Talk:Hercules in New York

Bad Movie? Not quite.

This movie may have been a bad movie, but it is also GREAT at the same time. It's hard to explain, but I laughed many times while watching it.

---

The bear.

That is all.

Lol, that bit was so bad it was funny.... i have seen alot worse movies.. and as this one didnt exactly take it self seriously anyway i wouldnt say its that bad --- Paulley

Fair use rationale for Image:Hercules in New York chariot.jpg

Image:Hercules in New York chariot.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:55, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Hercules in New York 3.jpg

Image:Hercules in New York 3.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:48, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Hercules in New York 2.jpg

Image:Hercules in New York 2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:48, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

The whole article needs to be re-written

Maybe it's just me, but there are far too may personal comments in the actual article...

Mykas0 22:39, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

---

It reads a bit like an unencyclopedia.com article to be honest.

Seconded. also, "one of the worst movies ever made" is pretty unrealistic and subjective. There's a lot of bad moves out there. If there's no outside reference, I suggest deletion. Mikef777 (talk) 07:14, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Poster

That can't possibly be the movie poster on release in the USA. For one, this was Arnold's first film and was a complete unknown... secondly he was credited in the film as Arnold Strong. Miyagawa (talk) 16:13, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Good point! How about replacing the poster with this one? Let me know if you need a helping hand. Erik (talk | contribs) 16:41, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Poster is fake. ARnie photo from 1976.  Original here http://wrongsideoftheart.com/wp-content/gallery/posters-h/hercules_in_new_york_poster_02.jpg   Sergey Woropaew (talk) 05:15, 1 April 2018 (UTC)