Wikipedia

Congress of Vienna

(Redirected from Final Act of the Congress of Vienna)
For other uses, see Congress of Vienna (disambiguation).
"Vienna peace congress" redirects here. For the 2015 congress on Syria, see Vienna peace talks for Syria.

The Congress of Vienna[a] of 1814–1815 was a series of international diplomatic meetings to discuss and agree upon a possible new layout of the European political and constitutional order after the downfall of the French Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte.[1] Participants were representatives of all European powers (other than the Ottoman Empire)[b] and other stakeholders. The Congress was chaired by Austrian statesman Klemens von Metternich, and was held in Vienna from September 1814 to June 1815.

The national boundaries within Europe agreed upon by the Congress of Vienna
Frontispiece of the Acts of the Congress of Vienna

The objective of the Congress was to provide a long-term peace plan for Europe by settling critical issues arising from the French Revolutionary Wars and the Napoleonic Wars through negotiation. The goal was not simply to restore old boundaries, but to resize the main powers so they could balance each other and remain at peace, being at the same time shepherds for the smaller powers. More generally, conservative leaders like Metternich also sought to restrain or eliminate republican, liberal, and revolutionary movements which, from their point of view, had upended the constitutional order of the European ancien régime.

At the negotiation table, the position of France was weak in relation to that of Britain, Prussia, Austria, and Russia, partly due to the military strategy of its leader, Napoleon Bonaparte, over the previous two decades, and his recent defeat. In the settlement the parties did reach, France had to give up all recent conquests, while the other three main powers made major territorial gains around the world. Prussia added territory from smaller states: Swedish Pomerania, most of the Kingdom of Saxony, and the western part of the former Duchy of Warsaw. Austria gained much of northern Italy. Russia added the central and eastern parts of the Duchy of Warsaw. All agreed upon ratifying the creation of the new Kingdom of the Netherlands, which had been created just months before from the former Dutch Seven Provinces together with formerly Austrian territory, and was meant to serve as a buffer between the German Confederation and France.

The immediate background was Napoleonic France's defeat and surrender in May 1814, which brought an end to 23 years of nearly continuous war. Remarkably, negotiations continued unaffected despite the outbreak of fighting triggered by Napoleon's return from exile and resumption of power in France during the Hundred Days of March to July 1815. The Congress's agreement was signed nine days before Napoleon's final defeat at Waterloo on 18 June 1815.

Some historians have criticised the outcomes of the Congress for causing the subsequent suppression of national, democratic, and liberal movements,[3] and it has been seen as a reactionary settlement for the benefit of traditional monarchs. Others have praised the Congress for protecting Europe from large and widespread wars for almost a century.

The Congress format

edit
 
Architect of the Congress System, Prince von Metternich, chancellor of the Austrian Empire from 1821 until the Revolution in 1848. Painting by Lawrence (1815)

The name "Congress of Vienna" was not meant to suggest a formal plenary session, but rather the creation of a diplomatic organizational framework bringing together stakeholders of all flocks to enable the expression of opinions, interests and sentiments and facilitate discussion of general issues among them. The Congress format had been developed by Austrian Foreign Minister Klemens von Metternich, assisted by Friedrich von Gentz, and was the first occasion in history where, on a continental scale, national representatives and other stakeholders came together in one city at the same time to discuss and formulate the conditions and provisions of treaties. Before the Congress of Vienna the common method of diplomacy involved the exchange of notes sent back and forth among the several capitals and separate talks in different places, a cumbersome process that required much in the way of time and transportation. The format set at the Congress of Vienna would serve as inspiration for the 1856 peace conference brokered by France (the Congress of Paris) that settled the Crimean War. The Congress of Vienna settlement gave birth to the Concert of Europe, an international political doctrine that emphasized the maintaining of political boundaries, the balance of powers, and respecting spheres of influence and which guided foreign policy among the nations of Europe until the outbreak of the First World War in 1914.

To reach amiable consensus among the many different nations holding great interest in the settlement proceedings, informal, face-to-face deliberative sessions were held where opinions and proposed solutions could be inventoried. The policy work on which the Concert of Europe was built on came about through closed-doors dealing among the five Great Powers – Austria, Britain, Russia, Prussia and France. The first four of the five dominant peacemakers held sway simply because they brought to the table "negotiating power" that came of hard-won victory in the Napoleonic Wars; France enjoyed her advantageous position largely through the brilliant diplomatic maneuvering by senior statesman Talleyrand. Lesser powers, like Spain, Sweden, and Portugal, were given few opportunities to advocate their interests and only occasionally partook in the meetings held between the great powers. However, because all representatives were gathered in one city it was relatively easy to communicate, to hear and spread news and gossip, and to present points of view for both powerful and less powerful nations. Also of great importance to the parties convened in Vienna were the opportunities presented at wine and dinner functions to establish formal relationships with one another and build-up diplomatic networks.

Preliminaries

edit

The Treaty of Chaumont in 1814 had reaffirmed decisions that had been made already and that would be ratified by the more important Congress of Vienna. They included the establishment of a confederated Germany, the division of Italy into independent states, the restoration of the Bourbon kings of Spain, and the enlargement of the Netherlands to include what in 1830 became modern Belgium. The Treaty of Chaumont became the cornerstone of the European Alliance that formed the balance of power for decades.[1]

Other partial settlements had already occurred at the Treaty of Paris between France and the Sixth Coalition, and the Treaty of Kiel that covered issues raised regarding Scandinavia. The Treaty of Paris had determined that a "general congress" should be held in Vienna and that invitations would be issued to "all the Powers engaged on either side in the present war".[4] The opening was scheduled for July 1814.[5]

Participants

edit
 
Delegates of the Congress of Vienna in a contemporary engraving by Jean Godefroy after the painting by Jean-Baptiste Isabey:
  1.   Britain: Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington
  2.   Portugal: Joaquim Lobo Silveira, 7th Count of Oriola
  3.   Portugal: António de Saldanha da Gama, Count of Porto Santo
  4.   Sweden: Count Carl Löwenhielm
  5.   France: Louis Joseph Alexis, Comte de Noailles [fr]
  6.   Austria: Klemens Wenzel, Prince von Metternich
  7.   France: Frédéric-Séraphin de La Tour du Pin Gouverne [fr]
  8.   Russia: Count Karl Robert Nesselrode
  9.   Portugal: Pedro de Sousa Holstein, 1st Count of Palmela
  10.   Britain: Robert Stewart, Viscount Castlereagh
  11.   France: Emmerich Joseph, Duke of Dalberg
  12.   Austria: Baron Johann von Wessenberg
  13.   Russia: Prince Andrey Kirillovich Razumovsky
  14.   Britain: Charles Stewart, 1st Baron Stewart
  15.   Spain: Pedro Gómez Labrador, 1st Marquess of Labrador
  16.   Britain: Richard Le Poer Trench, 2nd Earl of Clancarty
  17. Nikolaus von Wacken [de] (Recorder)
  18.   Austria: Friedrich von Gentz (Congress Secretary)
  19.   Prussia: Baron Wilhelm von Humboldt
  20.   Britain: William Cathcart, 1st Earl Cathcart
  21.   Prussia: Prince Karl August von Hardenberg
  22.   France: Charles Maurice de Talleyrand-Périgord
  23.   Russia: Count Gustav Ernst von Stackelberg

The Congress functioned through formal meetings such as working groups and official diplomatic functions; however, a large portion of the Congress was conducted informally at salons, banquets, and balls.[6]

The four great powers and Bourbon France

edit

Four great powers had previously formed the core of the Sixth Coalition, a covenant of nations allied in the war against France. On the verge of Napoleon's defeat they had outlined their common position in the Treaty of Chaumont (March 1814), and negotiated the Treaty of Paris (1814) with the Bourbons during their restoration:[7]

  • Austria was represented by Prince von Metternich, the Foreign Minister, and by his deputy, Baron Johann von Wessenberg. The Austrians sought to maintain the balance of power, while protecting the interests of the Conservative nations and rebuilding Austria's position diplomatically in Germany and Italy. As the Congress's sessions were in Vienna, Emperor Francis was kept closely informed.[8]
  • The United Kingdom was represented first by its Foreign Secretary, Viscount Castlereagh; then by the Duke of Wellington, after Castlereagh's return to England in February 1815. The United Kingdom wanted to prevent the return of France as a superpower (and stop Russia from attaining that status). It also sought to promote the balance of power by protecting the rights of smaller nations. In the last weeks it was headed by the Earl of Clancarty, after Wellington left to face Napoleon during the Hundred Days.[9]
  • Tsar Alexander I controlled the Russian delegation which was formally led by the foreign minister, Count Karl Robert Nesselrode. The tsar had two main goals, to gain control of Poland and to promote the peaceful coexistence of European nations, with Russia as the pre-eminent land power. He succeeded in forming the Holy Alliance (1815), based on monarchism and anti-secularism, and formed to combat any threat of revolution or republicanism.[10]
  • Prussia was represented by Prince Karl August von Hardenberg, the Chancellor, and the diplomat and scholar Wilhelm von Humboldt. The Prussians wanted to strengthen their position in Germany, particularly by annexing all of Saxony and parts of the Ruhr. King Frederick William III of Prussia was also in Vienna, playing his role behind the scenes.[11]
  • France, the "fifth" power, was represented by its foreign minister, Charles-Maurice de Talleyrand-Périgord, 1st Duke of Benevento, as well as the Minister Plenipotentiary, Emmerich Joseph de Dalberg, 1st Duke of Dalberg. Talleyrand had already negotiated the Treaty of Paris (1814) for Louis XVIII of France. He sought to ensure that France rejoined the group of Great Powers, and avoided being dismembered by the occupying powers. Louis XVIII, however, distrusted him and was also secretly negotiating with Metternich, by mail.[12]

The lesser powers, parties to the Treaty of Paris, 1814

edit

These parties had not been part of the Chaumont agreement, but had joined the Treaty of Paris (1814):

Other nations

edit
 
Negotiations at the Congress of Vienna

Other stakeholders, entertaining side program

edit

Virtually every state in Europe had a delegation in Vienna – more than 200 states and princely houses were represented at the Congress.[31] In addition, there were representatives of cities, corporations, religious organizations (for instance, abbeys) and special interest groups – e.g., a delegation representing German publishers, demanding a copyright law and freedom of the press.[32] With them came a host of courtiers, secretaries, civil servants and ladies to enjoy the magnificent social life of the Austrian court. The Congress was noted for its lavish entertainment: according to a famous joke of an attendee, it danced a lot but did not move forward.[33] On the other hand, the possibilities for informal gatherings created by this "side program" may have helped ensure the Congress's success.

Diplomatic tactics

edit

Talleyrand (France)

edit
 
Talleyrand proved an able negotiator for the defeated French.
 
Marquis of Labrador, Spanish Ambassador to the Congress of Vienna – Painting by Vicente López Portaña

Initially, the representatives of the four victorious powers hoped to exclude the French from serious participation in the negotiations, but Talleyrand skillfully managed to insert himself into "her inner councils" in the first weeks of negotiations. He allied himself to a Committee of Eight lesser powers (including Spain, Sweden, and Portugal) to control the negotiations. Once Talleyrand was able to use this committee to make himself a part of the inner negotiations, he then left it,[34] once again abandoning his allies.

The major Allies' indecision on how to conduct their affairs without provoking a united protest from the lesser powers led to the calling of a preliminary conference on the protocol, to which Talleyrand and the Marquess of Labrador, Spain's representative, were invited on 30 September 1814.[35]

Congress Secretary Friedrich von Gentz reported, "The intervention of Talleyrand and Labrador has hopelessly upset all our plans. Talleyrand protested against the procedure we have adopted and soundly [be]rated us for two hours. It was a scene I shall never forget."[36] The embarrassed representatives of the Allies replied that the document concerning the protocol they had arranged actually meant nothing. "If it means so little, why did you sign it?" snapped Labrador.[citation needed]

Talleyrand's policy, directed as much by national as personal ambitions, demanded the close but by no means amicable relationship he had with Labrador, whom Talleyrand regarded with disdain.[37] Labrador later remarked of Talleyrand: "that cripple, unfortunately, is going to Vienna."[38] Talleyrand skirted additional articles suggested by Labrador: he had no intention of handing over the 12,000 afrancesados – Spanish fugitives, sympathetic to France, who had sworn fealty to Joseph Bonaparte, nor the bulk of the documents, paintings, pieces of fine art, and books that had been looted from the archives, palaces, churches and cathedrals of Spain.[39]

Polish-Saxon questions

edit

The most complex topic at the Congress was the Polish-Saxon Crisis. Russia wanted most of Poland, and Prussia wanted all of Saxony, whose king had allied with Napoleon. The tsar would like to become king of Poland.[40] Austria analysed, this could make Russia too powerful, a view which was supported by Britain. The result was a deadlock, for which Talleyrand proposed a solution: admit France to the inner circle, and France would support Austria and Britain. The three nations signed a treaty on 3 January 1815, among only the three of them, agreeing to go to war against Russia and Prussia, if necessary, to prevent the Russo-Prussian plan from coming to fruition.[41]

When the Tsar heard of the treaty he agreed to a compromise that satisfied all parties on 24 October 1815. Russia received most of the Napoleonic Duchy of Warsaw as a "Kingdom of Poland" – called Congress Poland, with the tsar as a king ruling it independently of Russia. However, the majority of Greater Poland and Kuyavia, as well as the Chełmno Land, were given to Prussia and mostly included within the newly formed Grand Duchy of Posen (Poznań), while Kraków became a free city as a shared protectorate of Austria, Prussia and Russia. Furthermore, the tsar was forbidden from uniting his new realm with the parts of Poland that had been incorporated into Russia in the 1790s. Prussia received 60 percent of Saxony, much of which became part of the new Province of Saxony from 1816 (the now-Prussian parts of Lower Lusatia and some other areas instead became part of the Province of Brandenburg, with Prussian Upper Lusatia becoming part of the Province of Silesia by 1825); the remainder of Saxony returned to King Frederick Augustus I as his Kingdom of Saxony.[42]

Subsidies

edit

It can be learned from the diaries of the master of affairs Von Gentz that diplomatic tactics possibly included bribing. He notes that at the Congress he received £22,000 through Talleyrand from Louis XVIII, while Castlereagh gave him £600, accompanied by "les plus folles promesses" ("the wildest promises"); his diary is full of such entries.

Final agreement

edit
 
In red: territories left to France in 1814, but removed after the Treaty of Paris
 
Italian states after the Congress of Vienna with Austrian-annexed territories shown in yellow

The Final Act, embodying all the separate treaties, was signed on 9 June 1815 (nine days before the Battle of Waterloo).[43] Its provisions included:

Representatives of Austria, France, Portugal, Prussia, Russia, Sweden-Norway, and Britain signed the Final Act. Spain did not sign, but ratified the outcome in 1817.[citation needed]

Subsequently, Ferdinand IV, the Bourbon King of Sicily, regained control of the Kingdom of Naples after Joachim Murat, the king installed by Bonaparte, supported Napoleon in the Hundred Days and started the 1815 Neapolitan War by attacking Austria.[citation needed]

Other changes

edit
 
Alexander I of Russia considered himself a guarantor of European security

The Congress's principal results, apart from its confirmation of France's loss of the territories annexed between 1795 and 1810, which had already been settled by the Treaty of Paris, were the enlargement of Russia, (which gained most of the Duchy of Warsaw) and Prussia, which acquired the district of Poznań, Swedish Pomerania, Westphalia and the northern Rhineland. The consolidation of Germany from the nearly 300 states of the Holy Roman Empire (dissolved in 1806) into a much less complex system of thirty-nine states (4 of which were free cities) was confirmed. These states formed a loose German Confederation under the leadership of Austria.[citation needed]

Representatives at the Congress agreed to numerous other territorial changes. By the Treaty of Kiel, Norway had been ceded by the king of Denmark-Norway to the king of Sweden. This sparked the nationalist movement which led to the establishment of the Kingdom of Norway on 17 May 1814 and the subsequent personal Union with Sweden. Austria gained Lombardy–Venetia in Northern Italy, while much of the rest of North-Central Italy went to Habsburg dynasties (the Grand Duchy of Tuscany, the Duchy of Modena, and the Duchy of Parma).[55]

The Papal States were restored to the Pope. The Kingdom of Piedmont-Sardinia was restored to its mainland possessions, and also gained control of the Republic of Genoa. In Southern Italy, Napoleon's brother-in-law, Joachim Murat, was originally allowed to retain his Kingdom of Naples, but his support of Napoleon in the Hundred Days led to the restoration of the Bourbon Ferdinand IV to the throne.[56]

 
William II, King of the Netherlands - painting by Jan Adam Kruseman 1840)

A large United Kingdom of the Netherlands was formed for the Prince of Orange, including both the old United Provinces and the formerly Austrian-ruled territories in the Southern Netherlands, which gave way to the formation of a democratic state, formally headed by a constitutional monarch. Other, less important, territorial adjustments included significant territorial gains for the German Kingdoms of Hanover (which gained East Frisia from Prussia and various other territories in Northwest Germany) and Bavaria (which gained the Rhenish Palatinate and territories in Franconia). The Duchy of Lauenburg was transferred from Hanover to Denmark, and Prussia annexed Swedish Pomerania. Switzerland was enlarged, and Swiss neutrality was established. Swiss mercenaries had played a significant role in European wars for several hundred years: the Congress intended to put a stop to these activities permanently.[citation needed]

During the wars, Portugal had lost its town of Olivenza to Spain and moved to have it restored. Portugal is historically Britain's oldest ally, and with British support succeeded in having the re-incorporation of Olivenza decreed in Article CV of the General Treaty of the Final Act, which stated that "The Powers, recognizing the justice of the claims of ... Portugal and the Brazils, upon the town of Olivenza, and the other territories ceded to Spain by the Treaty of Badajoz of 1801". Portugal ratified the Final Act in 1815 but Spain would not sign, and this became the most important hold-out against the Congress of Vienna. Deciding in the end that it was better to become part of Europe than to stand alone, Spain finally accepted the Treaty on 7 May 1817; however, Olivenza and its surroundings were never returned to Portuguese control and, to the present day, this issue remains unresolved.[57]

The United Kingdom received parts of the West Indies at the expense of the Netherlands and Spain and kept the former Dutch colonies of Ceylon and the Cape Colony as well as Malta and Heligoland. Under the Treaty of Paris (1814) Article VIII France ceded to Britain the islands of "Tobago and Saint Lucia, and of the Isle of France and its dependencies, especially Rodrigues and Les Seychelles",[58][59] and under the Treaty between Great Britain and Austria, Prussia and Russia, respecting the Ionian Islands (signed in Paris on 5 November 1815), as one of the treaties signed during the Peace of Paris (1815), Britain obtained a protectorate over the United States of the Ionian Islands.[60]

Later criticism and praise

edit
 
Twelfth Night by George Cruikshank A contemporary caricature of the leading figures at the congress.

The Congress of Vienna has been criticized by 19th century and more recent historians and politicians for ignoring national and liberal impulses, and for imposing a stifling reaction on the Continent.[3] It was an integral part in what became known as the Conservative Order, in which democracy and civil rights associated with the American and French Revolutions were de-emphasized.[3]

In the 20th century, however, historians and politicians looking backward came to praise the Congress as well, because they saw it did prevent another widespread European war for nearly 100 years (1815–1914) and a significant step in the transition to a new international order in which peace was largely maintained through diplomatic dialogue. Among these is Henry Kissinger, who in 1954 wrote his doctoral dissertation, A World Restored, on it and Paul Schroeder. Historian and jurist Mark Jarrett argues that the diplomatic congress format marked "the true beginning of our modern era". To his analyses the Congress organisation was deliberate conflict management and was the first genuine attempt to create an international order based upon consensus rather than conflict. "Europe was ready," Jarrett states, "to accept an unprecedented degree of international cooperation in response to the French Revolution."[61] Historian Paul Schroeder argues that the old formulae for "balance of power" were in fact highly destabilizing and predatory. He says the Congress of Vienna avoided them and instead set up rules that produced a stable and benign equilibrium.[62] The Congress of Vienna was the first of a series of international meetings that came to be known as the Concert of Europe, which was an attempt to forge a peaceful balance of power in Europe. It served as a model for later organizations such as the League of Nations in 1919 and the United Nations in 1945.[citation needed]

Before the opening of the Paris peace conference of 1918, the British Foreign Office commissioned a history of the Congress of Vienna to serve as an example to its own delegates of how to achieve an equally successful peace.[63] Besides, the main decisions of the Congress were made by the Four Great Powers and not all the countries of Europe could extend their rights at the Congress. The Italian peninsula became a mere "geographical expression" as divided into seven parts: Lombardy–Venetia, Modena, Naples–Sicily, Parma, Piedmont–Sardinia, Tuscany, and the Papal States under the control of different powers.[64] Poland remained partitioned between Russia, Prussia and Austria, with the largest part, the newly created Kingdom of Poland, remaining under Russian control.[citation needed]

The arrangements made by the Four Great Powers sought to ensure future disputes would be settled in a manner that would avoid the terrible wars of the previous 20 years.[65] Although the Congress of Vienna preserved the balance of power in Europe, it could not check the spread of revolutionary movements across the continent some 30 years later.[citation needed]

Some authors have suggested that the Congress of Vienna may provide a model for settling multiple interlocking conflicts in Eastern Europe that arose after the break-up of the Soviet Union.[66][67]

See also

edit

Notes

edit
  1. ^ French: Congrès de Vienne, German: Wiener Kongress
  2. ^ Although the Ottoman Empire was officially invited by Robert Liston and Klemens von Metternich to actively participate in the Congress on topics such as the Russo–Turkish conflicts, Sultan Mahmud II did not send a delegation. Thus, the country was the only power in Europe to abstain from the Congress.[2]

References

edit
  1. ^ a b Artz, Frederick B. (1934). Reaction & Revolution: 1814–1832. p. 110. OL 45710678M.
  2. ^ Ozavci, Ozan (2022). "A Priceless Grace? The Congress of Vienna of 1815, the Ottoman Empire and Historicising the Eastern Question". The English Historical Review. 136 (583). Oxford University Press: 1459–1461. doi:10.1093/ehr/ceab356.
  3. ^ a b c Olson, James Stuart; Shadle, Robert (1991). Historical Dictionary of European Imperialism. Greenwood Press. p. 149. ISBN 0-313-26257-8.
  4. ^ Treaty of Paris (1814) Article XXXII
  5. ^ King 2008, p. 334.
  6. ^ Rösch, Felix (26 October 2020). "Affect, practice, and change: Dancing world politics at the Congress of Vienna". Cooperation and Conflict. 56 (2): 123–140. doi:10.1177/0010836720954467. ISSN 0010-8367.
  7. ^ Nicolson 1946, pp. 118–133.
  8. ^ Kissinger 1957, pp. 7–28.
  9. ^ Kissinger 1957, pp. 9–36.
  10. ^ Nicolson 1946, p. 158.
  11. ^ Simon, Walter M. (1956). "Prince Hardenberg". Review of Politics. 18 (1): 88–99. doi:10.1017/S0034670500023597. JSTOR 1404942.
  12. ^ Blinn, Harold E. (1935). "New Light on Talleyrand at the Congress of Vienna". Pacific Historical Review. 4 (2): 143–160. doi:10.2307/3633726. JSTOR 3633726.
  13. ^ Bernard, J.F. (1973). Talleyrand: A Biography. New York: Putnam. p. 371. ISBN 0-399-11022-4.
  14. ^ Treaty between Great Britain and Portugal, January 22, 1815. Vol. 5 George IV. London: His Majesty's Statute and Law Printers. 1824. p. 650. Archived from the original on 2 June 2021. Retrieved 29 May 2021 – via Google Books.
  15. ^ Freksa, Frederick (1919). A peace congress of intrigue. Translated by Hansen, Harry. New York: The Century Co. p. 116. the congress of vienna.
  16. ^ Bernard, p. 381.
  17. ^ Zamoyski 2007, p. 297, "[...] the Danish plenipotentiary Count Rosenkrantz.".
  18. ^ Couvée, D.H.; Pikkemaat, G. (1963). 1813–15, ons koninkrijk geboren. Alphen aan den Rijn: N. Samsom nv. pp. 123–124.
  19. ^ "[Castlereagh, during his stay in The Hague, in January 1813] induced the Dutch to leave their interests entirely in British hands" (Nicolson 1946, p. 65)
  20. ^ Nicolson, Harold (1946). The Congress of Vienna; a Study in Allied Unity, 1812–1822. Constable & Company. p. 197. Baron von Gagern – one of the two plenipotentiaries for the Netherlands.
  21. ^ Nicolson 1946, p. 195.
  22. ^ Ilari, Virgilio; Shamà, Davide (2008). Dizionario Biografico dell'Armata Sarda. Widerholdt Frères. p. 36. ISBN 978-88-902817-9-2.
  23. ^ Zamoyski 2007, p. 257, "The Pope's envoy to Vienna, Cardinal Consalvi [...].".
  24. ^ Berlinghieri, Umberto Castagnino (2006). Congresso di Vienna e principio di legittimità: la questione del sovrano militare ordine di San Giovanni gerosolimitano, detto di Malta (in Italian). Vita e Pensiero. ISBN 978-88-343-1422-7. Archived from the original on 8 April 2022. Retrieved 16 November 2021.
  25. ^ Cassinis, Giovanni Battista (1862). Parere per l'ordine di San Giovanni di Gerusalemme intorno all'intelligenza ed agli effetti dei decreti del parlamento siciliano del 5 agosto 1848 e del dittatore Garibaldi del 17 e 19 maggio 1860 (in Italian). tipogr. V. Vercellino. Archived from the original on 8 April 2022. Retrieved 16 November 2021.
  26. ^ Innocenti, Barbara; Lombardi, Marco; Tourres, Josianne (2020). In viaggio per il Congresso di Vienna: Lettere di Daniello Berlinghieri a Anna Martini con un percorso tra le fonti archivistiche in appendice. Florence: Firenze University Press. Archived from the original on 7 January 2022. Retrieved 14 November 2021.
  27. ^ Bernard, p. 409.
  28. ^ "Ruffo, Fabrizio, principe di Castelcicala in 'Dizionario Biografico'". www.treccani.it (in Italian). Archived from the original on 14 November 2021. Retrieved 14 November 2021.
  29. ^ "Maresca, Nicola in 'Dizionario Biografico'". www.treccani.it (in Italian). Archived from the original on 14 November 2021. Retrieved 14 November 2021.
  30. ^ Fritz Apian-Bennewitz: Leopold von Plessen und die Verfassungspolitik der deutschen Kleinstaaten auf dem Wiener Kongress 1814/15. Eutin: Ivens 1933; Hochschulschrift: Rostock, Univ., Diss., 1933
  31. ^ King 2008, p. 2.
  32. ^ Zamoyski 2007, pp. 258, 295.
  33. ^ According to King 2008, p. [page needed], it was Prince de Ligne, an attendee at the conference, who wryly quipped, ""Le congrès danse beaucoup, mais il ne marche pas."
  34. ^ William, Sir Ward Adolphus (2009). The Period of Congresses Archived 22 March 2015 at the Wayback Machine, BiblioLife, p. 13. ISBN 1-113-44924-1
  35. ^ "The Congress of Vienna | History of Western Civilization II". courses.lumenlearning.com. Retrieved 13 February 2024.
  36. ^ Alsop, Susan Mary (1984). The Congress Dances. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers. p. 120.
  37. ^ Wenceslao Ramírez de Villa-Urrutia, Marqués de Villa-Urrutia, España en el Congreso de Viena según la correspondencia de D. Pedro Gómez Labrador, Marqués de Labrador. Segunda Edición Corregida y Aumentada (Madrid: Francisco Beltrán, 1928), 13.
  38. ^ Antonio Rodríguez-Moñino (ed.), Cartas Políticas (Badajoz: Imprenta Provincial, 1959), 14 (Letter IV, 10 July 1814). Labrador's letters are full of such pungent remarks, and include his opinions on bad diplomats, the state of the postal system, the weather, and his non-existent salary and coach and accompanying livery for the Congress.
  39. ^ Villa-Urrutia, España en el Congreso de Viena, 61–62. Joseph had left Madrid with a huge baggage train containing pieces of art, tapestries, and mirrors. The most rapacious of the French was Marshal Nicolas Soult, who left Spain with entire collections, which disappeared to unknown, separate locations around the world. According to Juan Antonio Gaya Nuño, at least "[the paintings] have come to spread the prestige of Spanish art around the whole word."
  40. ^ Zawadzki, W.H. (1985). "Russia and the Re-Opening of the Polish Question, 1801–1814". International History Review. 7 (1): 19–44. doi:10.1080/07075332.1985.9640368.
  41. ^ Nicolson, Sir Harold (2001). The Congress of Vienna: A Study in Allied Unity: 1812–1822 Archived 22 March 2015 at the Wayback Machine Grove Press; Rep. Ed. pp. 140–164. ISBN 0-8021-3744-X
  42. ^ Webster 1913, pp. 49–101.
  43. ^ An Italian version of the Final Act was published in 1859 and is now accessible in Books.Google (albeit with some scanning imperfections): Atto finale del Congresso di Vienna fra le cinque grandi potenze, Austria, Francia, Inghilterra, Prussia e Russia del 9 giugno 1815 (in Italian). Milan: Sanvito. 1859.
  44. ^ Couvée, D.H.; G. Pikkemaat (1963). 1813–15, ons koninkrijk geboren. Alphen aan den Rijn: N. Samsom nv. pp. 127–130.
  45. ^ grosstuchen.de Prussian payment for Swedish Pomerania
  46. ^ Bernard, p. 415.
  47. ^ a b Bernard, p. 417.
  48. ^ Atto Finale 1859, p. 59, Art. 98.
  49. ^ With an agreement dated 20 December 1815, however, the Duchess ceded the former Lunigiana fiefs to her son, the Duke of Modena.
  50. ^ Bernard, p. 411.
  51. ^ Atto Finale 1859, p. 61, Art. 101.
  52. ^ Atto Finale 1859, p. 77, Articles 3 and 4 of the Treaty concluded in Paris on 10 June 1817 about the reversion of the Duchies of Parma, Piacenza e Guastalla.
  53. ^ Atto Finale 1859, pp. 67–68, Art. 118, paragraph n. 15.
  54. ^ Atto Finale 1859, pp. 64 ff, Articles 108 et seq..
  55. ^ Stearns, Peter N.; Langer, William Leonard (2001). The Encyclopedia of world history: ancient, medieval, and modern (6th ed.). Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. p. 440. ISBN 0-395-65237-5.
  56. ^ Stearns & Langer 2001, p. 440.
  57. ^ Hammond 1966, p. [page needed].
  58. ^ Treaty of Paris (1814) Article VIII
  59. ^ "Seychelles – History". Encyclopedia Britannica. 27 September 2016. Archived from the original on 8 June 2020. Retrieved 1 January 2020.
  60. ^ Hammond, Richard James (1966). Portugal and Africa, 1815–1910: a study in uneconomic imperialism. Stanford University Press. p. 2. ISBN 0-8047-0296-9.
  61. ^ Jarrett, Mark (2013). The Congress of Vienna and Its Legacy: War and Great Power Diplomacy after Napoleon. pp. 353, xiv, 187.
  62. ^ Schroeder 1992, pp. 683–706.
  63. ^ Ragsdale, Hugh; Ponomarev, V. N. (1993). Imperial Russian Foreign Policy (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 413. ISBN 0-5214-4229-X.
  64. ^ Benedict, Bertram (2008). A History of the Great War. Vol. I. BiblioLife. p. 7. ISBN 978-0-5544-1246-7.
  65. ^ Willner, Mark; Hero, George; Weiner, Jerry Global (2006). History Volume I: The Ancient World to the Age of Revolution. Barron's Educational Series. p. 520. ISBN 0-7641-5811-2.
  66. ^ Gutbrod, Hans (25 November 2020). "When Great-Power Politics Isn't Great Enough". Foreign Policy. Retrieved 9 November 2022.
  67. ^ Marks, Ramon (4 June 2022). "Congress of Vienna Redux: How the OSCE Can Foster Peace in Ukraine". National Interest. Retrieved 9 November 2022.

Works cited

edit

Further reading

edit
  • Chapman, Tim (1998). The Congress of Vienna 1814–1815. Routledge.
  • Dakin, Douglas (1979). "The Congress of Vienna, 1814–1815 and its Antecedents". In Sked, Alan (ed.). Europe's Balance of Power 1815–1848. London: Macmillan. pp. 14–33.
  • Ferraro, Guglielmo. The Reconstruction of Europe; Talleyrand and the Congress of Vienna, 1814–1815 (1941) online
  • Forrest, Alan. "The Hundred Days, the Congress of Vienna and the Atlantic Slave Trade". in Napoleon's Hundred Days and the Politics of Legitimacy (Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2018) pp. 163–181.
  • Gabriëls, Jos. "Cutting the cake: the Congress of Vienna in British, French and German political caricature". European Review of History: Revue européenne d'histoire 24.1 (2017): 131–157. illustrated
  • Gulick, E. V. "The final coalition and the Congress of Vienna, 1813–15" in C. W. Crawley, ed., The New Cambridge Modern History, vol 9, 1793–1830 (1965) pp. 639–667.
  • Jarrett, Mark (2013). The Congress of Vienna and its Legacy: War and Great Power Diplomacy after Napoleon. London: I.B. Tauris & Company, Ltd. ISBN 978-1-78076-116-9. online review
  • Kissinger, Henry A. (1956). "The Congress of Vienna: A Reappraisal". World Politics. 8 (2): 264–280. doi:10.2307/2008974. JSTOR 2008974. S2CID 153666035.
  • Kohler, Max James. "Jewish Rights at the Congresses of Vienna (1814–1815) and Aix-la-Chapelle (1818)" Publications of the American Jewish Historical Society, No. 26 (1918), pp. 33–125 online
  • Kraehe, Enno E. Metternich's German Policy. Vol. 2: The Congress of Vienna, 1814–1815 (1984)
  • Kwan, Jonathan. "The Congress of Vienna, 1814–1815: diplomacy, political culture and sociability". Historical Journal 60.4 (2020) online.
  • Lane, Fernanda Bretones, Guilherme de Paula Costa Santos, and Alain El Youssef. "The Congress of Vienna and the making of second slavery". Journal of global slavery 4.2 (2019): 162–195.
  • Langhorne, Richard. "Reflections on the Significance of the Congress of Vienna". Review of International Studies 12.4 (1986): 313–324.
  • Lockhart, J. G. (1932). The Peacemakers 1814–1815. Duckworth.
  • Nicolson, Harold. The Congress of Vienna: a Study in Allied Unity, 1812–1822 (1946) online.
  • Oaks, Augustus; R. B. Mowat (1918). The Great European Treaties of the Nineteenth Century. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ("Chapter II The restoration of Europe")
  • Peterson, Genevieve. "II. Political inequality at the Congress of Vienna". Political Science Quarterly 60.4 (1945): 532–554. online
  • Schenk, Joep. "National interest versus common interest: The Netherlands and the liberalization of Rhine navigation at the Congress of Vienna (1814–1815)". in Shaping the International Relations of the Netherlands, 1815–2000 (Routledge, 2018) pp. 13–31.
  • Schroeder, Paul W. (1994). The Transformation of European Politics, 1763–1848. Clarendon Press. pp. 517–582. ISBN 978-0-1982-0654-5.
  • Sluga, Glenda. "'Who Hold the Balance of the World?' Bankers at the Congress of Vienna, and in International History". American Historical Review 122.5 (2017): 1403–1430.
  • Vick, Brian. The Congress of Vienna. Power and Politics after Napoleon. Harvard University Press, 2014. ISBN 978-0-674-72971-1.
  • Webster, Charles (1922). "IV. The pacification of Europe". In Ward, A.W.; Gooch, G. P. (eds.). The Cambridge history of British foreign policy, 1783–1919. Vol. 1. Cambridge University Press. pp. 392–521. ISBN 978-1-108-04015-0.
  • Webster, Charles (1931). The Foreign Policy of Castlereagh, 1812–1815, Britain and the Reconstruction of Europe. Archived from the original on 24 July 2020. Retrieved 26 August 2017.

Primary sources

edit

Other languages

edit
  • Ghervas, Stella (2008). Réinventer la tradition. Alexandre Stourdza et l'Europe de la Sainte-Alliance. Paris: Honoré Champion. ISBN 978-2-7453-1669-1.
edit
 
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Congress of Vienna.
 
Wikisource has original text related to this article:
 
Wikisource has original text related to this article:
 
Wikisource has original text related to this article:

48°12′31″N 16°21′50″E / 48.2085°N 16.3638°E / 48.2085; 16.3638

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Congress_of_Vienna&oldid=1259932795#Final_Act"