User contributions for 124.78.210.114

11 February 2010

• 13:5613:56, 11 February 2010 diff hist +31 Talk:Google Scholar →The section of Features and specification needs to be rearranged to have a better view.....
• 13:5513:55, 11 February 2010 diff hist +265 Talk:Google Scholar →The section of Features and specification needs to be rearranged to have a better view.....
• 13:4813:48, 11 February 2010 diff hist +343 Talk:Google Scholar →The section of Features and specification needs to be rearranged to have a better view.....: new section
• 13:3213:32, 11 February 2010 diff hist +196 Talk:Comparison of web browsers →Call for academic reviews of the web browsers....
• 13:2913:29, 11 February 2010 diff hist +118 Talk:Comparison of web browsers →Call for academic reviews of the web browsers....
• 13:2613:26, 11 February 2010 diff hist +32 Google Chrome →See also
• 13:2413:24, 11 February 2010 diff hist +63 Google Chrome See my comment for internet explorer on the history page
• 13:2013:20, 11 February 2010 diff hist +400 Talk:Comparison of web browsers →Call for academic reviews of the web browsers....: new section
• 13:1513:15, 11 February 2010 diff hist +63 Internet Explorer 8 Even benchmark specifications will do
• 12:5512:55, 11 February 2010 diff hist +14 Talk:List of CAS numbers by chemical compound →I believe that this article has to be splitted with many, as the collection of CA substance book has not got one but heaps
• 12:5512:55, 11 February 2010 diff hist +306 Talk:List of CAS numbers by chemical compound →I believe that this article has to be splitted with many, as the collection of CA substance book has not got one but heaps: new section
• 12:4412:44, 11 February 2010 diff hist +37 List of CAS numbers by chemical compound Since the CAS numbers are the identifier, they have to be referenced
• 12:3712:37, 11 February 2010 diff hist +29 Mannitol →Toxicology
• 12:3412:34, 11 February 2010 diff hist +316 Talk:International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry →IUPAC name vs CAS index name....
• 12:3112:31, 11 February 2010 diff hist 0 Talk:International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry →IUPAC name vs CAS index name....
• 12:2912:29, 11 February 2010 diff hist +614 Talk:International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry →IUPAC name vs CAS index name....
• 11:5011:50, 11 February 2010 diff hist +227 Talk:Google →Please add the link of....: new section
• 11:4211:42, 11 February 2010 diff hist −18 Talk:International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry →IUPAC name vs CAS index name....
• 11:3811:38, 11 February 2010 diff hist +477 Talk:International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry →IUPAC name vs CAS index name....
• 11:3011:30, 11 February 2010 diff hist +264 Talk:International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry →IUPAC name vs CAS index name....
• 11:2811:28, 11 February 2010 diff hist +6 Talk:International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry →IUPAC name vs CAS index name....
• 11:2711:27, 11 February 2010 diff hist −3 Talk:International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry →IUPAC name vs CAS index name....
• 11:2711:27, 11 February 2010 diff hist 0 Talk:International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry →IUPAC name vs CAS index name....
• 11:2611:26, 11 February 2010 diff hist +343 Talk:International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry →IUPAC name vs CAS index name....
• 11:2111:21, 11 February 2010 diff hist −53 Talk:International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry →IUPAC name vs CAS index name....
• 11:1711:17, 11 February 2010 diff hist +299 Talk:International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry →IUPAC name vs CAS index name....
• 11:0411:04, 11 February 2010 diff hist +281 Talk:International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry →IUPAC name vs CAS index name....
• 10:5910:59, 11 February 2010 diff hist +394 Talk:International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry →IUPAC name vs CAS index name....
• 10:5510:55, 11 February 2010 diff hist +298 Talk:International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry →IUPAC name vs CAS index name....: new section
• 10:3010:30, 11 February 2010 diff hist +286 Talk:Inositol →The two new sections of T & C are based on the following....: new section
• 10:2810:28, 11 February 2010 diff hist +126 Inositol →See also
• 10:1910:19, 11 February 2010 diff hist +35 Inositol →See also
• 10:1810:18, 11 February 2010 diff hist +35 Inositol →See also
• 10:1610:16, 11 February 2010 diff hist +26 Inositol →See also
• 10:1510:15, 11 February 2010 diff hist +70 Inositol nicotinate No edit summary
• 10:1310:13, 11 February 2010 diff hist +324 Talk:Inositol →The relationship between myo-inositol and Vitamin B doesn't seem to be closely associated.....
• 10:1110:11, 11 February 2010 diff hist +207 Talk:Inositol →The relationship between myo-inositol and Vitamin B doesn't seem to be closely associated.....
• 10:0410:04, 11 February 2010 diff hist +35 Inositol →See also
• 10:0110:01, 11 February 2010 diff hist −32 Inositol No edit summary
• 10:0010:00, 11 February 2010 diff hist +576 Talk:Inositol →The relationship between myo-inositol and Vitamin B doesn't seem to be closely associated.....: new section
• 09:5709:57, 11 February 2010 diff hist +6 Inositol No edit summary
• 09:5709:57, 11 February 2010 diff hist +159 Inositol Official or academic references are required
• 09:4909:49, 11 February 2010 diff hist +70 Inositol monophosphatase Identifier....EC number...???
• 09:4609:46, 11 February 2010 diff hist −10 Inositol pentakisphosphate No edit summary
• 09:4509:45, 11 February 2010 diff hist +65 Inositol phosphate Does this belong to the group...???
• 09:3409:34, 11 February 2010 diff hist +244 Talk:Imidazolidinyl urea →Why is the compendial status necessary
• 09:3309:33, 11 February 2010 diff hist +375 Talk:Imidazolidinyl urea →Why is the compendial status necessary: new section
• 09:3109:31, 11 February 2010 diff hist +126 Imidazolidinyl urea →References
• 09:2809:28, 11 February 2010 diff hist +132 Imidazolidinyl urea Official or academic references are required