Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. Ifconsensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Another phrase that Erhard seems to have used frequently was "you can't tell your assholes from a hole in the ground". Maikel (talk) 08:07, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
The article on Erhard himself looks to include more criticism. I migrated some from it and added a bit I found. It might need some formatting as I'd mostly left Wikipedia so don't remember the correct formats.T. Anthony (talk) 12:57, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
ABSOLUTELY AGREE. This is in such bad shape on such a controversial topic blanking may be appropriate until it engages in ANY way, shape or form with the massive criticism of EST out there for the last 50 years/ The lack of a "controversies" section is absolutely telling and deafening 2601:246:5D02:B810:4A4:A6C2:CAEF:49AF (talk) 21:47, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Adding my support to this thread - I just read about this group today in "The Sullivanians: Sex, Psychotherapy, and the Wild Life of an American Commune" and this article really gives me the creeps. I'm going to edit this to try and at least remove some of the self-indulgent editorial-speak if nobody else has taken a crack at it later this week. SLAVETOLOVE (talk) 03:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Just thought I would let you all know about it. You can access it by getting a Wikipedia Library Card and applying for newspapers.com (a fairly trivial task). 23 Dec 1975 edition of the Courier-Post (Camden, New Jersey) page 17. Article by Jurate Kazickas about going to EST sessions. Seems to be an Associated Press article, so it may be available in other places. Title of the article is "What is, is... what ain't, ain't". If you need me to summarize the article I'd be happy to do so. MrAureliusRTalk!02:48, 18 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
In June 1978, during the recording of Incantations, Oldfield and his siblings completed a three-day Exegesis seminar, a controversial self-assertiveness programme based on Werner Erhard's EST training programme. The experience had a significant effect on Oldfield's personality, who recalled that he underwent a "rebirth experience" by reliving past fears. "It was like opening some huge cathedral doors and facing the monster, and I saw that the monster was myself as a newborn infant, because I'd started life in a panic." Following the Exegesis seminar, the formerly reclusive Oldfield granted press interviews, posed nude for a promotional photo shoot for Incantations, and went drinking with news reporters. He had also conquered his fear of flying, gained a pilot's licence, and bought his own plane.Über-Blick (talk) 03:27, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Deleted Thanks for letting us know. Polygnotus (talk) 13:00, 20 December 2023 (UTC)