User contributions for 119.155.51.48

17 February 2020

• 20:2920:29, 17 February 2020 diff hist −4,302 At-Talaq Undid revision 941272716 by GrammarDamner (talk) Refer talkpage: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Al_Imran#Inclusion_of_select_verses Tags: Undo section blanking
• 20:2820:28, 17 February 2020 diff hist −1,730 At-Tawbah Refer talkpage: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Al_Imran#Inclusion_of_select_verses
• 20:2520:25, 17 February 2020 diff hist −3,974 Al Imran Undid revision 941273478 by GrammarDamner (talk) Refer talkpage Tag: Undo
• 20:2520:25, 17 February 2020 diff hist +2,418 Talk:Al Imran Inclusion of verses
• 08:5508:55, 17 February 2020 diff hist −4,302 At-Talaq Removed non-relevant exegesis section that conflicts with an encyclopedic presentation Tag: section blanking
• 08:2408:24, 17 February 2020 diff hist +28 Satanic Verses controversy Not exactly. There verses themselves are not found, precisely because they were said to have been removed.
• 07:5107:51, 17 February 2020 diff hist +40 Satanic Verses Citation tag
• 07:1607:16, 17 February 2020 diff hist −1,831 An-Najm Undid revision 941212207 by Koreangauteng (talk) No, this is the article about a 62 verse Surah, with the alleged verse not even a part of it. Ibn Kathirs tafsir doesn't even mention it. The entire sentence "The response (termed the Satanic Verse), "Satan tempted him...gharāniq, whose intercession is hoped for" is also completely uncited. Also justified is the removal of the see also section of Al-Isra and Hajj. Completely POV. Tags: Undo section blanking
• 03:0103:01, 17 February 2020 diff hist −35 Al-Isra' Undid revision 941161472 by Koreangauteng (talk) Removed irrelevant tag Tags: Undo section blanking
• 03:0103:01, 17 February 2020 diff hist −35 Al-Hajj Undid revision 941160876 by Koreangauteng (talk) Removed irrelevant tag Tag: Undo
• 02:5802:58, 17 February 2020 diff hist −1,502 Muhammad in the Quran Undid revision 941158773 by Koreangauteng (talk) Repeating content. Read the article. The proposed revision was a move from here in the first place. Tag: Undo
• 02:5302:53, 17 February 2020 diff hist −1,831 An-Najm Removed unbalanced section in a stub article Tag: section blanking
• 02:4502:45, 17 February 2020 diff hist −790 Al Imran Undid edit. Many different verses are relevant to many hundreds of different topics. Moreover on what basis is this section of Ibn Kathir's commentary relevant when it is not given in the main article except to argue against your selective quotation. See citation 120.

14 February 2020

• 02:1302:13, 14 February 2020 diff hist +2,033 Talk:Muhammad →Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 14 February 2020: new section

13 February 2020

• 09:4209:42, 13 February 2020 diff hist −3,974 Al Imran Undid revision 940533391 by Koreangauteng (talk) WP:Topic is precisely the issue here. n what basis are these verses noteworthy? Have Ibn Kathir or Ozma Nasir Makarim specified them such? If not it seems you are adding them based on your own personal discretion which is a violation of WP:NOR. Refer to Surah Tawbah talkpage Tag: Undo
• 01:4401:44, 13 February 2020 diff hist −3,974 Al Imran Removed non noteworthy verses with no secondary source discussion. The verses should be relegated to their own specific or topical articles
• 01:3701:37, 13 February 2020 diff hist −2,896 At-Tawbah Removed non noteworthy verses with no secondary source discussion
• 01:3301:33, 13 February 2020 diff hist +471 Talk:At-Tawbah Non-relavant verses
• 00:5200:52, 13 February 2020 diff hist +66 Women in Islam Legitimacy and Zina comments

12 February 2020

• 18:3518:35, 12 February 2020 diff hist +86 Women in Islam Fixed citations
• 18:2218:22, 12 February 2020 diff hist −295 Women in Islam 1: Shifted and renamed section on slavery, 2: Overturned Undue emphasis on consent with partial quotes, without giving any background on the topic whatsoever 3: Removed news