Jump to content

User talk:RL0919

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Administrators' newsletter – January 2024

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2023).

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:54, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Featured Article Save Award

[edit]

On behalf of the FAR coordinators, thank you, RL0919! Your work on Harriet Tubman has allowed the article to retain its featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. I hereby award you this Featured Article Save Award, or FASA. You may display this FA star upon your userpage. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 16:39, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

[edit]
Precious
Seven years!

Congratulations to the successful saving efforts! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hayden Moss

[edit]

How is the outcome of the AFD re-nomination on this article different from that of an AFD nomination on another article? Both don't have input from others, yet the outcome is different. George Ho (talk) 17:56, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The obvious answer is that two different people closed the discussions, and human judgment can vary. As far as I can see, I would have closed the other discussion the same way I closed this one.
That said, I would also suggest that opening discussions for these situations may be counterproductive to begin with. The previous AfDs were a decade or more in the past, and much closer to when the subjects appeared on TV. The article creators are blocked for socking. Considering that no one bothered to comment on the AfDs, I strongly suspect that if you had just redirected the articles without opening a discussion about it, probably no one would have objected. Less work for you; no work for AfD participants and closers. --RL0919 (talk) 18:41, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Isn't redirecting a previously-nominated article kinda risky, especially right now? Furthermore, as I feared, any Survivor-fanatic editor would undo the redirecting and then restore the article back to as-is without further ado. I don't wanna take the closed AFD discussion to review yet, but I figured you'll stand by your decision, right? George Ho (talk) 19:12, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Almost forgot: AFD results... and even DRV ones are easier to enforce and more enforceable IMO than WP:IMPLICITCONSENSUS. George Ho (talk) 19:21, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your comments make me more comfortable with the choice to close as no consensus, not less. If you are so sure that someone would object to a redirect by you, then putting an admin stamp on a redirect based on a zero-input AfD would be placing a mantle of "enforceability" on a change that doesn't deserve it. --RL0919 (talk) 22:37, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – February 2024

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).

CheckUser changes

removed Wugapodes

Interface administrator changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC about increasing the inactivity requirement for Interface administrators is open for feedback.

Technical news

  • Pages that use the JSON contentmodel will now use tabs instead of spaces for auto-indentation. This will significantly reduce the page size. (T326065)

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee adopted a new enforcement restriction on January 4, 2024, wherein the Committee may apply the 'Reliable source consensus-required restriction' to specified topic areas.
  • Community feedback is requested for a draft to replace the "Information for administrators processing requests" section at WP:AE.

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:00, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An invitation

[edit]

You're invited to attend a meetup at the San Diego Central Library on Monday 26 February 2024. Hopefully see you there. RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 11:00, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – March 2024

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2024).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The mobile site history pages now use the same HTML as the desktop history pages. (T353388)

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:22, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – April 2024

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2024).

Administrator changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Toolforge Grid Engine services have been shut down after the final migration process from Grid Engine to Kubernetes. (T313405)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Editors are invited to sign up for The Core Contest, an initiative running from April 15 to May 31, which aims to improve vital and other core articles on Wikipedia.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:48, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – May 2024

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2024).

Administrator changes

readded Nyttend
removed

Bureaucrat changes

removed Nihonjoe

CheckUser changes

readded Joe Roe

Oversight changes

removed GeneralNotability

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Partial action blocks are now in effect on the English Wikipedia. This means that administrators have the ability to restrict users from certain actions, including uploading files, moving pages and files, creating new pages, and sending thanks. T280531

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – June 2024

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2024).

Administrator changes

readded Graham Beards
removed

Bureaucrat changes

removed

Oversight changes

removed Dreamy Jazz

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Nuke feature, which enables administrators to mass delete pages, will now correctly delete pages which were moved to another title. T43351

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:44, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

91.124.53.23

[edit]

Hi, I don't want to go through the hassle of filing a report at ANI and I saw that you were active recently so I wanted to ask you to possibley block the IP 91.124.53.23. If you look at their talk page (and talk page history) they are clearly making personal attacks despite being warned multiple times and they have also threatened to do sockpuppetry. Thanks. GoldRomean (talk) 21:16, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@GoldRomean: Already reported at AIV and blocked. If they do sock, you can file a request at WP:RFPP. TornadoLGS (talk) 21:18, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. Thanks for your help (and RL0919 sorry for wasting ur time). GoldRomean (talk) 21:19, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – July 2024

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2024).

Administrator changes

added
removed

Technical news

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:59, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Vivian Jenna Wilson

[edit]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Vivian Jenna Wilson. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Rei (talk) 20:05, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was surprised in your closure statement that you stated that there were mostly Delete and Redirect "votes" as it looked to me like more editors were arguing for Keep than Delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:29, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
By my count (not the appellant's), 18 participants preferred redirection, 4 more were open to deletion or redirection, and 6 (including presumably the nominator) preferred deletion. This is easily more than the 17 clear keeps. (Two others did not provide a clear preference; one of those appeared to be arguing against notability, while the other was clearly against redirection but did not indicate an opinion about notability or keep vs. delete.) So just under 38% of the clear positions preferred keeping. --RL0919 (talk) 02:49, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I just came to remove my comment as I said something similar at the Deletion Review. Liz Read! Talk! 03:19, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – August 2024

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2024).

Administrator changes

readded Isabelle Belato
removed

Interface administrator changes

readded Izno

CheckUser changes

removed Barkeep49

Technical news

  • Global blocks may now target accounts as well as IP's. Administrators may locally unblock when appropriate.
  • Users wishing to permanently leave may now request "vanishing" via Special:GlobalVanishRequest. Processed requests will result in the user being renamed, their recovery email being removed, and their account being globally locked.

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Atlas Shrugged

[edit]

Hi, I do not understand why you keep deleting my input on the Atlas Shrugged page... The libertarians and conservatives site the work as an influence do in fact subscribe to "rational selfishness," the philosophy of the book.... So why delete that fact? 2600:8800:4021:DE00:836:FE33:DAE6:8908 (talk) 19:53, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may believe so, but if you want to insert such claims into Wikipedia you should supply reliable secondary sources that have reached this conclusion. And then be prepared to make a case that they are representative of a common viewpoint that that warrants inclusion. So far, you haven't even responded to the Talk page discussion that has been open since March. --RL0919 (talk) 05:36, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would have responded to the talk page discussion, had I known it existed. I meant no disrespect to you or the page, but the point I made is self evident. If they cite a book's philosophy as an influence, the meaning of that influence should be mentioned. That said, I will look for a credible source that shows this self evident fact. If I find it, I will share it. --DMW 2600:8800:4021:DE00:3C7D:CD03:E8EC:64CB (talk) 17:29, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. ... but given the self evident nature of my comment, given the later mention of the philosophy later in this article, in the meantime, I implore you to reinstate my edit. --DMW 2600:8800:4021:DE00:3C7D:CD03:E8EC:64CB (talk) 17:31, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
here you go... https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/column-this-is-what-happens-when-you-take-ayn-rand-seriously 2600:8800:4021:DE00:3C7D:CD03:E8EC:64CB (talk) 17:38, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Reliable sources document that some people have said that they were influenced by Atlas Shrugged, a lengthy novel that contains multiple ideas. But you have picked one of those ideas and proclaimed on their behalf that it is what they meant. That interpretation of what the influence was is not "self-evident". The opinion column you just linked is a better source than than your own imagination, but still well below what we should be looking for. Such columns are generally not good sources for facts, especially when they are not from a recognized expert on the subject and most especially not for claims about living people. --RL0919 (talk) 22:19, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes the book does contain multiple ideas, but that response is a bit disingenuous, as the main thrust of the book is the philosophy of rational selfishness. If you think there is another more major theme in the book, I wish you would put it on the wiki page, as the page itself states rational selfishness as the main theme. Why the reluctance to put the theme of the book, which has been cited as an influence to these conservative and libertarian thinkers, next to the comment of its influence?
Thank you for continued dialogue. 2600:8800:4021:DE00:C0D8:2083:8D8A:3C65 (talk) 09:04, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The opening paragraph of the article says that the novel "explores a number of philosophical themes ... including reason, property rights, individualism, libertarianism and capitalism, and depicts what Rand saw as the failures of governmental coercion" and also mentions Rand's own description of the theme as "the role of man's mind in existence". The section on Themes has four subsections. It does discuss her support for egoism, but also that the novel "caricatures fascism, socialism, communism, and any state intervention in society", and other topics addressed in the novel including ones mentioned above such as property rights and individualism. When any individual says they were influenced by the novel, they could mean any of these or even some other element that isn't discussed in our article. If Wikipedia were in the business of drawing inferences about what people mean (without using a source that states that conclusion first), it would make more sense to infer that conservative politicians who overtly oppose socialism and communism are likely to be referring to the novel's critique of those, or to its endorsements of property rights and capitalism. It seems much less likely that politicians who are mostly self-declared believers in Christianity – a religion that endorses altruism and is founded on belief in a divine act of self-sacrifice – are indicating their support for Rand's very un-Christian views on egoism. But in any case, Wikipedia is not in the business of such inferences. --RL0919 (talk) 01:43, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – September 2024

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2024).

Administrator changes

removed Pppery

Interface administrator changes

removed Pppery

Oversighter changes

removed Wugapodes

CheckUser changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, there is a new criterion for speedy deletion: C4, which applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past.
  • A request for comment is open to discuss whether Notability (species) should be adopted as a subject-specific notability guideline.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:44, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SNL redirects

[edit]

Hi, thank you for performing the redirects of the SNL history articles to the new article as per the AfD. I've been changing any links to those old pages from other articles to reflect the new article, and I was wondering if it might be worth it to clean up and delete a lot of these old redirects to the redirects that are now pretty useless? I've compiled a full list of redirects that I'll happily supply if you decide this is worth looking at, but a partial list includes History of SNL:2010-2015, History of Saturday Night Live (2015-present), and History of Saturday Night Live (2020-present). All of these are now double redirects; I have a list of many more. They can easily be changed to match the new history article but would it be better to just delete them and keep things simple? Having a bunch of redirects for potential misspellings of a redirect (being kept only for its page history) seems a bit much, no? StewdioMACK (talk) 16:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@StewdioMACK: There are bots that will fix most double redirects, although you are also welcome to fix any that you find. As far as deleting them goes, that typically requires a WP:RFD discussion, and redirects that have meaningful page history are almost always kept to comply with our copyright licensing requirements. (See Wikipedia:Merge and delete for more detail about that.) --RL0919 (talk) 16:51, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, thanks for response, that makes sense - just to clarify, I didn't mean to delete those redirects with page histories that were just redirected by you, but rather, the redirects TO those redirects with no page history that will no longer see any usage. Happy to leave them alone though. I have put one of them up at WP:RFD (Slap Pack) as I don't understand the context of it and it's not used, but I haven't put the rest up. I don't think it'd be controversial to delete them though. StewdioMACK (talk) 17:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
I never extended my congratulations for the splendid rewrite that is Harriet Tubman! It's deeply humbling to see such a depth of research and wide coverage. Thanks for all you did there and elsewhere! Aza24 (talk) 23:28, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rose photos

[edit]

A courtesy note, some of your photos were added to this article.TomStonehunter (talk) 13:12, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NCORP and political parties

[edit]

Does NCORP not apply to political parties? Because the guidelines state otherwise. Traumnovelle (talk) 11:09, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming you are referring to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Zealand Republican Party (1995), no one made that argument. --RL0919 (talk) 12:00, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – October 2024

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2024).

Administrator changes

added
removed

CheckUser changes

readded
removed

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

[edit]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Important: Please update user script installation

[edit]

Hi there, you currently have a user script installed from Anne drew Andrew and Drew. Several weeks ago, I changed my username to Anne drew, and unfortunately, due to an issue with script redirects, the scripts you have installed under my old username no longer function.

To fix this, please update your JavaScript pages (Special:MyPage/common.js or Special:MyPage/skin.js) by replacing all instances of Anne drew Andrew and Drew with Anne drew.

If any of this is unclear, please ping Anne drew for help. I apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your understanding!

Thanks – Anne drew

You are receiving this message because you have installed one of Anne drew's user scripts. If you'd like to stop receiving notifications, you can unsubscribe here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:11, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – November 2024

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2024).

Administrator changes

readded
removed

CheckUser changes

removed Maxim

Oversighter changes

removed Maxim

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Mass deletions done with the Nuke tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. T366068

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:21, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Handwriting expert" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Handwriting expert has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 3 § Handwriting expert until a consensus is reached. BD2412 T 16:13, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

[edit]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Email

[edit]
Hello, RL0919. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Ed Erhart (WMF) (talk) 15:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Night of January 16th scheduled for TFA

[edit]

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for January 2025. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 2025, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/January 2025. Please keep an eye on that page, as notifications of copy edits to or queries about the draft blurb may be left there by user:JennyOz, who assists the coordinators by reviewing the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! SchroCat (talk) 11:24, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RL0919&oldid=1258925194"