Harry Meacher

Harry Meacher is a British actor and director.

= Biography =

I have rewritten to try to demonstrate notability, and have checked articles on entirely comparable British actors and satisfied myself that such articles exist on Wikipedia.

I have listed source references, though I lack the expertise to 'hide' them in Wikipedia fashion. (Documentary references for actors' careers can in their nature be tricky.)

Do please help me to get this right, I would be so grateful for a response in simple language.

Thanks & regards Rogersansom (talk) 07:27, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The removal of maintenance tags is discouraged, but it's not vandalism, and the removal of a prod tag should never be reverted. I'm disappointed you've been handled this way by three experienced vandal fighters. --Closedmouth (talk) 12:51, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Rogersansom! I am Tnxman307 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! TN‑X-Man 15:50, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

==

Many thanks to those above. This talk page has now somehow appeared on the internet, and as it contains discussion that contributed to articles that now exist, I hope I may properly delete it? Regards 82.16.224.196 (talk) 09:21, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#User talk pages. If you want to prevent search engines like Google from indexing this page then you can also place the magic word __NOINDEX__ on it (without the nowiki tags I used in the source here). Next time Google visits the page they should remove it from their index. PrimeHunter (talk) 11:46, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I will try putting _NOINDEX_ here, as the easy accessing of contributory discussion seems undesirable. I am learning - thanks again.

82.16.224.196 (talk) 09:39, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It has to be with two underscores on each side. When written correctly it is not rendered on the page but the software knows it's there. PrimeHunter (talk) 13:16, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Rogersansom (talk) 13:07, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That worked. The html source of the rendered page now says:

<meta name="robots" content="noindex,nofollow" />

PrimeHunter (talk) 13:16, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Old Beals

You must have known Barry Kyle at Beal as well. He's been the most successful of us all. Send me an email and let me know what you're doing if you like - you can find my home page easily enough. Ian R.79.65.56.87 (talk) 22:27, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Rogersansom! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Harry Meacher - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 15:37, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Harry Andrews, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page King Henry IV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Philippa Gregory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry the Fifth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Walker

Your recent edit to Mike Walker is interesting – how do you know this? But if Joan O'Norman was given in the on-air and Radio Times cast credits then wouldn't it be better to leave Joan O'Norman in the cast (unlinked) with a note? E.g.

Joan O'Norman <ref group=Note>Joan O'Norman was included in the cast credits but is an anagram of [[Joanna Monro]] used to conceal one "character" being a disguise</ref>

I think maybe the wording of the end of the note could be improved.

Jim Craigie (talk) 07:00, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. I know it because I heard the dramatisation as well as being familiar with the short story, which is of course freely available and will confirm that the "two" characters are one. I do not remember what they did in the spoken credits at the end of the programme, when there was no further need to protect the ending. I do remember that in a comparable situation when anagrams were used for characters' identical twins, the announcer said "Cristo Luvac (an anagram of Victor Lucas)" and "Jonah Sendy (an anagram of Haydn Jones")". That may have happened in this case. You may well be right about doing the equivalent on Wikipedia.

Rogersansom (talk) 12:35, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Henry IV, Part 1, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Calder (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

The Masters (novel) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to John Phillips, John Barron, John Carson and Frederick Treves

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:31, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robert Lang (actor), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Royal Court and National Theatre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aline Waites (January 19)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit when you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Aline Waites.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:05, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Rogersansom, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Aline Waites

Hi Roger, looking at this article, I think it stands a good chance of passing. If you fancy upping the odds, I'd recommend adding specific page numbers, article names and specific web links to the inline citations, if you can find them. The idea is to make it as easy as possible for any reader to go and find the source. The more sources you can add (from books and mainstream media) the more likely the article will fly. Good luck. I hope that helps. Span (talk) 12:45, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Aline Waites was accepted

Aline Waites, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:43, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aline Waites, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Birthday Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gordon Griffin (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Rogersansom/Gordon Griffin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 13:42, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gordon Griffin (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The list of screen credits is unsourced.

IMDB and his own web site are not reliable sources.

Resubmitting this draft without addressing the reviewer's previous concerns is tendentious.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gordon Griffin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:50, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gordon Griffin (November 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Seeing his filmography, I see only trivial and unconvincing works, nothing actually major and significant to suggest he had a longtime work, so also then considering this current article, he's not notable as an actor and I see nothing to suggest better as another occupation.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gordon Griffin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 05:46, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Rogersansom. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^[1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^[2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:20, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF). About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gordon Griffin

Hello, Rogersansom. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Gordon Griffin".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 18:23, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gordon Griffin (July 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:

The references here are not bolstering notability at all, as they're incomplete. References need to provide complete information about the specific content being cited: for instance, a citation to newspaper content has to include the title of the specific newspaper article being cited and the date it was published on, and cannot just be "Name of Newspaper"; book citations need, if possible, to include the specific page number on which the content in question is found; and on and so forth.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gordon Griffin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bearcat (talk) 14:26, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gordon Griffin

I spotted your note on Bearcat's page and have done a bit of work on the draft. If you're going to cite a newspaper article, you need to keep the cutting so that you can give date, page, article title - just as if you were writing a book or essay. I found it online. I've also found the MBE on the London Gazette - it's quite straightforward once you find out how to do it, though I've only just found a couple of the short cuts! Ditto the BFI database, which I hope counts as "Reliable" in a way that IBMD doesn't. But book sources are perfectly legitimate too: you just need to give more detail - author, title, publisher, ISBN, and page number for the specific fact you're citing. There are also quite a few links which lead to disambiguation pages - I have a "gadget" which paints them orange, which is really helpful (go to "Prefrences", "Gadgets" and look near the bottom of "Appearance", then tick the box). Good luck. I've left a note at User talk:Bearcat. PamD 09:20, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I've tagged the links which go to disambiguation pages ... but have you checked all your other links to make sure that they go to the article you intend, and not another film or person of the same name? Worth doing. PamD 09:24, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And another useful gadget, if it isn't included by default, is "Navigation popups: article previews and editing functions pop up when hovering over links" (in "Preferences", "Gadgets", "Browsing") - so you can quickly check that a link looks right by hovering over it, rather than clicking and waiting for it to load. I find it very useful when checking that my links go where I think they do. Best wishes. PamD 09:27, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just to be clear, the process going forward doesn't require that I have to personally come back and approve the changes — note, for example, that the prior reviews weren't all by the same editor, but rather each time has been a different one. If you or PamD are satisfied that the new changes are sufficient, either of you can just hit the "resubmit" button at the bottom of my rejection message, and the article will be readded to the queue and anybody who works with the AFC project will have the opportunity to review it. Bearcat (talk) 13:40, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Rogersansom. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Gordon Griffin.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Gordon Griffin.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 09:45, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Rogersansom. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[1]

[2]