Talk:St. Felix's flood
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Otr500 in topic Capitalization of "flood"
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editWhich St. Felix? There are at least half-a-dozen, and Alban Butler lists none of them for Nov. 5. Septentrionalis 16:35, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Please expand this article.
editApparently [1] the deadliest flood in Dutch history and this is all we have?! Kdammers (talk) 04:29, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Capitalization of "flood"
edit- Notice:
- There has been an on-going controversy on the capitalization of words in a title that normally are not capitalized. With few exceptions the word flood is not capitalized throughout Wikipedia as evidenced at [[Category:Floods]] and [[Category:Floods in the United States]]. [[Category:Floods in Canada]] list 19 like named titles (flood used in the title not as a first word or proper noun) and of these 6 capitalize "flood".
- Wikipedia policy:
- Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Titles#Capitalization states, "However, for names of Wikipedia articles and of section headings in articles and pages, generally only the first word and all proper names are capitalized in titles.". Wikipedia:Article titles#Article title format states, "Use lowercase, except for proper names". This supposedly narrows the criteria to determining if a word is part of such a "proper noun" or named as such as provided by reliable sources as the common name.
- I am always a proponent of using the common name when possible (exceptions for avoiding ambiguity) otherwise policy and title consistency should be followed. Otr500 (talk) 13:08, 1 November 2015 (UTC)