User contributions for Derex

10 May 2007

• 03:2203:22, 10 May 2007 diff hist +233 User:Derex best to all.
• 03:1703:17, 10 May 2007 diff hist −348 User talk:Derex waste 'o time
• 03:0903:09, 10 May 2007 diff hist +187 User talk:Derex →Good faith edits are not "vandalism"

9 May 2007

• 03:5103:51, 9 May 2007 diff hist +246 Talk:Nancy Pelosi →"Failure To Disclose Role in Family Charity"?
• 03:4503:45, 9 May 2007 diff hist +305 m Bush Derangement Syndrome Reverted vandalism by Jinxmchue (talk) to last version by Derex

8 May 2007

• 07:0807:08, 8 May 2007 diff hist +254 Talk:Swift Vets and POWs for Truth →Dubious source
• 07:0407:04, 8 May 2007 diff hist +305 m Bush Derangement Syndrome Reverted edits by Jinxmchue (talk) to last version by Derex
• 01:1401:14, 8 May 2007 diff hist +305 Bush Derangement Syndrome eleland is correct

7 May 2007

• 02:3902:39, 7 May 2007 diff hist −33 m Jimmy Carter rv addition of redundant Christian cat. already covered by Baptists cat
• 02:3002:30, 7 May 2007 diff hist −985 m User talk:Derex read

4 May 2007

• 01:2101:21, 4 May 2007 diff hist +530 Talk:Plame affair →Enough already?!

30 April 2007

• 01:1601:16, 30 April 2007 diff hist +633 Talk:Plame affair →Discussion

26 April 2007

• 02:0502:05, 26 April 2007 diff hist +99 User talk:DHeyward an injustice, just fyi.

25 April 2007

• 22:3922:39, 25 April 2007 diff hist −2,628 User talk:Derex ←Blanked the page

24 April 2007

• 04:0404:04, 24 April 2007 diff hist 0 m Talk:Plame affair moved Talk:CIA leak scandal (2003) to Talk:CIA Plame leak controversy: enough of this nonsense
• 04:0404:04, 24 April 2007 diff hist 0 m Plame affair moved CIA leak scandal (2003) to CIA Plame leak controversy: enough of this nonsense

15 April 2007

• 04:5904:59, 15 April 2007 diff hist +174 Wikipedia:Requests for comment/QuackGuru →Extended statement and evidence by Leflyman
• 04:4904:49, 15 April 2007 diff hist −3,410 User talk:Derex →SBVT: rm tiresome rant from ranting ranter

6 April 2007

• 07:4107:41, 6 April 2007 diff hist +256 User talk:Derex →SBVT
• 07:3607:36, 6 April 2007 diff hist +29 User talk:Derex →SBVT
• 07:3507:35, 6 April 2007 diff hist +476 User talk:Derex →SBVT
• 03:4103:41, 6 April 2007 diff hist +231 User talk:Derex →SBVT
• 02:4902:49, 6 April 2007 diff hist −110 Swift Vets and POWs for Truth rv, with source for figure
• 02:4102:41, 6 April 2007 diff hist +364 Talk:Impeachment of Bill Clinton →Bias in the first sentence

4 April 2007

• 12:0112:01, 4 April 2007 diff hist +102 Talk:Swift Vets and POWs for Truth/Archive 1 →not perjury
• 11:4111:41, 4 April 2007 diff hist +238 Talk:Larry Sanger →content moved from Essay controversy talk page

2 April 2007

• 11:3611:36, 2 April 2007 diff hist −756 Larry Sanger per talk
• 08:5308:53, 2 April 2007 diff hist +862 Talk:Plame affair →Vote on article name
• 01:5401:54, 2 April 2007 diff hist +495 Talk:Plame affair →Vote on article name

1 April 2007

• 23:3423:34, 1 April 2007 diff hist +1,339 Talk:Plame affair →Vote on article name
• 10:5410:54, 1 April 2007 diff hist +454 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Gwen Gale's response: will say no more, going on wikibreak, but the attitude here stinks to high hell.
• 10:2710:27, 1 April 2007 diff hist +308 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Ryulong protecting his own talk page
• 10:1810:18, 1 April 2007 diff hist +12 User talk:Derex No edit summary
• 10:1610:16, 1 April 2007 diff hist +34 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Gwen Gale's response
• 10:1510:15, 1 April 2007 diff hist +17 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Block of [[User:Gwen Gale]] by [[User:Dmcdevit]]
• 10:1510:15, 1 April 2007 diff hist +692 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Block of [[User:Gwen Gale]] by [[User:Dmcdevit]]: abusive
• 09:4009:40, 1 April 2007 diff hist +116 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Block of [[User:Gwen Gale]] by [[User:Dmcdevit]]: pathetic
• 09:3709:37, 1 April 2007 diff hist +348 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Block of [[User:Gwen Gale]] by [[User:Dmcdevit]]
• 08:2808:28, 1 April 2007 diff hist +726 Talk:Swift Vets and POWs for Truth →Book section
• 08:2008:20, 1 April 2007 diff hist −6 Swift Vets and POWs for Truth →Book: this statement is not original research. it is a straightforward reference and description of a primary source.
• 08:0608:06, 1 April 2007 diff hist +590 Talk:Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy →Why is Whitewater being brought up?
• 07:5207:52, 1 April 2007 diff hist +636 Talk:Plame affair →Vote on article name
• 07:2807:28, 1 April 2007 diff hist −9 m Talk:Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy →Why is Whitewater being brought up?: sig
• 05:0205:02, 1 April 2007 diff hist +122 Talk:Andrew Napolitano →"Several Sources"?
• 04:5704:57, 1 April 2007 diff hist +179 Talk:Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy →Why is Whitewater being brought up?
• 04:4004:40, 1 April 2007 diff hist +152 Wikipedia talk:Polling is not a substitute for discussion →Should not be a '''guideline'''
• 04:3804:38, 1 April 2007 diff hist +399 Wikipedia talk:Polling is not a substitute for discussion →Should not be a '''guideline'''
• 01:1101:11, 1 April 2007 diff hist +417 User talk:Kaisershatner Your conspiracy
• 01:0101:01, 1 April 2007 diff hist +405 Talk:Larry Sanger →NPOV solution to the nonsense
• 00:5700:57, 1 April 2007 diff hist −745 Larry Sanger Bramlet, it's disputed by a relevant party. I don't care if his arguments "convince anyone". That's not relevant. You're inference as to who knew what when are not relevant.