advising, mentoring, mediating, flattering, and chatting in non-article-related discussions. I really have not known how to respond to Yellowdesk given that advice. I wrote out the steps it would take at User:MJL/sandbox8, and I'd love nothing more than seeing it created, though. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 03:39, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

The plan in User:MJL/sandbox8 looks great. I was just afraid that you had lost interest, as the noticeboard was a popular proposal. Please proceed at your own pace, and don't be pressured to rush this. — Newslinger talk 06:41, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Resilient Barnstar
	For not giving up, for not giving in, for putting your head down and continuing to build an encyclopedia, and for having a cheerful, optimistic attitude no matter what comes your way, I hereby award you this Resilient Barnstar. Thank you for being a part of this community. Leviv ich 21:09, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

This is too sweet! I don't know if I really feel comfortable accepting this, though. Maybe when I get cleared to go back to WP:AN/RFC, I'd deserve it, but at the moment... I'm just trying to listen to the advice from Swarm and BHG to not be a nuisance. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 21:21, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

It's v well-deserved barnstar. MJL had a tough learning curve, but has stuck with it, so thanks to @Levivich for giving recognition where it was due. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:01, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Thirded and fourthed. --qedk (t 桜 c) 14:16, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	For sticking up for a colleague with bold kindness. Thank you! WanderingWanda (talk) 08:37, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Thank you, Wander! Hopefully, I didn't act too much like a white knight :D (edit conflict) –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 14:18, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Whiteknight, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page White knight (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

No worries, DPL bot! The page I was editing (/created) was also a disambiguation page. The link to the other disambiguation page was intentional. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 13:27, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

A cookie for you! (Plus another thanks)

I appreciate your apology for re-reverting. You did it in good faith, and I don't blame you for the re-revert, but I am happy to see that you acknowledge the error. And thank you for finding my comments insightful. - 188.176.129.120 (talk) 13:45, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

I also wanna thank you for your comment about political engagement in the US. I'm from Denmark, which already has a lot more engagement than many countries, but it's interesting to know that so many people get to meet the governor every week. - 188.176.129.120 (talk) 13:45, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

WP:WOOD and Redirects

I don't read the woodwork essay as having anything to do with redirection of portals. It isn't labeled as a deletion essay, but I interpret it to be a deletion essay, recommending that pages should be kept in draft space or user space if they are marginal as to notability in article space. I concur with User:BrownHairedGirl that it should not be used as a justification for redirection of portals, or in general for redirection. Redirection is an alternative to deletion for articles when a subject is marginally notable, so that a musician can be redirected to their band, or, for that matter, a band with which the performer performed before becoming a star can be redirected to the performer. Also, I know that some editors like to stub existing articles down to redirects as a backdoor deletion. I think that existing articles should only be stubbed down to redirects after discussion (and there are a few editors who will stubbornly get into a redirect-war to backdoor-delete an article and try to do that as a way to avoid any consensus discussion (by saying that redirection is not deletion and so does not have to be discussed at AFD, but that redirection is not a valid topic for RFC either). So I don't like casual redirection of existing pages, and certainly not for portals to a related topic. At least that is my opinion, that the woodwork essay is about articles, not about other things. Well, it can also be used to move a controversial essay from project space to user space. I don't see the woodwork essay as having anything to do with redirection either of portals or of articles. Redirecting a portal that has subpages behind it seems like performing an illegal face or brain transplant. That is my opinion. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:04, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

@Robert McClenon: That's certainly more than a reasonable statement. I suppose the remedy for a unilateral conversion to a redirect as a way to backdoor-delete an article as you describe it would be WP:RfD. For me, the general sentiment behind WP:WOOD is that redirects are a halfway decent method of breaking deadlocks during a deletion debate. I guess I've been forgetting about that last bit there during a deletion debate. I'll be making sure to take that feedback from both you and BHG to heart. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 02:09, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

User:MJL - Well, first, you are right that it does mention redirects, and that it mentions them as a way to deal with a deletion debate. I think that redirection is appropriate in the cases I mentioned, where notability is not inherited. I think that portals should face a straight yes-no. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:20, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Women in Red

Hi there, MJL, and welcome to Women in Red. I'm happy to hear you intend to write biographies of women in politics. As far as I can see, you have already created one new women's biography and may well have improved existing articles. When writing new articles, you might find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules and our Primer. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 07:32, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:2010s

There is a sentence in this nomination that says, "I it had to do with the of its." There appear to be some words missing from that sentence. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 00:36, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

@Metropolitan90:  Done I didn't link Fr.wiki right, and it was parsed differently than I expected. Thank you for alerting me to this! –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 01:56, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

IP note (2)

Hello, Thank you of your kindness and assistance — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.43.110.199 (talk) 18:11, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Of course! Wikipedia can be rough sometimes, so I try to help people out where I can. _{Just please sign your posts by typing ~~~~at the end of your comments.} –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 18:15, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Notes from Wayward Vagabond

Hello my friend, how are you, need help with restoring article categories Benita Collings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.42.2.16 (talk) 10:21, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello, i need help!, recently i received a block for adding what was classified as unsourced, full names of people should normally be in infobox, if they are listed in the article shouldn't they — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.42.2.16 (talk) 11:18, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Hey there WV! First of all, I highly recommend registering for an account on here. I get some people prefer to not register an account here for all sorts of reasons, but you will find that you have a much easier time with an account vs now. At the moment you are currently evading a block, and that's really bad.
Second, to answer your question, if the full name is listed in the main body of the article then it is okay to place in the infobox. This is covered in detail in the aforementioned game.
Additionally, most contributors will find your inability to follow talk page etiquette a problem. I've certainly gotten used to it, but that is really not a good thing.
Please just register an account (if you don't know what to name yourself, I recommend WaywardVagabond because you remind me of that character a lot) and play this game. It'll teach you everything you ever needed to know about Wikipedia syntax.
Lastly, you are actually quite lucky. This is not the first time you have been blocked. I am sure if that was known at the time you would have been blocked for a lot longer. I have personally known for a while now about your history, but I have yet to find it necessary to share this information with my colleagues like Bhunacat10.
The best you can do is listen to my advice and create an account and play The Wikipedia Adventure. This will help you keep out of trouble for the time being.
I really cannot do much more for you if you do not listen to that advice. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 16:47, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

WV again

Hello, could you please restore references section for Colette Mann thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.43.110.199 (talk) 22:59, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello, thank-you of you assistance, Colette Mann after everything i forgot the big one PRISONER (TV series) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.43.110.199 (talk) 23:14, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

I sometimes wonder if you in fact listen to me or what exactly goes on, but I know you have to at least read it. Okay, I'm standing by for more changes. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 23:17, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Okay, thank-you Mauren Edwards restore categories, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.43.110.199 (talk) 00:19, 7 June 2019 (UTC) i mean Maureen Edwards, sorry of spelling error — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.43.110.199 (talk) 00:22, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

 Already done Bamyers99 beat me to it. WV, this is clearly not a long term solution. It'd mean a lot to me if you took my advice and made an account. You'd get to use Wikipedia:VisualEditor and all sorts of features that you could really use (like WP:TWA). –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 01:10, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello, adding further links for actress Maureen Edwards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.43.110.199 (talk) 07:01, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

I'm happy to report that you added the links without any issues. Congratulations! –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 16:59, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello there my friend, hope you are going okay, thank-you for your assistance and kindness, very much appreciated, yes, not to many problems linking (wikilinks) pages except for some disambiguations, i know also the sites of IMDB (Internet Movie Database.com) and IMDB (Internet Broadway Database.com), are not the best sites for references, sources, citations etc. etc. but of course they are better than not adding anything at all. Also love your profile picture of the cat, so beautiful and adorable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.43.110.199 (talk) 07:51, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Oh, well thank you! Glad you like it! :D –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 16:34, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Lgross13/sandbox

Hello, MJL! Thank you for monitoring new pages and tagging the ones that need deletion. I wanted to let you know that I declined speedy deletion for User:Lgross13/sandbox. You had tagged it for speedy deletion as a hoax, but it is actually not a hoax. It is about TS7, a term used for Taylor Swift's unnamed upcoming album, just as the user said. They also correctly named a single from it that has been released. They didn't have any sources or anything, but that's OK in their own sandbox. I find it's always a good idea, before tagging something as a hoax, to do a quick Google search. In this case, here is what you would have found: [1] You'd be surprised how often people forget to do that! Anyhow, I know you do good work here, I just wanted to give you this followup. -- MelanieN (talk) 01:39, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Thank you, MelanieN. I do appreciate the feedback. It might not be worth putting on the Wall of Shame, but my reasoning for not doing the Google search was a pretty foolish one. I assumed it must be a hoax because there was no way the two artists would work together. Idk, I'm off my game. My CSD log isn't looking as good as it once was. _RIP. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 02:05, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Redirecting page:Wikipedia talk:Community_response_to_the_Wikimedia_Foundation's_ban_of_Fram/Community_conduct

A page you created, Wikipedia talk:Community_response_to_the_Wikimedia_Foundation's_ban_of_Fram/Community_conduct, does not seem to have enough reliable third party sources to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia in itself. It has been redirected to Wikipedia talk:Community response to the Wikimedia Foundation's ban of Fram which is related to the subject of the article. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 19:40, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

I guess I’ll put this here, then. The only reason I’ve asked who performed the actions is because that is what is suggested to do by WP:OA itself. (When in doubt, community members should consult the Foundation member of staff that performed the office action, or their line manager. –xeno^talk 16:40, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

@Xeno: sorry for not noticing this reply. That's certainly an equitable reason for making that ask, but I have felt that the repeated asking by other users had gotten to be somewhat disruptive. Right? –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 19:45, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Even if not, I think we’re past the stage. Surely their line manager (whoever that may be) knows of this by now. –xeno^talk 21:02, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

WV requests

Hello, can please correct current article, restore references and categories, Joy Westmore — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.42.2.16 (talk) 02:45, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

thank-you for your assistance, again Philipa Baker — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.42.2.16 (talk) 03:41, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

 Done WV, you really brighten up my day. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 03:44, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

thank-you could please restore article Tom Oliver, kind regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.42.2.16 (talk) 05:39, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

 Done –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 05:53, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello again, need fiix article, last filmography for today, the great Ron Haddrick — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.42.2.16 (talk) 10:30, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

 Done –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 17:03, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Placeholder

Hi, I just wanted to note that Special:Diff/901725510 seems to be a strange approach to chronology. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:26, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

@ToBeFree: you're not wrong, but it was the best way I could avoid causing edit conflicts. The statement is written out, but I'm in the middle of copy edited it. lol –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 21:37, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Finally got through that page with a single edit conflict, so at least that unorthodox method worked lol. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 21:43, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Fram post

Sorry I didn't mean to sound so abrupt. When I saw the size I thought you were talking about how large it was but then when you said "it's only pages that were created at most a few days ago" I thought you were minimizing it and so I was puzzled. I now think I misread the second point and you were making a consistent point that this is a lot of material.S Philbrick(Talk) 23:07, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

@S Philbrick: No worries! It certainly is a lot of material if you ask me, but I suppose I didn't make that obvious. Cheers, –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 23:25, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

No, no, my bad.S Philbrick(Talk) 23:33, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Requests from WV

Hello, i have on article need s restoring Ron Graham, i like the way you formulate articles, regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.42.2.16 (talk) 00:18, 15 June 2019 (UTC) Ron Graham (actor) disambiguation Ron Graham Australian actor — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.42.2.16 (talk) 00:22, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

No worries; it's all set. Also, thank you!! That means a lot! –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 00:27, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

re: your paper

Fortunately, you can find it here. I included that link in my post, but it was removed by another editor due to 'copyright' etc. Sigh. Well, for the record, as the author, I don't like publisher strongarming me to give away my copyright and then making my research inaccessible behind paywalls, to I am totally fine if you use Library Genesis link above. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:24, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

WV request(s)

Article needs restoring for Jack Howath, categories and references citations etc, kind regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.42.2.16 (talk) 17:00, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

oops, sorry i meant Jack Howarth MBE.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.42.2.16 (talk) 17:03, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

 Done –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 17:06, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello my friend i have another article for you, to do checks on, Noel Dyson) (1916-1995) British actress, however i have not fully complete the filmography, as she was a character actress there are quite some titles appeared in, and i have so far only added credits until 1970. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.42.2.16 (talk) 19:39, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Bamyers99 beat me to it. All set! –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 21:33, 18 June 2019 (UTC

WV note

Hello, how are you, could you please check article [[Noel Dyso] , i have finished filmography, i had a lot of trouble with this one, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.43.110.199 (talk) 03:10, 20 June 2019 (UTC) Noel Dyson, stage, television and film actress — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.43.110.199 (talk) 03:14, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

I'm doing well! Hope you are as well. This is now all taken care of. You did a lot good work! (edit conflict) –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 03:17, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

User talk:Love vashikaran specialist aghori baba message

Hi, MJL,

When I left a message on this editor's talk page, I got a message saying only admins could edit it because part of the editor's name is on the Title Blacklist. But I saw that you left a message there, too. Did you see a pink warning message? Just trying to figure out how this blacklist works. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:45, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

@Liz: I did get a pink warning message (uploaded for your convenience). Per its instructions, I was only disallowed from creating the page but not editing it. Hence this post to UAA. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 02:58, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Don't ask me why this would need to apply in userspace nor why that particular (and quite frankly confusing) message was used though. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 03:00, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Antisemitism in Poland/Workshop

@Volunteer Marek: Might be a better idea to take this to my talk page lol. I'm all game for whatever you got lol. Same applies to anyone else in the case who might need it as well. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 07:33, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Canvass

Heh. Kinda amusing seeing the one person who twice nominated Eric for RFA,canvassing people to pressure you to drop it. [2]   «l|Promethean|l»  (talk) 22:36, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

@Promethean: That isn't a canvass actually. Swarm is my adopter (see either of our userpages). That kind of talk page message is par for the course. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 22:53, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Fair call. Just seemed odd that someone who nominated Eric for RFA, twice, is now running around trying to get you to drop it via the back channels. There might be something I don't know, in fact there probably is, just seems odd to me.   «l|Promethean|l»  (talk) 22:55, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

I don't know who's history with what (too new for that). It's now moot anyways because the AE report has already been closed. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 22:57, 22 June 2019 (UTC)