- Barnabas, Ruanne V;
- Brown, Elizabeth R;
- Bershteyn, Anna;
- Stankiewicz Karita, Helen C;
- Johnston, Christine;
- Thorpe, Lorna E;
- Kottkamp, Angelica;
- Neuzil, Kathleen M;
- Laufer, Miriam K;
- Deming, Meagan;
- Paasche-Orlow, Michael K;
- Kissinger, Patricia J;
- Luk, Alfred;
- Paolino, Kristopher;
- Landovitz, Raphael J;
- Hoffman, Risa;
- Schaafsma, Torin T;
- Krows, Meighan L;
- Thomas, Katherine K;
- Morrison, Susan;
- Haugen, Harald S;
- Kidoguchi, Lara;
- Wener, Mark;
- Greninger, Alexander L;
- Huang, Meei-Li;
- Jerome, Keith R;
- Wald, Anna;
- Celum, Connie;
- Chu, Helen Y;
- Baeten, Jared M
Background
Effective prevention against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is currently limited to nonpharmaceutical strategies. Laboratory and observational data suggested that hydroxychloroquine had biological activity against SARS-CoV-2, potentially permitting its use for prevention.Objective
To test hydroxychloroquine as postexposure prophylaxis for SARS-CoV-2 infection.Design
Household-randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of hydroxychloroquine postexposure prophylaxis. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04328961).Setting
National U.S. multicenter study.Participants
Close contacts recently exposed (<96 hours) to persons with diagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infection.Intervention
Hydroxychloroquine (400 mg/d for 3 days followed by 200 mg/d for 11 days) or ascorbic acid (500 mg/d followed by 250 mg/d) as a placebo-equivalent control.Measurements
Participants self-collected mid-turbinate swabs daily (days 1 to 14) for SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing. The primary outcome was PCR-confirmed incident SARS-CoV-2 infection among persons who were SARS-CoV-2 negative at enrollment.Results
Between March and August 2020, 671 households were randomly assigned: 337 (407 participants) to the hydroxychloroquine group and 334 (422 participants) to the control group. Retention at day 14 was 91%, and 10 724 of 11 606 (92%) expected swabs were tested. Among the 689 (89%) participants who were SARS-CoV-2 negative at baseline, there was no difference between the hydroxychloroquine and control groups in SARS-CoV-2 acquisition by day 14 (53 versus 45 events; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.73 to 1.66]; P > 0.20). The frequency of participants experiencing adverse events was higher in the hydroxychloroquine group than the control group (66 [16.2%] versus 46 [10.9%], respectively; P = 0.026).Limitation
The delay between exposure, and then baseline testing and the first dose of hydroxychloroquine or ascorbic acid, was a median of 2 days.Conclusion
This rigorous randomized controlled trial among persons with recent exposure excluded a clinically meaningful effect of hydroxychloroquine as postexposure prophylaxis to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection.Primary funding source
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.