User talk:Drjmarkov
Welcome!
Hello, Drjmarkov, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Welcome!
All you'll write, I will read. Thank you
No war. Enjoy time here
[edit]Ciao! Sorry for giving you this impression... you work is appreciable and I just used to correct. I was just tired of checking ALL of them for typos and style. And, as you can see, the infobox are left n my new edits. I've added a template in the beginning in this page with all the references for style, article layout and rules, etc. Ciao and good work!!! --Attilios (talk) 12:07, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi!
[edit]About your creation of Mihtarlam, please remember that you always have to put a space after a comma (only in texts, not in numbers). Regards. --Damifb (talk) 19:17, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for your answer. Also, when you have time and if you want to, it would be great if you could track back all the articles where you left that error. Best wishes.
--Damifb (talk) 19:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- I already did most of it.--Damifb (talk) 20:32, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Sofia and Plovdiv
[edit]Please excuse me for my error! Thank you for the correction. Much appreciated. I was merging two articles together, one from Catholic Encyclopedia, and forgot to check whether the vicariate was elevated. Benkenobi18 (talk) 06:50, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]Thanks for the valuable advice. I being a novice in wikiworld, I am really indebted to you. --omalloor 16:04, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
RfA thanks!
[edit]
|
Collecting Materials
[edit]Thank you for the valuable suggestions. I am collecting materials for updating the other articles --202.164.134.155 --omalloor 08:03, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the invitation. I will do my level best in updating wikiproject: Christianity India omalloor 12:15, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
I think you are also a priest. I can co-operate with the project. But one thing my computer skill is very very little. I am able to do anything with this project provided you guide me. sorry to say that Still I didn't understand the use of templates and all. omalloor 12:55, 21 February 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kuzhinapurath (talk • contribs)
- Inviting your comments on the AFD discussion of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fr. Thomas Kuzhinapurath - Tinucherian (talk) 04:49, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
You have pointed out exactly. The name Thomas Kuzhinapurath is transilitrated from Malayam in worldcat. You can view another work of Thomas Kuzhinapurath namely Salvific Law in worldcat.Achasu (talk) 06:59, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions and suggestions to the article Fr. Thomas Kuzhinapurath. Simon Cheakkanal (talk) 11:28, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
I am happy to know that you are very much interested indian catholicism. May I have your email. Kuzhinapurath (talk) 02:43, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Your vote
[edit]I'm genuinely puzzled by what you say. I have checked everything, and I think you have only contacted me once, about Cardinal Archetti and titular sees. See [1], now at User talk:Charles Matthews/Archive 24. Otherwise - is it possible you are thinking of someone else? At Giovanni Andrea Archetti you undid my edit to links, and that was it. Charles Matthews (talk) 10:57, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Capitalization
[edit]Hi -- I'm sorting through a lot of the Afghanistan stubs you created (wow! must have taken you ages -- I'm glad someone took the time to do it), and I wanted to let you know about some capitalization rules in English. In most cases, "north," "south," "east," and "west" are not capitalized. Also, if you write two direction words together, they are usually written as one word - "northeast" and not "north-east." I'll take care of the Afghanistan ones as I sort, but I thought you'd like to know for the future. Keep up the good work! Aelfthrytha (talk) 06:54, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- Don't worry about it too much -- we all make mistakes in non-native languages. If you have any uncertainty in the future, though, please feel free to ask me. I am a native speaker, and I would be happy to assist you with anything related to English (or anything else, for that matter). Cheers! Aelfthrytha (talk) 20:41, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Why is it Khost (Matun)? Are they synonyms or is Matun within Khost? Kingturtle (talk) 18:54, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
My talk page...
[edit]Stop threatening that "administration" (????) will be on to me (your threats won't influence me). Stop your borderline personal attacks. Stop telling me what to do. If you want to continue the issue, use the correct channels that I have suggested to you - not my talk page. Good day. --Merbabu (talk) 00:00, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Baldevo, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rhodope and Ottoman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Khanabad.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Khanabad.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 04:06, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Soviet aviation Task Force
[edit]Hi! I've noticed your contributions to creating articles on Soviet aviation and was wondering if you would consider joining the Soviet Avition Task Force (still a work in progress right now) one it is established?--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:21, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 11
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gaytaninovo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Melnik (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
- D. B. Cooper (discussion) – Since 14 December 2021
- Granville Gee Bee Model A (discussion) – Since 21 April 2020
- List of aviation shootdowns and accidents during the Iraq War (discussion) – Since 22 February 2010
- Romanian Air Corps (discussion) – Since 25 December 2021
- Jean Batten (discussion) – Since 2 October 2021
- List of astronauts by name → List of astronauts by year of selection (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021
- List of cosmonauts → List of space travelers by nationality (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021
- List of space travelers by name → List of space travelers by nationality (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021
- Holidays Czech Airlines → Czech Airlines (discussion) – Since 23 June 2021
- Bendix Aviation → Bendix Corporation (discussion) – Since 30 May 2021
- Airport Movement Area Safety System → Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (discussion) – Since 29 May 2021
- ASDE-X → Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (discussion) – Since 28 May 2021
- Family Airlines (discussion) – Since 23 November 2021
- 2021 Kabul airport attack (discussion) – Since 24 September 2021
- List of military aircraft of the United States (discussion) – Since 16 August 2021
- Braniff International Airways (discussion) – Since 8 September 2019
- News and notes: Wikimania submissions deadline looms, Russian government after our lucky charms, AI woes nix CNET from RS slate
- Eyewitness: Three more stories from Ukrainian Wikimedians
- In the media: Paid editing, plagiarism payouts, proponents of a ploy, and people peeved at perceived preferences
- Featured content: Way too many featured articles
- Interview: 228/2/1: the inside scoop on Aoidh's RfA
- Traffic report: Who died? Who won? Who lost?
Nomination of Bryan White (motivational speaker) for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryan White (motivational speaker) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Fram (talk) 15:43, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Query
[edit]Hello Drjmarkov. I'm Blablubbs, and I'm an administrator here. I am reaching out to ask whether you have any connection to Bryan White (motivational speaker). Specifically, I am wondering whether you have any relationship with White that could constitute a conflict of interest. Please do not edit further before you answer this message. Thank you. --Blablubbs (talk) 17:10, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- I am a Bulgarian, living in Bulgaria. I never met him. I don't have relationship with him. I came upon his story from a friend of mine. It looked prety impressive to me. You are very biased when appears an article about some person from Africa and it always looks suspicious. After that there were shown materials throwing a shade over his work. I contacted my friend and asked him about the whole story and he told me about some extortion and stuff like that, trying to frame him, but he went clear out of it. This may sound stupid, but I think people like him deserve the world to know about them. If you decide to delete the article it will not be a great tragedy. People, who have done literally notning useful in their life may be mentioned here just because they are lame soccer players for example. I know the rules of Wikipedia prety well and they are allowing articles to exist for people, who have never done anything useful for anybody, but they are dead. But when appears an article for young living person, who is not a soccer player or celebrity, then a big peoblem rises. I think in that situation we should leave to some Ugandan user to say their opinion and avoid taking fast decisions. I don't know much about Uganda, but do you? Drjmarkov (talk) 23:50, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, Drjmarkov,
- I think you are off-the-mark making an accusation of bias. I spend a lot of time reviewing deletion discussions at AFD and any article on a self-employed "motivation speaker" would receive scrutiny because so much of their business model involves self-promotion on sites like Wikipedia and social media. I see similar articles written by paid editors on a daily basis that are swiftly deleted and these individuals come from many different countries. This article is well-written enough to warrant a deletion discussion. I encourage you to participate at the AFD linked to in the message above and respond to editors' concerns. It's not a foregone conclusion that this article will be deleted and this discussion will go on for a week, allowing time to improve the article. Good luck. Liz Read! Talk! 01:49, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- If you have never met him, how come File:Home-page.jpg is your "own work"? --Blablubbs (talk) 08:43, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- This was the easy way to upload the picture, I knew you would ask me, but the owner of the pic has nothing against using it. Drjmarkov (talk) 10:49, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- And also I sign with my own name and I am not afraid of my family name. Drjmarkov means Dr Julian Markov - this is me. I am a MD in dental medicine and all my presence in the internet is with that name. So please... Drjmarkov (talk) 10:53, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- Presenting something as your own work when it is not your own work is a copyright violation. I have tagged it as such on Wikimedia Commons. If you do have permission, the copyright holder will have to send a release to VRT.I don't know how your name, your professional qualifications, soccer players, or my knowledge of Uganda are relevant to this conversation. I reached out to you because I am concerned that you created an undersourced, promotional biography in mainspace, and I'm trying to understand why that happened. This is especially troubling to me because you hold the autopatrolled right, meaning that your creations receive far less scrutiny than those of other users. Given the neutrality and copyright issues, I'm inclined to remove the right. Ping @HJ Mitchell: You granted AP in 2011. Would you be okay with a removal? --Blablubbs (talk) 12:16, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- You are the only one taking personally the dispute about that article . You also are threatening me with something, which of course is your right, but it is also said "administrators are never required to use their tools, and must never use them to gain an advantage in a dispute in which they were involved". The only thing I said more than twice, that there should be an opinion from someone from Uganda, who knows better the sources and policy in that country. You are also trying to discourage me not only editing, but also using Wikipedia, which I think is not the aim of the administration. I have created and edited a lot of articles and have been in such disputes only twice. Also I don't care that much about that article and I would import some changers in it if don't say I can't edit it. About the picture I will remove it or change it. My suggestion is you to leave place for some other admins to take part in that discussion. As you have noticed I haven't edited or written any article recently and may continue to stay away from Wikipedia because of something like this. I wanted the world to know about a good person. And yes the Wikipedia page may give him popularity, but it is the same for every businessman or company having page there. Even the big companies can get benefits for being there. Wikipedia should either adopt policy not to publish any articles about businessmen and companies, or to allow them with certain rules for everyone. Or there should be rule to ban pages about living people in Wikipedia. When we speak about the developing countries the sources there may be less reliable, but it doesn't mean we should delete all the pages about people, who have not published books in the USA or Europe and articles in the Western media outlets. Also we have to have in mind that the English Wikipedia serves not only as Wikipedia for USA, Canada, UK, Australia and New Zealand, but for a lot of English-speaking countries, including Uganda. So my offer is for peace and I prefer this discussion to focus on the article, but about my name I may say again, that I don't know how to address to you and I feel uncomfortable because of that. Drjmarkov (talk) 13:22, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- I'm sorry if you feel discouraged; that was not my intention. You are free to edit the article – or anything else on Wikipedia – as you wish; all I asked was that you respond to my inquiry before continuing to edit, which is boilerplate language that we also include in some templated messages (e.g. here), to ensure that people respond to important queries. The only reason I am here is to ensure that Wikipedia's rules are being followed. I have not edited the article, not voted on the AFD, or interacted with you outside of an administrative role. I am not sure why you would consider me involved? As for my name: Like many Wikipedians, I choose not to use my real name online, and go by a pseudonym instead. That should be sufficient to have a conversation. --Blablubbs (talk) 13:59, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- You are the only one taking personally the dispute about that article . You also are threatening me with something, which of course is your right, but it is also said "administrators are never required to use their tools, and must never use them to gain an advantage in a dispute in which they were involved". The only thing I said more than twice, that there should be an opinion from someone from Uganda, who knows better the sources and policy in that country. You are also trying to discourage me not only editing, but also using Wikipedia, which I think is not the aim of the administration. I have created and edited a lot of articles and have been in such disputes only twice. Also I don't care that much about that article and I would import some changers in it if don't say I can't edit it. About the picture I will remove it or change it. My suggestion is you to leave place for some other admins to take part in that discussion. As you have noticed I haven't edited or written any article recently and may continue to stay away from Wikipedia because of something like this. I wanted the world to know about a good person. And yes the Wikipedia page may give him popularity, but it is the same for every businessman or company having page there. Even the big companies can get benefits for being there. Wikipedia should either adopt policy not to publish any articles about businessmen and companies, or to allow them with certain rules for everyone. Or there should be rule to ban pages about living people in Wikipedia. When we speak about the developing countries the sources there may be less reliable, but it doesn't mean we should delete all the pages about people, who have not published books in the USA or Europe and articles in the Western media outlets. Also we have to have in mind that the English Wikipedia serves not only as Wikipedia for USA, Canada, UK, Australia and New Zealand, but for a lot of English-speaking countries, including Uganda. So my offer is for peace and I prefer this discussion to focus on the article, but about my name I may say again, that I don't know how to address to you and I feel uncomfortable because of that. Drjmarkov (talk) 13:22, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- Presenting something as your own work when it is not your own work is a copyright violation. I have tagged it as such on Wikimedia Commons. If you do have permission, the copyright holder will have to send a release to VRT.I don't know how your name, your professional qualifications, soccer players, or my knowledge of Uganda are relevant to this conversation. I reached out to you because I am concerned that you created an undersourced, promotional biography in mainspace, and I'm trying to understand why that happened. This is especially troubling to me because you hold the autopatrolled right, meaning that your creations receive far less scrutiny than those of other users. Given the neutrality and copyright issues, I'm inclined to remove the right. Ping @HJ Mitchell: You granted AP in 2011. Would you be okay with a removal? --Blablubbs (talk) 12:16, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 23
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sadovo, Blagoevgrad Province, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Exochi.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 April 2023
[edit]- News and notes: Staff departures at Wikimedia Foundation, Jimbo hands in the bits, and graphs' zeppelin burns
- In the media: Contested truth claims in Wikipedia
- Obituary: Remembering David "DGG" Goodman
- Arbitration report: Holocaust in Poland, Jimbo in the hot seat, and a desysopping
- Special report: Signpost statistics between years 2005 and 2022
- News from the WMF: Collective planning with the Wikimedia Foundation
- Featured content: In which we described the featured articles in rhyme again
- From the archives: April Fools' through the ages, part two
- Humour: The law of hats
- Traffic report: Long live machine, the future supreme
The Signpost: 8 May 2023
[edit]- News and notes: New legal "deVLOPments" in the EU
- In the media: Vivek's smelly socks, online safety, and politics
- Recent research: Gender, race and notability in deletion discussions
- Featured content: I wrote a poem for each article, I found rhymes for all the lists; My first featured picture of this year now finally exists!
- Arbitration report: "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland" approaches conclusion
- News from the WMF: Planning together with the Wikimedia Foundation
The Signpost: 22 May 2023
[edit]- In the media: History, propaganda and censorship
- Arbitration report: Final decision in "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland"
- Featured content: A very musical week for featured articles
- Traffic report: Coronation, chatbot, celebs
The Signpost: 5 June 2023
[edit]- News and notes: WMRU director forks new 'pedia, birds flap in top '22 piccy, WMF weighs in on Indian gov's map axe plea
- Featured content: Poetry under pressure
- Traffic report: Celebs, controversies and a chatbot in the public eye
The Signpost: 19 June 2023
[edit]- News and notes: WMF Terms of Use now in force, new Creative Commons licensing
- Featured content: Content, featured
- Recent research: Hoaxers prefer currently-popular topics
The Signpost: 3 July 2023
[edit]- Disinformation report: Imploded submersible outfit foiled trying to sing own praises on Wikipedia
- Featured content: Incensed
- Traffic report: Are you afraid of spiders? Arnold? The Idol? ChatGPT?
The Signpost: 17 July 2023
[edit]- In the media: Tentacles of Emirates plot attempt to ensnare Wikipedia
- Tips and tricks: What automation can do for you (and your WikiProject)
- Featured content: Scrollin', scrollin', scrollin', keep those readers scrollin', got to keep on scrollin', Rawhide!
- Traffic report: The Idol becomes the Master
The Signpost: 1 August 2023
[edit]- News and notes: City officials attempt to doxx Wikipedians, Ruwiki founder banned, WMF launches Mastodon server
- In the media: Truth, AI, bull from politicians, and climate change
- Disinformation report: Hot climate, hot hit, hot money, hot news hot off the presses!
- Tips and tricks: Citation tools for dummies!
- In focus: Journals cited by Wikipedia
- Opinion: Are global bans the last step?
- Featured content: Featured Content, 1 to 15 July
- Traffic report: Come on Oppie, let's go party
The Signpost: 15 August 2023
[edit]- News and notes: Dude, Where's My Donations? Wikimedia Foundation announces another million in grants for non-Wikimedia-related projects
- Tips and tricks: How to find images for your articles, check their copyright, upload them, and restore them
- Cobwebs: Getting serious about writing
- Serendipity: Why I stopped taking photographs almost altogether
- Featured content: Barbenheimer confirmed
- Traffic report: 'Cause today it just goes with the fashion
The Signpost: 31 August 2023
[edit]- From the editor: Beta version of signpost.news now online
- News and notes: You like RecentChanges?
- In the media: Taking it sleazy
- Recent research: The five barriers that impede "stitching" collaboration between Commons and Wikipedia
- Draftspace: Bad Jokes and Other Draftspace Novelties
- Humour: The Dehumourification Plan
- Traffic report: Raise your drinking glass, here's to yesterday
The Signpost: 16 September 2023
[edit]- In the media: "Just flirting", going Dutch and Shapps for the defence?
- Obituary: Nosebagbear
- Featured content: Catching up
- Traffic report: Some of it's magic, some of it's tragic
The Signpost: 3 October 2023
[edit]- News and notes: Wikimedia Endowment financial statement published
- Recent research: Readers prefer ChatGPT over Wikipedia; concerns about limiting "anyone can edit" principle "may be overstated"
- Featured content: By your logic,
- Poetry: "The Sight"
The Signpost: 23 October 2023
[edit]- News and notes: Where have all the administrators gone?
- In the media: Thirst traps, the fastest loading sites on the web, and the original collaborative writing
- Gallery: Before and After: Why you don't need to know how to restore images to make massive improvements
- Featured content: Yo, ho! Blow the man down!
- Traffic report: The calm and the storm
- News from Diff: Sawtpedia: Giving a Voice to Wikipedia Using QR Codes
The Signpost: 6 November 2023
[edit]- Arbitration report: Admin bewilderingly unmasks self as sockpuppet of other admin who was extremely banned in 2015
- In the media: UK shadow chancellor accused of ripping off WP articles for book, Wikipedians accused of being dicks by a rich man
- Opinion: An open letter to Elon Musk
- WikiCup report: The WikiCup 2023
- News from Wiki Ed: Equity lists on Wikipedia
- Recent research: How English Wikipedia drove out fringe editors over two decades
- Featured content: Like putting a golf course in a historic site.
- Traffic report: Cricket jumpscare
How can you be a cancer and yet not smoke?
[edit]Just messing with you. Have a great day :) UnexpectedSmoreInquisition aka USI (talk) 04:08, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 November 2023
[edit]- In the media: Propaganda and photos, lunatics and a lunar backup
- News and notes: Update on Wikimedia's financial health
- Traffic report: If it bleeds, it leads
- Recent research: Canceling disputes as the real function of ArbCom
- Wikimania: Wikimania 2024 scholarships
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 December 2023
[edit]- In the media: Turmoil on Hebrew Wikipedia, grave dancing, Olga's impact and inspiring Bhutanese nuns
- Disinformation report: "Wikipedia and the assault on history"
- Comix: Bold comics for a new age
- Essay: I am going to die
- Featured content: Real gangsters move in silence
- Traffic report: And it's hard to watch some cricket, in the cold November Rain
- Humour: Mandy Rice-Davies Applies
The Signpost: 24 December 2023
[edit]- Special report: Did the Chinese Communist Party send astroturfers to sabotage a hacktivist's Wikipedia article?
- News and notes: The Italian Public Domain wars continue, Wikimedia RU set to dissolve, and a recap of WLM 2023
- In the media: Consider the humble fork
- Discussion report: Arabic Wikipedia blackout; Wikimedians discuss SpongeBob, copyrights, and AI
- In focus: Liquidation of Wikimedia RU
- Technology report: Dark mode is coming
- Recent research: "LLMs Know More, Hallucinate Less" with Wikidata
- Gallery: A feast of holidays and carols
- Comix: Lollus lmaois 200C tincture
- Crossword: when the crossword is sus
- Traffic report: What's the big deal? I'm an animal!
- From the editor: A piccy iz worth OVAR 9000!!!11oneone! wordz ^_^
- Humour: Guess the joke contest
The Signpost: 10 January 2024
[edit]- From the editor: NINETEEN MORE YEARS! NINETEEN MORE YEARS!
- Special report: Public Domain Day 2024
- Technology report: Wikipedia: A Multigenerational Pursuit
- News and notes: In other news ... see ya in court!
- WikiProject report: WikiProjects Israel and Palestine
- Obituary: Anthony Bradbury
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2023
- Comix: Conflict resolution
The Signpost: 31 January 2024
[edit]- News and notes: Wikipedian Osama Khalid celebrated his 30th birthday in jail
- Opinion: Until it happens to you
- Disinformation report: How paid editors squeeze you dry
- Recent research: Croatian takeover was enabled by "lack of bureaucratic openness and rules constraining [admins]"
- Traffic report: DJ, gonna burn this goddamn house right down
The Signpost: 13 February 2024
[edit]- News and notes: Wikimedia Russia director declared "foreign agent" by Russian gov; EU prepares to pile on the papers
- Disinformation report: How low can the scammers go?
- Serendipity: Is this guy the same as the one who was a Nazi?
- Traffic report: Griselda, Nikki, Carl, Jannik and two types of football
- Crossword: Our crossword to bear
- Comix: Strongly
The Signpost: 2 March 2024
[edit]- News and notes: Wikimedia enters US Supreme court hearings as "the dolphin inadvertently caught in the net"
- Recent research: Images on Wikipedia "amplify gender bias"
- In the media: The Scottish Parliament gets involved, a wikirace on live TV, and the Foundation's CTO goes on record
- Obituary: Vami_IV
- Traffic report: Supervalentinefilmbowlday
- WikiCup report: High-scoring WikiCup first round comes to a close
The Signpost: 29 March 2024
[edit]- Technology report: Millions of readers still seeing broken pages as "temporary" disabling of graph extension nears its second year
- Recent research: "Newcomer Homepage" feature mostly fails to boost new editors
- Traffic report: He rules over everything, on the land called planet Dune
- Humour: Letters from the editors
- Comix: Layout issue
The Signpost: 25 April 2024
[edit]- In the media: Censorship and wikiwashing looming over RuWiki, edit wars over San Francisco politics, and another wikirace on live TV
- News and notes: A sigh of relief for open access as Italy makes a slight U-turn on their cultural heritage reproduction law
- WikiConference report: WikiConference North America 2023 in Toronto recap
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Newspapers (Not WP:NOTNEWS)
- Recent research: New survey of over 100,000 Wikipedia users
- Traffic report: O.J., cricket and a three body problem
The Signpost: 16 May 2024
[edit]- News and notes: Democracy in action: multiple elections
- Special report: Will the new RfA reform come to the rescue of administrators?
- Arbitration report: Ruined temples for posterity to ponder over – arbitration from '22 to '24
- Comix: Generations
- Traffic report: Crawl out through the fallout, baby
The Signpost: 8 June 2024
[edit]- Technology report: New Page Patrol receives a much-needed software upgrade
- Deletion report: The lore of Kalloor
- In the media: National cable networks get in on the action arguing about what the first sentence of a Wikipedia article ought to say
- News from the WMF: Progress on the plan — how the Wikimedia Foundation advanced on its Annual Plan goals during the first half of fiscal year 2023-2024
- Recent research: ChatGPT did not kill Wikipedia, but might have reduced its growth
- Featured content: We didn't start the wiki
- Essay: No queerphobia
- Special report: RetractionBot is back to life!
- Traffic report: Chimps, Eurovision, and the return of the Baby Reindeer
- Comix: The Wikipediholic Family
- Concept: Palimpsestuous
The Signpost: 4 July 2024
[edit]- News and notes: WMF board elections and fundraising updates
- Special report: Wikimedia Movement Charter ratification vote underway, new Council may surpass power of Board
- In focus: How the Russian Wikipedia keeps it clean despite having just a couple dozen administrators
- Discussion report: Wikipedians are hung up on the meaning of Madonna
- In the media: War and information in war and politics
- Sister projects: On editing Wikisource
- Opinion: Etika: a Pop Culture Champion
- Gallery: Spokane Willy's photos
- Humour: A joke
- Recent research: Is Wikipedia Politically Biased? Perhaps
- Traffic report: Talking about you and me, and the games people play
The Signpost: 22 July 2024
[edit]- Discussion report: Internet users flock to Wikipedia to debate its image policy over Trump raised-fist photo
- News and notes: Wikimedia community votes to ratify Movement Charter; Wikimedia Foundation opposes ratification
- Obituary: JamesR
- Crossword: Vaguely bird-shaped crossword
The Signpost: 14 August 2024
[edit]- In the media: Portland pol profile paid for from public purse
- In focus: Twitter marks the spot
- News and notes: Another Wikimania has concluded.
- Special report: Nano or just nothing: Will nano go nuclear?
- Opinion: HouseBlaster's RfA debriefing
- Traffic report: Ball games, movies, elections, but nothing really weird
- Humour: I'm proud to be a template
The Signpost: 4 September 2024
[edit]- News and notes: WikiCup enters final round, MCDC wraps up activities, 17-year-old hoax article unmasked
- In the media: AI is not playing games anymore. Is Wikipedia ready?
- News from the WMF: Meet the 12 candidates running in the WMF Board of Trustees election
- Wikimania: A month after Wikimania 2024
- Serendipity: What it's like to be Wikimedian of the Year
- Traffic report: After the gold rush
The Signpost: 26 September 2024
[edit]- In the media: Courts order Wikipedia to give up names of editors, legal strain anticipated from "online safety laws"
- Community view: Indian courts order Wikipedia to take down name of crime victim, editors strive towards consensus
- Serendipity: A Wikipedian at the 2024 Paralympics
- Opinion: asilvering's RfA debriefing
- News and notes: Are you ready for admin elections?
- Recent research: Article-writing AI is less "prone to reasoning errors (or hallucinations)" than human Wikipedia editors
- Traffic report: Jump in the line, rock your body in time
The Signpost: 19 October 2024
[edit]- News and notes: One election's end, another election's beginning
- Recent research: "As many as 5%" of new English Wikipedia articles "contain significant AI-generated content", says paper
- In the media: Off to the races! Wikipedia wins!
- Contest: A WikiCup for the Global South
- Traffic report: A scream breaks the still of the night
- Book review: The Editors
- Humour: The Newspaper Editors
- Crossword: Spilled Coffee Mug
The Signpost: 6 November 2024
[edit]- From the editors: Editing Wikipedia should not be a crime
- In the media: An old scrimmage, politics and purported libel
- Special report: Wikipedia editors face litigation, censorship
- Traffic report: Twisted tricks or tempting treats?